- Research Article
- 10.7860/jcdr/2025/75831.21153
Impact of Preoperative Prism Adaptation Test and Patch Test Measurements on Surgery in Concomitant Horizontal Strabismus: A Prospective Interventional Study
- Jul 01, 2025
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
- Rahul Singh + 3 more +3
Introduction: Concomitant horizontal strabismus poses significant challenges in achieving optimal surgical outcomes, with risks of undercorrection or overcorrection remaining a concern. Preoperative assessment techniques, such as the Prism Adaptation Test (PAT) and Patch Test, have been utilised to better estimate the angle of deviation and plan surgeries accordingly. The PAT is thought to refine surgical corrections by revealing the maximum angle of deviation. However, its specific impact on surgical outcomes-especially in comparison to the patch test-remains underexplored. Aim: To evaluate the impact of preoperative PAT and patch test measurements on surgical outcomes in patients with concomitant horizontal strabismus, focusing on their role in optimising surgical corrections and minimising postoperative undercorrection and overcorrection. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted over 15 months at Department of Ophthalmology, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PGIMSR), Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India, from October 2017 to February 2018 and included 30 subjects diagnosed with concomitant horizontal strabismus. Preoperative deviation measurements were obtained using the Prism Bar Cover Test (PBCT) at three distances: near (33 cm), intermediate (6 m), and far (12 m). These measurements were recorded both before and after a one-hour monocular occlusion (patch test). Following this, participants underwent the PAT. Based on their responses to these tests, subjects were categorised into three groups: non responders, patch test responders, and PAT responders. Surgical corrections were planned and performed using the maximum deviation identified by the PAT. Postoperative outcomes were assessed eight weeks after surgery using Hirschberg’s test and the Prism Alternate Cover Test (PACT). The study’s parameters included analysing preoperative and postoperative deviations, categorisation of test responses, and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study included a total of 30 participants, comprising 18 males and 12 females, with a mean age of 20.83±12.03 years. Among them, 14 individuals presented with esotropia, while 16 exhibited exotropia. The study found that PAT significantly improved surgical outcomes. The actual residual deviation postsurgery ranged from 0 to 16Δ with PAT measurements, compared to an estimated range of 5 to 25Δ if surgeries were based on PBCT measurements before occlusion and 0 to 21Δ after occlusion. The mean residual deviation was lowest in PAT responders (6.8±6.07Δ) compared to patch test responders (8.5±6.09Δ) and non responders (11.5±7.09Δ) (p-value=0.02). Satisfactory alignment was observed in 90% of PAT responders, 80% of patch test responders, and 50% of non responders (p-value <0.04). Conclusion: The study concludes that the PAT significantly improves surgical precision and outcomes in patients with concomitant horizontal strabismus. By providing a more accurate assessment of deviation angles, the PAT reduces the risk of undercorrection and overcorrection compared to conventional preoperative measurements. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating PAT into preoperative evaluations to achieve optimal postoperative alignment and minimise residual deviations. The study underscores PAT’s value in enhancing surgical planning and outcomes, suggesting its routine use in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to evaluate its long-term effects on binocular vision and overall quality of life.
Read more