Future Directions in Natural Language Processing Applications in Smoking Cessation Therapy

Machine learning techniques have long been the foundations of speech processing. Bayesian classiflcation, decision trees, unsupervised clustering, the EM algorithm, maximum entropy, etc. are all part of existing speech recognition systems. The success of statistical speech recognition has led to the rise of statistical and empirical methods in natural language processing. Indeed, many of the machine learning techniques used in language processing, from statistical part-of-speech tagging to the noisy channel model for machine translation have roots in work conducted in the speech fleld. However, advances in learning theory and algorithmic machine learning approaches in recent years have led to signiflcant changes in the direction and emphasis of the statistical and learning centered research in natural language processing and made a mark on natural language and speech processing. Approaches such as memory based learning, a range of linear classiflers such as Boosting, SVMs and SNoW and others have been successfully applied to a broad range of natural language problems, and these now inspire new research in speech retrieval and recognition. We have seen an increasingly close collaboration between voice and language processing researchers in some of the shared tasks such as spontaneous speech recognition and understanding, voice data information extraction, and machine translation. The purpose of this special issue was to invite speech and language researchers to communicate with each other, and with the machine learning community on the latest machine learning advances in their work. The call for papers was met with great enthusiasm from the speech and natural language community. Thirty six submissions were received; each paper was reviewed by at least three reviewers. Only ten papers were selected re∞ecting not only some of the best work on machine learning in the areas of natural language and spoken language processing but also what we view as a collection of papers that represent current trends in these areas of research both from the perspective of

Big data analytics (BDA) is an advanced analytic technique used with very large and diverse sets of data from different sources. Natural language processing (NLP) is a technology that interfaces with different fields such as computer science, linguistics, and human-computer interactions. Over the past few years, there is a growing number of firms, which are using different BDA and NLP applications in their businesses. Only a few of the research have investigated different dimensions of NLP and BDA and their impacts on the overall organizational performance. There is a growing interest among researchers and practitioners in understanding the consequences for firms that adopt BDA and NLP applications. In this context, the aim of this article is to determine the factors for the usage of BDA and NLP applications in business. With the help of dynamic capability view theory and existing literature, a theoretical model was developed conceptually. Later, the model was validated using structural equation modeling approach considering 1287 samples from 23 firms, primarily based in Asia and Europe, which use NLP and BDA applications. The article finds that NLP and BDA applications help the firms to improve their operational efficiency, which in turn improves the overall firm performance.

Chest pain observation unit: A missed opportunity to initiate smoking cessation therapy

Optimal medical management before lower extremity bypass for claudication in the veteran population

The impact of smoking and smoking cessation interventions on outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures

Smoking cessation intervention is a key component in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To evaluate the prescribing of smoking cessation therapies (SCT) among hospital clinicians and identify factors that may hinder delivery of effective interventions. A retrospective analysis of medical records of patients admitted to the Royal Hobart Hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD was performed. A survey of hospital clinicians was also performed to ascertain levels of training and confidence in prescribing SCT. Nearly all medical and non-medical hospital clinicians self-reported confidence in offering SCT (91.1 vs 82.5%, respectively, P = 0.216). However, of the 122 eligible patients in our study population, the majority did not have any form of SCT initiated during their admission (n = 68, 55.7%) and only 21 patients (17.2%) were referred to the nurse-led smoking cessation service. Very few patients were initiated on efficacious regimes such as combination-nicotine replacement therapy (n = 8, 6.6%) or varenicline (n = 2, 1.6%). Only a small proportion of hospital doctors reported confidence in prescribing varenicline and bupropion (17.2 and 6.9%, respectively). Furthermore, very few hospital doctors reported ever receiving formal training in SCT compared to non-medical hospital staff (42.2 vs 84.5%, P < 0.001). Our study highlights the real-life challenges in tackling nicotine dependence in hospitals: under-utilisation of evidence-based pharmacotherapies, limited access to formal training for doctors and poor uptake of nurse-led smoking cessation services. Granting limited prescribing rights for specialised nurses may help hospital clinicians to alleviate gaps in current clinical practice.

The legal sector remains distinctive due to the complex language structure and specialized terminology of legal data. This complexity offers considerable contextual information, which demands natural language processing (NLP). The availability of high-quality and well-structured legal datasets is essential for advancing NLP research and applications within the legal field. However, a gap exists within the Arabic legal NLP owing to insufficient research and datasets. To address this gap, we aim to propose an Arabic legal case dataset containing cases, case summaries, relevant keywords, and case categories. The legal case data were obtained from the Board of Grievances website in Saudi Arabia and include 3170 cases distributed across 47 classes. The number of words in these cases varies significantly, ranging from about 100 to nearly 30,000 words per case. Moreover, the number of pages varies, ranging from one page to 80 pages per case. Therefore, this dataset supports various NLP applications, including text categorization, data extraction, sentiment analysis, and summarization, thereby improving task efficiency and decision accuracy in the legal profession.

Chapter 9 - Big Data Driven Natural Language Processing Research and Applications

1 IntroductionOrganizations focus on automate their processes in order to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and/or reduce human beings' errors in an easy and rapid manner. Business process management (BPM) methods provide a solution to this issue. In this context, information systems like CRM, ERP, SCM, etc. have known an increasing demand. The main problem consists of the length of the business process specifications. If new regulations appear, these specifications must be adapted. Manually extraction of visual models is time consuming. During time, a series of solutions were proposed. The literature shows a crowd of approaches that extracts data models [1], [2], [3], and process models [4], [5] from Natural Language (NL) text. This paper aims to analyze the Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and tools used in order to provide different types of visual representations.On the last few years, approaches based on NLP have been developed in order to automate process conversion from NL text. NLP plays an important role in NL text analysis as NLP tries to understand speech and text as humans beings would do. Colloquialism, abbreviations or typos make this task a challenging one. NLP has the origins in 1950s when Alan Turing proposed the Turing test [6], by introducing the imitation game. Since then, the literature shows a plethora of NLP tools [7], [8], [9], [10] using several machine learning techniques, our focus being on those applied on data models and process models discovery from NL text, starting with the first language parser [11] to the actual ones like NLTk [7], [8], ANTLR1, etc.Linguistic analysis is closely tied to NLP. Liddy [12] highlights 7 levels of linguistic analysis: a) Phonetic or Phonological level: how words are pronounced, b) Morphological level: prefixes, suffixes and roots analysis, c) Lexical level: word level analysis including lexical meaning and Part-Of-Speech (POS) analysis, d) Syntactic level: grammatical analysis of words in a sentence, e) Semantic level: determining the possible meanings of sentences, f) Discourse level: interpreting structure and meaning for texts larger than a sentence, g) Pragmatic level: understanding the purpose of a language.Some of the problems approached by NLP are: POS tagging, parsing, Named Entity Recognition (NER), chunking, Semantic Role Labeling (SRL). Anaphora resolution [13] refers to the interpretation of the link between the anaphor and its antecedents.The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly outlines the NLP domain, describing the levels of linguistic analysis and the main NLP approaches of analyzing NL requirements. Section 3 focuses on data and process models extraction from NL text. This section makes an introduction to Object Oriented Analysis and Business Process Modeling and analyses the existing tools that discover data and process models from text. Subsequently, Section 4 summarizes the results of this work and the conclusions are drawn in Section 5.2NLPA detailed review on NLP is given in [14] and in [15]. Jones [14] divides the history of NLP into four phases: the first starts at the beginning of the 1940s and lasts to the late 1960s, the second begins from the end of 60s and lasts to the end of 70s, the third is represented by late 80s, where the fourth phase starts in the late of 90s. Next, we will detail each phase as they were defined in [14] and [15]. First phase treated machine translation issues, while the second focused on artificial intelligence. The third phase can be called grammatico-logical phase, which is followed by the lexical phase. A fifth phase is proposed in [16] where formal theories and statistical data are combined. Since this study was published first in 1994 and then it was re-organized in 2001 we can add the sixth phase: from 2000 until present where NLP techniques are combined in order to contribute to visual models extraction.Software requirements are usually written in NL which is asymmetric and irregular [17]. …

Natural language processing (NLP) is a well-known sub-field of artificial intelligence that is having huge success and attention in recent years, its applications are also exploding in terms of innovation and consumer adoption, personal voice assistants and chatbots are two examples among many others, despite this recent success, NLP still has huge challenges and open issues. In this paper, we provide a short overview of NLP, then we dive into the different challenges that are facing it, finally, we conclude by presenting recent trends and future research directions that are speculated by the research community.

Rapid information and communicationtechnology advancements have prompted widespread interest in natural language processing (NLP) applications. This has led to the development of a plethora of NLP resources. However, several obstacles stand in the way of creating reliable NLP systems that can process natural languages effectively and efficiently. Part of speech (POS) tagging is one such technology;it assigns labels to sentences or phrases inside a paragraph based on where they appear. Researchers have made great strides in POS tagging, but there is always room for improvement, especially in decreasing false positives and correctly categorizing new words. It's also important to remember that there is sure to be some confusion if you tag phrases with manypossible interpretations depending on the surrounding material. In order to effectively identify words in a particular phrase across a paragraph, POS taggers based on “deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML)” have recently been deployed as viable solutions.

Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos (UFSCar), Dept Letras, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil

In the era of digitalization, electronic gadgets such as Google Translate, Siri, and Alexa have at least one characteristic: They are all the products of natural language processing (NLP). “Natural Language” refers to a human language used for daily communication, such as English, Hindi, Bengali, etc. Natural languages, as opposed to artificial languages such as computer languages and mathematical nomenclature, have evolved as they have been transmitted from generation to generation and are challenging to explain with clear limits in the first instance. In natural language processing, artificial intelligence (Singh et al., 2021), linguistics, information processing, and cognitive science are all related fields (NLP). NLP aims to use intelligent computer techniques to process human language. However, NLP technologies such as voice recognition, language comprehension, and machine translation exist. With such limited obvious exclusions, machine learning algorithms in NLP sometimes lacked sufficient capacity to consume massive amounts of training data. In addition, the algorithms, techniques, and infrastructural facilities lack enough strength. Humans design features in traditional machine learning, and feature engineering is a limitation that requires significant human expertise. Simultaneously, the accompanying superficial algorithms lack depiction capability and, as a result, the ability to generate layers of duplicatable concepts that would naturally separate intricate aspects in forming visible linguistic data. Deep learning overcomes the challenges mentioned earlier by using deep, layered modelling architectures, often using neural networks and the corresponding full-stack learning methods. Deep learning has recently enhanced natural language processing by using artificial neural networks based on biological brain systems and Backpropagation. Deep learning approaches that use several processing layers to develop hierarchy data representations have produced cutting-edge results in various areas. This chapter introduces natural language processing (NLP) as an AI component. The history of NLP is next. Distributed language representations are the core of NLP's profound learning revolution. After the survey, the boundaries of deep learning for NLP are investigated. The paper proposes five NLP scientific fields.

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a revolutionary discipline that resides at the crossroads of computer science and linguistics, with its primary emphasis on the interaction between computers and human language. With roots in artificial intelligence, NLP seeks to equip machines with the ability to comprehend, interpret, and respond to natural language, enabling more intuitive and meaningful communication between humans and computers. This multidisciplinary domain leverages advanced algorithms and models to tackle a range of linguistic challenges, from language translation and sentiment analysis to speech recognition. Recent breakthroughs, particularly in deep learning and neural networks, have propelled NLP to new heights, with applications spanning diverse sectors such as healthcare, finance, and education. As NLP continues to advance, its potential impact on enhancing human-machine interaction and information processing is increasingly evident, promising a future where technology seamlessly integrates with our natural modes of communication. The significance of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in research lies in its capacity to revolutionize human-computer interaction. NLP empowers machines to understand and generate human language, enabling advancements in sentiment analysis, language translation, and conversational AI. This transformative capability has profound implications across various industries, including healthcare, finance, and education. NLP research not only enhances the efficiency of information retrieval and processing but also holds the key to developing more intuitive and user-friendly technologies. As the frontier of NLP research expands, its potential to bridge the communication gap between humans and machines continues to shape the future of technology and information access. VIKOR functions as a multi-criteria decision-making technique that determines the best option by comparing it to the ideal option. The ranking procedure comprises determining distances concerning the optimal solution. VIKOR uses linear normalization to get the best possible outcomes. This technique was first presented by Opricovic in 1998 and was intended to optimize multi-attribute complex systems. Its main focus is on ranking lists that allow for flexibility in the strategy weight interval and incorporate compromise alternatives to obtain desired results. Alternative taken as Open AI GPT-4, Google BERT, Microsoft Azure Text Analytics, IBM Watson Natural Language Understanding, spaCy, NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit), Amazon Comprehend. Evaluation Parameter taken as Sentiment Analysis (F1 Score), NER Performance, Language Support, Processing Speed (Response Time) (ms), Translation Accuracy (BLEU Score), Data Privacy. The result it is seen that Amazon Comprehend is got the first rank where as is the IBM Watson Natural Language Understanding is having the lowest rank.

7 Background: Natural Language Processing (NLP) presents a novel method of extracting text-embedded information from the electronic health record (EHR) to improve routine assessment of palliative quality metrics such as timely advance care planning (ACP), palliative care provision (PC), and hospice referral. Methods: We identified cancer patients (ICD-9-CM codes 140-209) who received a gastrostomy tube (ICD-9-CM 43.11, 43.19, 44.32; CPT code 49440) from Jan 1, 2012, to Mar 31, 2016 at an academic medical center. We used NLP to identify palliative indication for gastrostomy tube placement by labeling clinical notes from the EHR containing the key word “venting” near the time of the procedure. Documentation of ACP, PC, and hospice referral was identified by NLP using a validated key term library. The sensitivity and specificity of the NLP method was determined by comparing outcome identification to manual chart abstraction performed by two clinicians. All NLP code was written in the open-source programming language Python. Results: NLP was performed for 75,626 documents. Among 305 cancer patients who underwent gastrostomy, 75 (24.6%) were classified by NLP as having a palliative indication for the procedure compared to 72 patients (23.6%) classified by human coders. Manual chart abstraction took &gt; 2,600 times longer than NLP (28 hrs vs. 38 seconds). NLP identified the correct patients with high precision (0.92) and recall (0.96). ACP was documented during the index admission for 89.3% of patients. PC was documented for 85.7% and hospice referral was documented for 64.3% of these patients with advanced cancer during the index hospitalization. NLP identified ACP, PC and hospice referral with high precision (0.88-1.0) and recall (0.92-1.0) compared to human coders. Median survival was 37 days following gastrostomy tube procedure. Conclusions: NLP can greatly speed the assessment of established palliative quality metrics with an accuracy approaching that of human coders. These methods offer opportunities for facilitate quality improvement in palliative care for patients with advanced cancer.