• Home
  • Search
  • Interphase Cytogenetics at the Earliest Stages of Human Development
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6558-4_7Copy DOI Icon

Interphase Cytogenetics at the Earliest Stages of Human Development

  • Jan 1, 2013
  • Darren K. Griffin +4 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

The widespread use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) throughout the world provides the opportunity to study human development at the very earliest stages before implantation. Nonetheless, the study of human embryos poses a series of unique ethical and moral implications. The unique totipotent nature of a human embryo and its potential to develop into a child necessitates a level of restriction and regulatory control that is not present when studying other cell types. Although some governments outlaw any experimental procedure on human embryonic material, others allow it under appropriate control. In the latter case (e.g., in the UK), experimentation can be justified on the basis of development of a diagnostic test and/or the goal of improving patient care. A further challenge to effective study is the paucity of material available. Much of the work reported in this chapter arises from the study of only single nuclei. For these reasons, research on interphase cytogenetics in human preimplantation embryos is less advanced than in other cell types. Despite this, a fundamental insight into chromosome copy number and nuclear organization can be gleaned from this material through collaboration with an appropriate clinical program. As attested by other chapters in this book, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was first adopted for research, but clinical applications rapidly followed. Prenatal and cancer diagnostics are the best examples of this,, but the increasing use of assisted reproductive technologies, namely IVF, precipitated the use of FISH in the field of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). PGD is defined as the diagnosis of genetic disorders in human preimplantation embryos. The purpose is selective implantation of unaffected embryos in the hope of establishing genetically normal ongoing pregnancies. PGD by interphase cytogenetics was first applied for sexing (to screen for sex-linked disorders), then for chromosome translocations, and later for chromosome copy number. In the latter case, termed preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), families at risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes (referral categories include advanced maternal age and recurrent miscarriage) are targeted, rather than families at risk of transmitting inherited disorders in a classical Mendelian fashion. Clinical application of interphase cytogenetics in the IVF world has allowed the subsequent study of chromosome copy number and nuclear organization. This chapter provides an overview of interphase cytogenetics in human embryos, highlighting the progress and the sometimes contentious pitfalls that it has encountered.

Similar Papers
  • Front Matter
  • Citations4

Deep impact: sequencing embryo biopsy specimens at increasing depth

  • Jul 01, 2015
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Katharina Spath +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations154

Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics

  • Feb 06, 2013
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Javier Herrero +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations129

Three-parent in vitro fertilization: gene replacement for the prevention of inherited mitochondrial diseases

  • Dec 30, 2013
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Paula Amato +3
  • Abstract
  • Citations1

Gender does not impact the developmental rate of in vitro fertilization-derived human embryos as confirmed by day 3 blastomere biopsy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)

  • Mar 31, 2004
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • K Miller +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations324

Chromosome mosaicism in human embryos.

  • Sep 01, 1994
  • Biology of Reproduction
  • S Munné +3
  • Abstract
  • Citations13

All 23 Chromosomes have Significant Levels of Aneuploidy in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Couples

  • Feb 27, 2012
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • P.R Brezina +5
  • Abstract
  • Citations19

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy in embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not improve reproductive outcome in women over 35: a prospective controlled randomized study

  • Sep 01, 2007
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • S Debrock +5
  • Research Article

Analysis of the efficacy and safety of techniques used in pre-implantational genetic diagnosis in human embryos from in vitro Fertilization (IVF)

  • Mar 21, 2025
  • Caderno Pedagógico
  • Giovanna Magalhães Fernandes +7
  • Research Article

Non-invasive preimplantationsexingusingRT-PCRon the spent embryo culture media

  • Apr 01, 2019
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Mahnaz Esmaeili +4
  • Front Matter
  • Citations13

Next-generation sequencing: challenges in reproductive genetics

  • Mar 31, 2014
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Carmen Rubio
  • Research Article
  • Citations38

Lineage segregation in human pre-implantation embryos is specified by YAP1 and TEAD1.

  • Jun 09, 2023
  • Human Reproduction
  • Marius Regin +11
  • Research Article
  • Citations47

Preimplantation diagnosis

  • Dec 01, 1994
  • Prenatal Diagnosis
  • J D A Delhanty
  • Abstract

Thawing cryopreserved oocytes: genetic screening of thawed oocytes and ongoing pregnancy success rate

  • Aug 27, 2014
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Y.G Kramer +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations83

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis—An Overview

  • Mar 01, 2005
  • Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
  • Caroline Mackie Ogilvie +2
  • Research Article

Spindle dynamics and chromosome segregation in human preimplantation embryos.

  • Mar 11, 2026
  • Fertility and sterility
  • Filip Vasilev +6
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.