Integration of artificial intelligence as a self-directed learning tool in an undergraduate physiology course.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has the potential to revolutionize teaching and learning, particularly in the development of students’ critical thinking skills. This study explores science instructors' familiarity, perceptions, and experiences with using AI to enhance students' critical thinking skills, as well as the level of institutional support for AI integration in teaching. A quantitative survey was conducted among 20 science instructors from higher education institutions in Isabela, Philippines. The findings reveal that while instructors acknowledge AI's potential to improve educational outcomes, there is a significant gap in formal AI training and literacy among educators. Positive correlations were found between AI literacy, AI integration, and critical thinking development, suggesting that as AI literacy increases, AI integration and enhancement of critical thinking skills also increase. Regression analysis identified AI integration as a significant predictor of critical thinking development. Challenges remain in the effective implementation of AI, including concerns about overreliance on AI-generated responses and the need for clear assessment guidelines. Interestingly, years of teaching experience did not significantly influence participants’ AI literacy, perceptions, or integration. This study highlights the importance of developing comprehensive AI literacy programs for educators and integrating AI into curriculum structures to balance AI-enhanced learning with human-centered pedagogy. These findings emphasize the need for thoughtful implementation and ongoing research to effectively leverage AI in promoting critical thinking skills in science education.

In recent years, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology with the potential to revolutionize collaborative learning experiences. This study investigates the role of generative AI in facilitating innovative collaboration among Saudi university students engaged in group projects within digital learning environments. As higher education institutions increasingly adopt digital tools and platforms, understanding how generative AI can enhance creativity, teamwork, and overall learning outcomes becomes paramount.Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, this research employs a comprehensive questionnaire distributed to a diverse sample of Saudi university students. The questionnaire is designed to assess participants’ experiences with generative AI tools, their perceptions of these tools' effectiveness in enhancing collaboration, and the impact on their creativity and problem-solving abilities during group projects. The survey includes both closed-ended questions for quantitative analysis and open-ended questions for qualitative insights, allowing for a nuanced exploration of the role of generative AI in educational settings.The findings reveal that a significant majority of participants (approximately 78%) reported that generative AI tools, such as AI-driven brainstorming applications and collaborative writing platforms, have had a positive influence on their group project experiences. Students highlighted that these tools fostered a more inclusive environment, enabling team members to contribute ideas more freely and creatively. Moreover, 65% of respondents noted improved communication and coordination among team members, attributing this enhancement to the real-time collaborative features provided by generative AI tools.Additionally, qualitative feedback from open-ended questions indicated that students appreciated the ability of generative AI to generate diverse perspectives and ideas, which enriched the brainstorming process and led to more innovative project outcomes. Participants expressed that the use of AI tools reduced the cognitive load associated with project management, allowing them to focus more on creative problem-solving and critical thinking. However, some concerns were raised regarding the potential for over-reliance on AI-generated content, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that combines human creativity with AI assistance.This study contributes to the growing body of literature on the integration of artificial intelligence in education, particularly in the context of collaborative learning. The implications of these findings suggest that incorporating generative AI tools into the curriculum can significantly enhance the collaborative capabilities of Saudi university students, fostering a culture of innovation and creativity in digital learning environments. As educational institutions continue to navigate the complexities of digital transformation, understanding the potential of generative AI as a catalyst for collaboration will be essential for fostering effective and engaging learning experiences.In conclusion, this research highlights the transformative potential of generative AI in enhancing group projects among Saudi students, offering valuable insights for educators and policymakers aiming to leverage technology for improved collaborative learning outcomes.

In today’s evolving world of work, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged not merely as a technological tool but as a catalyst for rethinking how jobs are structured and performed (Bankins et al., 2024; Parker & Grote, 2022). Across diverse job families and organizational contexts, tools like generative AI (GAI) go beyond mere instruments for data analysis or structuring and can adopt increasingly far-reaching roles through rapid progress in generating new graphic or textual content or algorithmic decision making (Ferràs- Hernández, 2018; Walsh et al. 2019). Central to this symposium is the recognition that this changing nature of work due to digitalization, propelled by AI and related tools, calls for a fresh look at established theories of job design and strategies for human resource management. Traditionally, research has illuminated how fostering characteristics like autonomy, skill and task variety, or adequate demands affect employee motivation, satisfaction, and well-being and thereby further organizational outcomes (Oldham & Fried, 2016; Parker et al., 2017). Yet the introduction of AI – particularly generative AI – adds complexity: Who performs which tasks? How are decisions made, and by whom? Which skills remain uniquely human, and which may be augmented or even entirely adopted by AI? Such questions demand a more nuanced and strategic approach to designing work in the future that balances efficiency and innovation with psychological and ethical considerations. The four presentations in this symposium aim to contribute to theory building on how AI affects work in terms of work design, the interplay of employees and AI use, and work outcomes. In particular, they highlight potential risks or unique challenges when working with AI (e.g., in terms of less enriched work, lowered autonomy levels, threats to job identity or risks due to disclosure of use) and path the way for interventions to achieve benefits of such technologies at work. In detail, the empirical studies in this symposium illuminate these issues at three interconnected levels: 1. Task-Level Insights: Two contributions focus on the more granular task characteristics (e.g., autonomy, skill variety) in modern, AI-enhanced work contexts. They demonstrate how AI use influences the allocation of specific tasks when designing work roles and how the perception of task characteristics changes when AI is used in a decision-making task. 2. Job- and Identity-Level: One paper zooms out from individual tasks to jobs as a whole and explores how AI-driven change might disrupt employees’ job identity. This lens demonstrates how task changes cascade into bigger questions of role definition and identity. 3. Organizational Context: Finally, one presentation adopts the broadest perspective and investigates managerial and organizational factors that might shape employees’ willingness to disclose and ethically integrate AI tools. Taken together, these presentations point toward a future in which AI’s transformative potential hinges on thoughtful coordination across tasks, roles, and organizational systems. By combining established frameworks with new insights drawn from (quantitative and qualitative) surveys and experiments conducted in Germany, Austria, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, these contributions illustrate how AI can enrich, rather than diminish, work and thereby strengthen human-centered organizations. By focusing on variables at different levels, the studies path the way for applications in practice, emphasizing the importance of individual approaches (e.g., training for job design, supporting self-efficacy), or on the organizational level (e.g., aligning HR practices, develop clear and supportive organizational policies and guidelines for the use of AI at work). Investigating the Influence of Work Design Perspective and AI Integration on Enriched Job Design Author: Tanja Bipp; Heidelberg University Author: Thea Ebert; Aalen University Collaborative Intelligence: Integrating Generative AI in Knowledge Work and its Impact on Job Design Author: Sabina Hodzic; University of Graz Author: Simon Grob; University of Graz Author: Bettina Kubicek; University of Graz Job Identity as Starting Point for SHRM in AI-Driven Organizational Change Author: Sophie Berretta; Ruhr University Bochum Author: Annette Kluge; Ruhr University Bochum Silent Adoption: Understanding the Drivers of Non-Disclosure of Generative AI Tools by Employees Author: Fangfang Zhang; Curtin University - Perth

In the dynamic field of programming education, integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools has started to play a significant role in enhancing learning experiences. This paper presents a case study conducted during a foundational programming course for first-year students in higher education, where students were encouraged to utilize generative artificial intelligence programming copilot extensions in their programming IDE and browser-based generative AI tools as supportive AI tools. The primary objective was to observe the impact of AI on the learning curve and the overall educational experience.Key findings suggest that the introduction of AI tools significantly altered the learning experience for students. Many who initially struggled with grasping elementary programming concepts found that AI support made understanding basic programming concepts much easier, enhancing their confidence and skills. This was particularly evident in the reduced levels of anxiety typically associated with early programming learning, as the AI copilot provided a non-judgmental, always-available source for clarifying doubts, including queries that students might hesitate to ask in a traditional classroom setting.Notably, some students leveraged the AI to generate similar exercise problems, reinforcing their understanding and skills. The AI's capability to address basic queries also freed up the instructor's time, allowing for more personalized student guidance in more advanced problems. This shift in the instructional dynamic further contributed to a learning environment where students felt more comfortable engaging with complex topics, thereby reducing the psychological barriers often linked with early-stage programming education.The course's structure, enriched by AI, enabled students to delve into more complex programming constructs earlier than traditional curricula would allow. For instance, students were tasked with simulating basic e-commerce operations, such as user registration, product browsing, and cart functionalities. These practical challenges naturally introduced advanced concepts like external data storage, unit testing, and user interface design, which are typically reserved for more advanced courses. With the help of generative AI programming copilot tools, students at any programming skill level were able to develop nearly functional complex structures. Interestingly, even when their projects were not fully functional, students remained motivated. Instead of feeling discouraged by these imperfect outcomes, they showed resilience and a keen interest in understanding and improving their code. This reaction is a significant shift from traditional learning settings, where unfinished or flawed projects often lead to increased anxiety or a drop in motivation.Furthermore, the AI's proactive suggestions inspired students to explore beyond the curriculum. Advanced learners delved into databases, cryptography libraries in Python, and even more advanced user interface design, ensuring that they remained engaged and challenged. This elementary course, enhanced by generative AI tools, also inspired students to learn other programming languages since they now learned that individual learning is more available with the aid of generative AI.In conclusion, the integration of AI in programming education offers a promising avenue for enhancing both the learning experience and outcomes. This case study underscores the potential of AI to revolutionize traditional teaching methodologies, fostering a more dynamic, responsive, and inclusive learning environment.This paper handles the results, possibilities and challenges of AI empowered education in programming. It also gives practical examples as well as future research perspectives.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into postgraduate supervision in higher education has accelerated globally, offering opportunities to enhance efficiency in research processes and academic mentoring. However, limited empirical evidence exists regarding the risks and challenges of this integration, particularly within Global South contexts such as South Africa. This study investigates the challenges associated with the use of AI tools in postgraduate supervision from a South African perspective. Anchored in a constructivist paradigm, the study adopts a qualitative research design, employing semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively selected participants—10 postgraduate students and 10 supervisors from faculties that are actively integrating AI into supervisory practices. Data were analysed thematically using qualitative content analysis. The findings identify six key challenges: increasing dependence on AI that may erode students’ critical thinking and originality; insufficient digital literacy and institutional support; financial and sustainability constraints; the questionable reliability and accuracy of AI-generated outputs; ethical dilemmas and limited cultural contextualisation; and resistance to technological change among supervisors. While acknowledging the potential of AI to enhance research productivity and the quality of supervision, the study cautions against its uncritical adoption, which may compromise academic integrity, creativity, and equity. It recommends institutional strategies, including subsidised AI access, structured training on ethical and critical AI use, the embedding of digital literacy in postgraduate curricula, and the fostering of collaboration with AI developers to ensure culturally relevant systems. A context-sensitive approach is essential to balance the affordances of AI with the preservation of human intellectual agency and critical scholarly engagement in postgraduate supervision.

This paper discusses the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in education, delineating their potential to transform pedagogical practices alongside the challenges they present. Generative AI models like ChatGPT, had a disruptive impact on teaching and learning, due to their ability to create text, images, and sound, revolutionizing educational content creation and modification. However, nowadays the educational community is polarized, with some embracing AI for its accessibility and efficiency thus advocating it as an indispensable tool, while others cautioning against risks to academic integrity and intellectual development. This document is designed to raise awareness about AI tools and provide some examples of how they can be used to improve education and learning. From an educator’s perspective, AI is an asset for curriculum development, course material preparation, instructional design and student assessment, while reducing bias and workload. For students, AI tools offer personalized learning experiences, timely feedback, and support in various academic activities. The Turkish Biochemical Society (TBS) Academy recommends educators to embrace and utilize AI tools to enhance educational processes, and engage in peer learning for better adaptation while maintaining a critical perspective on their utility and limitations. The transfer of AI knowledge and methods to the teaching experiences should complement and not replace the educator’s creativity and critical thinking. The paper advocates for an informed embrace of AI, AI fluency among educators and students, ethical application of AI in academic settings, and continuous engagement with the evolving AI technologies, ensuring that AI tools are used to augment critical thinking and contribute positively to education and society.

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, etc., into academic and professional settings has raised important questions about their influence on human cognition. This study examines the relationship between reliance on AI tools and critical thinking skills, with a particular focus on cognitive load. A quantitative survey design was employed, using structured questionnaires to collect data from 350 university students across diverse disciplines. Measures assessed the extent of AI usage, perceived cognitive load, and levels of critical thinking. AI tool use and critical thinking while controlling for demographic and educational factors. Findings indicate that frequent use of AI tools is associated with significantly lower reported cognitive load during complex tasks (β = –0.37, p < .01) but also with slightly lower self-assessed critical thinking skills (β = –0.21, p < .05). Results suggest that while AI support can reduce mental effort, it may inadvertently discourage deeper engagement with information. Implications for education and workplace training include encouraging deliberate reflection and structured critical analysis when integrating AI tools.

The growing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into translation workflows is reshaping the demands placed on translator education. Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems such as DeepL and Google Translate offer increased efficiency but challenge conventional teaching practices by shifting emphasis from direct translation to post-editing, evaluation, and decision-making. Despite this evolution, translator training programs often lack structured guidance on integrating AI, leading to a potential gap in preparing students for contemporary professional environments. This qualitative case study explores the evolving role of AI in translator education by analyzing student preparedness and attitudes toward AI-assisted translation tasks at the King Fahd School of Translation (KFST), Morocco’s only institution combining theoretical and practical translation approaches. The study involved 17 Master’s students enrolled in the “PE: English & Arabic” core module, all of whom had prior experience using AI tools such as Google Translate, ChatGPT, DeepL, or Reverso. Data were gathered through a Google Forms questionnaire comprising 16 items, including multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions designed to elicit both quantitative and qualitative insights. The questionnaire remained open for two weeks and was distributed via institutional email and messaging platforms to ensure full participation. Responses were analyzed through descriptive statistics for closed-ended questions and thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) for open-ended feedback, focusing on key themes such as AI familiarity, post-editing competence, curriculum reform, and ethical concerns. Thematic triangulation allowed for a nuanced understanding of student perceptions regarding the pedagogical integration of AI in translation education.Findings indicate that while this cohort widely uses AI tools for speed and efficiency, it expresses uncertainty about the reliability of machine outputs and reports a lack of formal training in post-editing and AI evaluation. All participants unanimously supported the introduction of dedicated modules on AI literacy and post-editing. The study concludes that AI integration can enhance translator training if supported by updated curricula emphasizing technological competence, critical engagement, and ethical awareness. It advocates for an andragogical paradigm that positions AI as a complementary tool, reinforcing human expertise and underscores the enduring value of human judgment in producing contextually nuanced translations.

This study investigates the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) integration on teachers’ professional identity and job satisfaction using a quantitative research design involving 251 respondents. Descriptive statistics showed relatively high levels of AI integration (M = 3.98, SD = 0.62) and professional identity (M = 4.12, SD = 0.58), indicating strong engagement with AI tools and a well-defined sense of professional role among teachers. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a moderately strong, statistically significant positive relationship between AI integration and professional identity (r = 0.612, p = 0.000), demonstrating that increased use of AI is associated with a strengthened professional identity. Mediation analysis further indicated that institutional factors significantly influence the relationship between AI integration and job satisfaction, with AI integration positively predicting institutional support (β = 0.54, p = 0.000) and institutional factors strongly predicting job satisfaction (β = 0.47, p = 0.000). Both a significant direct effect (β = 0.29, p = 0.001) and a strong indirect effect (β = 0.25, p = 0.000) were found, confirming partial mediation. These findings highlight that AI not only enhances teachers’ identity and satisfaction but that successful implementation relies heavily on institutional readiness and support. Overall, the results underscore the importance of adopting teacher-centered AI strategies that reinforce professional identity, reduce workload, and enhance well-being.

The integration and usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in academic research writing has ushered in a paradigm shift, fundamentally transforming traditional research methods. AI tools have reshaped scholarly writing by enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and productivity. This study investigated the level of awareness, adoption, challenges, perceived benefits, and effectiveness of AI tools among research scholars from India and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), via a structured questionnaire administered to 174 research scholars across various academic disciplines in leading universities. The study identified various generative AI platforms used by scholars and explored key metrics, such as brainstorming, generation of ideas, grammar and style checking, literature discovery, paraphrasing, citation management, and plagiarism detection. The findings revealed a strong positive response related to awareness and adoption rates as well as significant differences based on geographic location, gender, academic discipline, and years of research experience. Despite acknowledging the perceived benefits and effectiveness of AI tools, concerns and challenges related to ethical usage, accuracy and bias, academic integrity, overdependence, and technical difficulties exist. The study provides various recommendations for AI use in academic writing, including the need for AI literacy training, institutional support, and policies related to ethical standards, and offers important implications for academic institutions, AI tools developers, research supervisors, and policy makers, fostering the effective integration of AI in academic research practices, following an ethical framework.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the workflow of scholarly writing, including scientific and medical writing, offers transformative advantages while raising critical ethical and practical concerns. Among the pros, AI substantially enhances efficiency by automating several time-consuming tasks such as literature review, data synthesis and text editing. In particular, tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, and SciSpace Copilot remarkably empower researchers when they draft, refine, and format manuscripts, increasing precision and speed. In addition, AI tools may foster inclusivity by assisting non-native English speakers with seamless translations and also enabling interdisciplinary collaboration, thereby hopefully democratizing access and boosting scientific communication and cooperation. However, the rapid adoption of novel AI tools brings significant challenges. First, there is a distinct risk of perpetuating biases in training datasets, and other key issues include ambiguity in authorship accountability and the potential erosion of critical thinking skills. In addition, AI tools could be purposefully misused to generate mock datasets and fraudulent papers (e.g. by paper mills), and this clearly poses a threat to academic integrity. This challenge is all too pressing given that traditional plagiarism detection tools often fall short against sophisticated AI-generated content. We hereby explore the pros and cons of AI on medical writing, poignantly leveraging Sergio Leone’s The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly movie as a metaphor. By providing general concepts as well as focusing on several key AI tools, we are hopeful this overview may prove useful to anyone wishing to conscientiously adopt AI tools for scientific writing. In addition, we make a compelling case for transparent guidelines, robust and freely available detection mechanisms, and ongoing critical oversight to ensure AI will be able to serve as a catalyst for innovation and dissemination without compromising the credibility of scholarly endeavors.

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is set to profoundly impact the traditional upstream geoenergy industry (i.e., geothermal energy, oil and gas industry) by introducing unprecedented efficiencies and innovations. This paper explores AGI's foundational principles and its transformative applications, particularly focusing on the advancements brought about by large language models (LLMs) and extensive computer vision systems in the upstream sectors of the industry. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has already begun reshaping the upstream geoenergy landscape, offering enhancements in production optimization, downtime reduction, safety improvements, and advancements in exploration and drilling techniques. These technologies streamline logistics, minimize maintenance costs, automate monotonous tasks, refine decision-making processes, foster team collaboration, and amplify profitability through error reduction and actionable insights extraction. Despite these advancements, the deployment of AI technologies faces challenges, including the necessity for skilled professionals for implementation and the limitations of model training on constrained datasets, which affects the models' adaptability across different contexts. The advent of generative AI, exemplified by innovations like ChatGPT and the Segment Anything Model (SAM), heralds a new era of high-density innovation. These developments highlight a shift towards natural language interfaces and domain-knowledge-driven AI, promising more accessible and tailored solutions for the upstream geoenergy industry. This review articulates the vast potential AGI holds for tackling complex operational challenges within the upstream geoenergy industry, requiring near-human levels of intelligence. We discussed the promising applications, the hurdles of large-scale AGI model deployment, and the necessity for domain-specific knowledge in maximizing the benefits of these technologies.

This workshop aims to design advanced empathic user interfaces for in-vehicle displays, particularly for high-level automated vehicles (SAE level 3 or higher). Incorporating model-based approaches for understanding human emotion regulation, it seeks to enhance the user-vehicle interaction. A unique aspect of this workshop is the integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the design process. The workshop will explore generative AI’s potential in crafting contextual responses and its impact on user experience and interface design. The agenda includes brainstorming on various driving scenarios, developing emotion-oriented intervention methods, and rapid prototyping with AI tools. The anticipated outcome includes practical prototypes of affective user interfaces and insights on the role of AI in designing human-machine interactions. Through this workshop, we hope to contribute to making automated driving more accessible and enjoyable.

Artificial intelligence characterized as computing systems that perform tasks that humans do, such as learning, adapting, and synthesizing, as well as self-correcting and utilizing data for complex processing jobs. Integration of artificial intelligence into education has received much attention because it has the potential to revolutionize current approaches to teaching and learning this study has to explore student’s perception toward integration of Artificial intelligence tools in their academic experiences and also to explore the impact on their learning outcomes. For this study quantitative research approach has been used. A sample of 200 students selected from all the departments in the faculty of social sciences of Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi. Systematic sampling technique was used for data collection. In order to collect the data questionnaire was used. This research has been extracted from the M.Phil Dissertation. The study revealed that students who use artificial intelligence tools perform better on research work, examinations, assignments, presentations and overall coursework. As a result, artificial intelligence tools assist students in their learning processes and critical thinking. It develops their academic abilities, research work skills, academic grades, and self-efficacy. This study demonstrates that integrating artificial intelligence tools enhances students' academic performance, and self-efficacy. The results indicated that AI tools changed the way students learned and behaved academically.

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in art and design has disrupted the traditional creative landscape, leading to debates on the legitimacy of AI-generated art and the emergence of new markets such as non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The US Copyright Office’s February 21, 2023, ruling withdrawing copyright protection for AI-generated comic artwork, while protecting the accompanying text and arrangement, highlights the contested nature of AI art and suggests that significant human intervention in the creative process will be required for monetization. Whether considered content interpolation or content creation, AI generative content for the creation of art and design is here with human-AI collaboration. To explore the potential of AI tools in creative practice, this study introduced students in a digital art course to Craiyon and Midjourney generative AI tools, with DALL-E 2 selected as the primary tool due to its varied output. The students were tasked with selecting a preferred prompt from one tool and then reproducing the output from both tools. The results revealed significant variations in replicating the outputs of different AI tools and limited exploration of prompt engineering, leading to restrictions in the iterative process of artmaking. The students agreed that generative AI tools are not a substitute for human creativity and should be used for final projects. The study demonstrates the potential and limitations of integrating AI tools in art and design and suggests the need for further research in developing effective prompt engineering strategies.