Hybrid reliability analysis of structures with multi-source uncertainties

Structural reliability analysis based on probability and probability box hybrid model

Hybrid reliability evaluation of arch dam during long-term service with multi-dimensional parallelepiped convex model

RFOR-DQHFEM: Hybrid relaxed first-Order reliability and differential quadrature hierarchical finite element method for multi-physics reliability analysis of conical shells

A dimension-wise analysis driven active learning paired-Kriging (DWA-ALK) method for the hybrid reliability analysis

This paper combines time varying failure rates and Markov chain analysis to obtain a hybrid reliability and availability analysis. However, combining these techniques can, depending on the size of the system, result in solutions of the Markov chain differential matrix equations that are intractable. This paper identifies solutions that are tractable, These form the analytical baseline for the reliability and availability analysis of systems with time varying failure rates. Tractable solutions were found for the 1-component 2-state and the 2-component 4-state configurations. Time varying failure rates were characterized by a general polynomial expression. Constant, linear, and Weibull failure rate functions are special cases of this polynomial. The general polynomial failure rate provides flexibility in modeling the time varying failure rates that occur in practice.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

This article investigates the time-dependent sensitivity of structural reliability assessment to multisource uncertainties using Lamb wave. To precisely model the influence of local damage on the structure in the course of damage growth, a surface damage effect model is proposed to obtain the equivalent elasticity modulus, which can be coupled with the structure model. The evolution of the surface damage is modeled using the fatigue crack propagation model. Furthermore, by setting up the component and structure failure criteria, the time-dependent reliability model of the structure under multisource uncertainties from Lamb wave detection and material properties is established. The method of score function is employed to evaluate the sensitivity index, which is defined as the derivative of the reliability with respect to the distribution parameters of uncertain variables. A spatial truss structure is used to demonstrate the overall procedure. Numerical results show that the sensitivities indices are time and damage size dependent. The sensitivity contributions from Lamb wave quantification model and the material properties are comparable when the crack size is relatively small. When the crack grows to a larger size, the reliability assessment result is much more sensitive to uncertainties associated with material properties.

Compared with the probability model, the convex model approach only requires the bound information on the uncertainty, and can make it possible to conduct the reliability analysis for many complex engineering problems with limited samples. Presently, by introducing the well-established techniques in probability-based reliability analysis, some methods have been successfully developed for convex model reliability. This paper aims to reveal some different phenomena and furthermore some severe paradoxes when extending the widely used first-order reliability method (FORM) into the convex model problems, and whereby provide some useful suggestions and guidelines for convex-model-based reliability analysis. Two FORM-type approximations, namely, the mean-value method and the design-point method, are formulated to efficiently compute the nonprobabilistic reliability index. A comparison is then conducted between these two methods, and some important phenomena different from the traditional FORMs are summarized. The nonprobabilistic reliability index is also extended to treat the system reliability, and some unexpected paradoxes are found through two numerical examples.

A stress-strength interference model in its interval form, with uncertain quantities of structures described by interval numbers, is used for reliability analysis. Such structural reliability analysis problem is called structural interval reliability analysis. A discrete possibility degree method for structural interval reliability is proposed. By comparing equally-spaced-points of structural interval stress value and structural interval strength value, a partition for comparison relations (big, equal or small) between interval stress and interval strength is built. Based on this partition, new concepts for interval reliability analysis are defined, such as structural safety possibility degree and structural failure possibility degree, etc. By one simple example, the feasibility and effectiveness of discrete possibility degree method for structural interval reliability are demonstrated.

Fuzzy reliability analysis can be implemented using two discrete optimization maps in the processes of reliability and fuzzy analysis. Actually, the efficiency and robustness of the iterative reliability methods are two main factors in the fuzzy-based reliability analysis due to the huge computational burdens and unstable results. In the structural fuzzy reliability analysis, the first-order reliability method (FORM) using discrete nonlinear map can provide a C membership function. In this paper, a discrete nonlinear conjugate map is proposed using a relaxed-finite step size method for fuzzy structural reliability analysis, namely Fuzzy conjugate relaxed-finite step size method fuzzy CRS. A discrete conjugate map is stabilized using two adaptive factors to compute the relaxed factor and step size in FORM. The framework of the proposed fuzzy structural reliability method is established using two linked iterative discrete maps as an outer loop, which constructs the membership function of the response using alpha level set optimization based on genetic operator, and the inner loop, implemented for reliability analysis using proposed conjugate relaxed-finite step size method. The fuzzy CRS and fuzzy HL-RF methods are compared to evaluate the membership functions of five structural problems with highly nonlinear limit state functions. Results demonstrated that the fuzzy CRS method is computationally more efficient and is strongly more robust than the HL-RF for fuzzy-based reliability analysis of the nonlinear structural reliability problems.

In traditional reliability analysis, the uncertain parameters are generally treated by some ideal probability distributions with infinite tails, which, however, seems inconsistent with the practical situations as nearly all the uncertain parameters in engineering structures will get their values within a limited interval. To eliminate such an inconsistence and thereby improve the precision of the reliability analysis, the truncated probability distributions are then employed to quantify the uncertainty in this paper, and a corresponding reliability analysis method is developed. Two cases of positional relations are summarized for the uncertainty domain and the failure surface according to whether their intersection set is non-empty or empty. The probability and non-probability convex model methods are employed to deal with these two cases, respectively, and based on it, a hybrid reliability model is then constructed for truncated distribution problems. An efficient approach is also provided to distinguish these two positional relations and thereby determine which one of the probability and non-probability methods should be used when computing a real hybrid reliability. Five numerical examples are investigated to demonstrate the effectiveness of the present method.

PurposeBecause of the high computational efficiency, response surface method (RSM) has been widely used in structural reliability analysis. However, for a highly nonlinear limit state function (LSF), the approximate accuracy of the failure probability mainly depends on the design point, and the result is that the response surface function composed of initial experimental points rarely fits the LSF exactly. The inaccurate design points usually cause some errors in the traditional RSM. The purpose of this paper is to present a hybrid method combining adaptive moving experimental points strategy and RSM, describing a new response surface using downhill simplex algorithm (DSA-RSM).Design/methodology/approachIn DSA-RSM, the operation mechanism principle of the basic DSA, in which local descending vectors are automatically generated, was studied. Then, the search strategy of the basic DSA was changed and the RSM approximate model was reconstructed by combining the direct search advantage of DSA with the reliability mechanism of response surface analysis.FindingsThe computational power of the proposed method is demonstrated by solving four structural reliability problems, including the actual engineering problem of a car collision. Compared to specific structural reliability analysis methods, the approach of modified DSA interpolation response surface for structural reliability has a good convergent capability and computational accuracy.Originality/valueThis paper proposes a new RSM technology based on proxy model to complete the reliability analysis. The originality of this paper is to present an improved RSM that adjusts the position of the experimental points judiciously by using the DSA principle to make the fitted response surface closer to the actual limit state surface.

This paper first gives a brief review of the concepts of the reliability of structures. Some closed- form solutions, as well as approximate methods are elucidated. Different attempts to describe probabilistically the so-called “safety factor” are described and some instructive counterexamples are given. High sensitivity exhibited by the reliability of the structures is documented in a model structure. The same structure is also analyzed on the basis of non-probabilistic methods when only limited information is available on uncertain variables and functions. New interpretation of the safety factor through convex modeling is given.

Traditional reliability analysis generally uses probability approach to quantify the uncertainty, while it needs a great amount of information to construct precise distributions of the uncertain parameters. In this paper, a new reliability analysis technique is developed based on a hybrid uncertain model, which can deal with problems with limited information. All uncertain parameters are treated as random variables, while some of their distribution parameters are not given precise values but variation intervals. Due to the existence of the interval parameters, a limit-state strip enclosed by two bounding hyper-surfaces will be resulted in the transformed normal space, instead of a single hyper-surface as we usually obtain in conventional reliability analysis. All the limit-state strips are then summarized into two different classes and corresponding reliability analysis models are proposed for them. A monotonicity analysis is carried out for probability transformations of the random variables, through which effects of the interval distribution parameters on the limit state can be well revealed. Based on the monotonicity analysis, two algorithms are then formulated to solve the proposed hybrid reliability models. Three numerical examples are investigated to demonstrate the effectiveness of the present method.

Structural reliability analysis with fuzzy random variables using error principle

Efficient response surface method for high-dimensional structural reliability analysis