Generalizations of S- Prime Ideals

Let R be a commutative ring with nonzero identity. Let 𝒥( R ) be the set of all ideals of R and let δ : 𝒥 ( R ) → 𝒥 ( R ) be a function. Then δ is called an expansion function of ideals of R if whenever L, I, J are ideals of R with J ⊆ I , we have L ⊆ δ ( L ) and δ ( J ) ⊆ δ ( I ). Let δ be an expansion function of ideals of R . In this paper, we introduce and investigate a new class of ideals that is closely related to the class of δ -primary ideals. A proper ideal I of R is said to be a 1-absorbing δ -primary ideal if whenever nonunit elements a, b, c ∈ R and abc ∈ I , then ab ∈ I or c ∈ δ ( I ). Moreover, we give some basic properties of this class of ideals and we study the 1-absorbing δ -primary ideals of the localization of rings, the direct product of rings and the trivial ring extensions.

This series aims to report new developments in mathematical research and teaching -quickly, informally and at a high level.The type of material considered for publication includes: 1.Preliminary drafts of original papers and monographs 2. Lectures on a new field, or presenting a new angle on a classical field 3. Seminar work-outs 4. Reports of meetings, provided they are a) of exceptional interest or b) devoted to a single topic.

The multiplicative ideal theory of Leavitt path algebras

In this paper, we introduce $$\phi $$ -1-absorbing prime ideals in commutative rings. Let R be a commutative ring with a nonzero identity $$1\ne 0$$ and $$\phi :\mathcal {I}(R)\rightarrow \mathcal {I}(R)\cup \{\emptyset \}$$ be a function where $$\mathcal {I}(R)$$ is the set of all ideals of R. A proper ideal I of R is called a $$\phi $$ -1-absorbing prime ideal if for each nonunits $$x,y,z\in R$$ with $$xyz\in I-\phi (I)$$ , then either $$xy\in I$$ or $$z\in I$$ . In addition to give many properties and characterizations of $$\phi $$ -1-absorbing prime ideals, we also determine rings in which every proper ideal is $$\phi $$ -1-absorbing prime.

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. In this paper we define the notion of almost primary ideal. An ideal of a ring R is said to be an almost primary ideal if for a,b ∈ R with ab ∈ I − I 2 then a ∈ I or b n ∈ I for some n ∈ N. We prove that in Noetherian domains almost primary ideals are primary.

Integral domains are commutative rings whose non-zero elements are closed under multiplication. If each nonzero element is a unit, the domain is called a field and is shipped off to Chap. 11. For the domains D which remain, divisibility is a central question. A prime ideal has the property that elements outside the ideal are closed under multiplication. A non-zero element \(a\in D\) is said to be prime if the principle ideal Da which it generates is a prime ideal. D is a unique factorization domain (or UFD) if any expression of an element as a product of prime elements is unique up to the order of the factors and the replacement of any prime factor by a unit multiple. If D is a UFD, so is the polynomial ring D[X] where X is a finite set of commuting indeterminates. In some cases, the unique factorization property can be determined by the localizations of a domain. Euclidean domains (like the integers, Gaussian and Eisenstein numbers) are UFD’s, but many domains are not. One enormous class of domains (which includes the algebraic integers) is obtained the following way: Suppose K a field which is finite-dimensional over a subfield F which, in turn, is the field of fractions of an integral domain D. One can then define the ring \(\mathcal{O}_D(K)\) of elements of K which are integral with respect to D. Under modest conditions, the integral domain \(\mathcal{O}_D(K)\), will become a Noetherian domain in which every prime ideal is maximal—a so-called Dedekind domain. Although not UFD’s, Dedekind domains offer a door prize: every ideal can be uniquely expressed as a product of prime ideals (up to the order of the factors, of course).

David Rees completed his Cambridge undergraduate studies in mathematics in summer 1939; in his first three months of postgraduate work in autumn 1939, he produced a characterization of completely 0-simple semigroups. War then intervened: he worked until the end of the war at Bletchley Park, the British codebreaking centre in Buckinghamshire, where he was part of a team that broke the Enigma code regularly for some critical months during 1940. After the war, he first worked at Manchester University, but moved to Cambridge University in 1948. In the immediate post-war period, he continued with research into semigroups and non-commutative algebra. His first paper was very influential, and he is considered by semigroup theorists to be one of the founding fathers of their subject. At Cambridge, after attending a seminar by Douglas Northcott, Rees changed the focus of his research to commutative Noetherian rings. During an extraordinarily productive period between 1954 and 1961, he produced a string of far-reaching, foundational and deep ideas and results of lasting significance. Highlights include reductions of ideals, his Valuation Theorem, the theory of grade, the graded rings that are nowadays known as ‘Rees rings’, the Artin–Rees Lemma and his characterization of local rings whose completions have zero nilradical. Rees was appointed to the Chair of Pure Mathematics at the University of Exeter in 1958 and elected FRS in 1968. He was awarded the Polya Prize of the London Mathematical Society, and an Honorary DSc by the University of Exeter, in 1993. David Rees was born and brought up in Abergavenny; he was the fourth of five children of Gertrude (née Powell) and (another) David Rees, a corn merchant. The family lived above David's father's corn shop. There is history of both longevity and mathematical ability in David Rees's father's line: his father died at the age of 88, three of his siblings had 90th birthdays and one of his great-great-grandfathers was the Reverend Thomas Rees (1774–1858), a well-known non-conformist minister, who, according to one obituarist, was considered to be the best mathematician in Wales in 1802. David Rees was educated at King Henry VIII Grammar School in Abergavenny. At the time, the school had an excellent headmaster, Wyndham Newcombe, who was also a very good teacher of mathematics. Rees's early teenage years were affected by ill health, and he was absent from school for several terms. During those periods of illness, he studied at home independently, and his mother, armed with lists from the young David, became one of the best customers of the Abergavenny public library. This diligence stood him in good stead when he was able to return to normal schooling: under the guidance of mathematics master L. F. Porter, he was able to catch up quickly with his mathematics. He did rather well in School Certificate examinations in 1934 and 1936, and was awarded a State Scholarship and admission to Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, where his studies were supervised by Gordon Welchman. Rees started as a Commoner, but was made an Exhibitioner after one year and, after he had come top in the Preliminary Examination for Part II at the end of his second year, he was made a Scholar. Rees was persuaded to take Parts IIB and III together in 1939, and another candidate, Hermann Bondi, with whom he had a friendly rivalry and who only had to take Part IIB at that time, managed to just beat him into second place. Rees began postgraduate work in September 1939, without a proper supervisor, but inspired by ‘wonderful lectures’ by Philip Hall. In the autumn of 1939, he had a rather successful three months, during which he produced a characterization of completely 0-simple semigroups. Here are the relevant definitions. Let S be a semigroup, with operation written multiplicatively. A (two-sided) ideal of S is a non-empty subset A of S such that a s ∈ A and s a ∈ A for all a ∈ A and s ∈ S . A zero element of S is a (necessarily uniquely determined) element 0 ∈ S such that 0 s = 0 = s 0 for all s ∈ S . The semigroup S with zero is called 0-simple if { 0 } and S are its only ideals and there exist s , t ∈ S such that s t ≠ 0 . The semigroup S is said to be completely 0-simple if it is 0-simple and has a non-zero idempotent element e such that the only idempotent f ∈ S for which e f = f e = f ≠ 0 is e itself. Paper [1] was submitted in early May 1940, and represents a very successful start by Rees to postgraduate research. Given Rees's intensive work at Bletchley Park from December 1939 (see §3), most of the work for [1] must have been completed in Rees's first three months of research. In that paper, Rees does thank ‘Mr. P. Hall, both for his encouragement, while this paper was being written, and his very considerable assistance in preparing the paper for publication’. It should be noted that paper [1] is explicitly mentioned in the citation that accompanied David Rees's election as FRS. The phrases ‘Rees matrix semigroup’ and ‘Rees Theorem’ ensure that his name will live on among the semigroup community. By summer 1939, Gordon Welchman had been appointed to work at Bletchley Park, the British codebreaking centre in Buckinghamshire. In December 1939, Welchman knocked on the door of Rees's college rooms to tell him that he had a job for him to do. Rees naturally wanted to know details, but Welchman refused to elaborate, and only after prompting did he tell Rees to meet him a few days later at Bletchley railway station. Rees did so, and in this way was recruited to a team of codebreakers in Hut 6 at Bletchley Park. Welchman recruited several other young mathematicians he knew from Cambridge, including some he had taught at Sidney Sussex College. Even in later life after the veil of secrecy that covered the war-time exploits of Bletchley Park had been lifted, David Rees did not like to talk about his time there. However, it is now clear that he was part of a team that broke the Enigma code regularly for some critical months during the summer and autumn of 1940. The German operators of the Enigma machines were told which three of the five available rotors and which settings to use each day, but they had to choose the initial positions of the rotors and indicate their choices by means of the first three letters of their initial messages. John Herivel, who had also been recruited to Bletchley Park from Sidney Sussex College by Welchman, predicted in February 1940 that some German operators, when tired or stressed, might use short cuts that could be exploited by the Bletchley Park codebreakers. For three months, this lateral thinking by Herivel produced no result; but in May 1940 some of the German operators began to make the predicted mistakes, and David Rees and his fellow codebreakers were able to use the technique known as the ‘Herivel tip’ to break Enigma ciphers for some critical months from May 1940. Herivel has written an account 〈7〉 of the Herivel tip and related matters, in which he attributes the first successful use of the tip to David Rees: see 〈7, pp. 118–119〉. Interestingly, the same book contains a reproduction of a statement by David Rees about the Herivel tip in which he declared that he did not recollect being the person responsible for the first successful use of it, although he conceded that ‘it is possible that my memory is at fault’; see 〈7, p. 122〉. What is not in doubt is that the first successful use of the Herivel tip resulted in much rejoicing, shouting and standing on chairs. Rees thought very highly of Herivel's idea: he described it as ‘brilliant’ in the above-mentioned statement 〈7, p. 122〉; and he is quoted in 〈7, p. 11〉 as having said, in 2000, that ‘of course, the Herivel tip was one of the seminal discoveries of the Second World War’. Rees told the present author in 2007 that, in his opinion, Herivel did not receive the recognition that he deserved. In late 1941, David Rees was seconded to the Enigma Research Section at Bletchley Park, run by Dillwyn (‘Dilly’) Knox, and where the Abwehr Enigma used by the German Secret Service was broken. The so-called ‘Double Cross Committee’ used captured German agents to persuade Hitler that the D-Day landings would be south of Calais rather than in Normandy. It is said that, without the break into the Abwehr Enigma, British intelligence officers could not have known that the deception was working. David Rees subsequently moved to the ‘Newmanry’, the department at Bletchley Park led, for the second half of the war, by M. H. (Max) Newman, for which the first Colossus computer was constructed to assist with codebreaking. The list of subsequently famous mathematicians whom David Rees encountered during his service at Bletchley Park includes A. O. L. Atkin, I. J (Jack) Good, J. A. (Sandy) Green (who worked at Bletchley Park as a teenager), Peter Hilton, Max Newman, G. B. Preston and Shaun Wylie. Sandy Green and Peter Hilton were later to become coauthors of mathematical papers with David Rees, and Rees's third paper [3] (written after the war) was about a paper by Jack Good. There are now available in print numerous articles detailing aspects of the war-time exploits at Bletchley Park; two recent ones are The Guardian's obituary of Peter Hilton 〈23〉 and the Royal Society's Biographical Memoir about William Tutte 〈31〉. Following the end of the war, David Rees resumed his academic studies, and soon found himself working under Max Newman in a different context: he was appointed in 1945 to an Assistant Lectureship in the Department of Mathematics at Manchester University, and Newman was the head of that department. Rees remained at Manchester until 1948, when he was appointed to a University Lectureship at Cambridge; in 1949 he was appointed to a Fellowship at Downing College. He worked in semigroup theory and non-commutative algebra while at Manchester, and continued with these themes for his first years as a Cambridge don. He was very pleased with his joint paper [8] (with Sandy Green) from this time; in it they considered, for positive integers n and r with r ⩾ 2 , the semigroup S n , r (again written multiplicatively) generated by n elements in which each element x satisfies x r = x , but which is otherwise free, and they showed that the question as to whether S n , r is finite is intimately related to Burnside's Conjecture in group theory. Recall that the latter conjecture for r is the statement that, for all n > 0 , the group B n r generated by n elements in which each element x satisfies x r = e , but which is otherwise free, is finite. A striking result from the Green–Rees paper [8] is that the Burnside conjecture for r is true if and only if S n , r + 1 is finite for all n > 0 . David Rees wrote just five papers on semigroup theory, but their influence on the development of that subject has been very substantial. Interested readers might like to consult the tribute 〈11〉 to Rees in Semigroup Forum, where he is described as ‘one of the pioneers of semigroup theory’, as ‘one of the subject's founding fathers’, and as having ‘laid the foundations for a number of important avenues of future research’. However, as David Rees published about forty papers in commutative algebra, it is appropriate that the majority of this obituary be devoted to his contributions to that field. Another addition to the Mathematics faculty at Cambridge in 1948 was Douglas G. Northcott, who had spent 21 post-war months in Princeton, where he had been greatly stimulated by a seminar with the title ‘Valuation theory’ run by Emil Artin and Claude Chevalley, and by much informal guidance from Artin. Northcott returned to Cambridge having become a dedicated algebraist (his PhD work concerned a theory of integration for functions with values in a Banach space). In Princeton, Northcott had, at Artin's suggestion, studied the famous paper 〈28〉 by Weil, and, as a consequence, began to work in the algebra underlying what some refer to as the ‘pre-Grothendieck’ era of algebraic geometry. Thus Northcott became a commutative algebraist. Back in Cambridge, Northcott organized a very successful working seminar on Weil's book 〈29〉. David Rees was a member of the audience, and he was so inspired by the seminar that he too became a commutative algebraist. (Another aspect of Northcott's seminar that was life-changing for Rees was the presence in the audience of Joan Cushen: David and Joan were married in 1952.) David Rees's transition from semigroup theory was gradual and his first paper in commutative algebra ([9], written jointly with Northcott) only appeared in 1954. That paper is central to the next section. Paper [9], written jointly with Douglas Northcott, is, by a long way, David Rees's most-cited research paper: Mathematical Reviews records more than 200 citations of it. It introduced the notion of reductions of ideals. This concept and the related concept of integral closure have had a major influence on research in commutative algebra in the more than 60 years since they were introduced; indeed, even in the present century, hardly a top-level international conference in commutative algebra passes without there being several mentions of reductions. Let b and a be proper ideals of R. The ideal b is said to be a reduction of a if b ⊆ a and there exists s ∈ N 0 (the set of non-negative integers) such that b a s = a s + 1 . One can view such a b as an approximation to a that nevertheless retains some of the properties of a: for example, a prime ideal p of R is a minimal prime ideal of b if and only if it is a minimal prime ideal of a, and when that is the case, the multiplicity of b corresponding to p is equal to the multiplicity of a corresponding to p. (The multiplicity of a corresponding to its minimal prime ideal p is the multiplicity e ( a R p of the ideal a R p of the R p The for the of reduction to David Rees while he was thinking about so-called ideals in a graded S = n ∈ N 0 S n that is as an algebra S 0 , by elements of S + = n ∈ N S n N the set of positive A = n ∈ N A n be a graded ideal of R generated by elements of Rees noted that A n = S n for all n is, A is if and only if there exists ∈ N 0 such that A ( S + = ( S + + 1 . This to the of the concept of The between reductions and integral can be as Let b ⊆ a be ideals of R. b is a reduction of a if and only if each element of a is on the set J of all ideals of R that have b as a reduction has a b b is the of the of and this ideal b is the set of all elements of R that are on The ideal b is called the integral closure of it has the that the ideals of R that have b as a reduction are those between b and b . that b is if b = b . The ideal b is said to be a minimal reduction of a if b is a reduction of a and there is no reduction of a with b (the of is written under the that R is a local with and so that will be in until also will the ideal of Rees and Northcott the ( a of this to be equal to the of ( a ( a , where ( a the graded ∈ N 0 a a + 1 of that reduction of a at ( a that a reduction of a is a minimal reduction of a if and only if it can be generated by ( a and that each reduction of a contains a minimal reduction of Thus all minimal of all minimal reductions of a have ( a on to that ( a can be as 1 , , t ∈ a are said to be in a ∈ N and f ∈ R 1 , , t (the of R in t is a of such that f ( 1 , , t ∈ a , then all the of f in if b is a reduction of a, ( b b = t and { 1 , , t } is a minimal set for it that b is a minimal reduction of a if and only if 1 , , t are in ( a is equal to the number of elements of a that are in a, and a ( a ( a a . mentioned the in the of the of reduction and integral closure in the 60 years since Rees and Northcott published are very and related have been studied in The can some of the influence that these ideas of Rees and Northcott have had, and to in commutative algebra by the book by and on integral That book is dedicated to and David a of and about of Rees's contributions to commutative algebra. In this in which to of the commutative Noetherian some graded rings used by Rees to good these rings are to as ‘Rees and Rees A between graded rings is an that There is an between R a and R ( a . that the graded R ( a a R ( a is to the graded ( a = ∈ N 0 a a + 1 of The R ( a is also called the up of this has its in the that the of R ( a is the underlying the by up ( R with to The of R a , 1 is and Rees used to very good the that, for an ∈ N 0 , the of the graded ideal R a , 1 of R a , 1 is just a . In other R a , 1 R = a . By means of this Rees was able to some about of an ideal in a Noetherian to the where the ideal is and generated by a In that case, are The of Theorem, on the in Rees his use of the above that R is r ∈ = 1 a , then there exists a ∈ a such that r = a r . first with the where a is the ideal R generated by a r ∈ = 1 a , for each ∈ N , r = s for some s ∈ R . s = s + 1 for all ∈ N , since is a in R. R s 1 ⊆ R s 2 ⊆ ⊆ R s ⊆ , and so there exists ∈ N such that R s = R s + 1 . Thus s + 1 = s b for some b ∈ R , from which see that s = s + 1 = s ( b , with b ∈ R . r = s = ( b s = ( b r . In the case, the Rees S = R a , 1 , and set = 1 , a of that Let r ∈ = 1 a . r ∈ = 1 S , and, by the first of this can r = f r for some f ∈ S . f = = b , where b ∈ a for all = , , . of 0 to see that r = b 1 r , and that b 1 ∈ a . In the same paper Rees also a of what is now known as Artin–Rees That also the Rees Lemma (The Artin–Rees Lemma Lemma that R is Let a , b be two ideals of R. there exists ∈ N such that a n b = a n ( a b for all n ⩾ . S = R a , 1 , the Rees of a, and B = b R , 1 S , an ideal of Thus an element = r of R , 1 to B if and only if r ∈ a b for all = , , . B is a graded ideal of the Noetherian and so has a finite set of { b 1 1 , , b } where b ∈ a b for all = 1 , , . Let = { 1 , , } . a n b = a n ( a b for all n ⩾ . (The might it to that ( a b a n ⊆ ( a + 1 b a n ( + 1 for integers n , with 0 n David Rees the name of the as David had his of the in but he did not it for until May paper appeared in in the very in which Emil Artin at a conference in about his of the same and result; M. was to as to who should receive the and that ‘it is the Artin–Rees There is a of the for which that if N is a of a generated then there exists ∈ N such that a n N = a n ( a N for all n ⩾ . This result means that the on N by the on is the on The might like to consult well as being well to the of of a ideal a of the Rees R a , 1 can be used to the integral of the of a, it that R a , 1 R = a for each ∈ N 0 = 1 However, Rees's Valuation Theorem, which is the subject of the next also about the integral of of In a of papers published during an productive period from to David Rees what he called his ‘Valuation which can be as the integral of the of an ideal a of R in of uniquely rings are nowadays to as Rees rings’, while the are called Rees related to the Rees is the as a be a proper ideal of the R. The of a is the a R N 0 { } for which Lemma and Lemma the of for each r ∈ R , the The name is in recognition of P. of the of the theory of ideals in work had a influence on The of the and the of integral closure can be in to the where the underlying A is not and the of Lemma see for a ∈ N 0 , an ideal of A and a , a ∈ A , one can that, if a ∈ , then ( a ⩾ , while if ( a > , then a ∈ . For the statement of Rees's Valuation Theorem, the concept of of including in the where R is not a For properties of and the the is to a of the of the R R p for some minimal prime ideal p of R and a of the of R p that is non-negative on R p . the values of and in { } that, for an r ∈ R , have ( r = if and only if r ∈ p . Valuation that R is Let a be a proper ideal of R. there exist 1 , , of R the of and positive integers e 1 , , e , such that the Rees come in an that their are that, in a ideal is and the Theorem, the statement of which the concept of is an integral such that for each prime ideal p of of the p is a = p ∈ ( , p = 1 p each non-zero a ∈ to only of the prime ideals of of (The that R is that R is an integral its integral closure R is a This result is to in the where R is local and to M. in the that R not be In the about the can be used to Rees's Valuation Theorem, will be on the where R is a in that it is to see where the Rees come A in the of the Valuation from a Noetherian to a commutative Noetherian R is the that, for an ideal a of R and r ∈ R , have r ∈ a if and only if r + p ∈ a + p p for each minimal prime ideal p of R. a of Lemma is related to the integral of of have noted in the that if r ∈ a for a ∈ N , then a ( r ⩾ the Valuation can be used to the statement in Noetherian R. for ∈ N and r ∈ R , it is the that r ∈ a if and only if a ( r ⩾ . This of the Valuation is in such as to about whether two ideals a , b of R are that is, such that a s = b t for some s , t ∈ N . Rees thought that was his best paper, but another of which he was and in which also was In that, he a that had been by in and was related to The latter can be as if S the of in n a and if is a of the of of S that contains must the S be generated In the if is a generated of a and S is a generated integral whose of contains must the S be generated himself in that if the of is 1 or then S is generated In Rees constructed an that showed that the to is For he used and very an Rees the of a of the ideal a on was by in The concept of grade, to the theory of is also to David 1 , , t in R are said to a if they a proper ideal and ( ( 1 , , 1 = ( 1 , , 1 for all = 1 , t . (The of this when = 1 is as ( 0 1 = 0 , that is, 1 is a on In Rees that, for a proper ideal a of each in a has equal to the such that R ( R a , R ≠ 0 . all in a have the same and Rees this to be the of His him to quickly that

Let [Formula: see text] be commutative ring with [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we introduce a subclass of the class of [Formula: see text]-absorbing primary ideals called the class of [Formula: see text]-ideals. An ideal [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] is called [Formula: see text]-ideal if whenever [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text]. Many examples and results are given to disclose the relations between this new concept and others that already exist. Namely, the prime ideals, the primary ideals, the 2-absorbing primary ideals, and the [Formula: see text]-ideals. Also, we use the [Formula: see text]-ideals to characterize some kind of rings.

In this chapter, all rings are assumed to be commutative and to contain a unity element. A widely used result in commutative ring theory is the Prime Avoidance Theorem, which states that an ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals is contained in one of the prime ideals. The chapter provides a proposition that gives equivalent conditions on a fixed prime ideal in order that the prime ideal contains the intersection of a family of prime ideals only if the prime ideal contains one of the prime ideals of the family. It also presents basic local results concerning the intersection condition.

Localization in a Morita context with applications to fixed rings

This paper investigates the class of rings in which every nn-absorbing ideal is a prime ideal, called nn-AB ring, where nn is a positive integer. We give a characterization of an nn-AB ring. Next, for a ring RR, we study the concept of Ω(R)={ωR(I);I is a proper ideal of R},Ω(R)={ωR(I);I is a proper ideal of R}, where ωR(I)=min{n;I is an n-absorbing ideal of R}ωR(I)=min{n;I is an n-absorbing ideal of R}. We show that if RR is an Artinian ring or a Prüfer domain, then Ω(R)∩NΩ(R)∩N does not have any gaps (i.e., whenever n∈Ω(R)n∈Ω(R) is a positive integer, then every positive integer below nn is also in Ω(R)Ω(R)). Furthermore, we investigate rings which satisfy property (**) (i.e., rings RR such that for each proper ideal II of RR with ωR(I)<∞ωR(I)<∞, $\omega_{R}(I)=\mid Min_R(I)\mid $ωR(I)=∣MinR(I)∣, where MinR(I)MinR(I) denotes the set of prime ideals of RR minimal over II). We present several properties of rings that satisfy condition (**). We prove that some open conjectures which concern nn-absorbing ideals are partially true for rings which satisfy condition (**). We apply the obtained results to trivial ring extensions.

A commutative Noetherian local ring of finite global dimension is a regular local ring and the structure of such a ring is well described 1n many texts (see §1.9). It is perhaps surprising that very little seems to be known about the corresponding non-commutat1ve rings and it is our aim 1n this thesis to examine some of the ways in which the commutative theory can, and cannot be extended to a right Noetherian local ring of finite right global dimension. Chapter 1 contains basic definitions and, in Chapter 2, results are obtained on the projective and Injective dimensions of modules over right Noetherian local rings. Commutative regular local rings are domains and we begin Chapter 3 by considering the question of when a right Noetherian local ring R of finite right global dimension is a prime ring. An example of Stafford's shows that R is not necessarily prime; however, by examining the Nilpotent radical of R, we are able to extend results of Ramras [57] and Walker [75] and show that R is indeed prime when certain prime ideals are localisable. In Chapter 4 we consider the lattice of prime ideals of R when R is an AR-r1ng and provide theorems which generalise some of the basic results from the theory of commutative regular local rings. Section 4.3 contains examples which not only illustrate points arising in Chapters 3 and 4 but also show that some of the techniques which are mainstays of the commutative theory, fall dramatically in a non-commutat1ve setting. In Chapter 5, we generalise the concepts of regular sequences and Cohen Macaulay rings enabling us to prove, in §5.2 and chapter 6, that a right Noetherian local ring of finite right global dimension, which 1s integral over its centre, is a prime ring and exhibits many properties similar to those enjoyed by commutative regular local rings. Examples are provided which show that some alternative approaches are not applicable to the rings considered in these chapters. Regular local rings are Gorensteln rings and, as such, are the subject of an elegant structure theorem due to Bass [5]. In Chapter 7, we generalise his theorem to the situation of rings Integral over their centres. Each chapter begins with a summary of the results contained in that chapter.

In this article, we are interested in uniformly p r pr -ideals with order ≤ 2 \le 2 (which we call 2 r 2r -ideals) introduced by Rabia Üregen in [On uniformly pr-ideals in commutative rings, Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 4, 18781886]. Several characterizations and properties of these ideals are given. Moreover, the comparison between the (nonzero) 2 r 2r -ideals and certain classes of classical ideals gives rise to characterizations of certain rings based only on the properties of the ideals consisting only of zero-divisors. Namely, among other things, we compare the class of (nonzero) 2 r 2r -ideals with the class of (minimal) prime ideals, the class of minimal prime ideals and their squares, and the class of primary ideals. The study of 2 r 2r -ideal in polynomial rings allows us to give a new characterization of the rings satisfying the famous A A -property.

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with identity and $m$, $n$ be positive integers. We introduce the class of $(m,n)$-prime ideals which lies properly between the classes of prime and $(m,n)$-closed ideals. A proper ideal $I$ of $R$ is called $(m,n)$-prime if for $a,b\in R$, $a^mb\in I$ implies either $a^n\in I$ or $b\in I.$ Several characterizations of this new class with many examples are given. Analogous to primary decomposition, we define the $(m,n)$-decomposition of ideals and show that every ideal in an $n$-Noetherian ring has an $(m,n)$-decomposition. Furthermore, the $(m,n)$-prime avoidance theorem is proved.

Several years ago, M. Ward and the author [4] began a study in abstract form of the ideal theory of commutative rings. Since it was intended that the treatment should be purely ideal-theoretic, the system which was chosen for the study was a lattice with a commutative multiplication. For such multiplicative lattices, analogues of the Noether decomposition theorems for commutative rings were formulated and proved. However the theorems corresponding to the deeper results on the ideal structure of commutative rings were not obtained; the essential difficulty being the problem of formulating abstractly the notion of a principal ideal. This difficulty occurred in a mild form in treating the Noether theorem on decompositions into primary ideals. In fact, in the above mentioned paper, a weak concept of “principal element” was introduced which sufficed for the proof of the decomposition theorem into primaries. Nevertheless, the definition had serious defects and it was immediately obvious that it was not adequate for the further development of the abstract theory.KeywordsCommutative RingPrincipal IdealPrime ElementChain ConditionModular LatticeThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.