• Home
  • Search
  • Interpreting Weights in Multiple Criteria Decision Making
  • https://doi.org/10.6186/ijims.2016.27.2.7Copy DOI Icon

Interpreting Weights in Multiple Criteria Decision Making

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Many decision making problems of business and management are formulated in terms of Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM): given a set of alternatives evaluated with multiple criteria, find the alternative which according to the Decision Maker (DM), has the most preferred combination of criteria values (attributes), or rank alternatives from the most preferred one to the least preferred one. The MADM methods incorporate mechanisms of building preference models based on information obtained from the DM. In a wide variety of such methods, the DM is supposed to provide information in terms of weights of criteria, usually understood as criteria’s priorities. These weights serve as parameters of the method-pecific preference models. The DM can define weights directly, or by using special weight elicitation techniques such as AHP, MAVT and others. Our concerns are that when using weight-based methods, the DM cannot ensure the correctness of the preference model. First, different weight-based methods use different kinds of preference models, which prioritize criteria based on weights in different manners. Second, interpretation of weights in some MADM methods is far from intuitive. Thus, a situation may occur when an inexperienced DM thinks of weights differently than they actually work in the method, and expresses the preference information incorrectly. In this paper we demonstrate the differences between how weights are interpreted in several methods: simple additive weighting, TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE. We do it by comparing rankings produced with methods based on randomly generated data. We demonstrate that differences of interpreting weights significantly contribute to differences in produced rankings. A solution to this problem could be twofold: first, increasing awareness of differences between method-specific weight-based prioritizing mechanisms, and second, providing interpretations of weights for popular methods in the language understandable by the DMs.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Selection of Construction Materials using Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) Approach

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • International Journal of Technology
  • A Ranjith Kumar Reddy +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Comparative analysis of the sensitivity test of the SAW and WP methods in scholarship selection

  • May 31, 2023
  • Jurnal Teknik Informatika C.I.T Medicom
  • Wiwit Supriyanti
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

NetANPI: A network selection mechanism for LTE traffic offloading based on the Analytic Network Process

  • Sep 01, 2015
  • Ivan Martinez +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

A Spectrum Handoff Scheme for Optimal Network Selection in NEMO based Cognitive Radio Vehicular Networks: A Cost Function MADM Method based on Grey Theory based Approach

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Procedia Computer Science
  • Krishan Kumar
  • Research Article

سنجش توسعه زیرساختهای انرژی و ارتباطات نواحی روستایی در لرستان (رهیافت پرومته)

  • Jan 20, 2017
  • فرهاد برندک
  • Book Chapter

Use of MADM Techniques for Optimization of Thermal Performance of Ranque Hilsch Vortex Tube

  • May 05, 2023
  • K D Devade +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Research on the economic collaborative development evaluation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on hesitant triangular fuzzy information

  • Nov 04, 2023
  • Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems
  • Jun Wang
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Concurrent design of nanofluid for x-abilities using MADM approach

  • Jul 04, 2016
  • Benchmarking: An International Journal
  • Jyoti Prakash +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Multiple attribute decision making based on novel score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values, score matrix, and nonlinear programming model

  • Jun 15, 2023
  • Information Sciences
  • Shyi-Ming Chen +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Sensitivity analysis Decision techniques and weighting techniques in multiple attribute decision making Case Study (priority public transport systems in Qom)

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Cumhuriyet Science Journal
  • Hadi Merati +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations46

Survey and comparison of MADM methods for network selection access in heterogeneous networks

  • Jul 01, 2015
  • Mohamed Lahby +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Dombi weighted aggregation operators of neutrosophic Z-numbers for multiple attribute decision making in equipment supplier selection

  • Apr 18, 2022
  • Intelligent Decision Technologies
  • Jun Ye +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

An Approach for Solving Fuzzy MADM Problems

  • Aug 01, 1997
  • International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems
  • Chie-Bein Chen +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Multiple Attribute Decision Making Techniques Applied to Reusable Responsive Spacelift

  • Apr 23, 2007
  • Jeffrey Zweber +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Assessment of modern approach of water governance in the development of water exploitation systems in Sistan region

  • Dec 01, 2020
  • SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
  • Farzaneh Shahbakhsh +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.