Employer Behavior Human Resource Management Research and Teaching in Germany and Austria
Employer behavior (Arbeitgeberverhalten) plays an essential role when it comes to understanding Human Resource Management (HRM). However, rather few studies actually seem to take concrete behavior of organizations as employers into account. Instead, German textbooks and journals are replete with examples of good in HRM. We argue that, as a result, there is a growing discrepancy between HRM in research/teaching and practice, which unquestionably is a problematic development in an applied science like HRM. Based on our analysis of five leading German textbooks on HRM and five volumes of German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management (2005-2009), we highlight current gaps in academic discussion and we derive some theses concerning current state of discussion. Finally, we discuss our findings and highlight some avenues for further research in our field. Key words: HRM, employer behavior, textbook analysis, bad practice (JEL: M12, M14) 1. Introduction Human Resource Management (HRM) is an important academic discipline, which is institutionalized at most business schools around world. Journals dealing with HRM rank at high positions in VHB JourQual-Ranking and have considerably high Impact- factor s. Research on HRM ranges from identifying best practices in separate domains such as recruiting, trainings, incentives and appraisal to examining impact of creating firm- specific and idiosyncratic bundles of interdependent HR practices in a certain HRM-system on creating competitive advantage (for a current overview, see Reichel & Mayrhofer, 2009). However, identification of optimal bundles of HR practices and question for consistency in employer behavior seems to be an important issue only for researchers from Great Britain or US (cf. e.g. Baron & Kreps, 1999). Although it is obvious that employer behavior C'Arbeitgeberverhalten) needs to be taken into account when it comes to understanding Human Resource Management, few studies from German researchers explicitly address question, which behavior entrepreneurs and enterprises actually show in their role as employers. Instead, German textbooks and journals are replete with examples of good in HRM (cf. results of our analysis in third section of this paper). Bad practices, which ultimately lead to a deterioration of working conditions for a large number of employees and which employers regularly use in order to preserve flexibility or to maximize profit, are frequently neglected in research; even though such practices often are heavily discussed in media. As a result, there seems to be a growing discrepancy between HRM in research/ teaching and practice. In a special forum in Academy of Management Journal on the separate worlds of academics and practitioners in human resource management, Rynes et al. (2007, p. 987) argued that, the gap between science and practice is so pervasive that some have despaired of its ever being narrowed. Unquestionably, this is a problematic development in an applied science like Human Resource Management. In this paper, we take a look at role of employer behavior in research and teaching in Germany and Austria. Based on our analysis of five leading German textbooks on Human Resource Management and five volumes of German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management C' Zeitschrift fur Personalforschun?y ZfP) (2005-2009), we highlight current gaps in academic discussion. The results of our illustrative analysis show, that even though research on employer behavior is essential to understand HRM, it is a widely neglected issue. The paper is structured as follows: In next section, we define notion of employer behavior and we discuss recent developments in employer behavior, which occurred during last years and decades. Subsequently, we examine how scholars approach employer behavior in research and teaching. …
Read more