Language Matters in British Newspapers: A Participatory Analysis of the Autism UK Press Corpus.

BackgroundAddressing individuals with a disability can entail the use of person-first (person with a disability) or identity-first language (disabled person). However, there has been debate about use of these terms, yet there is a lack of evidence to inform preference across people with a broad range of health conditions, demographics, or health related factors. MethodsA 42-item survey measuring demographic and health condition factors, implicit and explicit preference for person-first and identity-first language use was open for completion by individuals with a self-reported health condition between July 7, 2021 and November 30, 2021. Recruitment was undertaken via posts on relevant social media sites and through community support and advocacy organisations. ResultsData analysis included responses from 875 valid surveys. Mean age of participants was 39.7 (SD: 13.7) years. There were 89 (10.2%) male, 637 female (72.8%) and 149 (17.0%) non-binary/other participants. When referring to themselves, participants most often reported use of identity first language (n = 335, 42.2%), followed by person-first language (n = 272, 34.1%), then both interchangeably (118, 23.7%). When referring to others, participants most often used person first language (n = 312, 39.4%), followed by both interchangeably (269, 34.0%), then identity-first language (n = 211, 26.6%). Disability language preference varied across health conditions, with participants with neurodevelopmental conditions most likely to use identity-first language and participants with digestive conditions most often preferencing person-first language. Participants who were younger and of non-binary gender preferred use of identity-first language. Appropriate use of identity-first language was rated significantly higher for people with a disability/health condition and family/friends than for third-party representatives, including healthcare professionals, educators, media and the general public. ConclusionFindings highlight the need to understand health condition and disability language preference in a more nuanced way to promote respectful language use when addressing people in the context of their disability/health condition.

Participatory research is one pathway for advancing the agenda of autistic advocates; however, little is known about the attitudes and values of autism researchers toward participatory research. This is a participatory research mixed-methods study of 215 survey respondents and 21 interviewees, all corresponding authors of published autism research papers. Our aim was to identify attitudes and practices about participatory research with autistic and non-autistic community partners. We found relatively low rates of various participatory strategies, moderate rates of barriers to participatory research, and moderate endorsement of the importance of participatory research. The interviews elucidated participatory research's best practices, complexity of barriers, and transformative power to positively impact autism research. Interviewees discussed the connection between participatory research and decisions about language. The survey responses indicated that 30% of autism researchers never used identity-first language. An emergent theme from the interviews explored the unique contribution of insider research-research in which an autistic person brings their expertise derived from lived experience and formal research training. This research provides descriptions of the current state of participatory autism research and guidance for its utilization.Lay AbstractParticipatory research is a way for autistic advocates, other community advocates, and researchers to work together for the benefit of the autistic community. Participatory research is when community members are partners throughout the research process, for example, selecting research questions, determining research methods, and interpreting results. However, little is known about autism researchers' attitudes and values about participatory research. This research describes the participatory research strategies autism researchers use, researchers' attitudes toward participatory research, and researchers' insights into best practices in participatory research. We looked at participatory autism research involving autistic people and non-autistic people who are connected to the autistic community, such as parents and teachers of autistic people. We surveyed 215 autism researchers to find out how much autism research is participatory, how important autism researchers think participatory research is, and what barriers get in the way of doing participatory autism research. On average, researchers who responded to the survey reported relatively low rates of participatory research, medium rates of barriers to participatory research, and medium agreement on the value of participatory research. The survey also asked what language they use regarding autism; a significant proportion of researchers in the study reported never using identity-first language (e.g., autistic person, as opposed to person-first language; person with autism). We also interviewed 21 of the researchers who responded to the survey. The interviews covered topics such as possible strategies to increase participatory research, examples of barriers to participatory research, and the interviewees' views on the importance of participatory research. Interviewees also discussed the connection between participatory research and decisions about language regarding autism. Several interviewees talked about the unique contributions of autistic academics, who have both lived experience as autistic people and formal research training.

There is currently disagreement among professionals (such as teachers, therapists, researchers, and clinicians) about the most appropriate and respectful way to refer to individuals with disabilities in general, and those with autism, in particular. Supporters of person-first language feel that it is important to emphasize the person rather than the disorder or disability, and promote the use of terms such as, "person with autism" or "a person with ASD." The goal is to reduce stereotypes and discrimination and emphasize the person's individuality rather than their disability. However, some people within the autism community have questioned the use of person-first terms because they are awkward and use an unconventional style of language that draws attention to the disability. Moreover, autistic individuals and their families are beginning to support the use of identity-first language that embraces all aspects of one's identity. Surveys in the United Kingdom and Australia support the idea that both types of language are preferred by different groups of autism stakeholder groups. In our study, we surveyed autism stakeholders in the United States. Overwhelmingly, autistic adults (n = 299) preferred identity-first language terms to refer to themselves or others with autism. Professionals who work in the autism community (n = 207) were more likely to support and use person-first language. Language is dynamic and our findings support the need for open communication among autism professionals about how we communicate with and about autistic individuals and their families.

Person-first language, to refer to a person with autism, has been dominant within peer-reviewed literature; however, there are autistic people who prefer identity-first language. This is a shift from the language championed within mental health nursing; therefore it is important to understand the meaning and actions within identifying language. This analysis of 29,606 words of Twitter discourse explored the political struggle between the modes of language. Differences within the conceptualisation of autism and disability underpinned varied subject positions and the rearticulation of autism and expertise was identified. Contextually driven adoption of identifying language requires awareness of the potential benefits and consequences.

The stereotype content model (SCM) provides a basis to investigate stereotypes of different social groups. Previous SCM research has shown that the “welfare recipients” are stereotyped negatively, with low warmth and low competence. However, prior research has not considered different categories of income support recipients who may be stereotyped differently. Using the SCM, we investigated the stereotypes held by the Australian general population (n = 807) towards five key social groups (unemployed, people with a mental disability, people with a physical disability, single parents, elderly). People with a mental or physical disability and the elderly were similar regardless of whether they were described as receiving income support payments or not. In contrast, the unemployed and single parents were stereotyped with significantly lower levels of warmth and competence when they were receiving payments. This research shows that the needs and circumstances of different groups may be reflected in different levels of community support.

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine, from the stereotype content model (SCM) perspective, the role of the competence and warmth stereotypes of older adults held by professional caregivers.MethodsA quasi-experimental design, ex post facto with observational analyses, was used in this study. The cultural view on competence and warmth was assessed in 100 caregivers working in a set of six residential geriatric care units (three of them organized following a person-centered care approach and the other three providing standard geriatric care). In order to assess caregivers’ cultural stereotypical views, the SCM questionnaire was administered. To evaluate the role of caregivers’ cultural stereotypes in their professional performance as well as in older adult functioning, two observational scales from the Sistema de Evaluación de Residencias de Ancianos (assessment system for older adults residences)-RS (staff functioning and residents’ functioning) were applied.ResultsCaregivers’ cultural views of older adults (compared to young people) are characterized by low competence and high warmth, replicating the data obtained elsewhere from the SCM. Most importantly, the person-centered units predict better staff performance and better resident functioning than standard units. Moreover, cultural stereotyping of older adult competence moderates the effects of staff performance on resident functioning, in line with the findings of previous research.ConclusionOur results underline the influence of caregivers’ cultural stereotypes on the type of care, as well as on their professional behaviors and on older adult functioning. Caregivers’ cultural stereotypes could be considered as a central issue in older adult care since they mediate the triangle of care: caregivers/older adults/type of care; therefore, much more attention should be paid to this psychosocial care component.

Fictional portrayals of autism play a role in raising awareness, shaping knowledge, and influencing attitudes toward autism. However, the accuracy of these portrayals is a topic of debate. Limited research has been conducted with the autism community regarding their perceptions of fictional portrayals of autism. This study aimed to explore autistic people's perceptions of the accuracy, educational benefits, and impact of Atypical, a Netflix comedy drama series focused on the experiences of an autistic protagonist. Participants were 77 members of the autism community (autistic N = 65, parent/partner N = 12), recruited via social media. Participants completed a cross-sectional predominantly qualitative survey. We undertook descriptive statistical analyses on the quantitative data and used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to analyze the qualitative data. The majority of participants described Sam's portrayal as accurate, emphasizing that it was accurate as one example of autism. Family members appeared more likely to perceive Atypical as having informative benefit and being likely to improve attitudes toward autism than were autistic people. The primary concerns identified were the stereotypical representation of a popular media image of autism, the lack of diversity, and the depiction of autism as a burden or challenge for the protagonist and his family. This study builds on previous research on the portrayal of autism in entertainment media by investigating the perception of the autism community regarding one such fictional portrayal. It identifies that for entertainment media to better represent the lived experience of autistic people and improve community understanding of autism, there is a need for increased diversity of portrayals and for the involvement of autistic people in the development and production process.

Socio-political developments can result in a change of perception of people with disabilities and increase sensitivity towards language, especially legal language, used in relation to them. Some terms perceived as offensive or stigmatising are rejected in favour of more neutral and inclusive ones. Such terms can often be categorised as euphemisms or orthophemisms (Allan and Burridge in Forbidden Words, Taboo, and the Censoring of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 2006). With the passage of time, such new words frequently cease to serve their purpose and new ones need to be proposed to refer to a given concept (euphemism treadmill). In order to examine this issue, a number of legal terms denoting persons with disabilities used, currently and historically, in legal regulations in Poland and Spain are discussed. They are analysed in the context of changing the model of perception of people with disabilities (medical model vs. social model). Next, the differentiation between the so-called Identity-First Language (the term denoting disability comes first linearly) and Person-First Language (the term denoting disability comes second linearly, often in the form of a prepositional phrase), advocated by some members of the disability rights movement, is discussed. In this context, important syntactic and morphological differences (word-order, number of the term denoting disability) between English, serving as a model, and Spanish and Polish are focused on.

This study investigates the negative consequences of warmth appeal in advertising, particularly in competitive cluttered contexts where consumers encounter multiple advertisements with varying warmth levels. Drawing upon the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), which suggests an inverse relationship between perceptions of warmth and competence, the study explores the "compensation effect", where increased perceptions of warmth lead to reduced perceptions of competence. Specifically, this study explores how advertisement exposure conditions (single advertisement vs. competitive clutter) with varying warmth levels affect consumer perceptions and purchase intention. The findings reveal that advertisements with high warmth appeal, when presented alongside advertisements with low warmth appeal, result in lower purchase intention owing to reduced perceptions of brand competence. Additionally, consumers’ self-monitoring was found to moderate these effects, with high self-monitoring exhibiting more pronounced negative reactions in a cluttered advertising context. These findings highlight the importance of strategically using warmth appeal, especially in competitive settings, and considering individual differences in consumer behavior, such as self-monitoring. This study offers valuable insights for advertisers and marketers to optimize warmth-based strategies in cluttered advertising environments.

ABSTRACTStereotypes people hold about computer scientists contribute to underrepresentation in computer science. Perceptions of computer scientists have historically been linked to males and a “nerd” culture, which can lead to lack of interest, particularly for girls. This article presents two studies conducted with two groups of middle schoolers: those who attended our programming camp (Study One) and those who did not (Study Two). After analyzing participants’ drawings and two survey questions we found that perceptions youth holds about computer scientists may be improving. Additionally, we found that males (versus females) and those youth who did not attend our camp (versus those who did) tended to have more stereotypical perceptions of computer scientists. With this article, we contribute to the literature on CS stereotypes by examining both positive and negative representations youth had about computer scientists. We also cast light on the lack of awareness about this profession among the youth of this age.

Prior research has established a relationship between playing video games containing stereotyped representations of traditionally marginalized groups and resulting negative attitudes towards those groups. Yet, very little work has examined video games containing more positive, non-stereotyped representations and whether these diverse casts have inverse effects resulting in positive attitudes following exposure, an effect demonstrated in television media. The current study makes use of two paradigms, one based on short-term priming theory concerning immediate exposure to media, and one on long-term cultivation theory dealing with the overall media diet, and the relation to attitudes towards Blacks including symbolic racism, colorblindness, and implicit bias. In Study 1 (n = 31), Black and White participants reported how much time weekly they spent playing a popular game with positive representations of People of Color before completing measures. In Study 2 (n = 91), Black and White participants were exposed to one of three games, one with positive representation, one with negative representation, and a control game before completing study measures. Findings suggested that participant race was related to pro-Black attitudes (p = .009), but that direct exposure to a game with positive representation (p = .13) as well as playing the game during the week (p = .25) was not, while controlling for participant interracial contract. Despite this, discussions are made in face of interesting patterns of results that could be expanded upon in future work to explain the present findings. Furthermore, practical applications of the present study are made for both non-academic creators and consumers of video games.

News media can influence audience opinions. Thus, the media have enormous potential and responsibility when writing about societal issues, such as mental health. Mental health coverage has traditionally been criticised for creating stigma, as the topic is often presented in combination with violence and crime. Since the 1990s, researchers have found that more positive representations challenge negative portrayals, and that such representa- tions change the audience’s attitudes towards the issue. Few studies on the topic have been conducted in Norway; therefore, one cannot confirm or deny whether the exact coverage change is occurring. Using a quantitative framing analysis, this study argues that mental health issues were normalised in the two most-read online news sources, Verdens Gang (VG.no) and Norsk Rikskringkasting (NRK.no), in 2018–2021.

Hospitals pose a threat to autistic children's mental health. Adapting hospitals to meet children's needs can address this issue. To determine the impact of an interprofessional program (Adaptive Care) to support autistic children's mental health on nursing staff's knowledge, efficacy, and confidence. Pretest-posttest, quasi-experimental design. Large pediatric hospital. Nursing staff were the first participants in the program implementation. Approximately 300 nursing staff received training through the program, and 107 completed program evaluation surveys. Of these, 18 nursing staff completed both the pretest and posttest surveys approximately 1 yr apart. Occupational therapy practitioners and other professionals developed and implemented the program, which consists of staff training and resources to adapt hospital physical and social environments and to ultimately improve patients' hospital experiences. Researcher-developed, pilot-tested, online survey to assess knowledge, perceived effectiveness, confidence, and strategies that staff used while caring for autistic children in the hospital. Respondents had increased effectiveness and confidence working with autistic children in the hospital after program implementation. Respondents reported significantly more strategies to care for autistic children. Interprofessional collaboration and programming can positively affect social environments in the hospital by enhancing nursing staff's self-efficacy, confidence, and strategies to support mental health and to enhance health care for autistic children. What This Article Adds: The Adaptive Care program is an example of occupational therapy practitioners and other interprofessional team members adapting physical and social health care environments to support autistic children's mental health. This program was effective at increasing nursing staff's self-efficacy, confidence, and strategies while caring for autistic children in the hospital. Positionality Statement: This article uses the identity-first language autistic people. This nonableist language describes their strengths and abilities and is a conscious decision. This language is favored by autistic communities and self-advocates and has been adopted by health care professionals and researchers (Bottema-Beutel etal., 2021; Kenny etal., 2016).

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to show how early newspapers have become ever more essential sources for the study of “history from below”.Design/methodology/approachThe paper looks at why back runs of newspapers are an unrivalled primary source for students, authors, and researchers.FindingsHistorians of all kinds now have access to a much expanded range of newspaper titles. The complete run of The Economist has been completed; the newspaper digitisation programme of the British Library has already recovered over three million pages from hundreds of titles from the restoration to the end of the nineteenth century. More than a million pages of the Guardian/Observer files are now appearing online, and the complete edition of The Illustrated London News will be published in the spring of 2009.Originality/valueThe paper describes the modern technology advances have made possible the creation of this great corpus of historical newspapers.

In this paper, we present the results of our experiments concerning the zero-shot cross-lingual performance of the PERIN sentence-to-graph semantic parser. We applied the PTG model trained using the PERIN parser on a 740k-token Czech newspaper corpus to Hungarian. We evaluated the performance of the parser using the official evaluation tool of the MRP 2020 shared task. The gold standard Hungarian annotation was created by manual correction of the output of the parser following the annotation manual of the tectogrammatical level of the Prague Dependency Treebank. An English model trained on a larger one-million-token English newspaper corpus is also available, however, we found that the Czech model performed significantly better on Hungarian input due to the fact that Hungarian is typologically more similar to Czech than to English. We have found that zero-shot transfer of the PTG meaning representation across typologically not-too-distant languages using a neural parser model based on a multilingual contextual language model followed by a manual correction by linguist experts seems to be a viable scenario.