Generative Adversarial Model-Guided Deep Active Learning for Voltage Dip Labelling

Deep learning methods have become popular among researchers in the field of fault detection. However, their performance depends on the availability of big datasets. To overcome this problem researchers started applying transfer learning to achieve good performance from small available datasets, by leveraging multiple prediction models over similar machines and working conditions. However, the influence of negative transfer limits their application. Negative transfer among prediction models increases when the environment and working conditions are changing continuously. To overcome the effect of negative transfer, we propose a novel deep transfer learning method, coined deep boosted transfer learning, for wind turbine gearbox fault detection that prevents negative transfer and only focuses on relevant information from the source machine. The proposed method is an instance-based deep transfer learning method that updates the weights of the source and the target machine training samples separately. The weights of different source training samples are gradually decreased to reduce the impact on the final model. The proposed method is verified by the Case Western Reserve University bearing and real field wind farm datasets. The results show that the proposed method ignores negative transfer and achieves higher accuracy compared to standard deep learning and deep transfer learning methods.

Data annotation for training of supervised learning algorithms has been a very costly procedure. The aim of deep active learning methodologies is to acquire the highest performance in supervised deep learning models by annotating as few data points as possible. As the feature space of data grows, the application of linear models in active learning settings has become insufficient. Therefore, Deep Bayesian Active Learning methodology which represents model uncertainty has been widely studied. In this paper, a study has been conducted in order to increase the performance of Deep Bayesian Active Learning method. Feature dimensionality reduction is performed on data set by using Variational Autoencoder model. Low dimensional data is used to train a Bayesian Multi Layer Perceptron. The proposed method outperformed the Bayesian Multi Layer Perceptron model which is trained on entire feature space in terms of accuracy performance. The accuracy of the proposed method is tested on baseline datasets.

This review paper examines the current state of lung disease diagnosis based on deep learning (DL) methods. Lung diseases, such as Pneumonia, TB, Covid-19, and lung cancer, are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accurate and timely diagnosis of these diseases is essential for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. DL methods, which utilize artificial neural networks to extract features from medical images automatically, have shown great promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of lung disease diagnosis. This review discusses the various DL methods that have been developed for lung disease diagnosis, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), deep neural networks (DNNs), and generative adversarial networks (GANs). The advantages and limitations of each method are discussed, along with the types of medical imaging techniques used, such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT). In addition, the review discusses the most commonly used performance metrics for evaluating the performance of DL for lung disease diagnosis: the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, accuracy, precision, and the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC). Moreover, the challenges and limitations of using DL for lung disease diagnosis, including the limited availability of annotated data, the variability in imaging techniques and disease presentation, and the interpretability and generalizability of DL models, are highlighted in this paper. Furthermore, strategies to overcome these challenges, such as transfer learning, data augmentation, and explainable AI, are also discussed. The review concludes with a call for further research to address the remaining challenges and realize DL's full potential for improving lung disease diagnosis and treatment.

Image dehazing has always been a challenging topic in image processing. The development of deep learning methods, especially the generative adversarial networks (GAN), provides a new way for image dehazing. In recent years, many deep learning methods based on GAN have been applied to image dehazing. However, GAN has two problems in image dehazing. Firstly, For haze image, haze not only reduces the quality of the image but also blurs the details of the image. For GAN network, it is difficult for the generator to restore the details of the whole image while removing the haze. Secondly, GAN model is defined as a minimax problem, which weakens the loss function. It is difficult to distinguish whether GAN is making progress in the training process. Therefore, we propose a guided generative adversarial dehazing network (GGADN). Different from other generation adversarial networks, GGADN adds a guided module on the generator. The guided module verifies the network of each layer of the generator. At the same time, the details of the map generated by each layer are strengthened. Network training is based on the pre-trained VGG feature model and L1-regularized gradient prior which is developed by new loss function parameters. From the dehazing results of synthetic images and real images, the proposed method is better than the state-of-the-art dehazing methods.

Classify image into benign and malignant is one of the basic image processing tools in digital pathology for breast cancer diagnosis. Deep learning methods have received more attention recently by training with large-scale labeled datas, but collecting and annotating clinical data is professional and time-consuming. The proposed work develops a deep active learning framework to reduce the annotation burden, where the method actively selects the valuable unlabeled samples to be annotated instead of random selecting. Besides, compared with standard query strategy in previous active learning methods, the proposed query strategy takes advantage of manual labeling and auto-labeling to emphasize the confidence boosting effect. We validate the proposed work on a public histopathological image dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is able to reduce up to 52% labeled data compared with random selection. It also outperforms deep active learning method with standard query strategy in the same tasks.

AI-generated content (AIGC) in the context of dermoscopic image analysis describes the application of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to produce synthetic images for training and enriching machine learning (ML) methods. In dermatology, where dermoscopic images are essential in skin lesion detection, AIGC helps overcome the challenges of inadequate datasets and class imbalances. By employing advanced generative complex systems like Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), AIGC will simulate different dermoscopic conditions by generating realistic-view synthetic images. These AI-generated images help to enhance the training dataset, contributing to the ML models with many widespread and varied sets of instances. This aids in increasing the ability of the model to precisely predict and generalize while handling new, unnoticed dermoscopic images. Deep learning (DL) methods, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), can provide a massive breakthrough in an extensive range of computer vision (CV) tasks of complex systems, predominantly by exploiting large-scale annotated datasets. This paper develops a GAN-based Synthetic Medical Image Augmentation for the imbalanced Dermoscopic Image Analysis (GANSMIA-CDIA) method. The GANSMIA-CDIA technique’s primary target is exploiting the GAN model for synthetic image generation to handle class imbalance data problems. In addition, the GANSMIA-CDIA technique diagnoses the melanoma using the optimal DL model. The GANSMIA-CDIA technique applies a contrast enhancement process for the noise eradication process. The GANSMIA-CDIA technique follows a feature fusion method comprising different DL methods such as MobileNetV2, AlexNet, ResNet50, and Inceptionv3 to learn feature patterns in the preprocessed images. Meanwhile, the Social Network Search (SNS) technique is utilized for the hyperparameter tuning process. Also, the bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) technique is implemented to detect and classify melanoma. A series of simulations were performed on the standard dermoscopic image dataset to evaluate the performance of the GANSMIA-CDIA technique. The experimental values indicate the excellence of the GANSMIA-CDIA technique over existing techniques.

In the modern era, cancer is a major public health concern. Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death among women. Breast cancer is becoming the top cause of death in women worldwide. Early identification of breast cancer allows patients to receive proper treatment, improving their chances of survival. The proposed Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) approach is designed to aid in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. GANs are deep learning algorithms that generate new data instances that mimic the training data. GAN is made up of two parts: a generator that learns to generate false data and a discriminator that learns from this false data. Furthermore, the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) is utilized as a feature descriptor in image processing and other computer vision techniques. Gradient orientation in the detection window and region of interest is determined by the histogram of oriented gradients descriptor approach. Using an image dataset and deep learning techniques, the proposed research (GAN-HOG) aims to improve the efficiency and performance of breast cancer diagnosis. The deep learning method is used here to analyze image data by segmenting and classifying the input photographs from the dataset. Unlike many existing nonlinear classification models, the proposed method employs a conditional distribution for the outputs. The proposed model GAN-HOG had an accuracy of 98.435%, a ResNet50 accuracy of 87.826%, a DCNN accuracy of 92.547%, a VGG16 accuracy of 89.453%, and an SVM accuracy of 95.546%.

Label shift conditioned hybrid querying for deep active learning

With the widespread application of automatic fire alarm systems in various types of buildings, the problem of fire false alarms has gradually become prominent, which not only causes resource waste, but also may reduce users’ trust in the alarm system, thereby affecting the efficiency of emergency response in actual fires. According to data from a certain fire cloud platform, 99.85% of the suspected fires predicted by its system are false alarms. Although existing models can recognize most fire accidents, the accuracy of fire alarm recognition is only 0.15%, due to loose judgment logic, which still requires a large amount of manpower to verify alarms. This article analyzes a large amount of false alarm data and explores the main causes of false alarms, including environmental interference, equipment failure, and improper human operation. By using a fire dynamics simulator (FDS) to establish fire simulation models under different data settings, horizontal and vertical multi-scene fire simulation data are obtained. The study combines simulation and platform data to form a fire and false alarm dataset using a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and deep neural network (DNN) deep learning techniques to learn the deductive rules of the fire scene, establish a two-stage judgment model, and gradually, accurately, judge the results. By quantifying the precision, recall, and F1 score of the model, a deep learning model designed to accurately identify genuine fire alarms while filtering out false ones is proposed that can significantly reduce the false alarm rate. The results indicate that the model can identify 1705 false alarms out of 2255 highly suspected true alarms identified by existing systems in multiple practical scenarios and eliminate 75.61% of false positive alarms. On the premise of ensuring an authenticity recognition rate greater than 98%, the accuracy of fire alarm recognition increased from 0.15% to 28.85%, which will significantly reduce the workload of staff verifying alerts, and has good practical value.

A Deep Active Learning Framework for Crack Detection in Digital Images of Paintings

Less than 10% of patients with cancer have detectable pathogenic germline alterations, which may be partially due to incomplete pathogenic variant detection. To evaluate if deep learning approaches identify more germline pathogenic variants in patients with cancer. A cross-sectional study of a standard germline detection method and a deep learning method in 2 convenience cohorts with prostate cancer and melanoma enrolled in the US and Europe between 2010 and 2017. The final date of clinical data collection was December 2017. Germline variant detection using standard or deep learning methods. The primary outcomes included pathogenic variant detection performance in 118 cancer-predisposition genes estimated as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The secondary outcomes were pathogenic variant detection performance in 59 genes deemed actionable by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and 5197 clinically relevant mendelian genes. True sensitivity and true specificity could not be calculated due to lack of a criterion reference standard, but were estimated as the proportion of true-positive variants and true-negative variants, respectively, identified by each method in a reference variant set that consisted of all variants judged to be valid from either approach. The prostate cancer cohort included 1072 men (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 63.7 [7.9] years; 857 [79.9%] with European ancestry) and the melanoma cohort included 1295 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 59.8 [15.6] years; 488 [37.7%] women; 1060 [81.9%] with European ancestry). The deep learning method identified more patients with pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposition genes than the standard method (prostate cancer: 198 vs 182; melanoma: 93 vs 74); sensitivity (prostate cancer: 94.7% vs 87.1% [difference, 7.6%; 95% CI, 2.2% to 13.1%]; melanoma: 74.4% vs 59.2% [difference, 15.2%; 95% CI, 3.7% to 26.7%]), specificity (prostate cancer: 64.0% vs 36.0% [difference, 28.0%; 95% CI, 1.4% to 54.6%]; melanoma: 63.4% vs 36.6% [difference, 26.8%; 95% CI, 17.6% to 35.9%]), PPV (prostate cancer: 95.7% vs 91.9% [difference, 3.8%; 95% CI, -1.0% to 8.4%]; melanoma: 54.4% vs 35.4% [difference, 19.0%; 95% CI, 9.1% to 28.9%]), and NPV (prostate cancer: 59.3% vs 25.0% [difference, 34.3%; 95% CI, 10.9% to 57.6%]; melanoma: 80.8% vs 60.5% [difference, 20.3%; 95% CI, 10.0% to 30.7%]). For the ACMG genes, the sensitivity of the 2 methods was not significantly different in the prostate cancer cohort (94.9% vs 90.6% [difference, 4.3%; 95% CI, -2.3% to 10.9%]), but the deep learning method had a higher sensitivity in the melanoma cohort (71.6% vs 53.7% [difference, 17.9%; 95% CI, 1.82% to 34.0%]). The deep learning method had higher sensitivity in the mendelian genes (prostate cancer: 99.7% vs 95.1% [difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, 3.0% to 6.3%]; melanoma: 91.7% vs 86.2% [difference, 5.5%; 95% CI, 2.2% to 8.8%]). Among a convenience sample of 2 independent cohorts of patients with prostate cancer and melanoma, germline genetic testing using deep learning, compared with the current standard genetic testing method, was associated with higher sensitivity and specificity for detection of pathogenic variants. Further research is needed to understand the relevance of these findings with regard to clinical outcomes.

Artificial Intelligence has been widely applied today, and the subsequent privacy leakage problems have also been paid attention to. Attacks such as model inference attacks on deep neural networks can easily extract user information from neural networks. Therefore, it is necessary to protect privacy in deep learning. Differential privacy, as a popular topic in privacy-preserving in recent years, which provides rigorous privacy guarantee, can also be used to preserve privacy in deep learning. Although many articles have proposed different methods to combine differential privacy and deep learning, there are no comprehensive papers to analyze and compare the differences and connections between these technologies. For this purpose, this paper is proposed to compare different differential private methods in deep learning. We comparatively analyze and classify several deep learning models under differential privacy. Meanwhile, we also pay attention to the application of differential privacy in Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), comparing and analyzing these models. Finally, we summarize the application of differential privacy in deep neural networks.

The clinical utility of regional strain measurements in echocardiography is challenged by suboptimal reproducibility. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the test-retest reproducibility of regional longitudinal strain (RLS) per coronary artery perfusion territory (RLSTerritory) and basal-to-apical level of the left ventricle (RLSLevel), measured by a novel fully automated deep learning (DL) method based on point tracking. We measured strain in a dual-centre test-retest data set that included 40 controls and 40 patients with suspected non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Two consecutive echocardiograms per subject were recorded by different operators. The reproducibility of RLSTerritory and RLSLevel measured by the DL method and by three experienced observers using semi-automatic software (2D Strain, EchoPAC, GE HealthCare) was evaluated as minimal detectable change (MDC). The DL method had MDC for RLSTerritory and RLSLevel ranging from 3.6 to 4.3%, corresponding to a 33-35% improved reproducibility compared with the inter- and intraobserver scenarios (MDC 5.5-6.4% and 4.9-5.4%). Furthermore, the DL method had a lower variance of test-retest differences for both RLSTerritory and RLSLevel compared with inter- and intraobserver scenarios (all P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated superior reproducibility by the DL method for the whole range of strain values compared with the best observer scenarios. The feasibility of the DL method was 93% and measurement time was only 1 s per echocardiogram. The novel DL method provided fully automated measurements of RLS, with improved test-retest reproducibility compared with semi-automatic measurements by experienced observers. RLS measured by the DL method has the potential to advance patient care through a more detailed, more efficient, and less user-dependent clinical assessment of myocardial function.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models with human experts and other diagnostic methods used for the clinical detection of oral cancer.MethodsComparative diagnostic studies involving patients with photographic images of oral mucosal lesions (cancer or non‐cancer) were included. Only studies using deep learning methods were eligible. Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until September 2024. QUADAS‐C assessed the risk of bias. A Bayesian meta‐analysis compared diagnostic test accuracy.ResultsEight studies were included, none of which had a low risk of bias. Three studies compared deep learning versus human experts. The difference in sensitivity favored deep learning by 0.024 (95% CI: −0.093, 0.206), while the difference in specificity favored human experts by −0.041 (95% CI: −0.218, 0.038). Two studies compared deep learning versus postgraduate medical students. The differences in sensitivity and specificity favored deep learning by 0.108 (95% CI: −0.038, 0.324) and by 0.010 (95% CI: −0.119, 0.111), respectively. Both comparisons provided low‐level evidence.ConclusionsDeep learning models showed comparable sensitivity and specificity to human experts. These models outperformed postgraduate medical students in terms of sensitivity. Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the real‐world performance of deep learning models.

Ballistics (the linkage of bullets and cartridge cases to weapons) is a common type of evidence encountered in criminal cases around the world. The interest lies in determining whether two bullets were fired using the same firearm. This paper proposes an automated method to classify bullets from surface topography and Land Engraved Area (LEA) images of the fired pellets using machine and deep learning methods. The curvature of the surface topography was removed using loess fit and features were extracted using Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) followed by various entropy measures. The informative features were identified using minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR), finally the classification was performed using Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) classifiers. The results revealed a good predictive performance. In addition, the deep learning model DenseNet121 was used to classify the LEA images. DenseNet121 provided a higher predictive performance than SVM, DT and RF classifiers. Moreover, the Grad-CAM technique was used to visualise the discriminative regions in the LEA images. These results suggest that the proposed deep learning method can be used to expedite the linkage of projectiles to firearms and assist in ballistic examinations.In this work, the bullets that were compared were air pellets fired from both air rifles and a high velocity air pistol. Air guns were used to collect the data because they were more accessible than other firearms and could be used as a proxy, delivering comparable LEAs. The methods developed here can be used as a proof-of-concept and are easily expandable to bullet and cartridge case identification from any weapon.