Is speech processing faster for familiar talkers?

Speech perception training can be a highly effective intervention to improve perception and language abilities in children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Most studies of speech perception training, however, only measure gains immediately following training. Only a minority of cases include a follow-up assessment after a period without training. A critical unanswered question was whether training-related benefits are retained for a period of time after training has stopped. A primary goal of this investigation was to determine whether children retained training-related benefits 4 to 6 weeks after they completed 16 hours of formal speech perception training. Training was comprised of either auditory or speechreading training, or a combination of both. Also important is to determine if "booster" training can help increase gains made during the initial intensive training period. Another goal of the study was to investigate the benefits of providing home-based booster training during the 4- to 6-week interval after the formal training ceased. The original investigation ( Tye-Murray et al. 2022 ) compared the effects of talker familiarity and the relative benefits of the different types of training. We predicted that the children who received no additional training would retain the gains after the completing the formal training. We also predicted that those children who completed the booster training would realize additional gains. Children, 6 to 12 years old, with hearing loss who had previously participated in the original randomized control study returned 4 to 6 weeks after the conclusion to take a follow-up speech perception assessment. The first group (n = 44) returned after receiving no formal intervention from the research team before the follow-up assessment. A second group of 40 children completed an additional 16 hours of speech perception training at home during a 4- to 6-week interval before the follow-up speech perception assessment. The home-based speech perception training was a continuation of the same training that was received in the laboratory formatted to work on a PC tablet with a portable speaker. The follow-up speech perception assessment included measures of listening and speechreading, with test items spoken by both familiar (trained) and unfamiliar (untrained) talkers. In the group that did not receive the booster training, follow-up testing showed retention for all gains that were obtained immediately following the laboratory-based training. The group that received booster training during the same interval also maintained the benefits from the formal training, with some indication of minor improvement. Clinically, the present findings are extremely encouraging; the group that did not receive home-based booster training retained the benefits obtained during the laboratory-based training regimen. Moreover, the results suggest that self-paced booster training maintained the relative training gains associated with talker familiarity and training type seen immediately following laboratory-based training. Future aural rehabilitation programs should include maintenance training at home to supplement the speech perception training conducted under more formal conditions at school or in the clinic.

Background: In the 1950s, with monitored live voice testing, the vu meter time constant and the shortdurations and amplitude modulation characteristics of monosyllabic words necessitated the use of the carrierphrase amplitude tomonitor (indirectly) the presentation level of the words. This practice continues withrecorded materials. To relieve the carrier phrase of this function, first the influence that the carrier phrasehas on word recognition performance needs clarification, which is the topic of this study.<br />Purpose: Recordings of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by two female speakers were usedto compare word recognition performances with and without the carrier phrases when the carrier phraseand test word were (1) in the same utterance stream with the words excised digitally from the carrier (VA-1speaker) and (2) independent of one another (VA-2 speaker). The 50-msec segment of the vowel in thetarget word with the largest root mean square amplitude was used to equate the target word amplitudes.<br />Research Design: A quasi-experimental, repeated measures design was used.<br />Study Sample: Twenty-four young normal-hearing adults (YNH; M = 23.5 years; pure-tone average[PTA] = 1.3-dB HL) and 48 older hearing loss listeners (OHL; M = 71.4 years; PTA = 21.8-dB HL) participatedin two, one-hour sessions.<br />Data Collection and Analyses: Each listener had 16 listening conditions (2 speakers 3 2 carrier phraseconditions 3 4 presentation levels) with 100 randomized words, 50 different words by each speaker.Each word was presented 8 times (2 carrier phrase conditions 3 4 presentation levels [YNH, 0- to24-dB SL; OHL, 6- to 30-dB SL]). The 200 recorded words for each condition were randomized as 8,25-word tracks. In both test sessions, one practice track was followed by 16 tracks alternated betweenspeakers and randomized by blocks of the four conditions. Central tendency and repeated measuresanalyses of variance statistics were used.<br />Results: With the VA-1 speaker, the overall mean recognition performances were 6.0% (YNH) and 8.3%(OHL) significantly better with the carrier phrase than without the carrier phrase. These differences werein part attributed to the distortion of some words caused by the excision of the words from the carrierphrases. With the VA-2 speaker, recognition performances on the with and without carrier phrase conditionsby both listener groups were not significantly different, except for one condition (YNH listeners at8-dB SL). The slopes of the mean functions were steeper for the YNH listeners (3.9%/dB to 4.8%/dB) thanfor the OHL listeners (2.4%/dB to 3.4%/dB) and were <1%/dB steeper for the VA-1 speaker than for theVA-2 speaker. Although the mean results were clear, the variability in performance differences betweenthe two carrier phrase conditions for the individual participants and for the individual words was strikingand was considered in detail.<br />Conclusion: The current data indicate that word recognition performances with and without the carrierphrase (1) were different when the carrier phrase and target word were produced in the same utterancewith poorer performances when the target words were excised from their respective carrier phrases(VA-1 speaker), and (2) were the same when the carrier phrase and target word were produced as independentutterances (VA-2 speaker).<br />See the Supplementary Data tab for supplementary materials.

Context and repetition effects in lexical decision and recognition memory

During a lexical decision task, lexical decision making can be distinguished from lexical retrieval. Lexical decision making is independent of stimulus modality and not reflected in the decision times, whereas the opposite holds for lexical retrieval. In neuroimaging studies investigating lexical decision tasks with either visual or auditory stimuli these two processes have so far been confused. Therefore, it is not clear whether the activation of Broca's region, consisting of the left Brodmann's area (BA) 44 and BA 45, reported in such studies really reflects lexical decision making. The present event-related fMRI study investigated the role of Broca's region in lexical decision by analyzing brain activation that is independent of stimulus modality or decision times. Twenty-two healthy participants performed lexical decisions on visual and auditory real words and pseudo-words. The left BA 44 was conjointly activated during visual and auditory lexical decisions as compared to rest indicating the modality-independent involvement of BA 44 in lexical decision tasks in general. To identify brain activation related to lexical decision making rather than lexical retrieval the decision times were entered as covariates into the fMRI analysis. In this analysis, the left BA 44 was activated for visual and for auditory lexical decision making. These results indicate that the left BA 44 as a distinct sub-part of Broca's region plays an important role in lexical decision making independently of stimulus modality and decision times.

Backward priming was examined at 150- and 500-msec prime-target stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) using visually presented primes and targets in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks. Two kinds of backward relations were used: compound items for which targets and primes formed a word in the backward direction (e.g., prime: HOP; target: bell), and noncompound items for which targets and primes did not form a word but were associatively related in the backward but not the forward direction (e.g., prime: BABY; target: stork). Results showed that backward priming effects were equivalent for compounds and noncompounds. However, for lexical decisions, backward priming occurred at both SOAs, whereas for pronunciation, it occurred only at the 150-msec SOA. We discuss how this SOA-dissociated backward priming effect in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks poses a serious challenge for all theories of semantic priming.

This study examines the factors affecting word recognition in a language with a consistent system to map letters into sounds; Spanish. The influence of semantics on the recognition of words in languages with inconsistent mappings, such as English, is well documented. Not much is known for other languages. A lexical decision task and two category verification tasks with varying levels of semantic complexity were used. In contrast to English, none of the semantic variables entered into the analyses had a significant impact on lexical decision latencies or errors. Imageability showed an influence on responses to both category verification tasks while the effect of connectivity was marginally significant in the category verification task with the greatest semantic complexity. Results indicate that word recognition decisions can be made without the involvement of central components of the semantic system. The role of semantics in word recognition in languages with consistent spelling systems will be discussed.

The lexical decision (LD) and naming (NAM) tasks are ubiquitous paradigms that employ printed word identification. They are major tools for investigating how factors like morphology, semantic information, lexical neighborhood and others affect identification. Although use of the tasks is widespread, there has been little research into how performance in LD or NAM relates to reading ability, a deficiency that limits the translation of research with these tasks to the understanding of individual differences in reading. The present research was designed to provide a link from LD and NAM to the specific variables that characterize reading ability (e.g., decoding, sight word recognition, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension) as well as to important reading-related abilities (phonological awareness and rapid naming). We studied 99 adults with a wide range of reading abilities. LD and NAM strongly predicted individual differences in word identification, less strongly predicted vocabulary size and did not predict comprehension. Fluency was predicted but with differences that depended on the way fluency was defined. Finally, although the tasks did not predict individual differences in rapid naming or phonological awareness, the failures nevertheless assisted in understanding the cognitive mechanisms behind these reading-related abilities. The results demonstrate that LD and NAM are important tools for the study of individual differences in reading.

Lexical decision tasks have been used to study both shifts of attention and semantic processing in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Whereas other laboratories have reported normal levels of semantic priming among PD patients, our laboratory has reported abnormally large levels. In this study, two experiments were performed to determine the influence of task structure on the extent of semantic priming during lexical decision-making and pronunciation tasks among PD patients and neurologically healthy controls. In Experiment 1, the effect of Prime Dominance (the ratio of category to neutral trials) on lexical decision-making was studied. Although equal numbers of word and nonword trials were presented, half of the PD patients and controls were studied under Category Prime Dominance (category : neutral prime ratio of 2:1) and half were studied under Neutral Prime Dominance (category : neutral prime ratio of 1:2). In Experiment 2, PD and control participants were studied on lexical decision-making and pronunciation tasks where twice as many words as nonword trials were presented, consistent with other studies from our laboratory. In Experiment 1, we found no group differences in the magnitude of priming and no effect of Prime Dominance. Moreover, the findings were similar in pattern and magnitude to results published by Neely (1977). In Experiment 2, we observed larger priming effects among PD patients than among controls, but only on the lexical decision (LD) task. These results support the hypothesis that abnormally large category-priming effects appear in LD studies of PD patients when the number of word trials exceeds the number of nonword trials. Furthermore, increased lexical priming in PD appears to be due to processes operating during the decision-making period that follows presentation of the lexical target.

Objective The goal of this study was to assess recognition of foreign-accented speech of varying intelligibility and linguistic complexity in older adults. It is important to understand the factors that influence the recognition of this commonly encountered type of speech, in a population that remains understudied in this regard. Design A repeated measures design was used. Listeners repeated back linguistically simple and complex sentences heard in noise. The sentences were produced by three talkers of varying intelligibility: one native American English, one foreign-accented talker of high intelligibility and one foreign-accented talker of low intelligibility. Percentage word recognition in sentences was measured. Study sample Twenty-five older listeners with a range of hearing thresholds participated. Results We found a robust interaction between talker intelligibility and linguistic complexity. Recognition accuracy was higher for simple versus complex sentences, but only for the native and high intelligibility foreign-accented talkers. This pattern was present after effects of working memory capacity and hearing acuity were taken into consideration. Conclusion Older listeners exhibit qualitatively different speech processing strategies for low versus high intelligibility foreign-accented talkers. Differences in recognition accuracy for words presented in simple versus in complex sentence contexts only emerged for speech over a threshold of intelligibility.

Previous research suggests that the right visual field advantage on the lexical decision task occurs independent of the visual quality of stimuli [Chiarello, C., Senehi, J., & Soulier, M. (1986). Viewing conditions and hemisphere asymmetry for the lexical decision. Neuropsychologia, 24(4), 521–529]. However, previous studies examining these effects have had methodological limitations that were addressed and controlled for in the present study. Participants performed a divided visual field, lexical decision task for words that varied in size (Experiment 1) and visibility (Experiment 2). Results showed a quality by visual field interaction effect. In both experiments, response times were faster for targets presented to the right visual field in the high quality (i.e., large font, high visibility) conditions; however, visual quality resulted in no differences for targets presented to the left visual field. Furthermore, this quality by visual field interaction effect was only observed when the target was a word. These results suggest that the left hemisphere advantage for lexical decision depends on the perceptual quality of targets, consistent with an early stage of processing account of hemispheric asymmetry during lexical decision. Findings are discussed within the context of word recognition and decision-based models.

Sereno, O'Donnell, and Sereno (2009) reported that words are recognized faster in a lexical decision task when their referents are physically large than when they are small, suggesting that "semantic size" might be an important variable that should be considered in visual word recognition research and modelling. We sought to replicate their size effect, but failed to find a significant latency advantage in lexical decision for "big" words (cf. "small" words), even though we used the same word stimuli as Sereno et al. and had almost three times as many subjects. We also examined existing data from visual word recognition megastudies (e.g., English Lexicon Project) and found that semantic size is not a significant predictor of lexical decision performance after controlling for the standard lexical variables. In summary, the null results from our lab experiment--despite a much larger subject sample size than Sereno et al.--converged with our analysis of megastudy lexical decision performance, leading us to conclude that semantic size does not matter for word recognition. Discussion focuses on why semantic size (unlike some other semantic variables) is unlikely to play a role in lexical decision.

Frontiers Events is a rapidly growing calendar management system dedicated to the scheduling of academic events. This includes announcements and invitations, participant listings and search functionality, abstract handling and publication, related events and post-event exchanges. Whether an organizer or participant, make your event a Frontiers Event!

The brain tracks incoming speech by aligning the phase of its low-frequency endogenous oscillatory activity to the slow amplitude modulations in the speech signal and is modulated by various bottom-up and top-down factors such as speech acoustics or selective attention. However, it is unclear whether speech tracking can be influenced by voice characteristics such bottom-up driven voice identity or the top-down feature of familiarity with the speaker’s voice. Speech from familiar speakers is more intelligible, so higher speech tracking response can be expected for speech from familiar compared to unfamiliar speakers. To test this, we familiarized 39 young adult listeners with four female voices. We used high-variability training containing sentence stimuli from different speaking styles and audio qualities to ensure listeners can recognize voices reliably across different stimuli types and form more stable voice representations. After this, we recorded EEG while participants listened to sentences from familiar and unfamiliar speakers in quiet and in multitalker babble noise. To quantify neural speech tracking, we computed cross-correlation between the neural response and the amplitude envelopes of the presented sentences. Results revealed that lab-trained familiarity with female voices does not affect neural speech tracking. We also found no differences in sentence comprehension scores for familiar and unfamiliar voices suggesting that lab-trained familiarity does not benefit sentence comprehension. However, we found a significant effect of individual speakers on speech tracking suggesting that neural speech tracking is modulated by voice identity. We also found a relationship between voice recognition and speech tracking: the better a particular speaker was recognized, the higher the speech tracking response was to the respective speaker. Our results further support the notion that voice identity is reflected in early acoustic and later linguistic processing stages in the brain and that linguistic and speaker-specific voice information are processed jointly on the neural level.

fMRI reveals cognitive and emotional processing in a long-term comatose patient

Recent evidence has demonstrated that young adults achieve improved spoken word recognition performance when words are produced by familiar, as compared to unfamiliar, voices [Nygaard etal., Psych. Sci. 5, 42–45 (1994)]. This benefit for familiar voices is hypothesized to be a result of reduced perceptual normalization demands when listeners have previous knowledge of source characteristics. The present study investigated whether normal-hearing older listeners exhibit a similar improvement for familiar voices. Younger and older volunteers were trained to discriminate four voices and were then tested on a perceptual identification task with familiar and unfamiliar voices. Although voice discrimination did not differ as a function of age, only the older participants exhibited improved word recognition performance for familiar talkers. Word recognition performance was also examined separately for words at two levels of lexical difficulty: (1) words that are phonetically distinct from others (easy words), and (2) words that are phonetically similar to others (hard words). The largest benefit of voice familiarity was observed for older listeners identifying lexically hard words. The implications of these findings for age differences in the use of voice information will be discussed.