• Home
  • Search
  • High‐Frequency Instruments and Identification‐Robust Inference for Stochastic Volatility Models
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12812Copy DOI Icon

High‐Frequency Instruments and Identification‐Robust Inference for Stochastic Volatility Models

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

ABSTRACTWe introduce a novel class of stochastic volatility models, which can utilize and relate many high‐frequency realized volatility (RV) measures to latent volatility. Instrumental variable methods provide a unified framework for estimation and testing. We study parameter inference problems in the proposed framework with nonstationary stochastic volatility and exogenous predictors in the latent volatility process. Identification‐robust methods are developed for a joint hypothesis involving the volatility persistence parameter and the autocorrelation parameter of the composite error (or the noise ratio). For inference about the volatility persistence parameter, projection techniques are applied. The proposed tests include Anderson‐Rubin‐type tests and their point‐optimal versions. For distributional theory, we provide finite‐sample tests and confidence sets for Gaussian errors, establish exact Monte Carlo test procedures for non‐Gaussian errors (possibly heavy‐tailed), and show asymptotic validity under weaker assumptions. Simulation results show that the proposed tests outperform the asymptotic test regarding size and exhibit excellent power in empirically realistic settings. The proposed inference methods are applied to IBM's price and option data (2009–2013). We consider 175 different instruments (IVs) spanning 22 classes and analyze their ability to describe the low‐frequency volatility. IVs are compared based on the average length of the proposed identification‐robust confidence intervals. The superior instrument set mostly comprises 5‐min HF realized measures, and these IVs produce confidence sets which show that the volatility process is nearly unit‐root. In addition, we find RVs with higher frequency yield wider confidence intervals than RVs with slightly lower frequency, indicating that these confidence intervals adjust to absorb market microstructure noise. Furthermore, when we consider irrelevant or weak IVs (jumps and signed jumps), the proposed tests produce unbounded confidence intervals. We also find that both RV and BV measures produce almost identical confidence intervals across all 14 subclasses, confirming that our methodology is robust in the presence of jumps. Finally, although jumps contain little information regarding the low‐frequency volatility, we find evidence that there may be a nonlinear relationship between jumps and low‐frequency volatility.

Similar Papers
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations138

Stochastic Autoregressive Volatility:A Framework for Volatility Modeling

  • Mar 10, 2005
  • Torben G Andersen
  • Research Article

A New Class of Discrete-Time Stochastic Volatility Model with Correlated Errors

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Sujay Mukhoti +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

A new class of discrete-time stochastic volatility model with correlated errors

  • Jul 11, 2018
  • Applied Economics
  • Sujay Mukhoti +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Parameters estimations for continuous-time stochastic volatility models

  • Jul 01, 2017
  • Ximei Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

The hybrid stochastic-local volatility model with applications in pricing FX options

  • Dec 19, 2013
  • Social Science Research Network
  • Yu Tian
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

The Hybrid Stochastic-Local Volatility Model with Applications in Pricing FX Options

  • May 31, 2017
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Yu Tian
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Bayesian Inference of Long-Memory Stochastic Volatility via Wavelets

  • Mar 23, 2001
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Mark J Jensen
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Are There Dragon Kings in the Stock Market?

  • Feb 08, 2024
  • Foundations
  • Jiong Liu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations89

Equity-linked annuity pricing with cliquet-style guarantees in regime-switching and stochastic volatility models with jumps

  • Mar 06, 2017
  • Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
  • Zhenyu Cui +2
  • Research Article

Predicting BIST-100 price dynamics with different GARCH and SV models

  • Feb 28, 2024
  • Gazi iktisat ve işletme dergisi
  • Huseyin Ozdemir
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Modeling Energy Price Dynamics: GARCH Versus Stochastic Volatility

  • Jun 11, 2015
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Joshua C C Chan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations200

Modeling energy price dynamics: GARCH versus stochastic volatility

  • Dec 15, 2015
  • Energy Economics
  • Joshua C.C Chan +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Pricing Options with Vanishing Stochastic Volatility

  • Sep 05, 2022
  • Risks
  • Loretta Mastroeni
  • Research Article
  • Citations51

Term Structure and Volatility: Lessons from the Eurodollar Markets

  • Jul 08, 2004
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Ruslan Bikbov +1
  • Research Article

Closed‐Form Optimal Investment Under Generalized GARCH Models

  • Nov 03, 2025
  • European Financial Management
  • Marcos Escobar‐Anel +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.