• Home
  • Search
  • Gaussian Process Regression for Predictive But Interpretable Machine Learning Models: An Example of Predicting Mental Workload across Tasks
  • Cite Icon69
  • https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00647Copy DOI Icon

Gaussian Process Regression for Predictive But Interpretable Machine Learning Models: An Example of Predicting Mental Workload across Tasks

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

There is increasing interest in real-time brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for the passive monitoring of human cognitive state, including cognitive workload. Too often, however, effective BCIs based on machine learning techniques may function as “black boxes” that are difficult to analyze or interpret. In an effort toward more interpretable BCIs, we studied a family of N-back working memory tasks using a machine learning model, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), which was both powerful and amenable to analysis. Participants performed the N-back task with three stimulus variants, auditory-verbal, visual-spatial, and visual-numeric, each at three working memory loads. GPR models were trained and tested on EEG data from all three task variants combined, in an effort to identify a model that could be predictive of mental workload demand regardless of stimulus modality. To provide a comparison for GPR performance, a model was additionally trained using multiple linear regression (MLR). The GPR model was effective when trained on individual participant EEG data, resulting in an average standardized mean squared error (sMSE) between true and predicted N-back levels of 0.44. In comparison, the MLR model using the same data resulted in an average sMSE of 0.55. We additionally demonstrate how GPR can be used to identify which EEG features are relevant for prediction of cognitive workload in an individual participant. A fraction of EEG features accounted for the majority of the model’s predictive power; using only the top 25% of features performed nearly as well as using 100% of features. Subsets of features identified by linear models (ANOVA) were not as efficient as subsets identified by GPR. This raises the possibility of BCIs that require fewer model features while capturing all of the information needed to achieve high predictive accuracy.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Simulating root length density dynamics of sunflower in saline soils based on machine learning

  • Apr 04, 2022
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • Lifeng Wu +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

A Comparative Analysis of Gaussian Process Regression and Support Vector Machines in Predicting Carbon Emissions from Building Construction Activities

  • Dec 30, 2024
  • Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics
  • Rufaizal Che Mamat +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Gaussian process regression with skewed errors

  • Dec 16, 2019
  • Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
  • M.T Alodat +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Short-term solar radiation forecasting using machine learning models under different sky conditions: evaluations and comparisons.

  • Nov 30, 2023
  • Environmental science and pollution research international
  • Brahim Belmahdi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Gaussian process regression to determine water content of methane: Application to methane transport modeling

  • Oct 16, 2021
  • Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
  • Reza Taherdangkoo +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations45

Estimating the phenological dynamics of irrigated rice leaf area index using the combination of PROSAIL and Gaussian Process Regression

  • Jul 24, 2021
  • International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
  • Oluseun Adeluyi +4
  • Preprint Article

Advancing spaceborne remote sensing for agroecosystem adaptive management

  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Rodolfo Ceriani +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Enhancing estimation of water quality index using stacking machine learning techniques: The case of Southern Bug River.

  • Nov 01, 2025
  • The Science of the total environment
  • Majid Niazkar +1
  • Research Article

Development and comparison of three different machine learning (ANN, RT, and GPR) models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in sub-humid region

  • Jan 07, 2023
  • ANADOLU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
  • Sevda Taşan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Uncertain Prediction for Slope Displacement Time-Series Using Gaussian Process Machine Learning

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • IEEE Access
  • Bin Hu +4
  • Book Chapter

Increasing Quality Control of Ultrasonically Welded Joints Through Gaussian Process Regression

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • P G Mongan +3
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations1

Crack localization in glass fiber composite beams by experimental modal analysis and multi variable Gaussian process regression method

  • Dec 05, 2023
  • International Journal of Structural Integrity
  • S Rama Krishna +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article

Forecasting and analyzing seasonal GHI for a SAPV system in extreme Indian climatic regions.

  • Nov 12, 2025
  • Scientific reports
  • Aadyasha Patel +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

Real-time energy prediction for a milling machine tool using sparse Gaussian process regression

  • Oct 01, 2015
  • Jinkyoo Park +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Machine learning based prediction for bulk porosity and static elastic modulus of Yungang Grottoes sandstone

  • Oct 15, 2024
  • Heritage Science
  • Ruoyu Zhang +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.