Home range size and population dynamic

Texas is estimated to harbor more than 2 million feral hogs, Sus scrofa. The increasing abundance of feral hogs throughout the United States is a testament to their ability to adapt to nearly any environment. We GPS-collared and tracked 16 feral hogs in the spring of 2015 and 2016 in the Texas Panhandle, United States. We determined home range and core area size using kernel density (KDE) and minimum convex polygon (MCP) estimators and selection of habitats by feral hogs in two field sites. Mean (±se) KDE home range and core area sizes were 9.73 ± 1.74 km2 and 1.31 ± 0.23 km2, respectively. Mean (±se) MCP home range and core area sizes were 15.13 ± 3.49 km2 and 3.14 ± 0.69 km2, respectively. Home range sizes were slightly larger but comparable to other home range sizes in Texas, and with home range and core area sizes larger for males than female. Feral hogs did not exhibit second-and-third order habitat selection at random (P < 0.005) in both field sites. Hogs selected for woodland and floodplain habitats over human developed areas. Feral hogs spent more time in agricultural habitats during crepuscular and nighttime periods and more time in natural habitats throughout the day. These results suggest management techniques in northern Texas need to be executed for the removal or deterrence of feral hogs in areas of cultivated crops, ideally before the planting period through the harvesting season.

Spatial confinement to a home range is theorized to be a more energetically efficient method of acquiring resources than random searching due to spatial memory. Intraspecific studies that have compared home range size at different population densities have found that home ranges shrink as population density increases. This negative trend could be due to increased conspecific competition via population density increase or due to correlations between resource density and population density. We use the 10-year population cycle of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) and individual-level food-add experiments as a case study to assess whether the mechanism of the relationship between home range size and population density is related to competition from increased conspecific density or confounds between population density and resource density. Over six winters (1 December-31 March) and a 50-fold change in population density, we estimated weekly home range sizes (n = 464; 90% minimum convex polygons) of 88 radio-collared hares, of which 26 were food-supplemented. We found a negative relationship between home range size and population density in controls; home ranges decreased by 2.5 ha as hare density increased from 0.24 to 1.2 hare/ha. Food-supplemented hares showed a more negative response to population density than controls (4.0 ± 0.56 ha decrease per 1 hare/ha increase). Our results suggest that the negative trend between home range size and population density is not due to confounds between population and resource density. Likely, there is a trade-off between resource acquisition and some other density-driven constraint when foraging at high densities, which we suggest is a reduction in resource sharing to minimize competition and maintain resource familiarity at high densities.

Summary1. Traditional explanations for interspecific variation in home range size are based almost exclusively on analysis of northern hemisphere eutherian mammals. These suggest that variation in body size is the most important factor, while climate and diet are less important. The generality of these explanations is tested using a novel database on macropod marsupials (kangaroos and allies).2. We found a 490‐fold difference in home range size and a 50‐fold difference in body weight amongst macropods. In agreement with studies on eutherians, female home range size was strongly correlated with body weight.3. However, unlike the pattern in eutherians, climate was more strongly associated with home range size than was body weight: annual rainfall explained more than half of the variation, while group size (6%) and population density (8%) were minor explanatory variables, and female body weight explained no further variation.4. When we used a phylogeny‐based comparative method, annual rainfall explained 32% of the variation and body size a further 16%.5. Sex differences in home range size were not explained by body size dimorphism, but were strongly related to rainfall and less strongly related to the degree of female home range overlap. Species with large sex differences in home range size lived in high‐rainfall habitats where female ranges were small.6. We suggest that climate has been a key factor in social evolution of macropods. In species inhabiting productive habitats, small female home ranges allow males to overlap with more females by increasing home range size. Males often compete for females by searching widely. In less productive habitats, males cannot further increase or defend their already large home ranges, resulting in similar‐sized ranges in both sexes. Where female home range overlap is high, males need not increase home ranges as much, but this effect is secondary to that of climate.7. In agreement with the theory that competitive searching by males is not necessarily related to body size, species with extreme size dimorphism had no sex difference in home range size, and species with extreme home range differences between the sexes showed no particular pattern of dimorphism.8. Variation among macropod species in home range size and social organization is more closely correlated with variation in habitat productivity, and is less related to body size, diet, density and group size, than predicted by eutherian‐based explanations.

Teratoscincus roborowskii is endemic to sand dune habitats in the Turpan Basin,Western China.Its home range was investigated using mark-recapture techniques from June 2008 to May 2009 and compared between the reproductive season(RS,June 2008 to August 2008) and the non-reproductive season(NRS,from September 2008 to May 2009 excluding the 5—6 month period of hibernation).In total,283 individuals were marked by toe-clipping,of which 24 individuals were recaptured more than three times in the RS,and 43 in the NRS(13 were recaptured in both seasons) and were used to quantify home range size.Their minimum convex polygon(MCP) ranges were calculated using MapGis software and analyzed with respect to the effects of factors such as sex,season,and body size.There were significant differences in home range size among male adults,female adults,and juveniles in the NRS,whereas,in the RS,the three groups were not significantly different.There were no significant differences in home range size between the sexes,in either the RS or the NRS.Home range and snout-vent length(SVL) were significantly correlated in the NRS,and home range size and SVL of adults were significantly correlated throughout the whole year(combining RS and NRS data).In the NRS,the home range sizes of adults were significantly larger than that of juveniles.There were significant differences in the home ranges of adults between the RS and the NRS(U=41,P=0.046) but,in juveniles,there was no difference(U=159,P=0.537).There was no difference between sexes in home range size but body size affected the home range.Home range size was correlated with body size,presumably,because of energetic requirements.The absence of a difference between sexes in the size of the home range of T.roborowskii is consistent with the absence of significant sexual dimorphism in body size in this species,and by the need for adult males to establish an optimal habitat.However,chases and intrusions by males were rarely observed and,because the eggs of pregnant females were contained in a relatively small abdominal cavity,the costs of reproduction during the RS were low for both adult males and females.Seasonal shifts in home range size appeared to have complex effects on its temporal-spatial usage(e.g.patterns of daily activity,thermoregulation,and food availability).Since T.roborowskii is a strictly nocturnal reptile,the pattern of daily activity and thermoregulation varied seasonally.Overall,seasonal differences of home range were non-significant but seasonal changes in the reproductive status of many adults led to significant seasonal differences of home range between the RS and the NRS.Juveniles were sexually immature and this was reflected in their non-significant seasonal differences of home range.Food availability exerted significant seasonal effect on adults.Adults occupying preferred areas,which are better for courtship,mating and food requirements,forced juveniles into less favorable areas during the RS.This meant that juveniles foraged over larger areas in the RS than that in the NRS.As the density of the population was increased in the NRS by the birth of new juveniles,this might intensify the trend of widening home range for juveniles.However,there was no significant difference in the home ranges of juveniles at different seasons.In conclusion,the most important factors that determine the home range size of T.roborowskii are seasonal variations in the type and availability of food resources,and reproductive status.

Effect of high density on the short term Calomys musculinus spacing behaviour: A fencing experiment

Most studies on the relationship between home-range size and composition focus on natural factors, whereas effects of anthropogenic factors are poorly understood. I evaluated effects of multiple natural and anthropogenic habitat factors, population density, and sex on the annual home-range size of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in wellpreserved forest areas in the Dinaric Mountains of Slovenia, Europe, based on .11,000 telemetry locations from 17 males and 25 females. Home ranges were 90–2,107 ha and averaged 460 ha. Using a mixed linear model, I estimated that home-range size decreased with increasing 1) red deer density, 2) supplemental feeding intensity, and 3) average annual temperature; 4) home-range size increased as the distance of main roads from the edge of the home range increased; and 5) males had a larger home range than females (580 ha versus 400 ha). These results were explained by effects of food availability (1, 2, and 3), energy expenditure of an individual (4 and 5), intraspecific interactions (1 and 5), and size of unfragmented habitat patches (4) on home-range size. To my knowledge, this is the 1st large mammal study to explicitly show that the density and spatial distribution of roads and supplemental feeding affect home-range size of red deer and that humans can have a greater impact on home-range size and shape than natural habitat factors. Ungulates are often supplementally fed to increase their value to hunters and to reduce forest damage, particularly in Europe; however, this practice can greatly reduce the home-range size, potentially leading to increased disease transmission and competition associated with the higher deer densities around feeding sites, which can result in just the opposite of what was intended.

We quantified the effect of multiple environmental and biological determinants on variation in home range size across multiple spatial (total-home range–core-home range areas) and temporal (seasonal and all seasons combined) scales for 22 adult female polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Svalbard, Norway (2003–2011). We also evaluated if considering spatiotemporal variation in home range size and location is valuable to assess variation in concentrations of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). In general, home range size was negatively related to the proportion of land within the home range and sea ice concentration, but positively to snow depth. However, effects typically differed between seasons and total, and core-home range size, providing evidence that home range size is scale dependent in this large Arctic mammal. Females accompanied by dependent offspring had smaller home ranges during the breeding season and spring compared to solitary females, while age and body mass did not explain variation in home range size. Correlations between POP concentration and space use were marginally significant, but consistently stronger at fine spatiotemporal resolutions (i.e. core-home ranges during the breeding season) compared to coarse resolution (i.e. total-home ranges over the entire year). We also found that the geographic location of the home range is a stronger ecological correlate of POP concentration than home range size. To improve our understanding of the relation between POPs and animal space use, we recommend increasing the temporal frequency of POP measurements to evaluate how POP concentrations vary during a year and across areas.

Intraspecific variation in home range size has important implications for the distribution of animals across landscapes and the spatial structuring of population, community, and ecosystem processes. Among species of similar trophic guild and body mass, differences in home range size can reflect extrinsic variables that exert divergent selective forces upon spacing behavior and social organization. We tested predictions about how resource availability and timing influence social system, home range size, and territoriality in two tree squirrel species of similar size and ecological niches but that differ in foraging strategy and social organization. We estimated home range size and intraspecific home range core overlap in the Mt. Graham red squirrel (Tamiasciurus fremonti grahamensis; Arizona USA; MGRS) and the Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris; Alps, Italy; ERS) as functions of species, sex, season, and individual's body mass. However, body mass did not explain differences found between the two species. We found MGRS home ranges being three times smaller with higher core area exclusivity compared to ERS in all seasons. In fact, territorial MGRS evolved in a system of brief resource pulses and are larder hoarders, whereas ERS experience prolonged resource availability and are non-territorial. Only male MGRSs increased their home range during the breeding season, reflecting interspecific differences in social organization and mating behavior. Male ERS home ranges always overlap with several females to enhance mating success although male and female MGRS maintain nearly exclusive territories throughout the year. Only during spring and summer do males temporarily leave their food-based territory to increase mating opportunities with neighboring estrus females. Home range comparisons between ecologically similar species emphasize the importance of divergent extrinsic factors in shaping variability in body size-home range size scaling relationships. Timing in resource availability influenced the social structure and space use in tree squirrels of similar body size, highlighting how the coevolution of arboreal squirrels with conifer tree species has shaped their natural history.

The size of the winter home range of female roe deer Capreolus capreolus was studied in Sweden in a boreal area, Grimsö, and in a boreo‐nemoral area, Bogesund. The home range size of each roe deer was based on 48–72 radio‐locations collected from late January to early March. The average size of the winter home range was similar in the two areas, i.e. about 60 ha. No significant differences were found between home range sizes based on minimum convex polygon and harmonic mean 95%. The mean size of core areas (harmonic mean 50%) differed significantly between study areas. Snow depth was identified as an important factor influencing the size of home ranges. In the boreal forest, snow cover lowered the availability of the main food for the roe deer, i.e. dwarf‐shrubs, resulting in roe deer concentrating around artificial feeding sites.

Within a species, home-range size can vary due to factors such as sex, mass, age, and breeding condition of individuals as well as habitat type, food availability, population density, and season. The objectives of this study were to estimate home ranges of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in sage-steppe habitat and to test the hypothesis that several factors (sex, mass, reproductive status, and seasonality) affect home-range size. We also tested the hypothesis that deer mice exhibit home-range fidelity over time. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology was used to estimate home ranges in June and September 2006. Home-range estimates varied from 360 m2 to 5868 m2 (65 individuals, 753 observations). Home-range size increased by approximately 60% from June to September. Besides seasonality, none of the other predictors of home range were informative in explaining the variation in home range. Deer mice recaptured in September (3 months after initial capture) had high fidelity in home-range use (42.1% [SE = 8.4%] overlap with 74.1% [SE = 8.7%] area conserved; n = 9). All animals for which home range was estimated in both seasons retained some fraction of their June home range in September. Results support the use of combined location data collected over long periods, such as weeks or months, to estimate home range for deer mice. The results have implications for deer mouse—pathogen ecology, particularly with respect to modeling transmission of Sin Nombre virus—a pathogen that is directly transmitted by deer mice.

Four summers of trapping data for the eastern chipmunk ( Tamias striatus ) were examined quantitatively in order to identify factors accounting for variation in home range size. Home range is linearly dependent upon the number of captures utilized to calculate a home range, whereas the mean percent change in home range is an asymptotic function of capture interval. In order to measure home range accurately, a minimum of twenty capture points is suggested. In analyses where home range size was based upon a minimum of four captures, significant differences were found in home range sizes between sexes, age groups and years. When strong statistical data were used in home range analysis (i.e., a minimum of 20 captures determining home range), there were no statistical differences among any categories. These results demonstrate the importance of minimum capture number in home range studies.

The mean home range size of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus; 125 100 km2 ± 11 800; n = 93) is substantially larger than the predicted value (514 km2 ) for a terrestrial carnivore of similar weight. To understand this difference, we correlated home range size and sea ice characteristics. Home range size was related to (i) the ratio of land vs. sea within a given home range (42% of explained variance), and (ii) seasonal variation in ice cover (24%). Thus, bears using land during the ice-free season had larger home ranges and bears living in areas of great seasonal variation in ice cover also had larger home ranges. In another analysis we investigated how variation in a bear's environment in space and time affects its choice of home range. We found that polar bears adjusted the size of their home range according to the amount of annual and seasonal variation within the centre of their home range. For example, polar bears experiencing unpredictable seasonal and annual ice tended to increase their home range size if increasing home range size resulted in reducing variation in seasonal and annual ice. Polar bears make trade-offs between alternate space-use strategies. Large home ranges occur when variable ice cover is associated with more seals but also a more unpredictable distribution of those seals.

The availability of resources, their effect on population density and territoriality, and the ways in which these factors are interwoven with mating systems are important determinants of small mammal space use. It is often difficult to study these patterns in an integrated way, however, especially because long‐term data are needed but not readily available. In this paper, we investigate effects of population density, season and breeding status on home range patterns of the promiscuous rodent Mastomys natalensis using monthly capture‐mark‐recapture data collected over 17 years in a 3‐ha grid. Home ranges were estimated using minimum convex polygons bounded by trap locations, and home range overlap and visitation rates were calculated as a measure of territoriality. As higher population densities coincide with increased resource availability, we predicted that home range sizes would correlate negatively with density. Furthermore, as M. natalensis is promiscuous and population densities are generally high, we predicted that territoriality would be low, and home range overlap would therefore be high. Contrary to expectations the home ranges of female adults increased with population density, although those of male adults and subadults followed the expected decrease. Home range overlap and visitation rates were generally high, and increased significantly with population density. More importantly, they were never lower than those of simulated datasets consisting of randomly moved home ranges. These results therefore suggest that M. natalensis displays a complete lack of territoriality that is rarely seen in small mammals but still meets predictions based on knowledge of density and mating system.

We examined the roles of sex and spatial scale in habitat selection by Alaskan moose Alces alces gigas . We GPS‐collared 11 female and seven male adult moose in the Tongass National Forest, Alaska, USA, during 2002‐2004. We predicted that adult male and female moose would be spatially separated outside of the mating season, consistent with hypotheses attributing sexual segregation among sexually dimorphic ruminants to allometric differences in body and gastrointestinal size, and resulting differential needs for nutrient requirements by the sexes (the gastrocentric hypothesis), and varying risks of predation (the predation hypothesis) between sexes, especially for females with young. We predicted that habitat selection would be similar between sexes during the mating season, but dissimilar and occur at different scales during periods of late gestation and lactation. We expected that during segregation, females would select for a higher percentage of forested cover and a higher edge density than males to reduce predation risk on their young. Furthermore, we examined whether differences in scale of habitat selected between the sexes was related to home‐range size. Multi‐response Permutation Procedures (MRPP) analysis indicated that the spatial distributions of adult males and females differed, particularly near or during parturition. The sexes selected habitats similarly during the mating season (rut), when sexes generally were aggregated, whereas sexes exhibited differential habitat selection during spring, when sexes were segregated. Habitat selection by both sexes was best explained by vegetation and landscape composition tabulated within 1,000‐m radii centered on GPS locations of moose. The sexes did not differ in the scale at which they selected habitats. Mean size of the annual home range was 76 km 2 for females and 125 km 2 for males, but size of home range was not related to scale of habitat selection by moose. Our results indicate that females were likely selecting habitat with high‐quality forage while minimizing predation risk during periods of sexual segregation, whereas males were selecting habitat that allowed high forage intake, which together provide support for both the gastrocentric and the predation hypotheses.

Although snappers (Lutjanidae) are commercially important fishery resources in tropical and subtropical waters, their home range size and its spatial arrangement have not been sufficiently clarified. In the present study, the size and spatial arrangement of the home range of the reef-associated checkered snapper Lutjanus decussatus (Lutjanidae) were investigated by use of a portable GPS receiver. In a 120 m × 120 m quadrat established on a section of the fringing reef of Ishigaki Island, 29 individuals of the species were identified by their color pattern and individuals were divided into five arbitrary size classes (class 1 <10 cm TL ≤ class 2 <15 cm TL ≤ class 3 <20 cm TL ≤ class 4 <25 cm TL ≤ class 5). Fish tracking by snorkeling was conducted with the portable GPS receiver. Site fidelity of this species was high. Home range size ranged from 93.0 to 3638.4 m2, and there was a significant positive correlation between the home range size and fish total length. Home ranges of the same-sized individuals abutted each other (8.8% area overlap), whereas those of different-sized individuals overlapped (44.0% area overlap). Agonistic behavior (attack and agonistic display) was more frequently found among same-sized individuals (times of agonistic behavior/times of all encounters × 100 = 71.3%), whereas such agonistic behavior was rarely found among different-sized individuals (times of agonistic behavior/times of all encounters × 100 = 6.9%). These results suggest that home ranges of Lutjanus decussatus can be regarded as territories against same-sized individuals, but not different-sized individuals. The usefulness of the fish tracking by snorkeling using a portable GPS receiver for home range size estimation and the function of the overlapping territory of the species are discussed.