The Trans-Alaska Pipeline Controversy: Technology, Conservation, and the Frontier by Peter A. Coates
TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE Book Reviews 437 The Trans-Alaska Pipeline Controversy: Technology, Conservation, and the Frontier. By Peter A. Coates. Bethlehem, Pa.: Lehigh University Press; Cranbury, N.J.: Associated University Presses, 1991. Pp. 447; illustra tions, notes, bibliography, index. $57.50. There are pipes and then there are pipes. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline (TAP) must rank as one of the most monumental pipes in the history of the world. From Prudhoe Bay to Valdez, the TAP measures 800 miles in length. About half the pipe is elevated, and half buried in the ground as it wends its way south, forging over the Brooks Range before descending across the Yukon River past Fairbanks and then climbing over the Alaska Range before disgorging itself at Valdez, the now infamous port on Prince William Sound. At one point there were more than 28,000 workers out there in the wilderness, making the 100,000 welds it took to connect the joints of this tubular monster that now cuts the nation’s largest state in half like a Mississippi River of steel. That pipe was built by the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, a consortium made up of this world’s largest and most powerful oil companies, including ARCO, Humble, and BP. It was finished in the summer of 1977, and since then we have heard little about it, that is, not until 1989, when a drunken ship captain grounded his tanker, the Exxon Valdez, on a reef, turning the Alaska coast black with oil. What is there to say about a pipe? A good deal indeed, judging from this thick volume written by Peter Coates. To be fair, Coates’s book is about more than just the TAP. In an effort to put the pipeline in historical perspective, Coates takes us back to the 19th century, to the time when the United States first acquired Alaska. Then the narrative moves forward in time to look at the role of technology and conserva tion in the history of the state. He covers the history of the Rampart Dam, which was never actually built, and of Project Chariot, a plan by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) to use nuclear explosives to blow a hole at the mouth of Ogotoruk Creek (over 100 miles north of the Arctic Circle) in order to turn the area into a harbor. Edward Teller— that tireless promoter of the control of nature—told an audience in 1959 that, if the AEC wanted to, it could “dig a harbor in the shape of a polar bear” (p. 121). Although the harbor was never built, when it comes to Alaska, Americans have tended to think big and arrogantly. And it was precisely this philosophy—that we can indeed do what we want with the natural world—that seems to have informed the TAP project from the start. Coates aims to use the pipeline controversy to uncover the meaning of the frontier forAlaska and forAmerican history more generally. What he finds is that supporters and defenders of the pipeline project (and the other technological projects that were planned for the state) invoked the rhetoric of the frontier to advance their respective causes. So Spiro Agnew, in defending the pipeline, recalled how we had 438 Book Reviews TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE conquered the American West and its frontier back in the 19th century. Alaska was simply the logical extension of that frontier, and it too needed to be conquered. That promoters of the pipeline and others used such frontier rhetoric is not by itself all that surprising. Frontier ideology has long occupied a place at the center of American culture. Thus the book left me feeling rather disappointed. One is hard-pressed to say exactly what Coates is trying to tell us. This is because the book lacks a coherent focus. Coates’s foray into Alaska conservation history leading up to the TAP is not sufficiently well connected with the story of the TAP controversy itself. What is the real meaning and historical lesson of the pipeline project? It is difficult to say what Coates’s answer would be, but his emphasis on the frontier is not entirely misguided. He just does not go far enough...
Read more