• Home
  • Search
  • How restoration engineering measures can enhance the ecological value of intertidal flats
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14247Copy DOI Icon

How restoration engineering measures can enhance the ecological value of intertidal flats

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Restoration engineering measures, such as managed realignments or building groins, modify the environmental characteristics of coastal intertidal ecosystems. Creating physical modifications that are beneficial to an intertidal system's ecology necessitates an in‐depth understanding of the relationships between the abiotic and biotic components of a given intertidal habitat. In this study, we evaluate how hydrodynamics and sediment characteristics drive the development of the benthic macrofauna community during the first 5 years following engineering measures to enhance benthic macrofauna diversity at three locations. The creation of low‐energy habitats through groins (Knuitershoek and Baalhoek) and a managed realignment dike breach (Perkpolder) led to the accumulation of fine sediments in all three impact sites. Biomass of benthic macrofauna quickly increased between 2016 and 2020, with successional processes being more important in Perkpolder, where the habitat was started completely from scratch due to a managed realignment, than at Knuitershoek or Baalhoek, where habitat conditions were improved by adding groins. In addition, the density of benthos‐eating birds, especially oystercatchers, increased at some of the modified sites. While a low‐energy habitat may harbor more diverse assemblages of benthic macrofauna than a highly dynamic one, the extremely high silt content, which is typical for low‐energy habitats, may slow benthic community development. The observed increase of biomass at our impact sites highlights the value of the interventions, while the delays in the response of the benthic macrofauna community emphasizes the need for extensive monitoring both in time and space and the identification of underlying abiotic–biotic mechanisms.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Spatial and temporal variation of benthic ecological quality evaluation in the Bohai Bay (China) using benthic indices.

  • Feb 02, 2026
  • Scientific reports
  • Rong Zeng +6
  • Dissertation
  • Citations4

Benthic macrofauna in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island: An examination of factors causing variability in community structure

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • Christopher Calabretta
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Estimating Effects of Sea Level Rise on Benthic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning in a Large Meso-Tidal Coastal Lagoon

  • Jan 10, 2023
  • Biology
  • Olivia Dixon +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations216

An experimental analysis of the effects of herbivory and nutrient enrichment on benthic community dynamics on a Hawaiian reef

  • May 01, 2001
  • Coral Reefs
  • J Smith +2
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations1

Biodiversity and ecological functioning of mudflat macrofauna in the Anthropocene

  • Oct 09, 2019
  • Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)
  • Navodha G Dissanayake
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Variability in benthic invertebrate community structure near warm water effluents of a power plant in the southern Caspian Sea

  • Oct 12, 2020
  • Regional Studies in Marine Science
  • Morteza Farshchi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

The effect of sewage and natural seasonal disturbances on benthic macrofaunal communities in Fitzroy Bay, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Jan 01, 1992
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Victor C Anderlini +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations70

Comparison of long-term trends in benthic and pelagic communities of the North Sea

  • Feb 01, 1991
  • Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
  • M C Austen +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Biodiversity and Habitat Assessment of Coastal Benthic Communities in a Sub-Arctic Industrial Harbor Area

  • Aug 28, 2020
  • Water
  • Elliot Dreujou +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations28

The effects of intertidal oyster reef habitat characteristics on faunal utilization

  • Oct 13, 2017
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series
  • Mh Hanke +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Habitat and lifestyle affect the spatial dynamics of prokaryotic communities along a river–estuary–sea continuum

  • Jun 01, 2025
  • mLife
  • Jiao Liu +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Benthic meiofaunal community response to the cascading effects of herbivory within an algal halo system of the Great Barrier Reef.

  • Mar 07, 2018
  • PLOS ONE
  • Quinn R Ollivier +8
  • Single Report
  • Citations2

Development of the benthic macrofauna community after tidal restoration at Rammegors : Progress report 1

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Brenda Walles +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations37

Benthic community response to habitat variation: A case of study from a natural protected area, the Celestun coastal lagoon

  • Jul 22, 2007
  • Continental Shelf Research
  • Daniel Pech +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Bioassessment of a Northwest Florida Estuary Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates.

  • Aug 23, 2019
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
  • Janet A Nestlerode +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.