• Home
  • Search
  • Investigating Quantum Machine Learning Frameworks and Simulating Quantum Approaches
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.62019/abbdm.v4i4.232Copy DOI Icon

Investigating Quantum Machine Learning Frameworks and Simulating Quantum Approaches

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Quantum machine learning (QML) has emerged as a promising field, combining the power of quantum computing with classical machine learning techniques to solve complex computational tasks. As the demand for efficient quantum simulations grows, multiple QML frameworks, including PennyLane, Qiskit, and TensorFlow Quantum (TFQ), have been developed to facilitate hybrid quantum-classical computations. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of three leading QML frameworks PennyLane, Qiskit, and TensorFlow Quantum in simulating quantum machine learning models, focusing on accuracy, execution time, and noise tolerance. The study examined three leading quantum machine learning (QML) frameworks PennyLane (v0.24), Qiskit (v0.43.2), and TensorFlow Quantum (TFQ, v0.7) each tested on a 64-bit Ubuntu Linux system with an Intel Core i7 processor, 32 GB RAM, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 GPU. Quantum algorithms like variational quantum circuits (VQCs) and quantum support vector machines (QSVMs) were simulated using these frameworks. Various quantum gates, including Pauli-X, Y, Z, Hadamard, CNOT, and Rotation gates (Rx, Ry, Rz), were used for parameter optimization and quantum superposition. The Iris and MNIST datasets were adapted for quantum encoding using Amplitude and Angle Encoding for binary classification tasks. Simulations were run on classical computers, while select circuits were executed on IBM Quantum’s Falcon r5.11 processor to compare hardware performance. PennyLane achieved the highest accuracy (92%) in quantum simulations, excelling in hybrid quantum-classical model integration. TensorFlow Quantum provided the fastest execution time, especially in classical simulations, making it suitable for rapid prototyping. Qiskit produced deeper quantum circuits but had higher error rates (6%) on real quantum hardware, highlighting noise and decoherence effects. The VQC models optimized by stochastic gradient descent (SGD) showed significant improvements in model performance, and QSVMs effectively classified both linearly separable and non-separable datasets, demonstrating the potential of quantum algorithms over classical approaches. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of the results (p < 0.05). PennyLane is the most robust framework for hybrid quantum-classical models, while TensorFlow Quantum is suited for rapid prototyping. Qiskit, despite longer execution times, excels in hardware implementation. The choice of framework should align with the specific needs of quantum machine learning tasks.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Implementation and Performance Evaluation of Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms for Binary Classification

  • Nov 28, 2024
  • Software
  • Surajudeen Shina Ajibosin +1
  • Research Article

Quantum Machine Learning Techniques for Network Defense: Comparative Study of Quantum vs. Classical Approaches

  • Dec 19, 2024
  • International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM)
  • Rosemary J +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Quantum Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Cyber Security Audits

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal
  • Venkatasubramanian Ganapathy
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Quantum Machine Learning for Enhanced Cybersecurity: Proposing a Hypothetical Framework for Next-Generation Security Solutions

  • Dec 30, 2024
  • Journal of Technologies Information and Communication
  • Forhad Hossain +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations38

Higgs analysis with quantum classifiers

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • EPJ Web of Conferences
  • Vasilis Belis +6
  • Research Article

Quantum Machine Learning: Algorithms, Applications, and Limitations

  • Mar 30, 2024
  • Journal of Science Technology and Engineering Research
  • Mohammed Madouri +1
  • Research Article

Robustness of Neural Networks: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses

  • Apr 15, 2025
  • International Journal on Advanced Electrical and Computer Engineering
  • Akash Verma +1
  • Research Article

A Survey on Quantum Machine Learning Applications in Medicine and Healthcare

  • Feb 05, 2026
  • Applied Sciences
  • Idzikowski Radosław +3
  • Research Article

Quantum-Enhanced Plant Disease Detection: A Comparative Study of QSVM vs SVM and QCNN vs CNN

  • Oct 23, 2025
  • International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management
  • Prof K Venkata Rao +1
  • Supplementary Content

Investigating Parameter Initialization Techniques in Variational Quantum Circuits

  • Dec 01, 2024
  • Jack R Cunningham
  • Book Chapter

Quantum machine learning: revolutionizing artificial intelligence and big data analytics

  • Jan 26, 2026
  • Harman Singh +3
  • Book Chapter

Quantum Computing for Nanomaterials: Accelerating Material Discovery

  • Nov 10, 2025
  • Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications
  • Chandra Mouli Penugonda +3
  • Conference Article

Quantum Machine Learning for Smart Grid Load Balancing

  • Nov 13, 2025
  • Guan Hong +1
  • Conference Article

Quantum Machine Learning for Disease Prediction: A Comparative and Multimodal Study on Early-Stage and Chronic Conditions

  • Nov 28, 2025
  • Nitika Bahl +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

Supervised Machine Learning Strategies for Investigation of Weird Pattern Formulation from Large Volume Data Using Quantum Computing

  • Jul 22, 2021
  • Mukta Nivelkar +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.