• Home
  • Search
  • Investigating Compressive Nonlinearity Using Forward Masking Auditory Brainstem Response in Humans.
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240102Copy DOI Icon

Investigating Compressive Nonlinearity Using Forward Masking Auditory Brainstem Response in Humans.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Background: The behavioral investigation of compressive nonlinearity (CNL) can be achieved by comparing the growth of forward masking (FM) between on-frequency and off-frequency maskers. Because the off-frequency masker exhibits linear behavior at the characteristic frequency whereas the on-frequency masker functions nonlinearly, comparing the experimental outcomes using scalp-recorded auditory brainstem response (ABR) measures provides an objective estimation of auditory physiology.Purpose: The study aimed to examine CNL using ABR parameters, such as Vth peak latency or amplitude, using probe stimuli frequencies ranging from 0.5–4 kilohertz (kHz), which employs both on- and off-frequency FM methods.Research Design: An experimental within-group research design was adopted for the study.Study Sample: The study was conducted in 31 healthy individuals aged 18–45 years (mean age of 27.88 ± 8.589 years).Data Collection and Analysis: The ABR was recorded employing a tone-on-tone FM paradigm for probe stimuli frequencies ranging from 0.5–4 kHz. The experiment was done under unmasked and forward-masked conditions (on- and off-frequency FM with varying masker intensity from 50–80 decibels [dB] sound pressure level [SPL]). The data for latency and amplitude were statistically analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA), two-way RM-ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc tests between and within different probe stimuli in different conditions. Further, a paired t test compared the slope across FM conditions.Results: A gradual shift in Vth peak latency and a reduction in response amplitude was observed in proportion to the increase in masker intensity for both masking conditions across all probe stimuli, with a more pronounced shift in on-frequency FM. However, no significant difference in latency was found between the masker intensities of 60–70 dB SPL in either masking condition. Additionally, the growth of masking showed a steep slope in the on-frequency FM with a smaller R² value.Conclusions: Objective electrophysiologic measures are instrumental in accurately estimating CNL because these measures provide robust, efficient, and reliable insights into the intricate functioning of the auditory system without reliance on a subjective behavioral response.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Effect of hormone replacement therapy on the auditory brainstem response of postmenopausal women.

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • The International Tinnitus Journal
  • Taciana Sarmento Cardoso De Oliveira +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Auditory brainstem response morphology and analysis in very preterm neonatal intensive care unit infants

  • Sep 06, 2011
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Saskia Coenraad +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Intensity effects in forward masking: Implications for psychophysical tuning curves

  • May 01, 1978
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Gregory P Widin +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Thalamocortical abnormalities in auditory brainstem response patterns distinguish DSM-IV bipolar disorder type I from schizophrenia

  • Aug 13, 2014
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Mia Sköld +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Auditory Brainstem Response Changes during Exposure to GSM-900 Radiation: An Experimental Study

  • Nov 16, 2010
  • Audiology and Neurotology
  • Antigoni E Kaprana +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Correlation between cVEMP and ABR for the Evaluation of Vestibular Migraine.

  • Sep 03, 2019
  • The Journal of International Advanced Otology
  • Mehmet Sürmeli +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements in Newborns: Which Electrode Placement Is Better?

  • Jul 10, 2020
  • Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
  • Oznur Yigit +5
  • Research Article

Predicting frequency selectivity in forward masking from simultaneous masking

  • May 01, 1983
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Robert A Lutfi +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Killer or helper? The mechanism underlying the role of adenylate activated kinase in sound conditioning

  • Sep 07, 2022
  • Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
  • Rui Zhao +6
  • Research Article

Newborn Auditory Brainstem Response and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

  • Nov 01, 2025
  • Journal of neuroscience research
  • Sarah E Maylott +8
  • Research Article

Auditory brainstem function in migraine with aura and without aura: a comparative study

  • Mar 02, 2026
  • The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
  • Mohammad Shawkat Ali +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Otologic safety of intratympanic N-acetylcysteine in an animal model.

  • Oct 01, 2023
  • International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
  • Ching Yee Chan +8
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations196

Deafness and Stria Vascularis Defects in S1P2 Receptor-null Mice

  • Apr 01, 2007
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Mari Kono +10
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Prevalence of hearing loss in Rett syndrome.

  • Apr 09, 2003
  • Developmental medicine and child neurology
  • Joseph P Pillion +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Normalization of Bone Conduction Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses in Normal Hearing Individuals.

  • Sep 03, 2019
  • The Journal of International Advanced Otology
  • Tuba Türkman +6
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.