• Cite Icon1714
  • https://doi.org/10.1145/506147.506153Copy DOI Icon

How bad is selfish routing?

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

We consider the problem of routing traffic to optimize the performance of a congested network. We are given a network, a rate of traffic between each pair of nodes, and a latency function for each edge specifying the time needed to traverse the edge given its congestion; the objective is to route traffic such that the sum of all travel times---the total latency---is minimized.In many settings, it may be expensive or impossible to regulate network traffic so as to implement an optimal assignment of routes. In the absence of regulation by some central authority, we assume that each network user routes its traffic on the minimum-latency path available to it, given the network congestion caused by the other users. In general such a "selfishly motivated" assignment of traffic to paths will not minimize the total latency; hence, this lack of regulation carries the cost of decreased network performance.In this article, we quantify the degradation in network performance due to unregulated traffic. We prove that if the latency of each edge is a linear function of its congestion, then the total latency of the routes chosen by selfish network users is at most 4/3 times the minimum possible total latency (subject to the condition that all traffic must be routed). We also consider the more general setting in which edge latency functions are assumed only to be continuous and nondecreasing in the edge congestion. Here, the total latency of the routes chosen by unregulated selfish network users may be arbitrarily larger than the minimum possible total latency; however, we prove that it is no more than the total latency incurred by optimally routingtwiceas much traffic.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations230

The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology

  • May 19, 2002
  • Tim Roughgarden
  • Conference Article
  • Citations229

Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users

  • Jun 09, 2003
  • Richard Cole +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Nash equilibria in discrete routing games with convex latency functions

  • Jul 19, 2008
  • Journal of Computer and System Sciences
  • Martin Gairing +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Computing the Critical Road Section for the Repair of a Transportation Network

  • Jan 01, 2012
  • Systems Engineering Procedia
  • Bing Su +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Analysis of Price of Total Anarchy in Congestion Games via Smoothness Arguments

  • Dec 01, 2017
  • IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
  • Xuehe Wang +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations137

Stackelberg scheduling strategies

  • Jul 06, 2001
  • Tim Roughgarden
  • Conference Article
  • Citations46

Network Selection for Group Handover in Multi-Access Networks

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • X Cai +1
  • Research Article

선박 네트워크에서 스마트 장치간 연결성 향상을 위한 릴레이 통신 기법

  • Nov 28, 2014
  • The Journal of Korea Information and Communications Society
  • Seong Ro Lee +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Combined Banzhaf & Diversity Index (CBDI) for critical node detection

  • Feb 05, 2016
  • Journal of Network and Computer Applications
  • Waqar Asif +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations63

Quantifying the resilience of community structures in networks

  • Oct 03, 2017
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • Jose E Ramirez-Marquez +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Rapid Finite-Fault Models for the 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Sequence

  • May 22, 2024
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Maren Böse +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Controlling unresponsive connections in an active network architecture

  • Jul 01, 2003
  • International Journal of Network Management
  • Niraj Prabhavalkar +1
  • Research Article

Despite its humanistic values, organisation development consultancy practice appears to be facing implementation challenges, especially regarding development programmes in the public and private sectors. OD's agenda for development programmes is to ensure

  • Sep 30, 2009
  • Pentvars Business Journal
  • P Danquah Danquah
  • Conference Article
  • Citations18

Performance Evaluation of Flooding in MANETs in the Presence of Multi-Broadcast Traffic

  • Nov 17, 2015
  • M.B Yassein +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Performance Management of Optical Transport Networks through Time Series Forecasting

  • Mar 01, 2017
  • Jefferson Cavalcante +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.