Large-scale Model-Driven Engineering of web user interaction: The WebML and WebRatio experience

Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is changing the way we build, operate, and maintain our software-intensive systems. Several projects using MDE practices are reporting significant improvements in quality and performance but, to be able to handle these projects, software engineers need a set of technical and interpersonal skills that are currently not widely available. The MDE postgraduate diploma intends to fill this gap by offering a full-time one year formation onMDE. The course syllabus is designed to teach students how to work at a higher abstraction level by the rigorous use of (software) models as the main artifacts in all software engineering activities. Contents include the conceptual framework of MDE plus all techniques and tools (e.g. for defining modeling languages, models, and model transformations) required to successfully complete software engineering projects following a MDE approach. The organizational impact (and challenges) of adopting MDE are exemplified using real industrial experiences. This article describes the MDE Diploma and the lessons that we learned after completing its first edition.

In this study, we investigate the usability of Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) through interviews with fifteen practitioners from diverse roles (e.g., developers, researchers, architects) and domains, and with a range of expertise levels across academic and industrial software sectors, capturing in-depth perspectives on its practical application. Participants emphasized MDE’s benefits in enhancing project robustness, reliability, development speed, and system organization. However, they also identified challenges such as a steep learning curve, technological constraints, organizational resistance, and a shortage of skilled professionals. To address these issues, participants recommended simplifying tools and language, improving consistency and flexibility, enhancing integration with existing workflows, and raising awareness of MDE. These insights provide valuable guidance for improving MDE usability and encouraging broader MDE adoption.

Lessons learned from applying model-driven engineering in 5 domains: The success story of the MontiGem generator framework

The virtue of quality is not itself a subject; it depends on a subject. In the software engineering field, quality means good software products that meet customer expectations, constraints, and requirements. Despite the numerous approaches, methods, descriptive models, and tools, that have been developed, a level of consensus has been reached by software practitioners. However, in the model-driven engineering (MDE) field, which has emerged from software engineering paradigms, quality continues to be a great challenge since the subject is not fully defined. The use of models alone is not enough to manage all of the quality issues at the modeling language level. In this work, we present the current state and some relevant considerations regarding quality in MDE, by identifying current categories in quality conception and by highlighting quality issues in real applications of the model-driven initiatives. We identified 16 categories in the definition of quality in MDE. From this identification, by applying an adaptive sampling approach, we discovered the five most influential authors for the works that propose definitions of quality. These include (in order): the OMG standards (e.g., MDA, UML, MOF, OCL, SysML), the ISO standards for software quality models (e.g., 9126 and 25,000), Krogstie, Lindland, and Moody. We also discovered families of works about quality, i.e., works that belong to the same author or topic. Seventy-three works were found with evidence of the mismatch between the academic/research field of quality evaluation of modeling languages and actual MDE practice in industry. We demonstrate that this field does not currently solve quality issues reported in industrial scenarios. The evidence of the mismatch was grouped in eight categories, four for academic/research evidence and four for industrial reports. These categories were detected based on the scope proposed in each one of the academic/research works and from the questions and issues raised by real practitioners. We then proposed a scenario to illustrate quality issues in a real information system project in which multiple modeling languages were used. For the evaluation of the quality of this MDE scenario, we chose one of the most cited and influential quality frameworks; it was detected from the information obtained in the identification of the categories about quality definition for MDE. We demonstrated that the selected framework falls short in addressing the quality issues. Finally, based on the findings, we derive eight challenges for quality evaluation in MDE projects that current quality initiatives do not address sufficiently.

During the last decade, Model Driven Engineering (MDE) has been proposed for supporting the development, maintenance and evolution of software systems. Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Software Factories and Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) are among the most representatives MDE approaches. Nowadays, it is well recognized that model transformation is at the heart of MDE approaches and, consequently represents one of the most important operations in MDE. However, despite the multitude of model transformation language proposals emerging from academic world and industry, these transformations are often manually specified; which is a tedious and error-prone task, and therefore an expensive process. Matching operation between metamodels is the keystone toward a (semi-)automatic transformation process. In this paper, the authors review metamodel matching techniques of the literature and then analyze their pros and cons in order to show how they can be useful for a semi-automatic transformation process. The result is a comparison of metamodel matching techniques, highlighting their similarities and differences in terms of information used for matching, demonstrating significant similarities between these techniques. Next, the authors compare four well-known metamodel matching techniques namely Similarity flooding, SAMT4MDE+ (extended Semi-Automatic Matching Tool for Model Driven Engineering), ModelCVS and AML (AtlanMod Matching Language) on ten couples of metamodels. For this comparison, the authors define a set of six criteria inspired from the database schema matching. One among these criteria is relevant to the quality of matching and for which we define a quality measure metrics. Furthermore, the authors develop a plug-in under Eclipse to support our comparison using ten couples of metamodels.

The integration of domain-specific concepts in a model-driven engineering (MDE) approach raises a number of interesting research questions. There are two possibilities to represent these concepts. The first one focuses on models that contain domain-specific concepts only, i.e. domain-specific modelling languages (DSML). The second one advocates the integration of domain-specific concepts in general-purpose models, using what we will refer to in this paper as domain-specific modelling annotation languages (DSMAL). In this position paper, we argue that each approach is particularly suited for specific activities and specific actors, and show how they can be developed and used together. We also highlight the challenges created by the use of two representations, such as the evaluation of models OCL constraints and the synchronisation between the two representations. As an illustration, we present rbacUML, our approach for integrating role-based access control (RBAC) concepts into an MDE approach.

Nowadays, Web Applications (WAs) are complex software sys- tems, used by multiple users with different roles and often devel- oped to support and manage business processes. Due to the chang- ing nature of the supported processes, WAs need to be easily and quickly modified, to adapt and align them to the processes they support. In recent years, Model Driven Engineering (MDE) ap- proaches have been proposed and used to develop and evolveWAs. However, the definition of appropriate MDE approaches for the de- velopment of flexible process-centric WAs is still limited. In par- ticular, (flexible) workflow models have never been integrated with the models (e.g., presentation, information models) used in MDE approaches to develop this type of applications. In this paper, we present M3D (Model Driven Development with Declare), a tool for developingWAs that integrates three MDE metamodels used to represent the main components of aWA with the metamodel of De- clare, a declarative language to model business processes. The tool exploits and combines the declarative nature of Declare and the ad- vantages of MDE to get an efficient roundtrip engineering support to develop and evolve flexible process-centric WAs.

Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing is an integral part of the development of power system automation solutions. HIL test beds facilitate system-level testing and validation of controllers against their specifications. The information required for HIL test bed configurations is typically scattered across different tools used in the development of power system automation solutions. These tools often have different formats and naming schemes. This implies that a significant effort is required for consolidating data from the tools and for creating valid test configurations from the consolidated data. This paper presents a Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) approach for creating HIL test configurations in a tool-, platform-, and protocol-agnostic manner. It shows how the MDE approach can be applied in practice to derive test configurations based on the information originating from different tools in a semi-automated fashion.

Today's Web Applications (WAs) are complex multi-user and multi-tenant software systems, used by users with different roles and often developed to support and manage complex business processes. Due to the changing nature of such processes, WAs need to be easily and quickly modified, to be adapted and aligned to the processes they support. In recent years, Model Driven Engineering (MDE) approaches have been used to support the development and the evolution of WAs. However, the definition of appropriate MDE approaches for the development of flexible process-centric WAs is still limited. In particular, flexible workflow models have never been integrated with the models used in MDE approaches to develop this type of applications. This paper proposes an MDE approach for the development and the evolution of flexible process-centric WAs that integrates four MDE metamodels used to represent the main components of a WA with the metamodel of Declare, a declarative language to model business processes. A case study, carried out to validate the feasibility, the correctness and the effectiveness of the proposed approach is presented and discussed.

Software agents, modeling and simulation, and Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) are fields with their unique body of knowledge. However, developments in one area can provide new avenues for advancing the methodologies and technical strategies in other fields. This paper examines the synergies among these three fields by highlighting selected challenges in each area and delineating how methods developed in one field can mutually be beneficial. We categorize the ways in which the agent paradigm can contribute to critical activities in MDE, and similarly we describe how domain-specific languages and model transformation strategies can be instrumental in the design, implementation, and management of agent systems.

A Service Level Agreement (SLA) is a legal contract between parties to ensure the Quality of Service (QoS). It specifies one or more service level objectives (SLO), to ensure that the QoS delivered has met customer expectations. However, It becomes hard to guarantee QoS levels and detect SLA violations. Therefore, we propose to use MDE (Model Driven Engineering) to express the SLA contract requirements. This latter, created with a specific modeling language (DSML), will be used harmonically with a Multi-agent systems (MASs) in order to monitor SLA violations in real-time. Indeed, MASs are suitable tools for self-detection of failures and self-monitoring of cloud operations and services, QoS negotiation and SLA management. They are designed to operate in a dynamically changing environment. Our main motivation is firstly to use MDE technology for the creation of the SLA contract and then to integrate MASs in order to control the quality of service contract and guarantee transparency and symmetry with respect to the SLA contract between prospective signatories.

As Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is increasingly applied to larger and more complex systems, the current generation of modelling and model management technologies are being pushed to their limits in terms of capacity and efficiency. Additional research and development is imperative in order to enable MDE to remain relevant with industrial practice and to continue delivering its widely recognised productivity, quality, and maintainability benefits. Achieving scalability in modelling and MDE involves being able to construct large models and domain-specific languages in a systematic manner, enabling teams of modellers to construct and refine large models in a collaborative manner, advancing the state of the art in model querying and transformations tools so that they can cope with large models (of the scale of millions of model elements), and providing an infrastructure for efficient storage, indexing and retrieval of large models. This paper attempts to provide a research roadmap for these aspects of scalability in MDE and outline directions for work in this emerging research area.

Critical systems are present in our daily life and affect many aspects providing essential support to several human activities; they are employed in several application domains, providing support to economic activities, transportation, communication, health-care. Such systems must meet strict non-functional requirements, including dependability requirements, and should be able to cope with competitive market needs. Their criticality implies the necessity to meet several requirements, often dictated by international standards, whose fulfillment must be demonstrated in order to achieve necessary certifications. Quantitative evaluations are hence needed to assess and demonstrate compliance with target requirements, since design phases of the lifecycle. For this purpose modeling approaches have been investigated during the years; their aim is to have a of the overall system which allows to assess and demonstrate these properties. It is commonly known that the adoption of formal models in industry, although if strongly recommended when not mandatory, is slowed down by difficulties dictated both by the complexity of the models (which reflects the complexity of the systems) and by the need to have skilled staff in the usage of formal languages. For this reason, also if the academic research trends have focused on complex modeling approaches and techniques, formal models are not so used in industries: in particular only combinatorial models are widely adopted, thanks to their intuitive representation. The great simplifications introduced by combinatorial models lead to approximated results, hence system designers do not trust in them. In the last years the need of a model engineering is noticed: there is the necessity to define appropriate methodologies and processes to support development activities of complex models, aiming at improving the quality/cost ratio. In this way three main research trends have been introduced: formal models generation, multiformalism, and compositional approaches. This thesis aims at defining a methodology for quantitative analysis of critical system that can integrate Model-Based evaluations, conducted by using formal models, with Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) paradigms, taking advantage of the actual research trends. More in detail, according to such approach, critical systems properties can be assessed starting from high level models expressed in proper languages (usually called Domain Specific Modeling Languages - DSMLs), and defining automatic transformation chains, able to generate formal models. The methodology is implementable into cost-effective processes in order to reduce time-to-market specifically during verification stages of critical system development lifecycles. Such objective will be achieved by both improving usability and re-usability of typical Model-Driven artifacts. The adoption of this methodology for railway system dependability analysis may lead to an estimated costs reduction of approximately 30%. The usage of a high-level central language significantly decreases also the training time of new analysts, as they only need to learn the DSML usage (properly developed for the application domain). This thesis defines also two high-level modeling languages: the first, CIP_VAM, has been defined to vulnerability aspects of physical infrastructures, while the second, DAM-Rail, allows the dependability modeling in railway domain. Another important contribution of this thesis is given in the definition of new methods and formal operators: in detail a reference architecture for performability and Quality of Service evaluation is defined, as well as the formal concept of Model Template is introduced (to enable reuse). At last two techniques which deals with scalability are addressed: stub and reduced models. Even if the focus is on quantitative evaluation, the proposed methodology is useful also for the complete design (based on centralized informations), hence it is possible to extend it for automatic generation of documents and, more generally, of all those artifacts which support system development. The proposed approach has been applied with different goals to case studies coming from three different domains: railway systems, conferencing systems, and sensor network. These systems have different and complementary properties in terms of number of involved components, scalability, etc. Produced models are described, and obtained results are shown and commented.

One of the important aspects of Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is to consider application-domain variability, which leads to creation of Domain Specific Languages (DSL). As with DSLs models are concise, easy to understand and maintain, this approach greatly increases the productivity and software quality. Usually, the DSLs in MDE are described with a metamodel and a concrete syntax definition. The models expressed in the DSL are linguistic instantiations of the language concepts found in the metamodel.However, for some of the application domains it’s not enough to consider the linguistic dimension of the instantiation. The problem arises when the domain itself contains the aspect of typing. This leads to another view on instantiation, called ontological instantiation . Since both aspects are present simultaneously, we refer to the combined approach with the term “two-dimensional metamodelling”.In the following, we will exemplify the problem with a case study based on a real challenge found in the domain of network management. The solution we propose benefits from ontology technology which is applied to enforce the semantics of ontological instantiation. Our approach presents significant differences comparing to the existing 2D metamodelling solution, although the motivations are similar. Thus, we consider our work as a case study of applying ontology enabled software engineering in the area of DSL engineering, rather than a new metamodelling technology or an application of existing 2D metamodelling architecture.The article is a result of joint work of the MOST project partners, applied within the case study provided by Comarch.KeywordsPhysical DeviceConcrete SyntaxEclipse Modelling FrameworkOntology TechnologyClose World AssumptionThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

In this paper we focus on generative model-driven engineering (MDE) tools and explore the notion of incorporating their deployment directly within the program source through metaprogramming. Our approach is based on the following principles: (i) the MDE tool is invoked as part of the metaprogram evaluation; (ii) instead of generating code, the MDE tool generates source fragments as abstract syntax trees (ASTs); (iii) the generated source fragments are directly inserted into the main program source through generator macros of the metaprogram; and (iv) the resulting program that incorporates both model code and custom application code can be normally compiled to produce the final application. Using this methodology, the metaprogram practically operates as an interactive editor for the program itself. We assess the validity of our approach with proof-of-concept case studies where all MDE deployment is performed through metaprogramming.