• Home
  • Search
  • Inelastic Deformation and Local Slenderness Requirements for Rectangular HSS Braces
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.62913/engj.v61i1.1316Copy DOI Icon

Inelastic Deformation and Local Slenderness Requirements for Rectangular HSS Braces

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Rectangular hollow structural sections (HSS) are commonly used as bracing in concentrically braced frames (CBFs) designed and detailed for seismic design requirements. As the primary yielding component in CBFs, braces are expected to sustain large inelastic axial deformation during earthquake loading. It is well known that their deformation capacity depends on the width-to-thickness ratio (local slenderness). Until 2013, HSS sections were produced to meet ASTM standard A500/A500M; after 2013, the ASTM 1085 specification was implemented, and since that time, HSS sections have also been produced to meet ASTM A1085/A1085M standards. Where the ASTM A500/A500M specification requires minimum yield and tensile stress values as well as a minimum elongation and tolerances on the wall thickness, the ASTM A1085/A1085M specification also requires a minimum Charpy V-notch (CVN) toughness, a maximum yield stress of the steel, and tighter tolerances on the wall thickness and radius of curvature of the corner. These requirements offer a more reliable brace for CBFs in seismic regions. Yet there has been limited research investigating the cyclic axial response of these members. A research study was undertaken to investigate the response of ASTM A1085/A1085M tubes using the response of ASTM A500C tubes as their reference. Forty-one brace specimens were tested under cyclic inelastic axial deformation. Comparison of the data shows that most of the ASTM A500/A500 M Grade C and ASTM A1085/1085M braces meet the respective requirements of their respective ASTM standard and that the differences between the performance of ASTM A500/A500M and ASTM A1085/1085M braces are not dramatic. In addition, the study investigated the impact of width-to-thickness ratio, global slenderness, and displacement history on the response of the braces. The data show that the current AISC 341-22 high-ductility slenderness limit for special concentrically braced frame (SCBF) braces is slightly conservative. However, the data suggest that the moderate ductility slenderness limit used for ordinary concentrically braced frame (OCBF) braces is significantly more conservative than required for consistent seismic safety. Further research is required to determine appropriate limits; this paper provides some initial recommendations based on this dataset.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Evaluation of New Seismic provisions for special concentrically braced frames in AISC 341-22

  • May 01, 2024
  • Structures
  • Jay Shen +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Design Recommendations for Bolted Rectangular HSS Flange-Plate Connections in Axial Tension

  • Mar 31, 2003
  • Engineering Journal
  • S Willibald +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations19

Improved Seismic Design of Concentrically Braced Frames and Gusset Plate Connections

  • Oct 14, 2008
  • Structures Congress 2008
  • Dawn Lehman +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Seismic performance of all-steel buckling-controlled braces with various cross-sections

  • Sep 22, 2017
  • Journal of Constructional Steel Research
  • Seyedbabak Momenzadeh +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations70

Investigation of the seismic response of three-story special concentrically braced frames

  • Jun 15, 2012
  • Journal of Constructional Steel Research
  • Eric J Lumpkin +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Experimental Study of Concrete-Filled Rectangular HSS Columns Subjected to Biaxial Bending

  • Aug 01, 2012
  • Advances in Structural Engineering
  • L.H Guo +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Development of centrically fused braced frame (CFBF) for seismic regions

  • Sep 11, 2019
  • Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Morteza Bastami +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Unveiling the Seismic Performance of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames: A Comprehensive Review

  • Jan 03, 2024
  • Sustainability
  • Anas Issa +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Fillet Weld Design for Rectangular HSS Connections

  • Mar 31, 2011
  • Engineering Journal
  • Jeffrey A Packer +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations52

Longitudinal Plate and Through Plate-to-Hollow Structural Section Welded Connections

  • Mar 14, 2003
  • Journal of Structural Engineering
  • N Kosteski +1
  • Conference Article

Update of Line Pipe Charpy Test Interpretation

  • Sep 26, 2022
  • Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
  • Fan Zhang +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Numerical and experimental investigations on inelastic cyclic performance of mid‐span gusset plate connections

  • Apr 23, 2018
  • Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
  • P C Ashwin Kumar +1
  • Book Chapter

Unified Inelastic Constitutive Equation for Cyclic Loading at High Temperature and its Application to 304 Stainless Steel and 2 1/4Cr-1mo Steel

  • Jan 01, 1992
  • Toshiya Nakamura +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Concrete-filled and bare 6082-T6 aluminium alloy tubes under in-plane bending: Experiments, finite element analysis and design recommendations

  • Jan 29, 2022
  • Thin-Walled Structures
  • Shafayat Bin Ali +3
  • Single Report

Crack Parameters

  • Oct 31, 1985
  • A Pitas
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.