• Home
  • Search
  • Graph Neural Networks for Systemic Financial Risk Forecasting: Modeling Cross-Market Contagion Between ‎Banking Systems and Cryptocurrency Markets
  • https://doi.org/10.14419/mh97vb34Copy DOI Icon

Graph Neural Networks for Systemic Financial Risk Forecasting: Modeling Cross-Market Contagion Between ‎Banking Systems and Cryptocurrency Markets

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Evolving interdependencies across institutions and markets drive systemic financial risk, yet most forecasting models either treat assets independently or rely on static correlation structures. This limitation becomes particularly salient as cryptocurrency markets increasingly interact with traditional banking systems amid financial stress. Ignoring time-varying cross-market network structure risks understating tail risk ‎precisely during periods when accurate systemic risk assessment is most critical. This study proposes a dynamic graph neural network ‎‎(GNN) framework for systemic risk forecasting that models time-varying financial networks spanning banking institutions and major cryptocurrency assets. Nodes represent financial entities, while edges are constructed using rolling-window dependency measures that adapt to ‎changing market conditions. Node dynamics are modeled through temporal neural architectures, and stress regimes are explicitly identified ‎to evaluate performance under market turmoil. The empirical design includes strong temporal baselines, static-graph ablations, and cross-market removal experiments to isolate the contribution of network dynamics and crypto-market integration. Results indicate that a strong ‎LSTM baseline achieves superior volatility forecasting accuracy in both overall and stress-period evaluations, demonstrating the competitiveness of purely temporal models. However, within the class of graph-based models, dynamic GNNs substantially outperform static-graph variants during stress periods, demonstrating the importance of time-varying network structure for capturing volatility amplification. ‎Bank-only and full-system dynamic GNNs exhibit comparable stress-period performance, suggesting that cryptocurrency assets contribute ‎limited incremental information to bank-specific forecasts, while remaining informative for system-level stress characterization. The findings ‎suggest that dynamic graph representations enhance stress sensitivity and structural interpretability relative to static network models, even ‎when they do not surpass strong temporal baselines in raw predictive accuracy. The results support a restrained view of crypto–banking ‎contagion, emphasizing its conditional relevance during periods of market stress rather than unconditional systemic dominance.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

The characteristics of the new dual-cycle development pattern and systemic financial risk based on TVP-SVAR and MS-VAR model analyses

  • Jul 23, 2024
  • Heliyon
  • Haifeng Zha +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Bankruptcy Prediction with Financial Systemic Risk

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Zhehao Jia +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Capital account liberalisation and systemic financial risk: evidence from 24 countries

  • May 21, 2022
  • Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja
  • Qianqian Guo +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Early Warning of Systemic Financial Risk of Local Government Implicit Debt Based on BP Neural Network Model

  • Nov 04, 2022
  • Systems
  • Yinglan Zhao +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Local Government Bonds, Land Finance and Systematic Financial Risk

  • Oct 31, 2019
  • Journal of finance and economics
  • Yulong Li
  • Research Article
  • Citations85

TodyNet: Temporal dynamic graph neural network for multivariate time series classification

  • Jun 07, 2024
  • Information Sciences
  • Huaiyuan Liu +7
  • Research Article

Modeling Systemic Communication Risks in Global Financial Media: A Review of Networked Information Flows Across Stock, Forex, and Cryptocurrency Markets

  • Dec 10, 2023
  • Review of Communication Research
  • Seyed Mohammad Seyed Hosseini
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

The impact of MTSA on financial risk and volatility of marine firms

  • Feb 01, 2007
  • Maritime Policy & Management
  • Anthony C Homan
  • Research Article
  • Citations329

The multi-layer network nature of systemic risk and its implications for the costs of financial crises

  • Aug 13, 2015
  • Journal of Financial Stability
  • Sebastian Poledna +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Does financial leverage volatility induce systemic financial risk? Empirical insight based on the Chinese fintech sector

  • Nov 09, 2022
  • Managerial and Decision Economics
  • Zhiyong Zheng +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article

System Dynamics Model for Systematic Evaluation of China’s Financial Risk

  • Feb 14, 2022
  • Scientific Programming
  • Jinghong Xu +2
  • Research Article

Tensor graphical Lasso for cryptocurrency portfolio analytics

  • Feb 21, 2026
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
  • Jaidev Goel +3
  • Research Article

REAL ESTATE MARKET, BANKING LENDING AND SYSTEMIC FINANCIAL RISKS: A NEW NONLINEAR DYNAMIC MODEL

  • Feb 28, 2026
  • Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice
  • Tetiana Unkovska +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Concentrated Commonalities and Systemic Risk in China’s Banking System: A Contagion Network Approach

  • Nov 13, 2021
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Qing Shi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Impact of fintech on systemic risk in banking: literature review

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • Krízový manažment
  • Vladimír Petrík
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.