From complex to convenient: The elastic stable intramedullary nailing removal method

Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical evolution and the epidemiological profile of long bone fractures in children in two African countries. Methods: This was a five-year retrospective study of closed fractures of long bones in children aged 9.7 years (Ranging 4–16). Seventy-two fractures were treated by elastic stable intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis. The results were evaluated according to Oestern and Tscherne criteria, and parental satisfaction was assessed using an individual investigation form. Results: The treatment of closed fractures of long bones in children is marked by complications such as infection (16.6%), implant migration (19.4%), non-union (11.1%), and malunion (2.7%). According to the assessment criteria, 33.3% were excellent, 45.8% were good, and 20.8% were poor. Twenty percentages of parents were very satisfied, 61% were satisfied, and 18% were disappointed with the outcome. Conclusion: Osteosynthesis is only indicated in common pediatric trauma if the capabilities of remodeling a callous are insufficient. It should not be the first choice in children’s fracture therapeutic options.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of open reduction and complications of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in treating unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 102 paediatric patients with a mean age of 9 years (range: 7-14 years) who underwent ESIN of unstable closed forearm fractures at three different centres. Closed reduction of one or both bones was achieved in 68 (67%) patients and open reduction was required in 34 (33%) patients. The rate of open reduction in single-bone fractures (52.2%) was significantly higher than that in both-bone fractures (27.8%) (P=0.04, Fisher's exact test). All the fractures united within 3 months. There were six refractures following nail removal. Five patients had superficial wound infections. Seven patients developed neuropraxia of the sensory branch of the radial nerve. All resolved spontaneously within 3 months of the surgery. ESIN is an effective technique in treating unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures. The need for open reduction should be decided promptly following failed attempts of closed reduction. Single-bone fractures are more likely to require open reduction than both-bone fractures. The radius should be reduced and stabilized first. If open reduction is required, this should be performed through a volar approach rather than a dorsal one.

Embrochage centro-médullaire dans les allongements osseux selon Ilizarov

The use of an orthopedic traction table (OTT) during elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in the management of displaced diaphyseal tibia fractures (DTFs) is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of children with displaced DTF managed by ESIN with and without the use of an OTT. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for all pediatric patients sustaining DTF managed by ESIN from 2011 to 2019 at two different institutions. In all, 160 consecutive children with displaced DTF were recorded, of whom 80 underwent operative treatment by ESIN without OTT (group A), and 80 by ESIN with the use of an OTT and skeletal traction (group B). ESIN outcome measure scale, Beaty radiologic criteria and Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia fractures (RUST) score were used to evaluate the results. Average patient age at time of injury was 10.8 years (range 7-15). The mean follow-up was 55.8 months (range 12-96). All complications (2.5%) and poorer results according to ESIN outcome measure scale and Beaty radiological criteria were recorded among children managed with OTT. No complications related to pin insertion for skeletal traction were observed. Mean RUST score, length of surgery and cumulative time of radiation exposure were comparable between the two groups. Children with a displaced DTF treated by ESIN without the use of OTT showed superior results as there are no additional procedures (traction wire insertion and removal) decreased theater time and no complications with similar radiation dose.

Twenty-eight patients with 31 closed fractures (27 acute fractures and four with malalignment after conservative treatment) of the metacarpal bones 2-5 were treated with only one elastic stable intramedullary nail and followed prospectively. Treatment protocol was without immobilization or physiotherapy. These patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up time of 15 months for ultrasound results as well as functional outcome concerning complications, pain, range of motion, and grip strength measured with a Vernier-Dynamometer. Satisfaction of the patients was investigated by Clients Satisfaction Questionnaire. Radiographs before nail removal, ultrasound, and clinical examination always showed complete union of the fracture without deviation of axis. All patients gained full range of motion without any limits in daily activity and sports. There was no loss of grip strength compared with the other hand. Patients' satisfaction was very high, especially because of almost no postoperative pain and lack of immobilization. This method can be offered as an effective and safe alternative in the treatment of closed displaced fractures of the 2-5 metacarpus without significant complications.

To investigate the application of modified elastic intramedullary nail and the outcomes between modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing and traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing in children with distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture. A retrospective study was conducted. From January 2018 to January 2021, a total of 36 children with distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture were treated in our hospital. All of them were treated with closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nailing internal fixation. A total of 18 children were treated by modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing and 18 children were treated by traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Postoperative imaging, clinical efficacy, and complications were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 20 (15-36) months in modified group and 22 (16-33) months in traditional group. There were no complications such as infection, loss of reduction, and unequal length of lower limbs in modified group while loss of reduction occurred in two cases in traditional group. In these two cases of loss of reduction, we preformed manual reduction and replacement of long leg casts, and there was no loss of reduction, and the patient achieved a good prognosis. In the last follow-up, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was used. In modified group, excellent outcome achieved in 17 cases, good outcome achieved in 1 case, and satisfactory therapeutic effect was achieved. In traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing group, excellent outcome achieved in 14 cases, and good outcome achieved in 4 cases. There was no statistical difference in the scores between the two groups. It was concluded that modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing fixation is a safe and effective treatment.

Background Recently, elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) devices have been proposed as an alternative to retrograde screw fixation in the treatment of superior ramus fractures. Aims The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of ESIN in pubic ramus fractures versus retrograde screw fixation. Methods Standardized pubic ramus fractures (Nakatani type II) were created in fresh-frozen paired hemipelves. Fractures were either stabilized with a 6.5mm cannulated screw (n=4) or a 3.5mm Stainless Steel Elastic Nail System (n=4). Cyclic loading protocol was applied with increasing axial force (1500 cycles, 250-750 N). Outcome parameters were fracture mobility over time, fracture displacement and construct survival. Descriptive and opto-metric methods were used to describe the mode of failure. Results Amongst all hemipelves, no construct failure was observed. There was no significant difference in mean vertical fracture displacement between the groups (ESIN 0.07 mm, SD 0.12 versus screw 0.04 mm, SD 0.05; p=0.773). After 500 cycles at 250 N, mean vertical fracture displacement was 0.09 mm (SD 0.16) in the ESIN group and 0.03 mm (SD 0.04) in the screw group (p=0.773). After subsequent 500 cycles at 500 N in the vertical plane, mean fracture displacement increased to 0.35 mm (SD 0.31) in the ESIN group and to 0.14 mm (SD 0.17) in the screw group (p=0.281). With a maximum load of 750 N, after 500 cycles, mean fracture displacement was 0.58 mm (SD 0.51) in the ESIN group and 0.31 mm (SD 0.26) in the screw group (p=0.376). There was no difference between the implants regarding the accumulated fracture movement over time (ESIN 494 mm*cycles, SD 385 versus screw 220 mm*cycles, SD 210; p=0.259). Conclusion In this in-vitro biomechanical study, fixation of superior ramus fracture using ESIN was not different in construct survival, relative motion to fracture, and fracture displacement when compared to retrograde screw fixation

The insertion of 2 elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESINs) is a common treatment for pediatric femur fractures. However, the use of this technique in length-unstable or metadiaphyseal fractures has historically been associated with higher complication rates. To improve stability, the addition of a third ESIN has been assessed biomechanically and clinically, but the addition of a fourth nail has only been evaluated biomechanically. The purpose of this study is to report our surgical technique and radiographic outcomes using a quartet of ESINs in pediatric femur fractures. A retrospective review was performed of pediatric patients with length-unstable or metadiaphyseal femur fractures who were treated with 4 ESINs by a single surgeon from 2008 to 2013. Nails were inserted in a retrograde manner, 2 each from medial and lateral starting points. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically until the union and routine removal of hardware. Primary outcomes included fracture union, sagittal, and coronal plane alignment, and complications. Fourteen patients underwent quartet ESIN placement. Two patients were excluded: one for early loss to follow-up and another with a diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta. The average patient age was 9.3 years (range, 4 to 14 y) and weight was 47 kg (range, 21 to 95 kg). All fractures achieved radiographic union at mean 5.5 months (range, 2 to 9 mo). Hardware was removed at a mean of 9.4 months (range, 2 to 22 mo) following implantation. At final mean follow-up of 18 months, patients and families reported no functional limitations. There were no hardware failures or revision surgeries. There were no limb length discrepancies or malalignment at the time of final radiographic follow-up. There were 2 minor complications-1 patient with pain secondary to nail migration resulting in prominence at the knee and another with refracture following a fall. The stable refracture occurred before complete fracture union and hardware removal and went on to the union without the need for any additional treatment. Treatment with a quartet of ESINs should be considered for skeletally immature children with length-unstable or metadiaphyseal femur fractures. In this series, all fractures achieved union without major complications or hardware failure. This modification to traditional elastic nailing techniques is an option for the surgeon to consider as an alternative to rigid intramedullary nailing, submuscular plating, or external fixation. Level IV.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) has became a well-accepted method of osteosynthesis of diaphyseal fractures in children and adolescents for many reasons including the following: no need for postoperative cast, primary bone union with avoidance of growth plate injury, and minimum invasive surgery. The principle is to introduce 2 elastic nails, titanium or stainless steel, into the medullary canal through a metaphyseal approach. The bended nails must have their maximum of curve at the level of the fracture, and their orientation, most often face to face, is in charge of the reduction and, so far, the stabilization, of the fracture. The usual size of the nails is equal to 0.4 times the diameter of the medullary canal. As far as possible, a bigger diameter is better than a thinner one. Most fractures of the femur are treated with a bipolar retrograde ESIN when some distal fractures need an antegrade subtrochanteric approach. Forearm fractures need a combined retrograde radial and antegrade ulnar through the posterolateral part of the olecranon. Humerus and tibial diaphyseal fractures may also be treated with ESIN. Complications are mainly caused by technical errors including too-thin nails, asymmetry of the frame, and malorientation of the implants. Nonunion was never observed in fractures of the femur and the forearm; osteomyelitis rate is 2%, and mean overgrowth of the femur is less than 10 mm before the age of 10 years. Indications of ESIN are fractures of the diaphysis: all the fractures of the femur between the age of 6 years and the end of growth except for the severe open grade III fractures, all the unstable fractures of the forearm, and some unstable fractures of the humerus and the tibia during adolescence or before the end of growth. In addition, ESIN is indicated in polytraumatism and multiple injuries. The good results of this reliable technique are obtained when surgeons have a good knowledge of it, especially in the understanding of the principle of the correction of the fracture and its stability.

BackgroundPediatric femur fractures are a major trauma in children. Different treatment algorithms have been developed but indications for surgical treatment, especially in very young patients, are still controversial. Literature recommends surgical stabilization with elastic-stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) starting at the age of 3 and non-operative treatment in younger patients. This study sought to present the outcome of patients younger than 3 years of age treated with ESIN for femur fractures.Materials and methodsInclusion criteria were patients younger than 3 treated with ESIN in femur fractures. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, mechanism of injury, outcomes and complications were recorded using charts and X-rays. Primary outcome measures were time to mobility, fracture consolidation and surgical-related complications.ResultsBetween 2010 and 2020, 159 patients were treated with ESIN in femur fractures in our institution. A total of 30 patients met the criteria. The mean age was 2.1 ± 0.7 years (13 months–2.9 years). Most common mechanism was fall from standing height (60%). Other mechanisms were motor vehicle accidents as a pedestrian (10%) or as a passenger (10%) as well as direct blow trauma (20%). Femoral shaft fracture was the most common injury (80%). 5 subtrochanteric and one distal metaphyseal femur fractures were found. Mean length of stay was 2.0 ± 1.3 days. Radiographic controls were performed on day 1, 14 and 6 weeks after surgery if not otherwise specified or if complications occurred. 4.6 ± 1.2 (n 2–7) X-rays were performed on average after surgery. First radiographic consolidation signs were seen after 2.4 ± 0.6 weeks. Only one child showed surgical-related complication with a leg length discrepancy of 1 cm. In 10% of the patients, shortening after surgery of 1.7 ± 1.4 mm (0.3–3.1 mm) occurred. One child initially treated with traction therapy showed skin irritations and was operated with ESIN. No non-union or ESIN-related complications were found. Mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 4.4 months (4–24 months). First independent mobilization was seen at an average of 3.4 ± 1.1 weeks (2–6 weeks) after surgery. Implant removal was performed after 3.2 ± 1.3 months (2–8 months). No refracture after implant removal occurred.ConclusionEarly results with ESIN show a reasonable and safe treatment option for femur fractures in toddlers and young children under the age of 3 with easy postoperative care, fast fracture union and early independent mobilization.

Background/Objectives: Distal forearm fractures are the most common fractures in children. Three surgical techniques are most commonly used at the level of the radial diametaphysis on the distal forearm in children: K-wire, ascending ESIN (elastic stable intramedullary nail) or plate osteosynthesis. The aim of this study was to compare these procedures in children with distal diametaphyseal radius fractures regarding operative and functional outcome. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in two level 1 trauma centers. Children and adolescents aged 2 to 15 years were included. The study period was from January 2010 to December 2022. The hospital information system was used to record patient age, gender, height, weight, fracture location, degree of angular deformity postoperatively, surgical procedure and postoperative complications, which were described in the medical records of the hospital information system. Complications graded by modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink served as the primary outcome. Reduction accuracy, operative and fluoroscopy times, immobilization length and postoperative motion were the secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 213 children were included in the study. K-wire osteosynthesis was performed in 25%, nailing in 19% and volar plate osteosynthesis in 55%. All ESIN were inserted in ascending technique. Complications occurred in 22% of patients and did not differ overall between techniques (p = 0.20). Severe complications were significantly more frequent after ESIN (20%) than after K-wires (7%) or plates (4%) (p = 0.04). Plate fixation achieved the most accurate alignment (≤5° angular deformity in 93% vs. 57% K-wires and 61% ESIN; p < 0.0001) and the fewest late motion restrictions (p = 0.02). K-wire surgery was fastest technique and required the least fluoroscopy, but necessitated the longest postoperative cast. Conclusions: Volar plating combines reliable anatomical reduction with a low rate of major complications and early mobilization, supporting its use in older children whose remodeling potential is limited. K-wires are a swift, minimally invasive option for younger patients, albeit with less precise reduction and prolonged immobilization. Conventional ESIN showed the highest burden of severe complications.

Aims: To determine the clinical profile and clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes and complications in children who underwent elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for unstable fractures of both bones of forearm. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Paediatric Orthopaedic Unit of the institution. Children with forearm fractures, who underwent ESIN of both the bones with titanium nails from January 2004 to June 2010, were included in the study. Clinical evaluation for deformity, range of motion at wrist and elbow, Daruwalla’s grading for forearm fractures, and radiological evaluation for bony union, malalignment, and radial bow were done. Paediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) questionnaire was used to assess functional outcome. Results: Twenty-six patients were followed up for a mean of 2.14 years. These included one primary internal fixation for unstable injury in a 15-year old, 10 open fractures, and 15 with malalignment after closed reduction. Age ranged from 5 to 15 years (mean of 11.39). Average time to bony union was 6 weeks. Twelve children had excellent, 12 good, and two fair outcomes according to Daruwalla’s grade. Average PODCI score was 50.78 (standardized range is minimum of −140 to maximum of 53). There were no major complications related to ESIN. Three patients had paraesthesia over superficial radial nerve distribution, three patients had hypertrophied scars, and one patient had superficial wound infection. One child had distal radial physeal arrest following inadvertent physeal injury during implant removal. Conclusion: ESIN is safe and effective for internal fixation of unstable forearm fractures.

When surgical treatment is indicated, closed reduction with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is a widely accepted technique for managing both-bone forearm fractures in children. However, the optimal postoperative protocol-particularly the necessity and duration of immobilization-remains a matter of debate. This study aims to compare complication rates in patients with both-bone forearm fractures treated with ESIN, with or without postoperative splint immobilization. This retrospective study included 137 patients with displaced and unstable both-bone forearm shaft fractures who underwent surgical treatment with ESIN at our Department of Pediatric Surgery, Orthopedics, and Traumatology between January 2020 and August 2022. Postoperative immobilization was decided individually by the operating surgeon. Data collected included fracture etiology, healing time, complications, and final clinical outcomes. Eighty-one patients were treated with postoperative splint immobilization, while 56 patients did not receive immobilization. There was no significant difference in bone healing time between the 2 groups. However, the complication rate was higher in the splinted group (16%) compared with the nonsplinted group (5.4%). In addition, open fractures and the need for open reduction were significantly associated with an increased risk of complications. No differences were observed between the groups in terms of QuickDASH scores. Postoperative splint immobilization does not appear to be necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes following ESIN treatment of both-bone forearm fractures in pediatric patients. It does not influence bone healing time or functional recovery and may be associated with a higher risk of complications. Open fractures and the requirement for open reduction are additional factors associated with increased complication rates. Level III-retrospective comparative study.

ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate the reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures and modified RUST (mRUST) fractures in pediatric forearm fractures treated with elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) and to investigate the effect of the experience of surgeon, thresholds for union, and delayed union decisions.Patients and methodsIn this retrospective study, radiographic images of 20 patients (10 males, 10 females; mean age 8.6±4.3; range, 4 to 11 years) with forearm fractures treated using ESIN between January 2013 and December 2018 were scored by 20 observers based on the RUST and mRUST scores. The observers scored the radiographs at immediate postoperative period, and at 4-, 8-, and 12-week follow-up. Intra- and interobserver agreement for each cortex, RUST, and mRUST were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Fleiss’ kappa (k) coefficient was used in the agreement between evaluators regarding union decision. Receiver operating curves were created to determine the thresholds for radiographic union and delayed union.ResultsIntra- and interobserver reliability of the mRUST score (ICC: 0.84 and 0.79) were slightly higher than that of the RUST score (ICC: 0.80 and 0.72). Pediatric orthopedic and trauma surgeons had slightly higher agreement than the residents and general orthopedists for the total mRUST and RUST scores of the eight-week radiographs. Mean RUST and mRUST scores at the union for all fractures were 10.2±3.4 and 13.0±2.1, respectively. Kappa value for union was moderate (0.74). The total mRUST score had a higher predictive value for union than the total RUST score (area under the curve: 0.986 vs. 0.889). A mRUST score of ≥12 and RUST score of ≥9 were considered as the predictors of union. In addition, a mRUST score of ≤7 and RUST score of <9 were considered as the predictors of delayed union.ConclusionA moderate agreement for both RUST and mRUST scores was found. However, the agreement for mRUST was found to be slightly higher. Healing and union of forearm fractures treated with ESIN can be reliably assessed using RUST and mRUST.

Infection is one of the major complications associated with intramedullary nailing. Aim of this study is to analyze the outcome of infection after fixation of tibia and femur with intramedullary nailing and to compare the outcome in patients treated with nail retention versus removal. This is a retrospective cohort study including consecutive adult patients treated at our institution between 01/2015 and 03/2022 for infection involving the intramedullary nail used for fixation of femur or tibia fractures. Characteristics of infection and outcome data were evaluated by actively contacting the patients with a standardized questionnaire. Uniform predetermined definitions were used. The probability of infection-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the groups using log-rank test. Fifty-one patients (37 males, 14 females) with infection associated with femur (n = 37) or tibia (n = 14) nail were included. The pathogen was identified in 45 (88 %) episodes, including 30 monomicrobial and 15 polymicrobial infections. The predominant pathogens in monomicrobial infections were coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 11) and in polymicrobial infections gram-negative bacteria. The intramedullary nail was removed in 35 (69 %) patients and retained in 16 (31 %) patients. At follow-up (median follow-up 28 months; IQR 21-38 months), 19 of 31 (61 %) evaluable patients were infection-free. In patients with nail removal, 14 of 22 (64 %) were infection-free, whereas those with nail retention, 5 of 9 (56 %) were infection free. The fact that patients in the nail retention group were of higher age, experienced earlier infection after surgery, and were mainly caused by high virulent pathogens suggest a potential selection bias. Nevertheless, it appears that certain infections may be treated successfully with nail retention, reducing the number of interventions for the patient, and increasing cost effectiveness. Overall cure of infected intramedullary nails was 61 %. No significant difference in the infection eradication of infected intramedullary nails were observed, irrespective of the time of occurrence after nail implantation. These results should be confirmed in a larger prospective cohort.