Introduction and Motivation

Discrete facility location problems are classified as types of facility location problems, wherein decisions on choosing facilities in specific locations are made to serve the demand points of customers, thus minimizing the total cost. The covering- and median-based problems are the common classified types of discrete facility location problems, which both comprise different classes of discrete problems as reviewed in this research. However, the discrete facility location problems shown in deterministic and known information and data under uncertain, vague, and ambiguous environments have usually been solved using intuitionistic fuzzy approaches. Neutrosophic is recently applied to tackle the uncertainty and ambiguity of information and data. This paper considered solving the discrete facility location problems under the neutrosophic environment, wherein the information of the locations, distances, times, and costs is uncertain. The mathematical models for the main types of neutrosophic discrete facility location problems, which remain unclear till now despite previous related works, are formulated in this study. Numerical examples demonstrated testing of the neutrosophic discrete models and comparison with the optimization solutions obtained from the normal situations.

Researchers have studied discrete location problems for a long time because of their importance in practice. The Discrete Ordered Median Problem (DOMP) generalizes discrete facility location problems. The DOMP generalizes the main facility location problems' objective functions such as the p-median, p-center and p-centdian location problems. As these problems, also known as the problems of location-allocation, have NP-hard structure, it is inevitable to use heuristic methods for solution. In this study, a metaheuristic algorithmic suggestion will be put forward by examining the DOMP to find optimal solutions. For that purpose, we proposed a Simulated Annealing (SA) metaheuristic with K-means Clustering Algorithm in initialization for the DOMP. Novel approaches for initial solution and K-exchange algorithm-based neighborhoods for local search were analysed. In addition, best level of selected parameters were determined by Taguchi method. Forty common p-median instances derived from OR-LIB were used to test the SA performance, and the results were compared with three state-of-art algorithms in the literature. According to the computational results, 21 best solutions were obtained on instances despite gap values and CPU times increasing proportionally to the scale of the instances. In a conclusion, the proposed clustering-based SA algorithm is competitive and can be a robust alternative for the DOMP.

To model flexible objectives for discrete location problems, ordered median functions can be applied. These functions multiply a weight to the cost of fulfilling the demand of a customer which depends on the position of that cost relative to the costs of fulfilling the demand of the other customers. In this paper a reformulated and more compact version of a covering model for the discrete ordered median problem (DOMP) is considered. It is shown that by using this reformulation better solution times can be obtained. This is especially true for some objectives that are often employed in location theory. In addition, the covering model is extended so that ordered median functions with negative weights are feasible as well. This type of modeling weights has not been treated in the literature on the DOMP before. We show that several discrete location problems with equity objectives are particular cases of this model. As a result, a mixed-integer linear model for this type of problems is obtained for the first time.

Acknowledgment to referees

The multiple facility location problem (MFLP) is to locate certain facilities so as to serve optimally a given set of customers, whose locations and requirements are known. When the facility locations have to be selected from a given set of candidate locations, the corresponding location problem becomes a discrete multiple facility location problem (DMFLP). In this study we consider a special case of DMFLP where multiple facilities that are of different type are to be placed (location decision) and assign customers to these facilities (allocation or assignment). The case will be discussed based on with and without interactions among new facilities. We then propose new heuristic solution methods and branch-and-bound algorithms. Computational results on randomly generated data in comparison with optimal solutions indicate that the new methods are both accurate and efficient.

Locating certain facilities in predetermined sites is named the multiple facility location problems (MFLP). The objective of these kinds of problems is locating facilities to serve a given set of customers so that candidate sites and requirements are known. When the new facility sites have to be selected from a given set of candidate sites, the mentioned location problem becomes a discrete multiple facility location problem (DMFLP). In this paper, a special approach of DMFLP is considered where different multiple facilities have to be placed (location decision) and also customers have to be assigned to these facilities (allocation or assignment). The mathematical model of the proposed problem is developed, and with respect to the complexity of solving the mathematical model, especially in large scale, a new hybrid approach is proposed based on tabu search algorithm to solve the problem at each scale. Computational results on several randomly generated problems in comparison with a new proposed lower bound obtained from Lagrangian relaxation indicate that the proposed hybrid approach is both accurate and efficient.

A quadtree-based allocation method for a class of large discrete Euclidean location problems

On solving the discrete location problems when the facilities are prone to failure

Multi-supply multi-capacitated p-median location optimization via a hybrid bi-level intelligent algorithm

Uncapacitated Facility Location (UFL) Problems are, in general, modelled as mixed integer programming problems, which are known as NP-hard problems. In recent years, a few publications have appeared on the metaheuristics for solving UFL problems, discussing the performance of particular implementations of metaheuristics for small and middle size UFL benchmarks. The large-scale problems remain untouched. The approach presented in this paper attempts to tackle them with a metaheuristics combining two well-known approaches. The idea is to enable algorithm searching through solution space by taking advantage of both underlying approaches in order to avoid local minima. The power of simulated annealing (SA) in local search and that of the evolutionary approach in global search have been brought together to obtain the desired solution quality within a shorter time.

Randomized decision making refers to the process of making decisions randomly according to the outcome of an independent randomization device, such as a dice roll or a coin flip. The concept is unconventional, and somehow counterintuitive, in the domain of mathematical programming, in which deterministic decisions are usually sought even when the problem parameters are uncertain. However, it has recently been shown that using a randomized, rather than a deterministic, strategy in nonconvex distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems can lead to improvements in their objective values. It is still unknown, though, what is the magnitude of improvement that can be attained through randomization or how to numerically find the optimal randomized strategy. In this paper, we study the value of randomization in mixed-integer DRO problems and show that it is bounded by the improvement achievable through its continuous relaxation. Furthermore, we identify conditions under which the bound is tight. We then develop algorithmic procedures, based on column generation, for solving both single- and two-stage linear DRO problems with randomization that can be used with both moment-based and Wasserstein ambiguity sets. Finally, we apply the proposed algorithm to solve three classical discrete DRO problems: the assignment problem, the uncapacitated facility location problem, and the capacitated facility location problem and report numerical results that show the quality of our bounds, the computational efficiency of the proposed solution method, and the magnitude of performance improvement achieved by randomized decisions. Summary of Contribution: In this paper, we present both theoretical results and algorithmic tools to identify optimal randomized strategies for discrete distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems and evaluate the performance improvements that can be achieved when using them rather than classical deterministic strategies. On the theory side, we provide improvement bounds based on continuous relaxation and identify the conditions under which these bound are tight. On the algorithmic side, we propose a finitely convergent, two-layer, column-generation algorithm that iterates between identifying feasible solutions and finding extreme realizations of the uncertain parameter. The proposed algorithm was implemented to solve distributionally robust stochastic versions of three classical optimization problems and extensive numerical results are reported. The paper extends a previous, purely theoretical work of the first author on the idea of randomized strategies in nonconvex DRO problems by providing useful bounds and algorithms to solve this kind of problems.

A discrete version of particle swarm optimization (DPSO) is employed to solve uncapacitated facility location (UFL) problem which is one of the most widely studied in combinatorial optimization. In addition, a hybrid version with a local search is defined to get more efficient results. The results are compared with a continuous particle swarm optimization (CPSO) algorithm and two other metaheuristics studies, namely, genetic algorithm (GA) and evolutionary simulated annealing (ESA). To make a reasonable comparison, we applied to same benchmark suites that are collected fromOR‐library. In conclusion, the results showed thatDPSOalgorithm is slightly better thanCPSOalgorithm and competitive withGAandESA.

Previous chapter Next chapter Full AccessProceedings Proceedings of the 2012 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)Inapproximability of the Multi-level Uncapacitated Facility Location ProblemRavishankar Krishnaswamy and Maxim SviridenkoRavishankar Krishnaswamy and Maxim Sviridenkopp.718 - 734Chapter DOI:https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973099.59PDFBibTexSections ToolsAdd to favoritesExport CitationTrack CitationsEmail SectionsAboutAbstract In this paper, we present improved inapproximability results for the k-level uncapacitated facility location problem. In particular, we show that there is no polynomial time approximation algorithm with performance guarantee better than 1.539 unless NP is contained in DTIME(nO(log log n)) for the case when k = 2. For the case of general k (tendining to infinity) we obtain a better hardness factor of 1.61. Interestingly, our results show that the two-level problem is computationally harder than the well known uncapacitated facility location problem (k = 1) since the best known approximation guarantee for the latter problem is 1.488 due to Li [22], and our inapproximability is a factor of 1.539 for the two-level problem. The only inapproximability result known before for this class of metric facility location problems is the bound of 1.463 due to Guha and Khuller [17], which holds even for the case of k = 1. Previous chapter Next chapter RelatedDetails Published:2012ISBN:978-1-61197-210-8eISBN:978-1-61197-309-9 https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973099Book Series Name:ProceedingsBook Code:PR141Book Pages:xiii + 1757

The sample average approximation (SAA) approach is a widely used technique, based on Monte‐Carlo simulation, often applied to large‐scale stochastic optimization problems. In this approach, a set of sample average problems with multiple copies of sampled scenarios are generated and solved exactly. In other words, there is an implicit assumption that the sample average problems are solvable to optimality. In some instances, however, the sample average problems might be NP‐hard problems, often difficult or impractical to solve to optimality. In this article, we broaden the scope of the SAA approach and show that even without solving the sample problems to optimality, by combining a heuristic and a lower bounding approach, high‐quality solutions with tight confidence bounds on the optimal solution value can be obtained. We demonstrate this “inexact SAA approach” on two problems. First, we apply it to the Stochastic Connected Facility Location (SConFL) problem, the motivating application for this article, that arises in the design of telecommunications networks. As an additional application, we also use it for the Stochastic Uncapacitated Facility Location (SUFL) problem. Our computational results demonstrate the effectiveness of the inexact SAA approach. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 70(1), 19–33 2017

We consider a class of problems where a given number p of facility locations must be selected from a set of s potential locations so as to optimize a pre-determined fitness function. There exist outstanding location problems in this class, such as the p-median, max-covering, MAXCAP, and MAXPROFIT problems. These location problems may contain more than a single global optimal solution. Obtaining multiple global optimal solutions allows us to consider other characteristics in the process of selecting the preferred solution. In [B. Pelegrín, J. Redondo, P. Fernández, I. García, and P. Ortigosa, GASUB: Finding global optima to discrete location problems by a genetic-like algorithm, J. Glob. Optim. 38 (2007), pp. 249–264], a new ‘multimodal’ algorithm (gasub) was presented for solving the previously mentioned location problems. In the paper, the algorithm was fine-tuned to obtain a single global optimum (with 100% success) as fast as possible, and it was compared with two widely used techniques, that is, the standard optimizer Xpress-MP [Xpress-MP, Dashoptimization, 2004.] and the Multi Start Heuristic. In this paper, we propose a new set of parameter values so that gasub can explore the space more deeply and consequently find several alternative global optimal solutions. Moreover, two coarse-grain parallelizations of gasub are presented, cggasub and cggasub_mo. cggasub is able to reduce the computational time of gasub where solutions of the same quality are generated, while cggasub_mo finds more alternative global optima than the sequential version and spending similar computational time in the process. gasub, with the new parameter setting and also the parallel algorithms, will be evaluated using a comprehensive computational set of experiments. Additionally, some criteria can also be used to select one of the known global optimal solutions when several alternatives optimize the corresponding objective function.