• Home
  • Search
  • Knowledge Acquisition and Representation for High-Performance Building Design: A Review for Defining Requirements for Developing a Design Expert System
  • Cite Icon13
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094640Copy DOI Icon

Knowledge Acquisition and Representation for High-Performance Building Design: A Review for Defining Requirements for Developing a Design Expert System

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

New functions and requirements of high performance building (HPB) being added and several regulations and certification conditions being reinforced steadily make it harder for designers to decide HPB designs alone. Although many designers wish to rely on HPB consultants for advice, not all projects can afford consultants. We expect that, in the near future, computer aids such as design expert systems can help designers by providing the role of HPB consultants. The effectiveness and success or failure of the solution offered by the expert system must be affected by the quality, systemic structure, resilience, and applicability of expert knowledge. This study aims to set the problem definition and category required for existing HPB designs, and to find the knowledge acquisition and representation methods that are the most suitable to the design expert system based on the literature review. The HPB design literature from the past 10 years revealed that the greatest features of knowledge acquisition and representation are the increasing proportion of computer-based data analytics using machine learning algorithms, whereas rules, frames, and cognitive maps that are derived from heuristics are conventional representation formalisms of traditional expert systems. Moreover, data analytics are applied to not only literally raw data from observations and measurement, but also discrete processed data as the results of simulations or composite rules in order to derive latent rule, hidden pattern, and trends. Furthermore, there is a clear trend that designers prefer the method that decision support tools propose a solution directly as optimizer does. This is due to the lack of resources and time for designers to execute performance evaluation and analysis of alternatives by themselves, even if they have sufficient experience on the HPB. However, because the risk and responsibility for the final design should be taken by designers solely, they are afraid of convenient black box decision making provided by machines. If the process of using the primary knowledge in which frame to reach the solution and how the solution is derived are transparently open to the designers, the solution made by the design expert system will be able to obtain more trust from designers. This transparent decision support process would comply with the requirement specified in a recent design study that designers prefer flexible design environments that give more creative control and freedom over design options, when compared to an automated optimization approach.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

A New Approach In Learning For Intelligent Multi Agent Systems

  • Jun 04, 2007
  • A M Elmahalawy
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Design of the Expert System for Edamame Grading Using Forward Chaining Method

  • Apr 26, 2020
  • SEAS (Sustainable Environment Agricultural Science)
  • Yuli Wibowo +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Can Both the Economic Value and Energy Performance of Small- and Mid-Sized Buildings Be Satisfied? Development of a Design Expert System in the Context of Korea

  • Jun 17, 2020
  • Sustainability
  • Sean Hay Kim +1
  • Research Article

In Memoriam: Dr. Clive L. Dym (1942–2016)

  • Aug 19, 2016
  • Journal of Mechanical Design
  • Shapour Azarm
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Development and performance of an expert system for pavement overlay design

  • Jan 01, 1989
  • Civil Engineering Systems
  • Stephen G Ritchie +1
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations55

Building expert systems: cognitive emulation.

  • Jan 01, 1987
  • Open Research Online (The Open University)
  • Philip E Slatter
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

Fuzzy second-generation expert system design for IE/OR/MS

  • Mar 08, 1992
  • I.B Turksen
  • Book Chapter

Design knowledge representation, retrieval and delivery for co-operative knowledge processing

  • Jan 01, 1999
  • C.-J Su +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Building Expert Systems: A Structured Bibliography

  • Jan 01, 1989
  • Studies in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
  • Giovanni Guida +1
  • Conference Article

Development of expert system for the design of airborne equipment

  • Oct 24, 2004
  • B.R Kumar +3
  • Research Article

Knowledge acquisition and representation for the tolerance design of injection-molded parts

  • Jan 01, 2000
  • Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition)
  • Xinyu Shao
  • Research Article

Key Technologies Study for Automobile Fault Diagnosis Expert System

  • Jan 01, 2012
  • Advanced Materials Research
  • Li Li Zhang +1
  • Conference Article

Forming Teachers' Awareness Of Knowledge In The Field Of Artificial Intelligence

  • Jun 12, 2021
  • ˜The œEuropean Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences
  • Alina N Bogdanova +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations194

Deep versus compiled knowledge approaches to diagnostic problem-solving

  • Nov 01, 1983
  • International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
  • B Chandrasekaran +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Adaptive abstraction in expert systems for medical diagnosis

  • Jun 14, 1992
  • J.J Kim +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.