• Home
  • Search
  • Improved cytokine\u2013receptor interaction prediction by exploiting the negative sample space
  • Cite Icon15
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03835-5Copy DOI Icon

Improved cytokine\u2013receptor interaction prediction by exploiting the negative sample space

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

BackgroundCytokines act by binding to specific receptors in the plasma membrane of target cells. Knowledge of cytokine–receptor interaction (CRI) is very important for understanding the pathogenesis of various human diseases—notably autoimmune, inflammatory and infectious diseases—and identifying potential therapeutic targets. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been used to predict CRIs. “Gold Standard” negative datasets are still lacking and strong biases in negative datasets can significantly affect the training of learning algorithms and their evaluation. To mitigate the unrepresentativeness and bias inherent in the negative sample selection (non-interacting proteins), we propose a clustering-based approach for representative negative sample selection.ResultsWe used deep autoencoders to investigate the effect of different sampling approaches for non-interacting pairs on the training and the performance of machine learning classifiers. By using the anomaly detection capabilities of deep autoencoders we deduced the effects of different categories of negative samples on the training of learning algorithms. Random sampling for selecting non-interacting pairs results in either over- or under-representation of hard or easy to classify instances. When K-means based sampling of negative datasets is applied to mitigate the inadequacies of random sampling, random forest (RF) together with the combined feature set of atomic composition, physicochemical-2grams and two different representations of evolutionary information performs best. Average model performances based on leave-one-out cross validation (loocv) over ten different negative sample sets that each model was trained with, show that RF models significantly outperform the previous best CRI predictor in terms of accuracy (+ 5.1%), specificity (+ 13%), mcc (+ 0.1) and g-means value (+ 5.1). Evaluations using tenfold cv and training/testing splits confirm the competitive performance.ConclusionsA comparative analysis was performed to assess the effect of three different sampling methods (random, K-means and uniform sampling) on the training of learning algorithms using different evaluation methods. Models trained on K-means sampled datasets generally show a significantly improved performance compared to those trained on random selections—with RF seemingly benefiting most in our particular setting. Our findings on the sampling are highly relevant and apply to many applications of supervised learning approaches in bioinformatics.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article

Research on positive and negative sample sampling strategies in contrastive learning

  • Nov 08, 2024
  • Applied and Computational Engineering
  • Wenyi Liu
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Assessing Wildfire Burn Severity and Its Relationship with Environmental Factors: A Case Study in Interior Alaska Boreal Forest

  • May 18, 2021
  • Remote Sensing
  • Christopher W Smith +5
  • Supplementary Content

Active Learning: New Approaches, and Industrial Applications

  • Jan 24, 2013
  • heiDOK (Heidelberg University)
  • Jens Röder
  • Research Article

A study on forest fire risk assessment in jiangxi province based on machine learning and geostatistics

  • Dec 01, 2024
  • Environmental Research Communications
  • Jinping Lu +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Analysis of Machine Learning Classifiers for Speaker Identification: A Study on SVM, Random Forest, KNN, and Decision Tree

  • Jan 31, 2024
  • Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing
  • Gregorius Airlangga
  • Book Chapter

Few-Shot Relation Extraction via Semantically Related Negative Samples

  • Oct 21, 2025
  • Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications
  • Delong Han +5
  • Research Article

Application of Semi-Supervised Clustering with Membership Information and Deep Learning in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment

  • Jul 15, 2025
  • Land
  • Hua Xia +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Evaluating the Impact of a Two-Stage Multivariate Data Cleansing Approach to Improve to the Performance of Machine Learning Classifiers: A Case Study in Human Activity Recognition

  • Mar 27, 2020
  • Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
  • Dionicio Neira-Rodado +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

On the performance evaluation of object classification models in low altitude aerial data

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • The Journal of Supercomputing
  • Payal Mittal +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Heart Failure prediction on diversified datasets to improve generalizability using 2-Level Stacking

  • Aug 31, 2023
  • Multidisciplinary Science Journal
  • Madhuri Dubey +2
  • Research Article

Iterative attack-and-defend framework for improving TCR-epitope binding prediction models.

  • Jul 01, 2025
  • Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
  • Pengfei Zhang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Sparse sampled visualization of ultrasonic guided waves for defect identification in plate structures

  • Jun 10, 2023
  • NDT & E International
  • Jagadeeshwar Tabjula +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Automated brain tumor detection and classification using weighted fuzzy clustering algorithm, deep auto encoder with barnacle mating algorithm and random forest classifier techniques

  • Apr 23, 2021
  • International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
  • Shenbagarajan Anantharajan +1
  • Book Chapter

Knowledge Representation Learning Based on GAN and Pre-training

  • Oct 06, 2021
  • Suyu Ouyang +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations68

Revisiting the negative example sampling problem for predicting protein–protein interactions

  • Sep 09, 2011
  • Bioinformatics
  • Yungki Park +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.