Humor Detection Using Deep Learning in 10 Years： A Survey

Humor detection is one of the most popular tasks in natural language processing. Yet humor is abstract to numerate, and there isn’t an acknowledged standard for humor assessment. Toward this end, this paper explores the performance of CNN, RNN, BiLSTM in tackling humor detection. We use the regression method and classification method, respectively, to identify the best model. The experiment was conducted on a dataset that is composed of 15,000 news headlines. Results show that the CNN network is a preferable choice, and combined with the classification method, the model obtains the best performance. Though there is plenty of more sophisticated sentiment analysis models, our work offers an intuition for short text sentiment analysis.

The advances in deep learning have led to great achievements in many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. With the nature of language, i.e., sequential data, most NLP tasks can be framed into the sequence learning framework, such as text generation. As one of the most important foundations for modern NLP techniques, autoregressive generation models have achieved dominant performance in a great deal of NLP tasks. Therefore, this thesis emphasizes improving the autoregressive generation model for different NLP tasks. While many tasks can naturally fit into the sequence learning framework, some of them, e.g., building discourse parsing tree, require sophisticated designs to fit into neural models. Therefore, this thesis firstly emphasizes a novel unified framework for discourse parsing, which builds a discourse tree in a top-down depth-first manner, and it frames the task as an autoregressive generation task with the goal of each step being the prediction of the node position given a piece of text. The proposed approach is proven effective with extensive empirical experiments. In addition, I extend the above framework by proposing a hierarchical decoder, which leverages the information from parents and siblings of the nodes that are currently processed. The proposed decoder utilizes the nature of the tree structure and further improves the experiment performance on both discourse parsing and dependency parsing tasks. On the other hand, the de facto strategies, i.e., cross entropy loss and teacher forcing, for training the autoregressive generation models have been shown problematic in certain aspects. For example, cross entropy loss, which is one of the widely leveraged training objective functions, often leads to text degeneration in text generation, and teacher forcing suffers from the exposure bias problem, where there exists a mismatch between the training and testing setup. For text degeneration, I introduce a class of diminishing attentions, which enforces the submodularity of the coverage calculated by cross attention in the sequence-to-sequence model. The proposed diminishing attentions achieve notable improvement on several neural text generation tasks, including text summarization, machine translation, and image paragraph generation. Further, I propose a novel training objective, ScaleGrad, to replace cross entropy, which significantly reduces the degeneration problem in different text generation tasks. In fact, ScaleGrad can be extended to problems beyond text degeneration. It provides wide flexibility to inject different inductive biases into the text generation model by directly modifying the gradient information in the output layer. Next, for the exposure bias problem, this thesis introduces a novel type of scheduled sampling based on training accuracy, which requires only minimal hyper-parameter tuning compared to existing scheduled sampling methods. Additionally, a novel imitation loss is proposed to further enforce the model’s generative behavior to match the teacher-forced behavior. Moreover, this thesis demonstrates that reducing exposure bias can improve the robustness of language models against repetition and toxic errors.

Like any other science, research in natural language processing (NLP) depends on the ability to draw correct conclusions from experiments. A key tool for this is statistical significance testing: We use it to judge whether a result provides meaningful, generalizable findings or should be taken with a pinch of salt. When comparing new methods against others, performance metrics often differ by only small amounts, so researchers turn to significance tests to show that improved models are genuinely better. Unfortunately, this reasoning often fails because we choose inappropriate significance tests or carry them out incorrectly, making their outcomes meaningless. Or, the test we use may fail to indicate a significant result when a more appropriate test would find one. NLP researchers must avoid these pitfalls to ensure that their evaluations are sound and ultimately avoid wasting time and money through incorrect conclusions.This book guides NLP researchers through the whole process of significance testing, making it easy to select the right kind of test by matching canonical NLP tasks to specific significance testing procedures. As well as being a handbook for researchers, the book provides theoretical background on significance testing, includes new methods that solve problems with significance tests in the world of deep learning and multidataset benchmarks, and describes the open research problems of significance testing for NLP.The book focuses on the task of comparing one algorithm with another. At the core of this is the p-value, the probability that a difference at least as extreme as the one we observed could occur by chance. If the p-value falls below a predetermined threshold, the result is declared significant. Leaving aside the fundamental limitation of turning the validity of results into a binary question with an arbitrary threshold, to be a valid statistical significance test, the p-value must be computed in the right way. The book describes the two crucial properties of an appropriate significance test: The test must be both valid and powerful. Validity refers to the avoidance of type 1 errors, in which the result is incorrectly declared significant. Common mistakes that lead to type 1 errors include deploying tests that make incorrect assumptions, such as independence between data points. The power of a test refers to its ability to detect a significant result and therefore to avoid type 2 errors. Here, knowledge of the data and experiment must be used to choose a test that makes the correct assumptions. There is a trade-off between validity and power, but for the most common NLP tasks (language modeling, sequence labeling, translation, etc.), there are clear choices of tests that provide a good balance.Beginning with a detailed background on significance testing, the book then shows the reader how to carry out tests for specific NLP tasks. There is a mix of styles, with the first four chapters providing reference material that will be extremely useful to both new and experienced researchers. Here, it is easy to find the material related to a given NLP task. The next two chapters discuss more recent research into the application of significance tests to deep neural networks and for testing across multiple datasets. Alongside open research questions, these later chapters provide clear guidelines on how to apply the proposed methods. It is this mix of background material and reference guidelines that I believe makes this book so compelling and nicely self-contained.The introduction in Chapter 1 motivates the need for a comprehensive textbook and outlines challenges that the later chapters address more deeply. The theoretical background material begins in Chapter 2, which introduces core concepts, including hypothesis testing, type 1 and type 2 errors, validity and power, and p-values. The reader does not need to have any prior knowledge of statistical significance tests to follow this part. However, experienced readers could still benefit from reading this chapter, as concepts such as p-values are widely misunderstood and misused (Amrhein, Greenland, and McShane 2019).The significance tests themselves are introduced in Chapter 3, categorized into parametric and nonparametric tests. The chapter begins with the intuitively simple paired z-test, then builds up to more commonly-applied techniques, showing the connections and assumptions that each test makes. Step-by-step algorithms help the reader to implement each test. Although the chapter does cite uses of tests in NLP research, the main purpose is to present the theory behind each test and point out their differences.Chapter 4 provides perhaps the most handy part of the book for reference: a correspondence between common NLP tasks and statistical tests. Each task is discussed in terms of the evaluation metrics used, then a decision tree is introduced to guide the reader toward a choice between a parametric test, bootstrap or randomization test, or sampling-free nonparametric test. Section 4.3 then links each NLP evaluation measure to a specific significance test, presenting a large table that helps readers identify which test they need for a specific task. Particular considerations for each task are also pointed out to provide more detail about the appropriate options. The final part of this chapter describes the issue of p-hacking, in which dataset sizes are increased until a significance threshold is reached without consideration for biases in the data (discussed, for example, in Hofmann [2015]). The chapter proposes a simple solution to ensure robust significance testing with large datasets.Where Chapter 4 presents well-established methods, Chapter 5 introduces the current research question of how best to apply statistical significance testing to deep learning. Non-convex loss functions, stochastic optimization, random initialization, and a multitude of hyperparameters limit the conclusions we can draw from a single test run of a deep neural network (DNN). This chapter, which is based on the authors’ ACL paper (Dror, Shlomov, and Reichart 2019), explains how the comparison process can be overhauled to provide more meaningful evaluations. Beginning by explaining the difficulties of evaluating DNNs, the chapter then introduces criteria for a comparison framework, then discusses the limitations of current methods. Reimers and Gurevych (2018) have previously tackled this problem, but their approach has limited power and does not provide a confidence score. Other works, such as Clark et al. (2011), compare DNNs using a collection of statistics, such as the mean or standard deviation of performance across runs. This book shows how such an approach violates the assumptions of the significance tests. The authors propose almost stochastic dominance as the basis for a better alternative. The chapter explains how to use the proposed method, evaluates it in an empirical case study, and finally analyzes the errors made by each testing approach.Large NLP models are often tested across a range of datasets, which presents another problem for standard significance testing. Chapter 6 discusses the challenges of assessing two questions: (1) On how many datasets does algorithm A outperform algorithm B? (2) On which datasets does A outperform B? Applying standard significance tests individually to each dataset and counting the number of significant results is likely to overestimate the total number of significant results, as this chapter explains. The authors then present a new framework for replicability analysis, based on partial conjunction testing, and discuss two variants (Bonferroni and Fisher) for when the datasets are independent or dependent. They introduce a method based on Benjamini and Heller (2008) to count the number of datasets where one method outperforms another, then show how to use the Holm procedure (Holm 1979) to identify which datasets these are. Chapter 6 provides a lot of detailed background on the proposed replicability analysis framework, and the later sections again link the process to specific NLP case studies, and step-by-step summaries help the reader to apply the methodology. Extensive empirical results illustrate the very substantial differences in outcomes between the proposed approach and standard procedures.The final two chapters present open problems and conclude, showing that the topic has many interesting research questions of its own, such as problems when performing cross-validation, and the limited statistical power of replicability analysis.Overall, I highly recommend this book to a wide range of NLP researchers, from new students to seasoned experts who wish to ensure that they compare methods effectively. The book is excellent as both an introduction to the topic of significance testing and as a reference to use when evaluating your results. For anyone with further interest in the topic, it also points the way to future work. If one could level any criticism at this book at all, it is that it does not deeply discuss the basic flaws of significance testing or what the alternatives might be. For now, though, significance testing is an integral part of NLP research and this book provides a great resource for researchers who wish to perform it correctly and painlessly.

Document classification is a prevalent task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), which has an extensive range of applications in the biomedical domains such as biomedical literature indexing, automatic diagnosis codes assignment, tweets classification for public health topics, and patient safety reports classification. Nevertheless, manual classification of biomedical articles published every year into specific predefined categories becomes a cumbersome task. Hence, building an automatic document classification for biomedical databases emerges as a significant task among the scientific community. In recent years, Deep Learning (DL) models like Deep Neural Networks (DNN), Convolution Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and Ensemble Deep Learning models are widely used in the area of text document classification for better classification performance compared to Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. The major advantage of using DL models in document classification is that it provides rich semantic and grammatical information for document representation through pre-trained word embedding. Hence, this paper investigates the deployment of the various state-of-the-art DL based classification models in automatic classification of benchmark biomedical datasets. Finally, the performance of all the aforementioned constitutional classifiers is compared and evaluated through the well-defined performance evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-measure.

Text classification is the most fundamental and essential task in natural language processing. The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. Numerous methods, datasets, and evaluation metrics have been proposed in the literature, raising the need for a comprehensive and updated survey. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021, focusing on models from traditional models to deep learning. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification. We then discuss each of these categories in detail, dealing with both the technical developments and benchmark datasets that support tests of predictions. A comprehensive comparison between different techniques, as well as identifying the pros and cons of various evaluation metrics are also provided in this survey. Finally, we conclude by summarizing key implications, future research directions, and the challenges facing the research area.

• Figurative language styles are analyzed at lexical, syntactic, semantic, discourse-level, and pragmatic NLP levels • Discourse-level styles dominate due to sarcasm’s prevalence in social media • Arabic ranks second in dataset count, but lacks stylistic diversity coverage • Embedding-based features lead performance, especially in semantic tasks • Publicly available datasets remain scarce for pragmatic and syntactic styles Figurative language detection has emerged as a critical task in natural language processing (NLP), enabling machines to comprehend non-literal expressions such as metaphor, irony, and sarcasm. This study presents a systematic literature review with a multilevel analytical framework, examining figurative language across lexical, syntactic, semantic, discourse, and pragmatic levels. We investigate the interplay between feature engineering, model architectures, and annotation strategies across different languages, analyzing datasets, linguistic resources, and evaluation metrics. Special attention is given to morphologically rich and low-resource languages, where deep learning dominates but rule-based and hybrid approaches remain relevant. Our findings indicate that deep learning models–especially transformer-based architectures like BERT and RoBERTa–consistently outperform other approaches, particularly in semantic and discourse-level tasks, due to their ability to capture context-rich and abstract patterns. However, these models often lack interpretability, raising concerns about transparency. Additional challenges include inconsistencies in annotation practices, class imbalance between figurative and literal instances, and limited data coverage for under-resourced languages. The absence of standardized evaluation metrics further complicates cross-study comparison, especially when diverse figurative language styles are involved. By structuring our analysis through linguistic and computational dimensions, this review aims to facilitate the development of more robust, inclusive, and explainable figurative language detection systems.

Text extraction is an important part of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Most NLP tasks like text classification, machine translation, text-to-speech, text-based language identification, text summarization, and named-entity recognition involve the use of textual data. Such data is limited for low-resourced languages making it difficult to experiment advanced NLP techniques on these languages. This paper presents a Python-based toolkit for text analysis and text extraction from different types of images, documents, and audio files. The toolkit is built as a library that has functions that can be imported and utilized for text extraction.

Many tasks in natural language processing like offensive, toxic, or emotional text classification are subjective by nature. Humans tend to perceive textual content in their own individual way. Existing methods commonly rely on the agreed output values, the same for all consumers. Here, we propose personalized solutions to subjective tasks. Our four new deep learning models take into account not only the content but also the specificity of a given human. The models represent different approaches to learning the representation and processing data about text readers. The experiments were carried out on four datasets: Wikipedia discussion texts labelled with attack, aggression, and toxicity, as well as opinions annotated with ten numerical emotional categories. Emotional data was considered as multivariate regression (multitask), whereas Wikipedia data as independent classifications. All our models based on human biases and their representations significantly improve the prediction quality in subjective tasks evaluated from the individual’s perspective.

Chapter 9 - Big Data Driven Natural Language Processing Research and Applications

Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is a challenging task in Natural Language Processing (NLP) field. It is a fast evolving field in the recent years because of the development of large-scale datasets and the deep learning technology. Even though, numerous MRC models have been developed for Question Answer (QA) system, the existing MRC models are not on par with reading comprehension. In order to assess and improve the performance of the projected datasets, an advanced level of evaluation metrics have been introduced. Therefore, this work has conducted a survey over the existing MRC models and evaluation metrics utilized in them to address the lack of MRC with human reading.

In this paper, we present the preliminary results on the analysis of deep learning terms used for natural language processing (NLP) tasks. We propose a statistical analysis of papers published from 2012 to 2015 in the main ACL conferences. Our aim is investigating which DL term, and consequently which DL method, is mostly used for each specific NLP task, since its introduction in the field. In order to do this, our first contribution is the development of two terminological lists, referring respectively to DL methods for text analysis and NLP tasks. The list of deep learning terms contains 41 terms and acronyms, as well as a NLP term list contains 145 terms and acronyms. From our corpus, the frequencies of various terms have been extracted with respect to the ACL conference and the publication year. After the preliminary data analysis, we decided to restrict the extraction process to abstract texts. We applied multivariate techniques called correspondence analysis in order to visualize and evaluate the joint behavior of our variables.

Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are unique to exercise data in its memory cell with long-term memory as Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks have inklings of intensive time and computational power due to their complex structures like magnitude language model Transformer required to pre-train and learn billions of data performing different NLP tasks. In this paper, a dynamic chaotic model is proposed for the objective of transforming neurons states in network with neural dynamic characteristics by restructuring LSTM as Chaotic Neural Oscillatory-Long-Short Term Memory (CNO-LSTM), where neurons in LSTM memory cells are weighed in substitutes by oscillatory neurons to speed up computational training of language model and improve text classification accuracy for real-world applications. From the implementation perspective, five popular datasets of general text classification including binary, multi classification and multi-label classification are used to compare with mainstream baseline models on NLP tasks. Results showed that the performance of CNO-LSTM, a simplified model structure and oscillatory neurons state in exercising different types of text classification tasks are above baseline models in terms of evaluation index such as Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F1. The main contributions are time reduction and improved accuracy. It achieved approximately 46.76% of the highest reduction training time and 2.55% accuracy compared with vanilla LSTM model. Further, it achieved approximately 35.86% in time reduction compared with attention model without oscillatory indicating that the model restructure has reduced GPU dependency to improve training accuracy.

Towards a Novel Weakly Supervised Joint Approach of Named Entity Recognition and Normalization for Noisy Text

Work orders, equipment information, technical records and best practices documents contain within them a wealth of insights related to Equipment Maintenance which can be unlocked with Natural Language Processing tasks like classification, clustering, named entity recognition or part of speech tagging. But obtaining large enough labelled data sets in Equipment Maintenance domain manually is prohibitive and very expensive. This lack of labeled Equipment Maintenance data can be overcome with Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3, BERT that are pretrained transformer networks, considered state-of-the-art when it comes to Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, the vocabulary understood by these LLMs are mostly from English Language and need to be fine-tuned to understand industry and organization specific vocabulary and acronyms. This paper explores the potential of a domain specific LLM model for oil and gas industries. Data that are of good quality and that provide a comprehensive overview of industry are collected. This corpus of text contains documents like work orders, equipment data and technical documents. A custom tokenizer is trained on this data to identify domain specific terminology. A comparative study is done with other off-the-shelf tokenizers: BERT and RoBERTa, to compare the effectiveness of the tokenization. With millions of work orders and equipment documents, training pipelines had to parallelized so that training can occur on multiple GPUs. A comprehensive study of multiple training methods is done in this paper. Model and tokenizer developed were packaged and archived to be consumed in machine learning pipelines to specific use-cases across the organization. For an organization adopting digital transformation, the availability of an organization specific LLM is an enabler to extract insights from millions of documents containing free text. The applicability of such models spans across multiple disciplines like Maintenance, Reliability, Safety etc. and streamlines the development of highly accurate and robust text analytics.

Generative large language models (LLMs) are a subset of transformers-based neural network architecture models. LLMs have successfully leveraged a combination of an increased number of parameters, improvements in computational efficiency, and large pre-training datasets to perform a wide spectrum of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Using a few examples (few-shot) or no examples (zero-shot) for prompt-tuning has enabled LLMs to achieve state-of-the-art performance in a broad range of NLP applications. This article by the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) NLP Working Group characterizes the opportunities, challenges, and best practices for our community to leverage and advance the integration of LLMs in downstream NLP applications effectively. This can be accomplished through a variety of approaches, including augmented prompting, instruction prompt tuning, and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Our focus is on making LLMs accessible to the broader biomedical informatics community, including clinicians and researchers who may be unfamiliar with NLP. Additionally, NLP practitioners may gain insight from the described best practices. We focus on 3 broad categories of NLP tasks, namely natural language understanding, natural language inferencing, and natural language generation. We review the emerging trends in prompt tuning, instruction fine-tuning, and evaluation metrics used for LLMs while drawing attention to several issues that impact biomedical NLP applications, including falsehoods in generated text (confabulation/hallucinations), toxicity, and dataset contamination leading to overfitting. We also review potential approaches to address some of these current challenges in LLMs, such as chain of thought prompting, and the phenomena of emergent capabilities observed in LLMs that can be leveraged to address complex NLP challenge in biomedical applications.