Hibachi

Problems setting. Legal restrictions in working with open sources often concern intellectual property, and the possibility of establishing such restrictions is an important problem. The Berkeley Protocol states that investigators should be aware of any intellectual property permissions they may need to lawfully publish, distribute, and/or otherwise use the information they gather during the investigation. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The use of information from open sources is subject to both legal and technical restrictions, such as third-party rights and platform rights, the validity of the license granted to the platform providing access, the technical requirements of the platforms, the purpose of use of the works, etc. The application of many OSINT methods may encounter legal restrictions, so these restrictions require systematization, additional analysis and description in accordance with the state of technology development. Purpose of the research is to describe and systematize the main legal risks associated with intellectual property when using information from open sources. Article’s main body. To achieve the goal of the article, the following widespread methods of OSINT are considered: text and data mining, image analysis, video analysis, audio analysis, face recognition, geolocation, improvement and use of open-source software products. Conclusions and prospects for development. The following risks of OSINT activities are identified according to the probability of their occurrence: – high degree: violation of copyright of its owner due to the difficulty of identifying that owner and the difficulty of managing the distribution of information in the global network; use of works or products (even from authoritative or familiar resources for the user) that violate the intellectual property rights of third parties; violation of intellectual property rights in one country without violation of the same rights in another country due to the lack of international unified laws; violation of platform license terms due to differences in such licenses and careless reading; violation of the license terms of the open source product due to differences in such licenses or incorrect (compared to the license) interpretation of the term “open source” by the user; ignoring the collection of permissions from a large number of parties involved; – medium degree: violation of the copyright of its owner due to the use of pirated works; violation of commercial secret rights; – low degree: violation of trademarks rights of faces; violation of patent rights for products used for a particular investigation due to lack of knowledge of such rights. To reduce such risks, the most obvious are the following actions: unification of national laws; implementation of special legal regimes for the use of information from open sources at the national and/or international levels; unification of license agreements of large platforms on a voluntary basis; training researchers in intellectual property issues; intensifying the implementation of technological solutions of intellectual property rights management, such as blockchain, encryption of works and watermarks; and noncommercial use of intellectual property rights, without going beyond the scope corresponding to the intended purpose.

Globalization has fueled a knowledge-based economy, and intellectual property rights (IPR) are a key driver of innovation. Agricultural businesses have traditionally not been linked to IPRs since farming and related processes were deemed common and traditional knowledge. Globalization of agriculture presents both threats and opportunities for innovative ideas and inventions. It creates a complex tension between IPRs and human rights of farmers, particularly in developing countries. IPRs restrict farmers' access to traditional seeds, limit ability to save and exchange seeds, and force them into dependence on patented technology. This dependence led to indebtedness, loss of biodiversity, and decline in food security. Providing farmers with access to information, training, and financial resources can help them to make informed decisions about their farming practices and to negotiate with corporations on equitable terms. Keeping in view the above, this chapter provides a comprehensive roadmap to explore the intersection of globalization, intellectual property, and farmers' human rights.

A lot misinformation and mystery surrounds the topic of Open Source software. The conceptual misunderstanding of software is fostered, in some respects, by a lack of understanding within the professional ranks of the computer field. There are many different views of Open Source software today, based upon ones perspective. After about 20 years of evolution, the position of Open Source in our economy still has not coalesced. Few seems to understand whether Open Source is free software for running a computer (i.e., Linux) or just a way to obtain some software products without giving Microsoft ones money. “There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world and that is an idea whose time has come” - Victor Hugo any view Open Source (OS) software as just a free alternative to proprietary software. The term does not mean that there is no cost associated with its procurement, although some vendors do provide free versions. The word “free” usually means the freedom to copy, modify, or distribute the software. One must be very careful when applying this broad, general meaning to Open Source software. There are many different Open Source licenses in use and it is imperative that users acquaint themselves with the legal ramifications of dealing with intellectual property rights. ` Open Source software should be viewed as a viable alternative in many software selection processes. Recently, the news has portrayed the report of India's Kerala state moving to Linux and OpenOffice for its 2,724 high schools. Likewise, OpenOffice is replacing Microsoft Office in many schools districts around the US. With tight school budgets, school superintendents are realizing significant cost savings by using the OpenOffice products for their campuses. Products such as OpenOffice may not be 100% compatible with their current proprietary counterpart, but for many applications, compatibility is not the issue. The price and the software license management of proprietary packages may be overwhelming.

Commercialization of high-technology entrepreneurial ideas plays an important role in the success of high-technology companies and economic development. However, most of commercialization processes fail due to poor recognition of enabling and constraining factors at each stage of the process. Thus, this article aimed to identify the factors through the meta-synthesis method of Sandelowski and Barroso. A systematic review of 30 articles selected on the basis of inclusion criteria was carried out. The findings revealed that the key internal enabling factors were competitive capabilities of the high-tech company, qualified human resources, satisfying market needs, content marketing, application of high technology, innovative high-technology product, and sufficient financial resources; as well, the key external enabling factors were elite research universities, quadruple helix, intellectual property rights, and government support policies. Moreover, the findings showed that the key internal constraining factors were limited financial resources, uncertainty of high technology, traditional marketing, market uncertainty, limited companies’ capabilities, unqualified human resources, and uncertainty of product, while the key external constraining factors were shortage of government support, absence of quadruple helix, lack of intellectual property rights, and weak research universities. Consequently, identifying the factors help high-technology firms to effectively commercialize high-technology entrepreneurial ideas.

The essence of management, is the confident and efficient use of resources, the organization’s and the means to achieve certain goals. The advertising agency, in addition to human resources also has financial, tangible and intangible resources. However, of particular interest is intellectual property rights which has economic value and gives the advertising agency a powerful competitive edge. It is significant, therefore, that the management of intellectual property is effective. In this article, the author attempts to illustrates what the process involves.

Wikitopia: Balancing intellectual property rights within open source research databases

We present a dataset of open source software developed mainly by enterprises rather than volunteers. This can be used to address known generalizability concerns, and, also, to perform research on open source business software development. Based on the premise that an enterprise's employees are likely to contribute to a project developed by their organization using the email account provided by it, we mine domain names associated with enterprises from open data sources as well as through white- and blacklisting, and use them through three heuristics to identify 17,264 enterprise GitHub projects. We provide these as a dataset detailing their provenance and properties. A manual evaluation of a dataset sample shows an identification accuracy of 89%. Through an exploratory data analysis we found that projects are staffed by a plurality of enterprise insiders, who appear to be pulling more than their weight, and that in a small percentage of relatively large projects development happens exclusively through enterprise insiders.

This paper reports on the first phase of a multiphase science education development project being conducted in three Inuit communities in the northern Qikiqtani region of Nunavut. The development project, in its entirety, employs an action research methodology, and by so doing endeavours to support the improvement of science education delivery in accordance with school community aspirations. The project focuses on (a) establishing the current situation in Kindergarten to Grade 6 science education in the communities; (b) identifying developmental aspirations for stakeholders within the communities and potential contributors and constraints to these aspirations; (c) implementing mechanisms for achieving identified aspirations; and, finally, (d) evaluating the effectiveness of such mechanisms. This paper focuses on the initial phase of the development project: evaluating the current situation in Kindergarten to Grade 6 science education, and identifying the developmental aspirations and perceived constraints and contributors for achieving these science education aspirations within these communities. Finally, the paper outlines some priorities to consider for further education development based on the outcomes of the preliminary discussions.

∗ LLB (University of Asmara), LLM (Cornell University), JSD candidate, Cornell Law School. 1 Copyright law is generally categorised into economic and moral rights of authors. Almost all countries of the world today protect the economic rights of authors. Certain countries, for instance the US, have a very limited moral rights concept. One of the challenges that creators of works of authorship suffer in this age of technology is that it has become so easy and cheap to reproduce works of authorship. The cost of producing a song is much more than burning it on a CD. In addition, the intangibility of the property rights in creative works also allows the non-rivalrous consumption of the good. This non-rivalrous character does not deter the buyer of an original CD from allowing his or her friend to make a copy of it. Both the original and copy CDs can be consumed at the same time without reducing the value of the original CD for the original buyer. 2 John Stuart Mill, the grand philosopher of liberalism, explained how intellectual property rights can incentivise creations. He emphasised the need for granting authors a limited time monopoly for their creations. The debate about whether granting authors limited monopoly rights serves as an incentive for creativity is as prevalent today as it was in the 1800s (Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy (2002), p. 9, available at http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/Ch1final.pdf (accessed 8 September 2010)). However, it is not necessarily true to assume that people invest time and effort to create works because of the incentives granted to them by copyright laws. The Creative Commons is a non-profit organisation that is dedicated to making access to information easy. For instance, the movement with Mozilla Firefox and other open source software is one of them. For further discussion on the works of the Creative Commons movement, see http://creativecommons.org/about/ (accessed 3 June 2010). Contemporary copyright law grants limited monopoly of protection in the sense that the copyright holder does not have absolute rights. The term of protection is limited in time. It is also limited for certain forms of exploitations that fall within the general exceptions of copyright laws. See, for instance, section 102 of the 17 USC (United States Code). 3 Historically, in the 1950s there was a prevalent view that the rationale for intellectual property rights protection was mainly to protect against retaliation from foreign governments. For instance,

Most research on open source software communities has focused on those that are community founded. More recently, firms have founded their own open source communities. How do sponsored open source communities differ from their autonomous counterparts? With comparative examination of 12 open source projects initiated by corporate sponsors, we identify three design parameters that together help form a participation architecture—the opportunity structure extended to potential external contributors. In exploring sponsors' community design decisions, we found that sponsored open source projects were more likely to offer transparency than they were accessibility and that this had implications for their communities' growth. We contribute theoretical constructs that offer a common basis of comparison for the future study of open source projects and illustrate how the tension between control and growth affects open source community design and creation.

Intellectual property protection and M&A performance

In the era of digital transformation of the economy and globalization of economic processes, competition between countries takes on a new format and becomes digital. The rivalry is no longer only for natural, human, financial resources, the center of the struggle is information, innovative developments, advanced digital technologies. The purpose of the article is to study the dynamics and reasons for changing the rating of digital competitiveness of the countries of the world; monitoring of Ukraine’s position in the world ranking of digital competitiveness; outlining promising opportunities for strengthening Ukraine’s competitive power. The author found that in 2023, the USA, the Netherlands, and Singapore became the first in the overall ranking of digital competitiveness due to technological leadership, attention to increasing the level of knowledge in the country, and the development of strategic approaches to future development. As a result of the analysis of the digital competitiveness of Ukraine in 2019–2021, the author found out that the country had positive dynamics in all factors, and achieved the greatest progress in the “Knowledge” factor thanks to the support of talented young people in scientific research; deepening the orientation of education in educational institutions to European principles; creation of scientific centers of researchers to accelerate the exchange of ideas. The scientific novelty and practical value of the article lies in the provided recommendations for ensuring better digital competitiveness of Ukraine, in particular, in terms of strengthening the development of digital skills of citizens, improving the national system of cyber security and protection of personal data on the Internet, stimulating the improvement of the quality of scientific research. Thus, the author recommends creating a powerful technological framework of the country, strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights, strengthening the information protection, which in the complex will ensure the growth of trust and protection in the country.

The implementation of innovation strategy of project management in scientific research enterprises needs many guarantees. In terms of system guarantee, it is necessary to establish and improve the project management system and process, improve the performance appraisal and evaluation system, strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, and provide norms, incentives and results security for project development; Resource guarantee includes ensuring sufficient capital investment, rationally allocating human, material and financial resources and strengthening information construction, so as to provide material foundation and means to improve efficiency for the project; Cultural protection includes creating a cultural atmosphere that encourages innovation and tolerates failure, strengthening publicity and education of corporate values, promoting knowledge sharing and exchange among employees, and stimulating innovation spirit and team cohesion. The three complement each other, and jointly help scientific research enterprises to enhance the innovation ability and core competitiveness of project management, and promote the sustainable and healthy development of enterprises.

I am grateful for the financial contributions provided by the Canadian Indigenous of Health Research (CIHR), Institute of Indigenous Peoples Health and Gender and Health, with First Nations Health Authority, the Canadian Nurses Foundation, and the University of Victoria.

Open source ERP business model framework