• Home
  • Search
  • Interior Point Optimization of Low-Thrust Spacecraft Trajectories
  • https://doi.org/10.15368/theses.2021.124Copy DOI Icon

Interior Point Optimization of Low-Thrust Spacecraft Trajectories

  • Aug 1, 2021
  • Jordan D Frederiksen
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Low-thrust interplanetary spacecraft trajectory optimization poses a uniquely difficult problem to solve because of the inherent nonlinearities of the dynamics and constraints as well as the large size of the search space of possible solutions. Tools currently exist that optimize low-thrust interplanetary trajectories, but these tools are rarely openly available to the public, and when they are available they require multiple interfaces between multiple different packages. The goal of this work is to present a new piece of low-thrust interplanetary spacecraft trajectory optimization software that is open-source and entirely self-contained so that more people can have access to the ability to design interplanetary trajectories. To achieve this goal, a gradient-descent based nonlinear programming method, called the interior point method, was used. The nonlinear programming method was chosen so that results from this work could be compared and contrasted with results from Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization Suite (STOpS), which uses heuristics to iterate towards a solution. Interior point methods are popular because of their ability to handle large amounts of equality and inequality constraints, which is a characteristic that is valuable for low-thrust interplanetary spacecraft trajectories. The software developed, Interior Point Optimizer (IP Optimizer), was then validated against test cases with known solutions to ensure that the software delivered the intended results. Lastly, a constraint satisfaction, a minimum-time, and a maximum-final-mass optimization problem were solved and compared with literature to illustrate the advantages of IP Optimizer and the methods it employs. For the constraint satisfaction problem, IP Optimizer was able to find a solution that exactly satisfied the desired terminal constraints whereas STOpS had an error of 2.29 percent. In this case, IP Optimizer had a reduced runtime of 15 percent compared to STOpS as well. When minimizing time for a spacecraft transfer, IP Optimizer improved upon the solution found by STOpS by 5.3 percent. The speed of convergence for IP Optimizer was almost twice as fast as STOpS for this case. These results show that IP Optimizer is faster than STOpS at converging on a solution and the solution it converges to has a better objective value and more accurately satisfies the terminal constraints than STOpS. Lastly, the maximum-final-mass problem resulted in an objective value that was only 0.5 percent lower than the value found in literature.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations77

Applications of convex optimization in signal processing and digital communication

  • Jul 01, 2003
  • Mathematical Programming
  • Zhi-Quan Luo
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Experience with interior point optimization software for a fuel planning application

  • May 01, 1994
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • V.R Sherkat +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Nonlinear optimal power flow by a noninterior-point method based on Chen-Harker-Kanzow NCP-functions

  • May 24, 1998
  • G.L Torres +1
  • Research Article

Enhancing Robustness in Finite‐Strain Crystal Plasticity: An Interior Point Method With Sequential Rotation Updates

  • Feb 11, 2026
  • PAMM
  • Felix Steinmetz +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations250

Improved interior point method for OPF problems

  • Jan 01, 1999
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • J.A Momoh +1
  • Book Chapter

Optimization of Spacecraft Trajectories Using Nonlinear Programming

  • Jan 01, 1995
  • Bruce A Conway
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations7

Interior Point Filter Line Search: IPOPT

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Neculai Andrei
  • Research Article
  • Citations186

The quadratic interior point method solving power system optimization problems

  • Jan 01, 1994
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • J.A Momoh +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Energy Management of Industrial Energy Systems via Rolling Horizon and Hybrid Optimization: A Real-Plant Application in Germany

  • Jul 25, 2025
  • Energies
  • Loukas Kyriakidis +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Teaching large-scale optimization by an interior point approach

  • Jan 01, 1993
  • IEEE Transactions on Education
  • A Vannelli
  • Research Article

A generalized self-regular Kernel function for large-scale nonlinear optimization problems

  • Jan 01, 2026
  • AIMS Mathematics
  • Mounia Laouar +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Power System Reactive Power Optimization Based on Fuzzy Formulation and Interior Point Filter Algorithm

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Energy and Power Engineering
  • Zheng Fan +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

An interior-point algorithm for linear optimization based on a new barrier function

  • Jun 20, 2011
  • Applied Mathematics and Computation
  • Gyeong-Mi Cho
  • Research Article
  • Citations317

Maximum loadability of power systems using interior point nonlinear optimization method

  • Jan 01, 1997
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • G.D Irisarri +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Validation of measurement data using an interior point SQP

  • Jan 01, 1996
  • Computers and Chemical Engineering
  • D.J Kyriakopoulou +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.