Instructions to authors

Rationalisation of Fractionation in RadiotherapyL. G. Lajtha, R. Oliver and F. EllisL. G. LajthaRadiobiology Laboratory, Department of Radiotherapy, Churchill Hospital, OxfordSearch for more papers by this author, R. OliverRadiobiology Laboratory, Department of Radiotherapy, Churchill Hospital, OxfordSearch for more papers by this author and F. EllisRadiobiology Laboratory, Department of Radiotherapy, Churchill Hospital, OxfordSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-33-394-634SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractA rationale of fractionation of X-ray doses, based on the multi-hit nature of X-ray dose response curves for reproductive integrity in mammalian cells is presented. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAdaptive fractionation at the MR-linac3 January 2023 | Physics in Medicine & BiologyCancer Stem Cell Radioresistance and Enrichment: Where Frontline Radiation Therapy May Fail in Lung and Esophageal Cancers10 March 2011 | Cancers, Vol. 3, No. 1Adaptive fractionation therapy: I. Basic concept and strategy9 September 2008 | Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 53, No. 19Different fractionation schemes tested by histological examination of autopsy specimens from lung cancer patients*H. J. Eichhorn28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 54, No. 638Book review Radiation Therapy Technology (Examination Review). 814 Multiple Choice Questions and Referenced Explanatory Answers. Ed. StrykerJ., ClementJ. A., VelkeyD. E. and GruverC. A., pp. 265, 1980 (Medical Examination Publishing Co., New York), £14·00. ISBN 0–87488–459–1Brendan Hale28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 54, No. 638Grundlagen der strahlentherapeutischen MethodenSome Parameters of Cell Proliferation in a Solid Tumor119 May 2005 | Veterinary Radiology, Vol. 9, No. 1The Application of Cell Survival Theory to High Dose-rate Intracavitary TherapyW. E. Liversage29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 39, No. 461Dose-Effect Relationships for Radiation Damage to Organized TissuesNature, Vol. 199, No. 4890II. Dose-time Relationships in Radiotherapy and the Validity of Cell Survival Curve ModelsJ. F. Fowler and Babette E. Stern29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 36, No. 423Theoretical aspects of dose-time factors in radiotherapy techniqueClinical Radiology, Vol. 14, No. 4Cell Population Kinetics following Different Regimes of IrradiationL. G. Lajtha and R. Oliver29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 35, No. 410Review Problems of Infection, Immunity and Allergy in Acute Radiation Diseases (from the Russian). By KlemparskayaN. N., AlekseyevaO. G., PetrovR. V. and SosovaV. F., translated by VentersLydia, pp. viii + 154, 34 illus., 1961 (Oxford, Pergamon Press), 50s.R. H. Mole29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 35, No. 410Problems of Radiosensitivity in Mixed Cell Populations with Particular Reference to RadiotherapyR. Oliver and L. G. Lajtha28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 34, No. 406Some Radiobiological Considerations in RadiotherapyL. G. Lajtha and R. Oliver28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 34, No. 400CorrespondenceJ. E. Burns28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 34, No. 400CorrespondenceW. J. Weston28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 34, No. 400CorrespondenceC. W. Wilson28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 34, No. 400 Volume 33, Issue 394October 1960Pages: 595-658 © The British Institute of Radiology History ReceivedMarch 01,1960Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

1. Use of air kerma for photon dosimetry in airPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-55-653-375SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractExposure, expressed in terms of its unit the röntgen, has been widely used for the dosimetry of photons since its introduction for X radiation in 1928 and its extension to γ radiation in 1937.Although in recent years absorbed dose has to a large extent replaced exposure in clinical dosimetry, nevertheless exposure has continued to be used in deriving absorbed dose and for measurements in air generally. When in 1953 the value of 100 ergs per gram was adopted by ICRU as the value of the unit of absorbed dose, the rad, one of the reasons was so that the numerical value of an exposure expressed in röntgens would be fairly close to the numerical value of the absorbed dose to water resulting from that exposure (assuming that electron equilibrium existed at the point of measurement). Once however a change is made to SI units, i.e. the coulomb per kilogram (=3876 röntgens) for exposure, and the gray (=1 joule per kilogram =100 rad) for absorbed dose, this approximate agreement between the numerical values of the two quantities no longer exists.In view of the change to SI units and the widespread use of absorbed dose in radiotherapy, BCRU recently recommended a revised procedure for the calibration of dosemeters for use in radiotherapy where the measurement takes place in an appropriate phantom (BCRU, 1980). The main intention was to provide the user with a calibration in terms of the quantity required, namely absorbed dose to water. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byInstructions to authors29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 68, No. 805Instructions to authors29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 66, No. 788Instructions to authors29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 66, No. 781Instructions to authors29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 65, No. 769Instructions to authors29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 64, No. 757Realisation of the ISO Narrow Spectrum Series of filtered radiations at the National Physical Laboratory19 December 2000 | Journal of Radiological Protection, Vol. 8, No. 4When did you last see your röntgen?-the SI units and their use6 December 2000 | Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 29, No. 2SI units of exposure in radiologyC. K. Bomford and S. B. Sherriff28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 56, No. 667The hazards of acupunctureC. E. Latter28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 56, No. 667 Volume 55, Issue 653May 1982Pages: 321-B24 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Free AccessEditorialSubtle signs, subtle designs: future change and BJRD A BradleyD A BradleyDepartment of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UKPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130078SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutWhat an honour it is to have been accepted as the incoming Honorary Editor (Scientific) of the British Journal of Radiology (BJR) as of September 2012.It is also a matter of great pride and fortune that I find myself taking over the reins from Professor Roger G. Dale; my professional life started some 35 years ago, under his direct tutelage. On behalf of the journal, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Roger for all his hard-work, working closely with Dr Jane Phillips-Hughes in helping to steer BJR through a period of considerable change.Although it would be foolhardy to believe that I might ever fill the boots previously occupied by Roger Dale or indeed of those preceding him, hopefully my prior experience as Editor-in-Chief of the journals Radiation Physics and Chemistry and Applied Radiation and Isotopes will be found to be more than simply useful. The world of academic publishing is in transition, the prime drivers including the move towards electronic publishing and Open Access content. Each should be considered as a positive development, favouring readers and publishers alike. BJR is strongly engaged in this process, taking many proactive steps in ensuring that it thrives in this increasingly sophisticated environment.In my brief time in the role so far BJR has introduced an open access option, BIROpen. This allows authors of accepted articles the opportunity to pay an author processing charge in order to make their article freely available upon publication under a creative common licence.Another move for BJR is the transition to continuous publication for 2013. From the start of 2013, all articles will be rapidly published online with their final citation. This removes the delay between online advance publication and final print publication. The articles will be cited by an article identifier, rather than a page number, but will still appear in a printed format as usual.It is in such ways that BJR is continuing to live up to the imperatives embodied in the 1958 Royal Charter of Incorporation to the British Institute of Radiology, in particular:to promote and encourage the study and practice of the art and science of radiology, radiobiology and the medical applications of nuclear science in all their aspects and the study of kindred sciencesto maintain and extend to the public advantage the usefulness of the work of the radiologist, radiobiologist, physicist, radiographer and X-ray engineer in the field of medicine and in the expanding field of the industrial application of radioactive substancesto disseminate knowledge concerning all aspects of the science of radiology, radiobiology and the medical applications of nuclear science.As the new boy, I am currently seeking to better understand those topics that both represent the state-of-the-art in radiology and attract the greatest interest. It is clear, for instance, that reviews enjoy considerable prominence among the more highly cited articles, also attracting a prolonged citation half-life. So what might such realisation mean for the journal? Personally, I would like to see a balanced approach, attracting potential high impact reviews as well as papers highlighting state-of-the-art applications and papers pointing to future applications of new science. Some of the most highly cited BJR articles in the past 2 years have been in the fields of radiobiology, medical physics and the underpinning science and technology; see for instance [1–3], a small number of examples from the top 20 most cited BJR articles in 2012. As the Honorary Editor covering the scientific, rather than the medical, aspects, I am looking forward to seeing more of such content during my post with BJR. Almost certainly, a number of these articles will go on to have an extended lifetime. To paraphrase Jackson [4], BJR continues to rank highly in terms of its cited half-life, demonstrating that the articles it publishes continue to be of importance for far longer than those in many comparable journals with client impact factors. I further endorse the observation "that it reflects the nature of the publication strategy for BJR, which reflects translational and clinical imaging studies capable of influencing practice over a sustained period of time"; the words "therapeutic radiology" added to that observation would have made the statement simply perfect. To perceive the most subtle signs of change and to have ready sophisticated designs towards achieving the best of outcomes are familiar desires of the readers and publisher of BJR.REFERENCES1 Fowler JF. 21 years of biologically effective dose. Br J Radiol 2010;83:554–68. 10.1259/bjr/31372149. Link ISI, Google Scholar2 Paudyal B, , Paudyal P, , Tsushima Y, , Oriuchi N, , Amanuma M, , Miyazaki M, , et al.. The role of the ADC value in the characterisation of renal carcinoma by diffusion-weighted MRI. Br J Radiol 2010;83:336–43. 10.1259/bjr/74949757. Link ISI, Google Scholar3 Carton AK, , Gavenonis SC, , Currivan JA, , Conant EF, , Schnall MD, , Maidment AD. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis—a feasibility study. Br J Radiol 2010;83:344–50. 10.1259/bjr/80279516. Link ISI, Google Scholar4 Jackson A. The impact factor game: the rising impact factor of the British Journal of Radiology—a success story? Br J Radiol 2010;83:93–8. 10.1259/bjr/18689409. Link ISI, Google Scholar Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 86, Issue 1023March 2013 © 2013 The Authors History ReceivedJanuary 30,2013AcceptedJanuary 30,2013Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

In the last few years there has been rapid progress in the application of nuclear magnetic resonance clinical imaging as a diagnostic aid (Partain et al, 1983; Steiner, 1983; Worthington, 1983). Records kept by the operators of NMR imaging equipment indicate that about 1800 individuals have now been examined without incident within the United Kingdom. In view of this progress, an advisory group (Appendix) appointed by the National Radiological Protection Board recommends some modifications to the original advice given in 1981 (NRPB, 1981). The principal modifications are that: (1) It is no longer considered necessary to exclude volunteers with a history of epilepsy or cardiac disease. (2) It is not obligatory that a registered medical practitioner trained in resuscitation techniques be present during an exposure. (3) Higher limits are recommended for rates of change of magnetic flux density when the period of change is less than 10 ms. (4) The radiofrequency limit of 15 MHz has been removed. Theoretical considerations indicate that the interaction of an applied magnetic field with the intrinsic magnetic moments of protons and electrons within a molecule could alter its rate of chemical reaction (McLauchlan, 1981). Chemical reactions involving radical pair intermediates are expected to be sensitive to magnetic fields for this reason and a number of enzyme reactions that might be expected to be affected have been identified (A. Cass, personal communication). However, there is no experimental confirmation of these theoretical possibilities at present.

Instructions to AuthorsPublished Online:29 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-37-443-880SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractCommunications should ordinarily be addressed to the Honorary Editors, The British Journal of Radiology, 32 Welbeck Street, London, W.1.Communications from overseas should preferably be submitted to the most appropriate of the following Associate Editors:Dr. A. C. Begg, Public Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand. Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 37, Issue 443November 1964Pages: 805-880 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineMay 29,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Instructions to AuthorsPublished Online:29 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-38-446-160SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractCommunications should ordinarily be addressed to the Honorary Editors, The British Journal of Radiology, 23 Welbeck Street, London, W.1.Communications from overseas should preferably be submitted to the most appropriate of the following Associate Editors:Dr. A. C. Begg, Public Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.Professor H. E. Johns, The Ontario Cancer Institute, 500 Sherbourne Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Dr. H. A. Luke, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, S.1, Victoria, Australia. Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 38, Issue 446February 1965Pages: 81-160 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineMay 29,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Instructions to authorsPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-35-418-724SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractCommunications should ordinarily be addressed to the Honorary Editors, The British Journal of Radiology, 32 Welbeck Street, London, W.1.Communications from overseas should preferably be submitted to the most appropriate of the following Associate Editors:Dr. A. C. Begg, Public Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand. Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 35, Issue 418October 1962Pages: 653-724 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Instructions to authorsPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-35-411-220SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractCommunications should ordinarily be addressed to the Honorary Editors, The British Journal of Radiology, 32 Welbeck Street, London, W.1.Communications from overseas should preferably be submitted to the most appropriate of the following Associate Editors:Dr. A. C. Begg, Public Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.Professor H. E. Johns, The Ontario Cancer Institute, 500 Sherbourne Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Dr. H. A. Luke, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran S.1, Victoria, Australia. Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 35, Issue 411March 1962Pages: 149-220 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Radiology now. Fast neutrons—clinical requirementsPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-49-579-203SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractFor decades, there have been numerous treatments for cancer and recently a plethora of drugs has added almost limitless possibilities to these. When fast neutrons became available clinically, there was, understandably, a demand for their effects to be compared objectively with conventional radiation.The precision and efficiency of modern megavoltage X- and γ-ray machines, and their ability to deliver an exact dose of radiation to the volume delineated, probably cannot be improved upon, and usually exceeds the ability of the clinician to localize the extent of the malignancy. Output of radiation is so good that treatment times are of the order of one to three minutes, and well-defined beams can be directed in any direction and in any plane. Patients can be treated in the most suitable of many possible positions and do not usually suffer skin reactions. Megavoltage machines are situated within hospitals and are available in most centres throughout the world where physicists and clinicians have wide experience in their use.In contrast, all existing neutron sources suffer from serious disadvantages. For instance, in the U.S.A., patients from the M.D. Anderson Hospital are transported 100 miles into Texas for each treatment. The M.R.C. Cyclotron in Hammersmith Hospital has a neutron beam which is fixed in the horizontal position and is collimated in squares or rectangles of fixed sizes. The energy (7·5 MeV) gives a dose distribution only slightly better than 250 kV X rays and the isodoses are rounded at the ends and show a clinically significant penumbra. Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byEvaluating the dependency of neutron spectra and absorbed dose rates on the collimation field size in fast neutron therapyHeliyon, Vol. 7, No. 11The dependency of fast neutron flux and spectra on the collimation-field size and geometry for fast neutron therapy purposes29 July 2021 | Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, Vol. 99Fast neutron therapyThe Clatterbridge high-energy neutron therapy facility: specification and performanceD. E. Bonnett, S. W. Blake, J. E. Shaw and D. K. Bewley28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 61, No. 721Neutron beam characteristics from 50 MeV protons on beryllium using a continuously variable multi-leaf collimatorRadiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 1, No. 1Progress in Neutron Dosimetry for Biomedical ApplicationsThree-dimensional CT and structure modelsC. Alberti28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 53, No. 627Neutron sources for cancer therapyL. Cranberg28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 53, No. 627Radionuclide cystography vs. micturating cystourethrography for diagnosing vesico-ureteric reflux in childrenS. T. Meller, B. C. H. Ward and H. B. Eckstein28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 53, No. 627The Use of Compact Cyclotrons for Producing Fast Neutrons for Therapy in a Rotatable Isocentric GantryIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 26, No. 2History of the use of neutrons in radiation therapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Vol. 3The results of randomised and other clinical trials of fast neutrons from the medical research council cyclotron, LondonInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Vol. 3The future neutron therapy clinical trials in the united statesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Vol. 3Superconducting cyclotron neutron source for therapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Vol. 3 Volume 49, Issue 579March 1976Pages: 203-302 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Carcinoma of the Oesophagus, with Special Reference to the Upper ThirdM. LedermanM. LedermanThe Royal Marsden Hospital, London, S.W.3Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-39-459-193SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractThe classification of oesophageal tumours is discussed and the indications for curative and palliative treatment outlined. The results of treatment are also given. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byOesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: I. A critical review of surgery12 December 2005 | British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 6Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: II. A critical review of radiotherapy7 December 2005 | British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 7Intracavitary brachytherapy combined with external-beam irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagusInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Vol. 24, No. 2Palliative therapy of inoperable oesophageal carcinoma with radiotherapy and methotrexate: Final results of a controlled clinical trialInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Vol. 16, No. 1Radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagusJournal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 37, No. 1Controlled Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Patients with Inoperable Esophageal Carcinoma: A Study of the EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative GroupAn endoesophageal irradiation technique using iridium 192J. B. Dubois, J. L. Balmes and H. Pujol13 February 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 57, No. 676Current concepts in the treatment of esophageal cancerSTUDIES ON SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVICAL ESOPHAGUSThe Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 6Clinical Trials in Radiotherapy and the Merits of High Energy Protons8 July 2009 | Acta Radiologica: Therapy, Physics, Biology, Vol. 9, No. 1EsophagusGastroenterology, Vol. 54, No. 6Radiation treatment of cancer of the pharynx: with special reference to telecobalt therapyM. Lederman and R. F. Mould28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 41, No. 484January, 1968, Issue28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 41, No. 484Reconstruction of the Esophagus After Resection for CancerSurgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 47, No. 1Progress in Radiotherapy Volume 39, Issue 459March 1966Pages: 161-240 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Placental localization: a comparison of isotopic and ultrasonic placentographyG. D. Dunster, E. Rhys Davies, F. G. M. Ross and A. H. JohnG. D. DunsterDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Bristol Royal Infirmary, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bristol Maternity HospitalSearch for more papers by this author, E. Rhys DaviesDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Bristol Royal Infirmary, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bristol Maternity HospitalSearch for more papers by this author, F. G. M. RossDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Bristol Royal Infirmary, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bristol Maternity HospitalSearch for more papers by this author and A. H. JohnDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Bristol Royal Infirmary, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bristol Maternity HospitalSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:29 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-49-587-940SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractTwo-hundred-and-ninety patients were investigated using both isotopic and ultrasonic methods in order to determine accurate placental localization: results are compared. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byReferencesPlacenta previa: Avoiding false-negative diagnosesJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, Vol. 9, No. 3131 I Isotope Placentography: Simple Counting Equipment in Obstetric Practice2 December 2016 | International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Vol. 18, No. 2Ultrasonic diagnosis of placenta previa: Value of a postvoid scanJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, Vol. 6, No. 1Comparison of Isotopic and Ultrasonic placentographyJ. Higginbottom29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 50, No. 598Placental localization: a comparison of isotopic and ultrasonic placentographyF. G. M. Ross, G. D. Dunster, E. Rhys Davies and A. H. John29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 50, No. 598134Cs—a potential radionuclide for radiation therapyD. V. Rao, F. Ellis and J. T. Mallams29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 50, No. 598 Volume 49, Issue 587November 1976Pages: 901-976 © The British Institute of Radiology History ReceivedOctober 01,1975Published onlineMay 29,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Radiological Appearances of the Chest following Partial Asphyxiation by a Smoke ScreenP. H. WhitakerP. H. WhitakerSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-18-216-396SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractThe radiological appearances of the chest following asphyxiation by a smoke-screen are recorded, and literature on damage to the lungs by caustic fumes is reviewed. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe toxicology of zinc chloride smoke producing bombs and screens11 January 2017 | Clinical Toxicology, Vol. 55, No. 3Zinc Chloride (Smoke Bomb) Inhalation Lung InjuryChest, Vol. 127, No. 6Pulmonary damage after modest exposure to zinc chloride smokeRespiratory Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 12A comparative study of the acute inhalation toxicity of smoke from TiO2-hexachloroethane and Zn-hexachloroethane pyrotechnic mixturesArchives of Toxicology, Vol. 59, No. 3Some Hazards of Accidental Gassing25 June 2016 | Medicine, Science and the Law, Vol. 6, No. 1The Pulmonary Effects of Toxic Gases and Smokes An Experimental Radiographic Investigation*G. M. Ardran28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 23, No. 266The Australian and New Zealand Association of Radiologists28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 23, No. 266 Volume 18, Issue 216December 1945Pages: 369-402 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Sixteenth Annual Meeting December 1984Published Online:29 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-58-691-687SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractAlthough conventional echocardiography gives a clear demonstration of intracardiac anatomy, the assessment of valvular stenosis is limited by its inability to measure pressure gradients. Doppler echocardiographic techniques allow the pressure drop in obstructive lesions to be measured from the maximum jet velocity using the Bernoulli equation. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byProceedings of The British Medical Ultrasound Society29 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 60, No. 714Proceedings of The British Medical Ultrasound Society: Seventeenth Annual Meeting, December 17–19, 198529 May 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 59, No. 703 Volume 58, Issue 691July 1985Pages: 585-B44 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineMay 29,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Dactylitis and Growth DisordersW. Peter CockshottW. Peter CockshottUniversity College, Ibadan, NigeriaSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-36-421-19SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractThe clinical and radiographic features of several forms of dactylitis seen in West Africa are briefly described.A description of growth disturbances that may follow dactylitis in children is given. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byMiscellaneous Conditions with Manifestations in the Hand and WristVascular Deficiency4 October 2011Infection4 October 2011Sickle cell anemia and the handJournal of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Vol. 3, No. 3Bone and Soft Tissue InfectionsThe Normal and Abnormal Growth PlateRadiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 25, No. 6Bone changes in the extremities in sickle cell anemiaSeminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 22, No. 3Osteoarticular manifestations in sickle-cell disordersClinical Rheumatology, Vol. 3, No. 4Femoral neck growth deformity following the irritable hip syndromeA. P. Wolinski, I. W. McCall, G. Evans and W. M. Park28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 57, No. 681Part 3: Sickle Cell Anaemia in Tropical AfricaClinics in Haematology, Vol. 10, No. 3Observations on the Natural History of Dactylitis in Homozygous Sickle Cell Disease2 July 2016 | Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 20, No. 5The incidence of cone epiphyses and ivory epiphyses of the hand in Nigerian childrenAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 51, No. 2Scheuermann's diseaseSkeletal Radiology, Vol. 1, No. 4Rheumatological Manifestations of Sickle Cell Disease and other Hereditary HaemoglobinopathiesClinics in Rheumatic Diseases, Vol. 1, No. 1Die entzündlichen Erkrankungen der WirbelsäuleGrowth disturbances of the distal femur following sickle cell bone infarcts and/or osteomyelitisClinical Radiology, Vol. 25, No. 2Tropical diseases of the footSeminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 5, No. 4Pathological Fractures in the Immature SkeletonLokale Anregung des Extremitätenwachstums im TierexperimentA RE-EVALUATION OF THE "FISH VERTEBRA" SIGN IN SICKLE CELL HEMOGLOBINOPATHYAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 97, No. 3Radiological Findings in Histoplasma duboisii InfectionsW. Peter Cockshott and Adetokunbo O. Lucas28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 37, No. 441 Volume 36, Issue 421January 1963Pages: 1-76 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF

Notice to AuthorsPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-32-376-271SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractCommunications should ordinarily be addressed to the Hon. Editors, The British Journal of Radiology, 32 Welbeck Street, London, W.1.Contributions from the Dominions should preferably be submitted to one of the following:Dr. A. C. Begg, Public Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.Prof. T. A. Watson, Saskatoon Cancer Clinic, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada.Dr. H. E. Johns, The Ontario Cancer Institute, 41 St. George Street, Toronto, Canada.Dr. H. A. Luke, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne S.1, Victoria, Australia.The acceptance of a paper for publication in The British Journal of Radiology is at the discretion of the Editorial Committee. It is important to avoid matter, especially illustrations, which is not essential for the understanding of the paper. It is desirable that papers should not exceed 6,000 words in length. Papers of exceptional merit which are longer than this may receive special consideration.The Editorial Committee takes no responsibility for the return of MSS., prints, etc., submitted for publication and is not responsible for opinions expressed by authors whose papers are published in the Journal. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 32, Issue 376April 1959Pages: 215-284 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF