• Home
  • Search
  • Improved multiobjective salp swarm optimization for virtual machine placement in cloud computing
  • Cite Icon61
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-019-0174-9Copy DOI Icon

Improved multiobjective salp swarm optimization for virtual machine placement in cloud computing

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In data center companies, cloud computing can host multiple types of heterogeneous virtual machines (VMs) and provide many features, including flexibility, security, support, and even better maintenance than traditional centers. However, some issues need to be considered, such as the optimization of energy usage, utilization of resources, reduction of time consumption, and optimization of virtual machine placement. Therefore, this paper proposes an alternative multiobjective optimization (MOP) approach that combines the salp swarm and sine-cosine algorithms (MOSSASCA) to determine a suitable solution for virtual machine placement (VMP). The objectives of the proposed MOSSASCA are to maximize mean time before a host shutdown (MTBHS), to reduce power consumption, and to minimize service level agreement violations (SLAVs). The proposed method improves the salp swarm and the sine-cosine algorithms using an MOP technique. The SCA works by using a local search approach to improve the performance of traditional SSA by avoiding trapping in a local optimal solution and by increasing convergence speed. To evaluate the quality of MOSSASCA, we perform a series of experiments using different numbers of VMs and physical machines. The results of MOSSASCA are compared with well-known methods, including the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with decomposition (MOEAD), and a multiobjective sine-cosine algorithm (MOSCA). The results reveal that MOSSASCA outperforms the compared methods in terms of solving MOP problems and achieving the three objectives. Compared with the other methods, MOSSASCA exhibits a better ability to reduce power consumption and SLAVs while increasing MTBHS. The main differences in terms of power consumption between the MOSCA, MOPSO, MOEAD, and NSGA-II and the MOSSASCA are 0.53, 1.31, 1.36, and 1.44, respectively. Additionally, the MOSSASCA has higher MTBHS value than MOSCA, MOPSO, MOEAD, and NSGA-II by 362.49, 274.70, 585.73 and 672.94, respectively, and the proposed method has lower SLAV values than MOPSO, MOEAD, and NSGA-II by 0.41, 0.28, and 1.27, respectively.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations46

A Multi-objective Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Workflow Scheduling in Cloud Computing Environment

  • Aug 26, 2014
  • Saurabh Bilgaiyan +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations59

A novel approach to hybrid dynamic environmental-economic dispatch of multi-energy complementary virtual power plant considering renewable energy generation uncertainty and demand response

  • Oct 04, 2023
  • Renewable Energy
  • Hui Wei +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations104

Multiple objective particle swarm optimization technique for economic load dispatch

  • May 01, 2005
  • Journal of Zhejiang University Science
  • Bo Zhao +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations321

A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems

  • Mar 15, 2016
  • Energy and Buildings
  • Mohamed Hamdy +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Multi-objective optimal approach for injection molding based on surrogate model and particle swarm optimization algorithm

  • Feb 01, 2010
  • Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science)
  • Wei Chen +3
  • Conference Article

Parameter Identification of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle Based on Distance-based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

  • Nov 25, 2022
  • Jinghui Yan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Economic Expansion Planning of Sub-Transmission Grid and Regional Virtual Power Plant

  • Dec 01, 2019
  • Journal of Energy Management and Technology
  • Seyed Masoud Moghaddas-Tafreshi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations48

Power efficient virtual machine placement in cloud data centers with a discrete and chaotic hybrid optimization algorithm

  • Sep 28, 2020
  • Cluster Computing
  • Sasan Gharehpasha +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization: A Survey of the State-of-the-art

  • Jul 25, 2025
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Innovation
  • Li Zhen +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Design of miniaturized FSS using equivalent circuit model and multi-objective particle swarm optimization

  • Jul 19, 2021
  • Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
  • Xianjun Sheng +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Multi-Objective and Parallel Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Container-Based Microservice Scheduling

  • Sep 16, 2021
  • Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
  • Xinying Chen +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations28

Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for optimal power flow problem

  • Mar 01, 2008
  • M A Abido
  • Research Article
  • Citations47

Speckle noise removal in SAR images using Multi-Objective PSO (MOPSO) algorithm

  • Jan 04, 2019
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • R Sivaranjani +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations26

Optimal placement of distributed generation units in distribution systems via an enhanced multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm

  • Apr 01, 2014
  • Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C
  • Shan Cheng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for no-wait flow shop scheduling problems

  • Apr 01, 2008
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
  • Q-K Pan +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.