• Home
  • Search
  • Interpretable Tree‐Based Models for Predicting Short‐Term Rockburst Risk Considering Multiple Factors
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70513Copy DOI Icon

Interpretable Tree‐Based Models for Predicting Short‐Term Rockburst Risk Considering Multiple Factors

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

ABSTRACT Rockbursts are typical dynamic disasters in underground coal mines. Their formation and occurrence are influenced by multiple factors, including geological conditions, mining disturbances, and microseismic activities. Machine learning models can support early warning by forecasting high‐energy microseismic (MS) activity associated with elevated rockburst risk. However, many of these models are black boxes that are difficult for humans to understand, which may diminish their credibility and constrain their practical applicability. To establish interpretable models for short‐term rockburst prediction considering multiple factors, we assess five tree‐based models (decision tree, random forest, LightGBM, XGBoost, and CatBoost) using field databases from Gao Jiapu coal mine and utilize the model explanation method SHAP to interpret the models. A day is labeled as rockburst risk if its daily maximum MS energy exceeds 1 × 10⁵ J, otherwise no risk. The results revealed that CatBoost exhibited the highest overall performance, followed by LightGBM, and both the random tree and XGBoost performed better than the decision tree. When considering the influence of time window length, all models displayed optimal performance under a 3‐day time window. Specifically, CatBoost achieved F1 scores of 0.856, 0.778, and 0.807 for the 3‐day, 5‐day, and 10‐day time windows, respectively. Global feature importance analysis showed that the average energy, energy deviation, and cumulative energy were the three most important predictors. Furthermore, local SHAP values were drawn to reveal the complex underlying relationships between the 12 factors and model predictions. The results show that factors such as energy‐related factors, coal depth, and working face advance positively contribute to rockburst risk prediction. Conversely, fold distance, total frequency, and source concentration degree negatively impact the model outcomes. The findings suggest that incorporating CatBoost and the SHAP method holds great potential in developing interpretable models for accurate rockburst risk prediction.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

An Intelligent Rockburst Prediction Model Based on Scorecard Methodology

  • Nov 22, 2021
  • Minerals
  • Honglei Wang +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations93

Evolution of Stress Concentration and Energy Release Before Rock Bursts: Two Case Studies from Xingan Coal mine, Hegang, China

  • Dec 11, 2015
  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Gui-Feng Wang +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Prediction of white spot disease susceptibility in shrimps using decision trees based machine learning models

  • Dec 09, 2023
  • Applied Water Science
  • Tran Thi Tuyen +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Assessment of unconfined compressive strength of nano-doped fly ash-treated clayey soil using machine learning tools.

  • Sep 30, 2025
  • Scientific reports
  • Anish Kumar +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Machine Learning Analysis of Post-Operative Tumour Progression in Non-Functioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Pilot Study

  • Mar 19, 2024
  • Cancers
  • Ziad Hussein +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations102

Prediction of rockburst risk in underground projects developing a neuro-bee intelligent system

  • May 16, 2020
  • Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
  • Jian Zhou +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Parkinson’s Disease Classification Using Random Forest Kerb Feature Selection

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing
  • E Bharath +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Enhancing thermal comfort prediction in high-speed trains through machine learning and physiological signals integration

  • Mar 27, 2024
  • Journal of Thermal Biology
  • Wenjun Zhou +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations43

Spatio-temporal assessments of rockburst hazard combining b values and seismic tomography

  • Jan 31, 2017
  • Acta Geophysica
  • Jing Li +6
  • Research Article

Poster Session 11: Pediatric Urology Sunday, June 29, 2025 • 07:00-08:30.

  • Jun 05, 2025
  • Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
  • Editor Cuaj
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Analyzing and Explaining Black-Box Models for Online Malware Detection

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • IEEE Access
  • Harikha Manthena +3
  • Research Article

Novel Convolution Neural Network for Enhanced Network Attack Pattern Recognition

  • Sep 19, 2025
  • University of Bisha Journal for Basic and Applied Sciences
  • Salahaldeen Duraibi
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Explainable machine learning model incorporating social determinants of health to predict chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes patients.

  • May 09, 2025
  • Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders
  • Md Mohaimenul Islam +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

LLM meets ML: Data-efficient Anomaly Detection on Unstable Logs

  • Oct 09, 2025
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • Fatemeh Hadadi +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Evaluation of machine learning methods for the retrospective detection of ovarian cancer recurrences from chemotherapy data

  • May 01, 2024
  • ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
  • A.D Coles +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.