Human–Robot Collaboration in Industry

Robots present an innovative solution to the construction industry’s challenges, including safety concerns, skilled worker shortages, and productivity issues. Successfully collaborating with robots requires new competencies to ensure safety, smooth interaction, and accelerated adoption of robotic technologies. However, limited research exists on the specific competencies needed for human—robot collaboration in construction. Moreover, the perspectives of construction industry professionals on these competencies remain underexplored. This study examines the perceptions of construction industry professionals regarding the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for the effective implementation of human—robot collaboration in construction. A two-round Delphi survey was conducted with expert panel members from the construction industry to assess their views on the competencies for human—robot collaboration. The results reveal that the most critical competencies include knowledge areas such as human—robot interface, construction robot applications, human—robot collaboration safety and standards, task planning and robot control system; skills such as task planning, safety management, technical expertise, human—robot interface, and communication; and abilities such as safety awareness, continuous learning, problemsolving, critical thinking, and spatial awareness. This study contributes to knowledge by identifying the most significant competencies for human—robot collaboration in construction and highlighting their relative importance. These competencies could inform the design of educational and training programs and facilitate the integration of robotic technologies in construction. The findings also provide a foundation for future research to further explore and enhance these competencies, ultimately supporting safer, more efficient, and more productive construction practices.

Human–robot collaboration can enhance productivity of production lines and reduce human ergonomic risk. The numbers and types of robots and stations in which robots are allocated need to be determined. Operations should be scheduled carefully when a human and robot work on a part in a station to obtain a feasible operation allocation with the highest efficiency and lowest ergonomic risk. A mixed-integer linear programming model, constraint programming model, and Benders decomposition algorithm were developed to analyse advantages of collaborative robots in assembly lines. An energy expenditure method was used to evaluate ergonomic risk. By scheduling and balancing collaborative human–robot assembly lines, operational advantages and scheduling constraints from human–robot collaboration were studied when immobile and mobile robots are used. Regression lines were developed that can help managers determine how many and what types of robots are best for a line and what the impact of robot mobility on robot and line performance can be. The best configuration for equipping a line with collaborative robots is when (number of robots)/(number of stations) is near .7 and about 37% of robots are mobile. Robots can be efficiently used in lines with both a small and large number of passive resources and in simple and mixed-model lines.

As collaborative robots begin to appear on factory floors, there is a need to consider how these robots can best help their human partners. In this paper, we propose an optimization framework that generates task assignments and schedules for a human-robot team with the goal of improving both time and ergonomics and demonstrate its use in six real-world manufacturing processes that are currently performed manually. Using the strain index method to quantify human physical stress, we create a set of solutions with assigned priorities on each goal. The resulting schedules provide engineers with insight into selecting the appropriate level of compromise and integrating the robot in a way that best fits the needs of an individual process.

Driven by the evolving role of modern robots in collaboration with human operators, this paper proposes a virtual potential field-based motion planning and control strategy to realize effective human-robot collaboration through kinesthetic guidance via robot teleoperation. The motion of the teleoperated robot is determined by the human operator using a haptic device programmed to replicate movement under the influence of the virtual potential field constructed based on the obstacles and objectives in the environment. This approach facilitates seamless cooperation between the human and collaborative robot. It can also be readily generalized to include moving obstacles and goals in a dynamic environment. The results suggest that the virtual potential field can effectively enhance the safety and accuracy of human-robot cooperation. The developed method has promising applications in human-centric robotics fields such as medical robotics and robot-assisted surgeries.

The evolution of industrial robotics has advanced from isolated, caged systems through basic human–robot interaction (HRI) to sophisticated human–robot collaboration (HRC). However, conventional vision systems based on red, green, blue (RGB) cameras remain a significant limiting factor in realizing the full potential of collaborative automation. This comprehensive review examines the transformative role of event cameras in advancing HRC capabilities and addressing current limitations in industrial settings. Event cameras, with their microsecond-level temporal resolution and robust performance under challenging lighting conditions, offer substantial advantages over traditional RGB cameras that are constrained by fixed frame rates and ambient lighting dependencies. We present a systematic framework for leveraging event cameras to enhance the human state understanding in collaborative robotics, encompassing real-time detection of poses, gestures, facial expressions, and emotional states. This framework addresses fundamental challenges in workplace safety and collaborative efficiency while enabling more sophisticated and responsive HRC systems. Our review synthesizes recent research developments in event camera applications specific to HRC, providing a detailed comparative analysis of their advantages over conventional vision systems. We identify emerging opportunities and potential research directions for advancing event-based vision in industrial robotics. In addition, we examine integration challenges and propose strategies for implementing event camera technology in existing industrial infrastructure. This work contributes valuable insights into the future trajectory of adaptive and intuitive HRC systems, offering a roadmap for researchers and practitioners in the field of industrial automation.

In many current assembly scenarios, efficient collaboration between humans and robots can improve collaborative efficiency and quality. However, the efficient arrangement of human–robot collaborative (HRC) tasks constitutes a significant challenge. In a collaborative workspace where humans and robots collaborate on assembling a shared product, the determination of task allocation between them is of crucial importance. To address this issue, offline feasible HRC paths are established based on assembly task constraint information. Subsequently, the HRC process is simulated within a virtual environment leveraging these feasible paths. Human assembly intentions are explicitly expressed through human assembly trajectories, and implicitly expressed through simulation results such as assembly time and human–robot resource allocation. Furthermore, a two-stage MLP-LSTM network is employed to train and optimize the assembly simulation database. In the first stage, a sequence generation model is trained using high-quality HRC processes. Then, the network learns human evaluation patterns to score the generated sequences. Ultimately, task allocation for HRC is performed based on the high-scoring generated sequences. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through assembly scenarios of two products. Compared with traditional optimization methods like DFS and Greedy, the human collaboration ratio has been optimized by 10%, while the collaborative quality evaluation has been improved by 3%.

As the development of robotics technologies for collaborative robots (COBOTs), the applications of human–robot collaboration (HRC) have been growing in the past decade. Despite the tremendous efforts from both academia and industry, the overall usage and acceptance of COBOTs are still not so high as expected. One of the major affecting factors is the comfort of humans in HRC, which is usually less emphasized in COBOT development; however, it is critical to the user acceptance during HRC. Therefore, this paper gives a review of human comfort in HRC including the influential factors of human comfort, measurement of human comfort in terms of subjective and objective manners, and human comfort improvement approaches in the context of HRC. Discussions on each topic are also conducted based on the review and analysis.

Human in the loop online estimation of robotic speed limits for safe human robot collaboration

The use of collaborative robots (cobots) and human robot collaboration has started to increase in diverse industrial areas in the past years. However, cobots are seldom applied in construction work even if there is a growing need for robotics solutions in this area. This study aims to present the possibilities of applying lightweight cobots for single tasks in the construction sector. This paper presents the development of a proof-of-concept dedicated to screwing gypsum board panels to the ceiling of a room. After identifying the challenges related to this task, we present the cobot solution that we implemented for this purpose. Our results show that repetitive screwing work in upright position achieved by cobot can benefit workers by removing ergonomical strain. At the same time, cobot ensures that this task is achieved with constant performance. Future research directions lead to the search for better accuracy in screw positioning and more dynamic ways of collaboration with human workers.

Objective:The objective of this work was to examine human response to motion-level robot adaptation to determine its effect on team fluency, human satisfaction, and perceived safety and comfort.Background:The evaluation of human response to adaptive robotic assistants has been limited, particularly in the realm of motion-level adaptation. The lack of true human-in-the-loop evaluation has made it impossible to determine whether such adaptation would lead to efficient and satisfying human–robot interaction.Method:We conducted an experiment in which participants worked with a robot to perform a collaborative task. Participants worked with an adaptive robot incorporating human-aware motion planning and with a baseline robot using shortest-path motions. Team fluency was evaluated through a set of quantitative metrics, and human satisfaction and perceived safety and comfort were evaluated through questionnaires.Results:When working with the adaptive robot, participants completed the task 5.57% faster, with 19.9% more concurrent motion, 2.96% less human idle time, 17.3% less robot idle time, and a 15.1% greater separation distance. Questionnaire responses indicated that participants felt safer and more comfortable when working with an adaptive robot and were more satisfied with it as a teammate than with the standard robot.Conclusion:People respond well to motion-level robot adaptation, and significant benefits can be achieved from its use in terms of both human–robot team fluency and human worker satisfaction.Application:Our conclusion supports the development of technologies that could be used to implement human-aware motion planning in collaborative robots and the use of this technique for close-proximity human–robot collaboration.

In human–robot collaborative assembly tasks, it is necessary to properly balance skills to maximize productivity. Human operators can contribute with their abilities in dexterous manipulation, reasoning and problem solving, but a bounded workload (cognitive, physical, and timing) should be assigned for the task. Collaborative robots can provide accurate, quick and precise physical work skills, but they have constrained cognitive interaction capacity and low dexterous ability. In this work, an experimental setup is introduced in the form of a laboratory case study in which the task performance of the human–robot team and the mental workload of the humans are analyzed for an assembly task. We demonstrate that an operator working on a main high-demanding cognitive task can also comply with a secondary task (assembly) mainly developed for a robot asking for some cognitive and dexterous human capacities producing a very low impact on the primary task. In this form, skills are well balanced, and the operator is satisfied with the working conditions.

The Importance of Cobot Speed and Acceleration on the Manufacturing System Efficiency

The human-robot collaboration (HRC) solutions presented so far have the disadvantage that the interaction between humans and robots is based on the human's state or on specific gestures purposely performed by the human, thus increasing the time required to perform a task and slowing down the pace of human labor, making such solutions uninteresting. In this study, a different concept of the HRC system is introduced, consisting of an HRC framework for managing assembly processes that are executed simultaneously or individually by humans and robots. This HRC framework based on deep learning models uses only one type of data, RGB camera data, to make predictions about the collaborative workspace and human action, and consequently manage the assembly process. To validate the HRC framework, an industrial HRC demonstrator was built to assemble a mechanical component. Four different HRC frameworks were created based on the convolutional neural network (CNN) model structures: Faster R-CNN ResNet-50 and ResNet-101, YOLOv2 and YOLOv3. The HRC framework with YOLOv3 structure showed the best performance, showing a mean average performance of 72.26% and allowed the HRC industrial demonstrator to successfully complete all assembly tasks within a desired time window. The HRC framework has proven effective for industrial assembly applications.

Human-robot collaboration (HRC), as a part of Industry 4.0 strategy, requires a completely new type of robots able to co-work with humans, called collaborative robots or cobots. This kind of collaboration is especially needed in assembly systems, which are known for having a low level of automation. For some assembly tasks human is still an irreplaceable factor. On the other hand, some assembly tasks are monotonous and tiring for humans. Therefore, the different approaches to cope with the challenge of identification and selection of proper task allocation between human worker and cobots are reported by many researchers. It is not an easy task since multiple and often conflicting criteria need to be taken into account. Some kind of artificial decision support is needed, to successfully solve this problem. In this research, task allocation procedure is presented for identification of different improvement options that utilize cobots into the assembly line for different tasks to be performed. The decision support system based on the HUMANT algorithm has been used for selection of the option which represents the best compromise solution. The procedure is experimentally tested on the assembly line with car gearboxes as a real product.

The emergence of Industry 5.0 brings a paradigm shift towards collaborative environments where humans and intelligent robots work side-by-side, enabling personalized, flexible, and resilient manufacturing. However, integrating humans and robots introduces new operational and safety risks that require proactive and adaptive control strategies. This study proposes an intelligent multi-criteria decision-making framework for smart risk assessment and the selection of optimal adaptive control strategies in human–robot collaborative manufacturing settings. The proposed framework integrates advanced risk analytics, real-time data processing, and expert knowledge to evaluate alternative control strategies, such as real-time wearable sensor integration, vision-based dynamic safety zones, AI-driven behavior prediction models, haptic feedback, and self-learning adaptive robot algorithms. A cross-disciplinary panel of ten experts structures six main and eighteen sub-criteria spanning safety, adaptability, ergonomics, reliability, performance, and cost, with response time and implementation/maintenance costs modeled as cost types. Safety receives the most significant weight; the most influential sub-criteria are collision avoidance efficiency, return on investment (ROI), and emergency response capability. The framework preserves linguistic semantics from elicitation to aggregation and provides a transparent, uncertainty-aware tool for selecting and phasing adaptive control strategies in Industry 5.0 collaborative cells.