Interprofessional Team Training With Virtual Reality: Acceptance, Learning Outcome, and Feasibility Evaluation Study

ABSTRACTHigh quality care relies on interprofessional teamwork. We developed a short simulation-based course for final year medical, nursing and nursing anaesthesia students, using scenarios from emergency medicine. The aim of this paper is to describe the adaptation of an interprofessional simulation course in an undergraduate setting and to report participants’ experiences with the course and students’ learning outcomes. We evaluated the course collecting responses from students through questionnaires with both closed-ended and open-ended questions, supplemented by the facilitators’ assessment of students’ performance. Our data is based on responses from 310 students and 16 facilitators who contributed through three evaluation phases. In the analysis, we found that students reported emotional activation and learning outcomes within the domains self-insight and stress management, understanding of the leadership role, insight into teamwork, and skills in team communication. In subsequent questionnaire studies students reported having gained insights about communication, teamwork and leadership, and they believed they would be better leaders of teams and/or team members after having completed the course. Facilitators’ observations suggested a progress in students’ non-technical skills during the course. The facilitators observed that nursing anaesthesia students seemed to be more comfortable in finding their role in the team than the two other groups. In conclusion, we found that an interprofessional simulation-based emergency team training course with a focus on leadership, communication and teamwork, was feasible to run on a regular basis for large groups of students. The course improved the students’ team skills and received a favourable evaluation from both students and faculty.

Extended-Reality Technologies: An Overview of Emerging Applications in Medical Education and Clinical Care.

The use of human cadavers and virtual reality simulation in endovascular training: A questionnaire of patient and professional opinion

Researchers (Lampert, et al., 2013; Zeichner, 2010; Grossman, et al., 2009a) recommend the use of rehearsals in teacher education classrooms to help preservice teachers (PST) bridge theory to practice. Rehearsals enable PSTs to practice teacher moves, such as asking purposeful questioning and engaging students in mathematical discourse during an episode of teaching a lesson (NCTM, 2014). During a rehearsal, the PST’s teacher education instructor provides coaching that helps the PST make flexible adjustments to their instruction. Using a phenomenological approach, this research investigates the use of Virtual Reality (VR) simulations to support PSTs learning to teach mathematics through rehearsals. The presentation will include samples of PSTs’ mathematics teaching episodes with attention to successes, challenges, and lessons learned from the use of VR simulations in teacher education classrooms.

Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery requires intensive training due to challenges such as loss of haptic feedback and depth perception. Traditional training methods include box trainers (BT), which offer realistic haptic feedback but lack objective performance assessment, and virtual reality (VR) simulators, which provide automated feedback but lack haptic feedback. This review, conducted at the Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University, examines the learning outcomes of VRsimulators with haptic feedback compared to BT. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines from December 2023 to April 2024. Research databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VR simulators with haptic feedback to BT in training medical students. Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and four were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were learning curves and learning effectswhile secondary outcomes included skill transfer to a surgical environment. The review analysed data from 125 participants across the studies. Results indicated that BTs demonstrated a superior learning curve, with participants achieving proficiency faster than those using VR. Both simulators showed significant learning effects; however, BTs resulted in greater improvements across more performance parameters. Regarding skill transfer to surgical environments, there was no significant difference between the two groups, suggesting both approaches effectively support surgical skill transfer. Overall, BT has a more effective learning curve and marginally better performance in skill acquisition. While VR with haptic feedback offers enhanced realism, it does not fully replicate the natural haptic feedback provided by BT. Further studies are needed to improve VR haptic feedback and its integration into training programs to enhance learning outcomes.

Immersive virtual reality (VR) simulations are increasingly being used in diverse educational and training contexts to supplement traditional learning methods. The high versatility of virtual laboratories allows students to take advantage of many benefits, like experiencing dangerous reactions, time-consuming protocols, or expensive equipment without the necessity of a real science laboratory. However, little research is currently available to support the efficacy and efficiency of this new learning tool. In this context, the main objective of this study was to assess the influence of biotechnology training by using immersive VR technologies on the student’s motivational and learning outcomes as compared with learning with conventional methods only. To this aim we tested two diverse strategies, respectively VR simulations were used in place of or in addition to the teacher’s introductory lesson of a hands-on laboratory experience. Aligned questionaries were administered before and after the proposed activities to assess theoretical knowledge, self-efficacy, interest in biotechnology, and engagement of the participants. We found that when the introductory lesson to a biotechnology hands-on laboratory is replaced with an equivalent immersive VR simulation, the student’s learning outcomes are lower with respect to the traditional approach. On the contrary, when VR simulations are integrated as an additional tool to the existing learning methods, higher learning outcomes were observed demonstrating a deeper understanding of the learning contents. Furthermore, our study showed that learning with immersive VR simulations motivates students more than the traditional methods, thus, using this new technology in addition to the existing educational methods in biotechnology could be considered as a win-win strategy to raise the attention of the students while increasing the learning outcomes.

We investigated the impact of a health sciences centre-wide, high-fidelity, simulation-based interprofessional team training program on participants’ knowledge, skills and attitudes towards teams and teamwork. Senior medical, nurse anaesthesia and allied health profession students participated in dual-scenario, simulation-based, interprofessional team training sessions with immediate debriefings about team-based competencies (2015–2017). Pre- and post-intervention, students completed the Interprofessional Teamwork (IPT) questionnaire and the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). Observers and students rated team performance using the Teamwork Assessment Scales (TAS). Descriptive statistics were determined for IPT and RIPLS items and TAS subscales; student Students from five health professions participated ( A health sciences centre-wide high-fidelity, simulation-based, interprofessional team training program improves students’ team-based behaviours, teamwork attitudes and interprofessional learning attitudes. Widespread adoption of such large-scale team training programs has the potential to improve teamwork among healthcare providers over time.

Introduction Currently there is little evidence on the role of virtual reality (VR) simulators for orthopaedic trauma simulation due to lack of validated commercially available platforms. We determined face validity and acceptability of the only VR haptic-enabled DHS fixation simulator as a potential training tool. Methods 52 medical students (naive to both DHS fixation and VR simulation) were voluntarily recruited and electronically randomised to two groups. Group 1 (training) performed five attempts whilst Group 2 (control) performed one attempt. After a week, both groups repeated the same number of attempts. Participants then filled in an eight-item questionnaire using a seven-point Likert scale (1–7). The mean score and Mann-Whitney U-test for significance (p Results No significant difference was found between both cohorts in all questionnaire responses, thus data was pooled and analysed as a unified cohort. Participants agreed that visual appearance of the external surgical field was realistic (mean score 4.8 [68.6%]) and that the haptic feedback was realistic (mean score 5.7 [81.4%]). The simulator was moderately accepted as an unthreatening learning environment (mean score 6.4 [91.4%]), subjects recognised the VR DHS simulator as a useful training tool (mean score 6.3 [90.0%]) and would recommend this modality to colleagues (mean score 6.3 [90%]). Moreover, participants strongly agreed that they enjoyed using the simulator (mean score 6.5 [92.9%]), that they would like to practise on a simulator before operating on a patient (mean score 6.5 [92.9%]) and they would like to train further on the simulator (mean score 6.5 [92.9%]). Conclusions The simulator was well received and participants moderately agreed that the VR DHS simulator would be a useful training tool and would recommend it to their colleagues. There was an overwhelming and unanimous demand among medical students and future surgeons for VR simulation technology in formal orthopaedic training. References Blyth P, Anderson IA, Stott NS. Virtual reality simulators in orthopaedic surgery: what do the surgeons think? J Surg Res 2006;131(1):133–9; discussion 140–2. Froelich JM, Milbrandt JC, Novicoff WM, et al . Surgical simulators and hip fractures: a role in residency training? J Surg Educ 2011;68(4):298–302.

BackgroundThe use of information communication technologies such as telemedicine has increased over the years, offering access to specialized healthcare even in remote locations. However, telemedicine in interprofessional team training is seldom included in medical or nursing programs, and little is known about how to practise these scenarios. This study aimed to explore how medical and nursing students experience teamwork when one team member is participating remotely and digitally.MethodsFollowing interprofessional team training in which one team member participated remotely, focus group interviews were conducted with three teams, each comprising one medical student and two nursing students (n = 9 students in total). The focus group interviews were analysed with thematic content analysis. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model was applied as a theoretical framework and served as a lens in the analysis.ResultsThree themes were identified in the analysis: challenging the dynamic of leadership, becoming familiar with a new setting, and finding new strategies to communicate.ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that future physicians and nurses need to enhance their knowledge of practicing teamwork through telemedicine during their education, as the use of telemedicine continues to grow.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-024-06104-8.

Virtual reality (VR) applications promise the safe, efficacious, and valid replication of scenarios encountered in modern neurosurgery, and a number of navigation- or dissection-related and endovascular simulators have been successfully deployed in the last 2 decades. Concurrently, neurosurgical training is changing, and VR simulations are expected to play a part in future training. To give an overview of currently available neurosurgical VR applications in the spectrum of desired applications and the outlook of the requirements to be met by future applications. The available literature was analyzed using structured Medline and PubMed searches. Relevant articles were retrieved and reviewed. When quantitative results were available, effect sizes were collated or estimated to check for publication bias. There has been a significant increase in publications concerning the use of VR in neurosurgery in the last 22 years (P < .001). Thirty-eight of 117 publications (32%) identified reported data regarding the use of a simulator by practitioners; 35 of these were reported as positive trials (92%). Twenty-two of 38 studies (58%) reported quantitative data with mostly small positive effect sizes (median, 1.41; interquartile range, 1.08-2). The use of VR simulators in endovascular surgery has the most robust basis, with 65% of studies reporting quantitative outcomes. Current neurosurgical VR applications focus on basic procedural skill acquisition and are valid and efficacious adjuncts to neurosurgical training. In the future, the development of complex procedural simulators, teamwork, and focus on validated measures will lead to robust framework of the use of VR over the entire career of a neurosurgeon.

Can virtual reality simulation be used for advanced bariatric surgical training?

Virtual reality simulation in training endoscopic skills: A systematic review

Background Learning and applying anatomy are essential but are studied and done through 2D tools and imaging techniques. This study aims to verify the usefulness of an additional 3D technique and ensure an improvement in the visualization of anatomical structures and pathological findings. Objective The study aims to examine the usefulness of virtual reality (VR) technology as an additional tool in medical diagnostics. Groups of students, residents, and specialists in surgery, radiology, and internal medicine evaluated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by answering a multiple-choice questionnaire. Subsequently, a virtual 3D display was used for processing. The questionnaire focused on topographical conditions and the transfer of academic knowledge into clinical application. The main objective was to determine anatomical understanding in a comparison between sectional image (2D) presentation and additional VR (3D) presentation, measured through correctly answered questions and processing time. The system usability scale (SUS) was integrated as another criterion for VR usability. Methods The cross-over study assessed 63 participants regarding their knowledge of liver anatomy and pathologies based on an interindividual comparison. Group formation according to the respective level of medical training was as follows: students (n=35), residents (n=15), and specialists (n=13). Participants answered 25 multiple-choice questions first using sectional imaging (MRI) in a 2D environment (computer screen) and afterward with the respective segmented 3D model visualized in a VR simulation. The main criteria for the analyses were the number of correctly answered questions and processing time. A customized SUS was used to analyze VR usability. Missing data analysis showed that there were no accounted missing data. Results The rate of correct answers improved significantly with the additional use of VR (F1,59=314.376; P&lt;.001). Using MRI, a significant difference was observed between students and residents (P=.04) and between students and specialists (P&lt;.001). In the VR condition, no significant differences between groups were found. In the MRI condition, significant differences in processing time were observed between students and specialists (P=.02) and between residents and specialists (P=.04). No differences existed between students and residents. With VR, processing time decreased significantly in all groups (F1,59=280.700; P&lt;.001). Significant differences between students and specialists (P=.02) and between students and residents (P=.004) remained. No notable differences between residents and specialists (P=.72) were found. The SUS showed a subjectively simplified answerability of the questions with additional use of VR. The usefulness and benefits for an additional use of VR were stated. Conclusions The additional use of VR suggests statistically significant improvements across all groups. VR seems to enable students and residents to participate in diagnostics and create treatment plans at an early stage. Transferred to clinical practice, this may lead to improvement in diagnostics and interventions. The lack of randomization and a potential learning effect are the main limitations to be addressed in future studies.

BackgroundThis study compared scenario-based generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) patient simulation with immersive 360° virtual reality (VR) simulation in terms of perceived clinical competence, cultural awareness, AI readiness, and simulation effectiveness among nursing students.MethodsThis cross-over randomised controlled study design was conducted from June 2024 to August 2024. Forty-four undergraduate nursing students from years 1–3 were randomised to receive either GenAI patient simulation (Group B) or 360° VR simulation (Group A) with a one-week washout period. Five self-reported questionnaires were used to measure clinical competency: the Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), Cultural Awareness Scale (CAS), Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS), Simulation Effectiveness Tool – Modified Questionnaire (SET-M), and a demographic questionnaire.ResultsBoth interventions significantly improved clinical competence, cultural awareness, and AI readiness. When administered first, GenAI patient simulation demonstrated greater initial effects on clinical competence and AI readiness compared to the 360° VR simulation, though both groups achieved similar improvements by study completion. At T1, Group B (receiving GenAI) demonstrated significantly larger improvements in CCQ total score [47.68 (95% CI: 36.68, 58.68), p < 0.001] compared to Group A (receiving 360° VR) [24.95 (95% CI: 13.96, 35.95), p < 0.001], with significant between-group difference [16.59 (95% CI: 2.77, 30.41), p = 0.020]. At T2 (post-crossover), both groups maintained significant improvements. For MAIRS-MS (measured at baseline and following each group’s GenAI exposure), Group B showed improvement from baseline to T1 [30.18 (95% CI: 23.35, 37.01), p < 0.001] while Group A showed improvement from baseline to T2 [16.64 (95% CI: 9.80, 23.47), p < 0.001], with significant between-group difference [12.09 (95% CI: 4.43, 19.75), p = 0.003]. Both groups experienced changes in CAS scores, though between-group differences were not statistically significant. For SET-M, most participants (75%) felt debriefing contributed to their learning, and 68.2% reported increased confidence in nursing assessment skills.ConclusionsThe findings provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness in enhancing perceived clinical outcomes among nursing students. Both 360° VR simulation and GenAI patient simulation may serve as effective teaching tools; however, GenAI patient simulation appeared to demonstrate a greater initial effect on clinical competence and AI readiness, although both interventions proved effective across all measured domains.Clinical trial registration/numberNot applicable.

Development of three-dimensional visualisation technology of the aerodynamic environment in a greenhouse using CFD and VR technology, Part 2: Development of an educational VR simulator