• Home
  • Search
  • Guarantees Concerning Geometric Objects with Imprecise Points
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0052098Copy DOI Icon

Guarantees Concerning Geometric Objects with Imprecise Points

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Traditional geometric algorithms are often presented as if input imprecision does not exist, even though it is often unavoidable. We argue that in some cases, it may be desirable for geometric algorithms to treat this imprecision as an explicit component of the input, and to reflect this imprecision in the output. Starting with three problems from computational geometry whose inputs are planar point sets (Voronoi diagrams, convex hulls, and smallest bounding discs), we recast these as problems where each input point’s location is imprecise, but known to lie within a particular region of uncertainty. Where algorithms to solve each of the original problems produce a single geometric object as output, the algorithms that we present typically produce either guaranteed or possible output objects. A guaranteed object represents qualities that can be guaranteed for every point set that is consistent with the uncertain regions, and a possible object represents qualities that exist for at least one such point set. By dealing with input imprecision explicitly, these guaranteed and possible objects can represent a more accurate view of what can be reliably inferred from the input data.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

An Efficient Algorithm of Convex Hull for Very Large Planar Point Set

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Guangquan Fan +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Optimal Geometric Data Structures

  • Nov 01, 2007
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • A Khosravi Dehkordi
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

On Geometric Set Cover for Orthants

  • Sep 01, 2019
  • DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)
  • Karl Bringmann +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Fast Algorithms for Geometric Consensuses

  • Jun 01, 2020
  • DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)
  • Sariel Har-Peled +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations8

Computational Geometry and Spatial Meshes

  • Jan 01, 2002
  • César Otero +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations7

Chapter 7 A survey of computational geometry

  • Jan 01, 1995
  • Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science
  • Joseph S B Mitchell +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Low-cost fault-tolerant spanning graphs for point sets in the Euclidean plane

  • Mar 01, 1997
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • Enrico Nardelli +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

Two Approaches to Building Time-Windowed Geometric Data Structures

  • Aug 18, 2016
  • DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)
  • Timothy M Chan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Polynomial Root-Finding Methods Whose Basins of Attraction Approximate Voronoi Diagram

  • Feb 18, 2011
  • Discrete & Computational Geometry
  • Bahman Kalantari
  • Research Article

Sparsity & [and] dictionaries - algorithms & [and] design

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
  • Karin Schnass
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations14

Voronoi diagrams of moving points in the plane

  • Jan 01, 1990
  • Jyh-Jong Fu +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Regular triangulations of dynamic sets of points

  • Jan 08, 2002
  • Computer Aided Geometric Design
  • Marc Vigo +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations3

Bisectors and Voronoï Diagram of a Family of Parallel Half-Lines

  • Jan 01, 2014
  • I Adamou +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

A Proof of the Orbit Conjecture for Flipping Edge-Labelled Triangulations

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Anna Lubiw +2
  • Single Book
  • Citations47

Polyhedral and Algebraic Methods in Computational Geometry

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Michael Joswig +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.