Integrating decision making conditions into DEA models

The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: A case of faculty academic performance evaluation

Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring efficiency of peer decision-making units (DMUs). Conventional DEA evaluates the performance of each DMU using a set of most favourable weights. As a result, traditional DEA models can be considered methods for the analysis of the best relative efficiency or analysis of the optimistic efficiency. DEA efficient DMUs obtained from conventional DEA models create an efficient production frontier. Traditional DEA can be used to identify units with good performance in the most desirable scenarios. There is a similar approach that evaluates the performance indicators of each DMU using a set of most unfavourable weights. Accordingly, such models can be considered models for analysing the worst relative efficiency or pessimistic efficiency. This approach uses the inefficient production frontier for determining the worst relative efficiency that can be assigned to each DMU. DMUs lying on the inefficient production frontier are referred to as DEA inefficient while those neither on the efficient frontier nor on the inefficient frontier are declared DEA inefficient. It can be argued that both relative efficiencies should be considered simultaneously and any approach with only one of them would be biased. This paper proposed the integration of both efficiencies as an interval so that the overall performance score would belong to this interval. It was shown that efficiency interval provided more information than either of the two efficiencies, which was illustrated using two numerical examples.

This paper deals with urban sustainable development in China. We propose a network data envelopment analysis (DEA) model with a slack-based measure (SBM) to analyze the eco-efficiency of 284 Chinese cities, enabling us to find a way to open the “black box” in conventional DEA models and introduce social well-being factors into the model, and depict the role of local government in providing public service and improving social well-beings. We set up a framework of urban development by dividing the process of into two steps. The first stage is a production system translating inputs and natural resources into GDP and waste production, which will be inputs to the second stage for distribution and consumption to realize social welfare and environmental protection. The results show eco-efficiency of Chinese cities experienced a significant decrease from 2005 to 2016, which should be mainly attributed to the distribution and consumption processes. Structural differences are described by regions, administrative level and clusters. These results are compared with an existing urban sustainability index system developed by McKinsey and an ANOVA approach is conducted to reveal differences between cities across regions and clusters. This article sheds new light on the understanding of urban sustainable construction and development in China regarding the service performance of local government.

Operational and non-operational performance evaluation of thermal power plants in Iran: A game theory approach

In this paper, we have formulated Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models to reduce the inputs in an inefficient Decision Making Unit (DMU) when the specific inputs are under the constant sum constraint. We have also extended the models to reallocate the excess input without any reduction in efficiency of other DMUs. These DEA models and methods developed in this work will help decision makers in developing an optimal strategy to transfer excess input to other DMUs. Theoretical results have been illustrated with the help of a case study.

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric technique for measuring the efficiency of decision making units (DMU) with exact input and output terms. So far, a number of DEA models with interval data have been developed. The radial DEA model such as CCR or BCC model with interval data are well known as basic DEA models with interval data. However, these radial DEA models have some defects. In this study, we develop a new approach based upon the slacks-based measurement (SBM) of super-efficiency model for dealing with interval data in DEA. The SBM super-efficiency DEA model can not only discriminate the performance of efficient DMUs from inefficient ones, but can distinguish between the efficient DMUs. In addition, this model can overcome the drawback that the super-efficiency model can be infeasible under variable returns to scale (VRS) assumption. An illustrative example is provided to verify the idea of this paper and show its potential application and validity.

A generalized model for data envelopment analysis with interval data

Supplier selection is an important decision-making problem in supply chain management. Selecting appropriate suppliers based on sustainability criteria including economic, environmental, and social criteria can help companies move toward sustainable development. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is applied to recognize the most sustainable supplier. However, conventional DEA models can be applied only to performance measurement systems characterized by positive input–output data. However, in real world, data can be negative. We propose a new DEA model for evaluating sustainability of suppliers in presence of negative data and volume discounts. Also, we present a super-efficiency model for ranking suppliers. In addition, we prove some main properties of our proposed method. Finally, we present a case study to demonstrate applicability of proposed model.

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models with weight restrictions (WRs) have proven valuable for benchmarking and target setting. Although the DEA literature has explored the incorporation of managerial preferences and value judgments regarding the relative worth of inputs and outputs, as well as the establishment of targets in benchmarking contexts, little attention has been devoted to target setting under restricted DEA models. Moreover, despite the significant advances offered by minimum distance models for target establishment, limited research has addressed benchmarking improvement plans that integrate expert opinions and prior knowledge. Some studies have examined minimum distance models constrained to the efficient Assurance Region (AR) frontier, primarily by extending the concept of closest targets under WR. In contrast, this paper develops improvement plans that deviate minimally from the closest target projection obtained from the original, unrestricted DEA model—termed the reference target. This reference target is considered an acceptable “peer” since it requires the least effort for a decision making unit (DMU) to reach optimal performance before incorporating WR. To this end, we developed a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model under the assumption of Variable Returns to Scale in DEA. The proposed approach is illustrated through an application to benchmarking the tourism performance of localities in Córdoba, Argentina. The results reveal realistic and achievable improvement plans for the analyzed localities, ensuring that both global efforts are managed and expert-imposed restrictions are satisfied.

An efficiency measurement model of a university faculty is proposed with additional new sub-functions that produce new output variables, based on the network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model for systems with a hierarchical structure.For production systems composed of hierarchical processes, the system efficiency is well represented as the aggregated performance of the components involved in the system. It is identified that the conventional DEA model ignores internal process activities in a university. Therefore, an improved DEA model based on a network structure that accounts for more activities in a university is proposed to measure its overall efficiency. The impact of major functions of a university are taken into account to represent the output variables in assessing the efficiency. Currently, collaboration activities have been given more attention, so, this variable is suggested as a new output for the hierarchical production system. In order to show the practicality of the model, a hypothetical set of data of 14 faculties has been used as a numerical example. The results show that none of the faculties is relatively efficient since its functions were found to be inefficient. The proposed model enables to help the management of university faculties to identify weaknesses of each function and thus to plan for suitable actions on improving the overall performance of the university.

In models of data envelopment analysis (DEA), an optimal set of input and output weights is generally assumed to represent the assessed decision making unit (DMU) in the best light in comparison to all the other DMUs. The paper shows that this may not be correct if absolute weight bounds or some other weight restrictions are added to the model. A consequence may be that the model will underestimate the relative efficiency of DMUs. The incorporation of weight restrictions in a maximin DEA model is suggested. This model can be further converted to more operational forms, which are similar to the classical DEA models.

The main goal of this paper is to develop a new data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to use optimal weights of each decision making unit (DMU) to improve its relative efficiency aligned with other DMUs. In spite of the vast amount of studies in this area and related tools and techniques, current literature deploys the optimal weights of DMUs to calculate the DMUs' relative efficiency and benchmarking for each DMU is less investigated. In order to fill this gap, this paper proposes a model for obtaining benchmark(s) for each DMU. Furthermore, a numerical example is used to illustrate the capability of the proposed model.

Park proposed a pair of mathematical data envelopment analysis (DEA) models to estimate the lower and upper bound of efficiency scores in the presence of imprecise data. This article illustrates that his approach suffers from some drawbacks: (i) it may convert weak ordinal data into an incorrect set of precise data; (ii) it utilizes various production frontiers to obtain an interval efficiency score for each decision making unit (DMU); (iii) in the absence of exact output data (pure ordinal output data), the approach leads to a meaningless model; (iv) the built model is infeasible with pure ordinal input data; (v) it may include free or unlimited production output which results in unreliable and suspicious results. Moreover, the utilized models by Park involve a positive lower bound (non-Archimedean epsilon) for the weights to deter them from being zero. However, the author ignored the requirement of determining a suitable value for the epsilon. This study constructs two new DEA models with a fixed and unified production frontier (the same constraint set) to compute the upper and lower bounds of efficiency. It is demonstrated that the suggested models can successfully capture the aforementioned shortcomings. Although these models are also epsilon-based, a new model is developed to obtain a suitable epsilon value for the proposed models. It is proved that the suggested approach effectively eliminates all the weaknesses. Additionally, a case study of Iranian Space Agency (ISA) industry is taken as an example to illustrate the superiority of the new approach over the previous ones.

Energy efficiency analysis method based on fuzzy DEA cross-model for ethylene production systems in chemical industry