Assessment of ionospheric amplitude scintillation on GNSS signals during high solar activity of cycle 24
In recent years, the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology has been undergoing a process of modernization and expansion.The emergence of new systems and the need for stringent accuracy levels triggered the development and launch of new satellites able to broadcast new civil signals.For GNSS users, the ionosphere can bring the most significant propagation errors.Among the disturbances due to the ionosphere is scintillation, which results from rapid phase and amplitude fluctuations of the wave caused by variations or inhomogeneities in the refractive index of the propagating medium [1,2].Ionospheric scintillation causes fading of the signal received power because of signal scattering by irregularities at the ionosphere layer [3].Lower L band frequencies are more susceptible to ionospheric scintillations than higher frequencies, so GNSS signals are prone to be affected by scintillations.The reduced signal amplitude (fading) can affect the receiver's ability to track the signals, thus causing losses of lock (LOL), resulting in navigation failures and increased Dilution of Precision (DOP) values and affecting the availability requirement.LOL can last several minutes, jeopardizing the use of GNSS on safetycritical operations such as aircraft navigation.In equatorial and low-latitude regions, the ionosphere has behaviors that accentuate the impacts on GNSS signals.In addition to sporadic events such as the occurrence of geomagnetic storms, these regions are characterized by the occurrence of phenomena such as the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) and Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPB) [4,5,6] reinforcing the scintillation effects.In Brazil, the Space Geodesy Study Group (GEGE, Portuguese acronyms) has maintained an active GNSS network named GNSS-NavAer, equipped with Ionospheric Scintillation Monitor Receivers (ISMR) and provides an extensive database with high-rate recorded data.Thus, this work presents a comparative analysis of the amplitude scintillation considering all the signals and constellations (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou and SBAS) tracked by the GNSS-NavAer receivers.Therefore, in the high activity period of the solar cycle 24, we selected 29 days between 2013 and 2015, characterized by strong amplitude scintillations (S4 > 0.7) occurrences.We used S4 data from four stations (PALM, PRU2, SJCU and POAL) located at different geomagnetic latitudes to contemplate varied behaviors of the ionosphere.The preliminary results showed that the E5b followed by L5 signals are more susceptible to ionospheric amplitude scintillation after sunset.In terms of the constellations, Galileo signals suffered more drawbacks caused by ionospheric scintillations than signals from other constellations (GPS, GLONASS and Beidou).However, Galileo signals showed the best robustness against amplitude fluctuations during the daytime.E5a and E5b signals showed the greatest similarity in response to ionospheric interference, reaching a 99% correlation between S4 values.
Read more