• Home
  • Search
  • Integrating principles and tools of decision science into value-driven watershed planning for compensatory mitigation.
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2766Copy DOI Icon

Integrating principles and tools of decision science into value-driven watershed planning for compensatory mitigation.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Several environmental policies strive to restore impaired ecosystems and could benefit from a consistent and transparent process-codeveloped with key stakeholders-to prioritize impaired ecosystems for restoration activities. The Clean Water Act, for example, establishes reallocation mechanisms to transfer ecosystem services from sites of disturbance to compensation sites to offset aquatic resource functions that are unavoidably lost through land development. However, planning for the prioritization of compensatory mitigation areas is often hampered by decision-making processes that fall into a myopic decision frame because they are not coproduced with stakeholders. In this study, we partnered with domain experts from the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services to codevelop a real-world decision framework to prioritize catchments by potential for the development of mitigation projects following principles of a structured decision-making process and knowledge coproduction. Following an iterative decision analysis cycle, domain experts revised foundational components of the decision framework and progressively added complexity and realism as they gained additional insights or more information became available. Through the course of facilitated in-person and remote interactions, the codevelopment of a decision framework produced three main "breakthroughs" from the perspective of the stakeholder group: (a) recognition of the problem as a multiobjective decision driven by several values in addition to biogeophysical goals (e.g., functional uplift, restoring or enhancing lost functionality of ecosystems); (b) that the decision comprises a linked and sequential planning-to-implementation process; and (c) future risk associated with land-use and climate change must be considered. We also present an interactive tool for "on-the-fly" assessment of alternatives and tradeoff analysis, allowing domain experts to quickly test, react to, and revise prioritization strategies. The decision framework described in this study is not limited to the prioritization of compensatory mitigation activities across North Carolina but rather serves as a framework to prioritize a wide range of restoration, conservation, and resource allocation activities in similar environmental contexts across the nation.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations640

How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28

  • Mar 26, 2018
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Diana Reckien +29
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations188

The Influence of Drivers and Barriers on Urban Adaptation and Mitigation Plans—An Empirical Analysis of European Cities

  • Aug 28, 2015
  • PLoS ONE
  • Diana Reckien +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Model-driven development platform selection: four industry case studies

  • Jan 15, 2021
  • Software and Systems Modeling
  • Siamak Farshidi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations62

An integrative framework for sustainable coral reef restoration

  • Jun 01, 2023
  • One Earth
  • David J Suggett +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

US environmental governance and local climate change mitigation policies

  • Apr 19, 2011
  • Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal
  • Lauren C Heberle +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Question of Liability for Emissions from Land Development in Relation to New York State Climate Change Plan

  • May 17, 2023
  • Climate
  • Elena A Mikhailova +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations138

Knowledge co-production for Indigenous adaptation pathways: Transform post-colonial articulation complexes to empower local decision-making

  • Oct 22, 2020
  • Global Environmental Change
  • Rosemary Hill +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Ethnopedology, its evolution and perspectives in soil security: A review

  • Nov 22, 2023
  • Soil Security
  • Georgina Pérez-Rodríguez +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations48

Environmental problem-solving in South Africa: harnessing creative imaginaries to address ‘wicked’ challenges and opportunities

  • Aug 31, 2016
  • South African Geographical Journal
  • C Vogel +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Choice basis: a model for multi-attribute preference.

  • May 01, 1986
  • British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
  • J P Barthélemy +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations59

The impacts of climate change on displaced populations: A call for action

  • Aug 01, 2021
  • The Journal of Climate Change and Health
  • Ayman Ahmed +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Understanding Perceptions of Climate Change, Priorities, and Decision-Making among Municipalities in Lima, Peru to Better Inform Adaptation and Mitigation Planning

  • Jan 25, 2016
  • PLoS ONE
  • Mariella Siña +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

A novel fuzzy-prospect theory approach for hydrogen fuel cell component supplier selection for automotive industry

  • Jan 05, 2024
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Rishav Raj Singh +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Compensatory mitigation

  • Mar 01, 2008
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
  • David Priddel
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Active Ecological Restoration of Cold-Water Corals: Techniques, Challenges, Costs and Future Directions

  • Sep 13, 2021
  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Maria Montseny +22
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.