The construction and validation of a clinical predictive model for somatic symptom disorders in epilepsy patients
ObjectiveTo investigate factors influencing somatic symptom disorder (SSD) in epilepsy patients and construct a cut-off point prediction model.MethodsUsing structured interviews and based on DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, the 206 epilepsy patients included in this study were categorized into SSD and non-SSD (n-SSD) groups. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and assessments were conducted using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Neuropsychiatric Disease and Disability Inventory-Extended (NDDI-E), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Age, negative life events, seizure anxiety, energy/fatigue, GAD-7, NDDI-E, and PSQI scores were identified as independent risk factors for SSD comorbidity in epilepsy. The constructed cut-off model demonstrated good predictive performance. External validation in an independent multicenter cohort is required prior to clinical implementation.ResultsCompared with the n-SSD group, the SSD group exhibited statistically significant differences in age, age at onset, years of education, place of residence, number of comorbid physical illnesses, and adverse life events (all p < 0.05). The SSD group also showed significantly higher scores on GAD-7, NDDI-E, and PSQI, but lower total QOLIE-31 score and lower subscale scores for seizure worry, medication effects, energy/fatigue, life satisfaction, social functioning, and emotional well-being (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (OR = 1.076, 95% CI: 1.015–1.141), negative life events(OR = 6.624, 95% CI: 2.130–20.606), seizure anxiety (OR = 0.945, 95% CI: 0.895–0.999), energy/fatigue (OR = 0.923, 95% CI: 0.872–0.977), and GAD-7 (OR = 1.274, 95% CI: 1.015–1.274) were independently associated with higher QOLIE-31 total scores. Fatigue (OR = 0.923, 95% CI: 0.872–0.977), GAD-7 (OR = 1.274, 95% CI: 1.037–1.565), NDDI-E (OR = 1.233, 95% CI: 1.038–1.442), and PSQI (OR = 1.375, 95% CI: 1.097–1.723) were independent predictors of SSD. The AUC of the nomogram model constructed based on the aforementioned factors was 0.939 (95% CI: 0.904–0.975), with an AUC of 0.907 following internal validation. The optimal risk probability cutoff value was 0.200 (based on the Yorden index), yielding a sensitivity of 84.7% and specificity of 95.3%. Calibration curve and decision curve analyses demonstrated good model calibration and clinical net benefit.ConclusionOlder age, exposure to negative life events, higher GAD-7, NDDI-E, and PSQI scores, and lower scores on the seizure worry and energy/fatigue dimensions of QOLIE-31 are independent risk factors for SSD in epilepsy patients. The constructed nomogram model demonstrates favorable predictive performance. External validation within an independent multicenter cohort is required prior to clinical implementation.
Read more