Genetic-fuzzy approach to the Boolean satisfiability problem

Quantum annealing device has shown a great potential in solving discrete problems that are theoretically and empirically hard. Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problem, determining if there is an assignment of variables that satisfies a given Boolean function, is the first proven NP-complete problem widely used in various domains. Here, we present a novel mapping of the SAT problem to the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem (QUBO), and further develop a tool flow embedding the proposed QUBO to the architecture of the commercialized quantum computer D-Wave. By leveraging electronic design automation techniques including synthesis, placement and routing, this is not only the first work providing the detail flow that embeds the QUBO, but also a technique scalable for real world applications and some hard SAT problems with over 6000 variables in QUBO. Based on our results, we discuss the challenges in solving SAT using the current generation of annealing device, and explore the problem solving capability of future quantum annealing computers.

The satisfiability (SAT) problem is an important problem of automated reasoning. In the past decades, many methods of SAT are proposed, such as method based on resolution, method based on tableau and method based on extension rule. Based on the study of extension rule, we find that the SAT problem can be solved with hitting set algorithms. If we can find a hitting set of a clause set, and if there is not any pair of complementary literals in the hitting set, the clause set is satisfiable. Algorithm BHS based on Boolean algebra proposed by Jiang is an efficient hitting set algorithm. SSBF proposed in this paper is a revised algorithm of BHS that can be used to judge the satisfiability of a clause set. The test result shows that SSBF is an efficient algorithm.

Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) is a keystone in the history of computer science. SAT was the first problem shown to be NP-complete in 1971 by Stephen Cook. Having passed more than 40 years from then, SAT is now a lively research field where theory and practice have a natural intermixing. In this talk, we overview the use of SAT in practical domains, where SAT is thought in a broad sense, i.e. including SAT extensions such as Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT), Pseudo-Boolean Optimization (PBO) and Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF).

Advances in methods for solving Boolean satisfiability (SAT) for large problems have motivated recent attempts to recast physical design problems as Boolean SAT problems. One persistent criticism of these approaches is their inability to supply partial solutions, i.e., to satisfy most but not all of the constraints cast in the SAT style. In this paper, we present a formulation for "subset satisfiable" Boolean SAT: we transform a "strict" SAT problem with N constraints into a new, "relaxed" SAT problem which is satisfiable just if not more than k/spl Lt/N of these constraints cannot be satisfied in the original problem. We describe a transformation based on explicit thresholding and counting for the necessary SAT relaxation. Examples from field-programmable gate-array routing show how we can determine efficiently when we can satisfy "almost all" of our geometric constraints.

This dissertation is to illustrate the current state of the art of DNA computing achievements, especially of new approaches to solve theoretical 3-SAT problems and the hitting-set problem. Beginning with Adleman’s breakthrough which is an molecular algorithm for the solution of a NP-complete, combinatorial problem, the directed Hamiltonian path problem (HPP). Today, many researchers all over the world concentrate on proposing new methods to solve engineering or application problems with a DNA computing approach. Satisfiability problem is given a Boolean formula, and decide if a satisfying truth assignment exists. ( ) ( ) … ( ) ( ) is an example of Boolean formula. k-SAT problem means that each clause has exactly k literals. Not-All-Equal (NAE) 3-SAT problem and One-In-Three (1IN3) 3-SAT problem are both NP-complete problems. In this dissertation, we present molecular solutions to find all true assignments (3-SAT problem) and furthermore find Not-All-Equal (NAE) solutions and One-In-Three (1IN3) solutions in DNA-based Supercomputing. Hitting-set problem assume that there exists a collection C of subsets of a finite set S, and a positive integer K  |S|, and we need to know if there is a subset  S with | |  K such that contains at least one element of each subset in C. In other words, is the subset that intersects every subset in C and is called the hitting-set. In this dissertation, a DNA-based algorithm is proposed to solve the small hitting-set problem. A small hitting-set is a hitting-set with the smallest K value, i.e., the hitting-set with the smallest number of elements. Furthermore, an algorithm is introduced to find the number of ones from 2n combinations and minimum numbers of ones represents the small hitting-set since K is expected to be as small as possible. The complexity of all the presented DNA-based algorithms is also discussed. We describe time complexity and volume complexity of three Algorithms, numbers of test tube used and the longest library strand in solution space of all three Algorithms. Finally, the simulated experiment is applied to verify correctness of the proposed DNA-based algorithm for solving the One-In-Three (1IN3) 3-SAT problem, and simulation of Not-All-Equal (NAE) 3-SAT problem is similar. Also, another simulated experiment is applied to our proposed DNA-based algorithm 6-2, in order to solve the well-known hitting-set problem. This research has been motivated by the benefit and the application of DNA computing and gives new methods to solve two 3-SAT problems and the hitting-set problem which are NP-complete.

We investigate how to count the number of solutions in the Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problem, a fundamental problem in theoretical computer science that has applications in various domains. We convert the problem to a spin-glass problem in statistical physics and approximately compute the entropy of the problem, which corresponds to the logarithm of the number of solutions. We propose a new method for the entropy computing problem based on a combination of the tensor network method and the message-passing algorithm. The significance of the proposed method is its ability to consider the effects of both long loops and short loops present in the factor graph of the SAT problem. We validate the efficacy of our approach using 3-SAT problems defined on the random graphs and structured graphs, and show that the proposed method gives more accurate results on the number of solutions than the standard belief propagation algorithms. We also discuss the applications of our method across a wide range of combinatorial optimization problems.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) is a widely used modeling tool in Electronic Design Automation (EDA). It finds application in test pattern generation, delay-fault testing, equivalence checking and circuit delay computation, among many other problems. This paper starts by describing how Boolean Satisfiability algorithms can take circuit structure into account when solving instances derived from combinational circuits. Afterwards, it shows how recursive learning techniques can be incorporated into Boolean Satisfiability algorithms. The proposed algorithmic framework has several natural applications in EDA. Moreover, potential advantages include smaller run times, the utilization of circuit-specific search pruning techniques, avoiding the overspecification problem that characterizes Boolean Satisfiability testers, and reducing the time for iteratively generating instances of SAT from circuits. The experimental results obtained, on a large number of benchmark examples in different problem domains, illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed techniques.

Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is a fundamental problem of immense practical importance. While SAT is NP-complete when clauses can contain 3 literals or more, the problem can be solved in linear time when the given formula contains only binary clauses (2SAT). Many complete search algorithms for SAT solving have taken advantage of 2SAT information that occurs in the statement of the problem in order to simplify the solving process, only one that we are aware of uses 2SAT information that arises in the process of the search, as clauses are simplified. There are a number of possibilities for making use of 2SAT information to improve the SAT solving process: maintaining 2SAT satisfiability during search, detecting unit consequences of the 2SAT clauses, and Krom subsumption using 2SAT clauses. In this paper we investigate the tradeoffs of increasing complex 2SAT handling versus the search space reduction and execution time. We give experimental results illustrating that the SAT solver resulting from the best tradeoff is competitive with state of the art Davis-Putnam methods, on hard problems involving a substantial 2SAT component.

We perform a comprehensive study of mappings between constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) and propositional satisfiability (SAT). We analyse four different mappings of SAT problems into CSPs, and two of CSPs into SAT problems. For each mapping, we compare the impact of achieving arc-consistency on the CSP with unit propagation on the SAT problem. We then extend these results to CSP algorithms that maintain (some level of) arc-consistency during search like FC and MAC, and to the Davis-Putnam procedure (which performs unit propagation at each search node). Because of differences in the branching structure of their search, a result showing the dominance of achieving arc-consistency on the CSP over unit propagation on the SAT problem does not necessarily translate to the dominance of MAC over the Davis-Putnam procedure. These results provide insight into the relationship between propositional satisfiability and constraint satisfaction.

Efficient solutions to nonpolynomial (NP)-complete problems would significantly benefit both science and industry. However, such problems are intractable on digital computers based on the von Neumann architecture, thus creating the need for alternative solutions to tackle such problems. Recently, a deterministic, continuous-time dynamical system (CTDS) was proposed [1] to solve a representative NP-complete problem, Boolean Satisfiability (SAT). This solver shows polynomial analog time-complexity on even the hardest benchmark $k$ -SAT ( $k \geq 3$ ) formulas, but at an energy cost through exponentially driven auxiliary variables. This paper presents a novel analog hardware SAT solver, AC-SAT , implementing the CTDS via incorporating novel, analog circuit design ideas. AC-SAT is intended to be used as a coprocessor and is programmable for handling different problem specifications. It is especially effective for solving hard $k$ -SAT problem instances that are challenging for algorithms running on digital machines. Furthermore, with its modular design, AC-SAT can readily be extended to solve larger size problems, while the size of the circuit grows linearly with the product of the number of variables and the number of clauses. The circuit is designed and simulated based on a 32-nm CMOS technology. Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE) simulation results show speedup factors of ~104 on even the hardest 3-SAT problems, when compared with a state-of-the-art SAT solver on digital computers. As an example, for hard problems with $N=50$ variables and $M=212$ clauses, solutions are found within from a few nanoseconds to a few hundred nanoseconds.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) is a classical NP-complete problem with both theoretical and practical interests. This paper presents our work in developing an application-specific processor for SAT based on a commercial configurable processor core. We customize the processor configuration and design new instruction extensions based on the data structure and atomic operations used in SAT. The customized processor has achieved around 24 /spl times/ speedup at a very low hardware cost. The small size of the processor makes it possible to integrate multiple processors and other customized logic into a single chip for an application-specific multiprocessor solution for SAT. Our work shows the strength of application-specific processing in accelerating applications with complex control and dynamic data structures - an area that has traditionally not been targeted by application-specific processing. It also demonstrates that configurable processor cores can be used to cut the development time and cost for designing and building such application-specific processors.

The periodic event scheduling problem (PESP) is a well studied problem known as intrinsically hard. Its main application is for designing periodic timetables in public transportation. To this end, the passengers' paths are required as input data. This is a drawback since the final paths which are used by the passengers depend on the timetable to be designed. Including the passengers' routing in the PESP hence improves the quality of the resulting timetables. However, this makes PESP even harder. Formulating the PESP as satisfiability problem and using SAT solvers for its solution has been shown to be a highly promising approach. The goal of this paper is to exploit if SAT solvers can also be used for the problem of integrated timetabling and passenger routing. In our model of the integrated problem we distribute origin-destination (OD) pairs temporally through the network by using time-slices in order to make the resulting model more realistic. We present a formulation of this integrated problem as integer program which we are able to transform to a satisfiability problem. We tested the latter formulation within numerical experiments, which are performed on Germany's long-distance passenger railway network. The computation's analysis in which we compare the integrated approach with the traditional one with fixed passengers' weights, show promising results for future scientific investigations.

This paper addresses the problem of counting models in integer linear programming (ILP) using Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) techniques, and proposes two approaches to solve this problem. The first approach consists of encoding ILP instances into pseudo-Boolean (PB) instances. Moreover, the paper introduces a model counter for PB constraints, which can be used for counting models in PB as well as in ILP. A second alternative approach consists of encoding instances of ILP into instances of SAT. A two-step procedure is proposed, consisting of first mapping the ILP instance into PB constraints and then encoding the PB constraints into SAT. One key observation is that not all existing PB to SAT encodings can be used for counting models. The paper provides conditions for PB to SAT encodings that can be safely used for model counting, and proves that some of the existing encodings are safe for model counting while others are not. Finally, the paper provides experimental results, comparing the PB and SAT approaches, as well as existing alternative solutions.

Many formal verification tools today are based on Boolean proof techniques. The two most powerful approaches in this context are binary decision diagrams (BDDs) and methods based on Boolean satisfiability (SAT). Recent studies have shown that BDDs and SAT are orthogonal, i.e. there exist problems where BDDs work well, while SAT solvers fail and vice versa. Beside this, the techniques are very different in general. E.g. SAT solvers try to find a single solution and BDDs represent all solutions in parallel. In this paper the first integrated approach is presented that combines BDDs and SAT within a single data structure. This hybrid approach combines the advantages of the two techniques, i.e. multiple solutions can be computed while the memory requirement remains small. First experimental results demonstrate the quality of the approach in comparison to BDDs and SAT solvers.

Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers are at the core of efficient approaches for solving a vast multitude of practical problems. Moreover, albeit targeting an NP-complete problem, SAT solvers are increasingly used for tackling problems beyond NP. Despite the success of SAT in practice, modeling with SAT and more importantly implementing SAT-based problem solving solutions is often a difficult and error-prone task. This paper proposes the PySAT toolkit, which enables fast Python-based prototyping using SAT oracles and SAT-related technology. PySAT provides a simple API for working with a few state-of-the-art SAT oracles and also integrates a number of cardinality constraint encodings, all aiming at simplifying the prototyping process. Experimental results presented in the paper show that PySAT-based implementations can be as efficient as those written in a low-level language.