Learning analytics design

This paper describes a Human‐Centred Learning Analytics (HCLA) design approach for developing learning analytics (LA) dashboards for K‐12 classrooms that maintain both contextual relevance and scalability—two goals that are often in competition. Using mixed methods, we collected observational and interview data from teacher partners and assessment data from their students' engagement with the lesson materials. This DBR‐based, human‐centred design process resulted in a dashboard that supported teachers in addressing their students' learning needs. To develop the dashboard features that could support teachers, we found that a design refinement process that drew on the insights of teachers with varying teaching experience, philosophies and teaching contexts strengthened the resulting outcome. The versatile nature of the approach, in terms of student learning outcomes, makes it useful for HCLA design efforts across diverse K‐12 educational contexts. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Learning analytics that are aligned to both a learning theory and learning design support student learning. LA dashboards that support users to understand the associated learning analytics data provide actionable insight. Design‐based research is a promising methodology for Human‐Centred Learning Analytics design, particularly in the K‐12 educational context. What this paper adds Leveraging a longstanding, yet fluid, research‐practice partnership is an effective design‐based research adaptation for addressing the high variation in instructional practices that characterize K‐12 education. Using both quantitative and qualitative data that reflects students' developing knowledge effectively supports teachers' inquiry into student learning. Teachers' use of learning analytics dashboards is heavily influenced by their perspectives on teaching and learning. Implications for practice and/or policy Impact on student learning outcomes, alongside usability and feasibility, should be included as a necessary metric for the effectiveness of LA design. LA dashboard developers should both leverage learning data that reflect students' developing knowledge and position teachers to take responsive pedagogical action to support student learning. LA researchers and developers should utilize a long‐term, yet fluid, research‐practice partnership to form a multi‐stakeholder, multidisciplinary design team for Human‐Centred Learning Analytics design.

We implemented a systematic literature review to investigate the trends and issues of learning analytics in seamless learning environments. We collected and analyzed a total of 27 empirical journal articles that study and discuss learning analytics design and implementation in seamless learning environments. In a recent decade, researchers have explored various seamless learning environments supporting students’ inquiry-based and experiential learning. Seamless learning aims to engage students to develop, elaborate, and apply knowledge to various inquiry-based learning contexts. With the significance of formative assessment in digital learning environments, integrating learning analytics into seamless learning environments increasingly evolved to trace and assess student learning. Despite various uses of learning analytics during seamless learning, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews that illustrate how learning analytics has been integrated into seamless learning. This literature synthesis decomposes the collected journal articles to understand learning analytics design and integrations inherent to seamless learning environments. Also, using qualitative thematic analysis, this systematic literature review demonstrates various design practices and future research directions of learning analytics in seamless learning environments.

Learning analytics involve collecting, analyzing, and visualizing the digital 'footprints' that learners leave behind as they interact with digital learning environments. Learning analytics inform ongoing refinements to improve educational design and teaching practice. To date, research suggests that educators have not fully capitalized on learning analytics, despite the growing availability of data generated through digital learning platforms, programmatic assessment, and competency-based training. In this article, the authors adapted an established "learning analytics lifecycle" framework to evaluate a representative example of digital learning in HPE: eduCAST, an online, video-based website for orthopaedic surgery training. The framework provided a stepwise approach for exploring the potential of learning analytics in eduCAST, identifying implementation gaps, and developing a transferable list of recommendations for educators in HPE. Demographic and engagement data of 141 registered eduCAST users were analyzed after being collected via website analytics. The findings revealed limitations and opportunities related to: (1) planning for the learning environment and its users, (2) the scope and specificity of available learning analytics data, (3) the purposeful use of data analysis techniques, and (4) the relative absence of educators' data-informed actions. Generic website analytics showed significant limitations: high website traffic did not correspond to meaningful learner engagement, nor did it provide useful data to inform ongoing website refinement. Indeed, these analytics produced more data mysteries than meaningful data stories. Consistent with prior reviews in the HPE literature, this worked example demonstrated that educators appear to make diminishing investments of effort and resources across the learning analytics lifecycle. The authors argue that HPE educators can benefit from using learning analytics frameworks to guide the design, implementation, evaluation, and long-term sustainability of digital learning environments. When thoughtfully collected, analyzed, and interpreted, learning analytics can enhance learners' experiences and outcomes, support educators' professional development, and inform continuous program refinement.

240 Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 20 No. 2 (Fall 2010) ISSN: 1546-2250 Linking Architecture and Education: Sustainable Design for Learning Environments Taylor, Anne (2009). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press; 451 pages. $100. ISBN 9780826334077. In Linking Architecture and Education, Anne Taylor has compiled a career of research into an extensive resource for architects, administrators, educators, and anyone else involved in the design of learning environments. Dr. Taylor founded and served as director of the Institute for Environmental Education in the School of Architecture and Planning at the University of New Mexico, where she directed research that examined the effects of the built environment on children. In this book she advocates for a series of design principles developed through years of teaching, research, and professional consultancy on the design of learning environments. The book places primary emphasis on the design of schools and schoolyards, with consideration also given to informal learning spaces such as museums and playgrounds. Aimed at providing a common language for design professionals and educators, Taylorattempts to link educational goals and learning theories to design principles through the use of numerous charts and graphics woven throughout the volume. The book is loosely organized around five key themes: philosophical foundations, organizational strategies, the building as a teaching tool or “threedimensional textbook,” future trends, and fostering ecological stewardship. The first four themes serve as the topics for the book sections, providing a sequential organization and unifying structure to the extensive literature. Stewardship is addressed in four separate chapters—one for each section of the book. The organization of the book is driven by Taylor’s aspirations to transform the educational built environment through a series of holistic-design guidelines including: design criteria that is informed by the users’ developmental needs; architectural form that evolves from curriculum and learning theory; educational spaces that are 241 flexible and modeled after the design studio; learning landscapes; community engagement through co-location, multi-use design, and the community as living laboratory; and post-occupancy user guides and evaluation. Along the way she incorporates supplemental information in the form of case studies, photographs, charts, and visual and verbal commentary from colleagues. These are organized in a brilliantly colored and graphically coded format of sidebar information, design tools, designer perspectives, and stewardship forums. At times this rich array of resources and varied perspectives disrupts the flow of the book—obscuring the points presented instead of punctuating them. But, perhaps more significantly, they also create the possibility for an alternative, nonlinear, reading of the book. Students, design and education professionals, parents, and community members may find this secondary organization helpful in using the text as a sourcebook of examples and best practices both to inform the design of new learning spaces as well as to identify opportunities to make more effective use of existing spaces. The link between pedagogy and architectural design is made clear throughout the book, with related concepts often introduced through charts and diagrams and further reinforced by case examples. In section one, for example,Taylor links philosophical theories to the roles of the learner and teacher, the curriculum, and instructional strategies. She also links these theories to the role of the architect, the design process, and the form of the physical environment. A case study of Reggio Emilia preschools inItaly then demonstrates how aspects of the building design can support the educational philosophy of the school. Stakeholders in design processes may benefit from understanding how philosophy informs practice, and Taylorjustifies combining this information into a single chart as a starting point for design discussion between disciplines. Often such diagrams in the book successfully illustrate key relationships between architecture and education, but at times the format is problematic. For example, the chart could easily be misinterpreted by the reader as a prescription for a particular design process or architectural style based on the educational philosophy of the client. In general, however, Taylor successfully relates educational and architectural concepts in clear and meaningful 242 ways. Design students and practitioners may appreciate the succinct overview of major educational theories in section two, whereas educators may find section three particularly useful for the long list of suggestions about how to use the educational facility...

<p class="2M-body">Teaching assistants (TAs) in higher education are expected to teach courses in their major subject area with little to no formal instruction in the principles of effective teaching methods. The demands on TAs time are high and there is a need for easy to access, flexible, high quality instruction to provide them with the tools necessary to be effective instructors at the college level. One method of meeting this need is to provide TAs with a “toolbox” of instructional theory and methods based on instructional design principles. In order to be effective, it is important for TAs to understand the interconnected nature of effective educational principles including: instructional design, motivation, learning environments, instructional technologies and assessment. The current study looks at the effects of a self-paced online instruction designed for TAs on their teaching efficacy, perceived teaching competence and satisfaction with knowledge of the delivered instructional concepts using a pre-post, self-report design. Thirteen TAs at a southwestern research university completed both pre and post measures of knowledge and perceptions. Findings indicate that self-paced online training in instructional design concepts significantly increased TAs’ satisfaction with their knowledge of instructional theory and principles, design of learning environments and instructional technology. It further increased the significance and magnitude of their understanding of the interconnected nature of instructional principles and elements of the learning dynamic and led to appreciable knowledge change in key areas. These findings provide evidence of the benefits and utility of flexible, easily accessible training in instructional principles for TAs.</p>

This research is a theory building study regarding the design of distance learning environments from a socio-technical perspective. Within this study, a synthesis of current theories and approaches in addition to established theories in the field of distance education will be conducted, with focus placed on the notion that a flexible learning environment may be designed based on social and technical elements. In this regard, the process of designing the aforementioned learning environment is expressed in a theoretical manner, with the following two theories comprising the basis of the study: (1) the Flexible Learning Approach and (2) the Socio-Technical Theory. A theoretical matrix is established within the study utilizing these theories, while each cell in the theoretical matrix provides a statement that determines a flow chart regarding the design of Flexible Distance Learning Environments.

Designing an educational online learning environment requires proper planning as it will influence students' learning experiences. For the purpose of developing a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment, the development process should be properly designed to meet the objectives of learning. In this research, the design of a CSCL environment is explained using the Three-phase Development Model (3PD) which serves as a guideline for developing a functional learning environment. This study attempts at promoting interaction in CSCL by designing interaction during the development process of the CSCL environment rather than scaffolding interaction during the online learning process.

This research study aimed to synthesize theoretical framework and designing of constructivist mobile application learning environment to foster creative thinking on basic photography skill for high school students. The target group consisted of 3 expert reviewers for content, mobile application and learning environment designing. Research methodology is developmental research; developmental research consisted of 3 processes: (1) designing process, (2) developing process, (3) evaluate process. The procedures were as follows: (1) to examine and analyze the principles and theories, (2) to synthesize theoretical framework, and (3) to synthesize designing framework. The result revealed that: 1) to synthesize theoretical framework comprise of 6 components as following that. Contextual base, Psychological base, Pedagogies base, Creative Thinking base and Technologies and media base. 2) To synthesize design framework of mobile application learning environment to foster creative thinking of 6 components i.e., (1) Problem base, (2) Resource, (3) Creative Thinking Photo Lab, (4) Collaboration, (5) Coaching, (6) Scaffolding. The efficiency of this learning environment was evaluated by expert review. It was found that the learning environment is appropriate on 3 aspects: content, mobile application learning design, and learning environment design..

The design of learning environments has greatly influenced learning approaches and strategies, and has traditionally been considered to exist within the physical walls of a learning institution. In recent years, learning environments have evolved alongside advances in the internet, technology, and mobile devices and have given rise to smart learning environments to better accommodate a new generation of learners and learning behaviors. This chapter presents an exploration of the possibilities of smart learning environments in distinct and diverse environments, across varying learner locations, profiles, and demographics. The authors explore and analyze technology and pedagogy elements that make up an effective smart learning environment, through different cases and viewpoints of the contributing authors of this book. Based on the findings, they propose a framework for the design and implementation of smart learning environments that will effectively create engaging, personalized, and effective learning moments for individual learners.

It is very difficult to instill a concept and interpretation of nature and a sense of responsibility to protect nature in the minds of children who are increasingly becoming disconnected and alienated from it.. TheFailure to integrate learning environments with nature, despite the continuous increase in the integration between learning environments andmodern technology, is complicating the task of creating perception of nature and awareness in children concerning the problems of nature. This study aims at shedding light on the way the teachers who are responsible for the design of the educational environments, perceive the concept of “nature” and “alienation of children from nature”. The phenomenographic research design, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used in this study. The sample of the study was selected using criterion sampling method, one of the purposive sampling methods. The participants of the study are 40 teachers, including 20 elementary school teachers and 20 science teachers, who are assigned to schools located in the center of Diyarbakır province and affiliated with the Provincial Directorate of National Education. 17 (42.5%) of these participants were female and 23 (47.5%) were male. The findings of the study revealed that the teachers interpret the concept of nature under three different categories: these are respectively physical/ visible features of nature, wholeness and function of nature and its importance for the human health. Consequently, inclusion of activities that have the contents of nature in the design of educational programs and relate to children who spend most of their time at school and design of learning environments with models, samples and visual tools which include contents of nature may make it easier for children to perceive and interpret nature.

Facilitating human learning is one of the uses of virtual reality (VR). Users interact within original and dynamic situations of learning in an integrated learning environment called Virtual Reality Learning Environment (VRLE). Nevertheless, the design of these environments is still considered as a complex task. We intend to study and propose technical and methodological solutions to help teachers to design (adapt or reuse) their pedagogical situation with a scenario-based approach and to operationalize it in a VR learning environment. In this work, we defined a design process allowing teachers to generate their VRLE. Then, we instantiated the proposed design process with a pedagogical situation as an illustrated example.

The need for environments conducive to learning and wellbeing has been broadly recognised. Considering particularly learner perceptions in the learning environment design is known to improve both their learning and wellbeing. There are no, however, shared theoretical frameworks guiding the learning environment co-design from the learner perspective. As a response to this challenge, a learning environment design (LED) framework was developed based on the literature and co-design involving learners aged 7 to 19 (n = 342) in Finland (n = 266) and Spain (n = 76). The LED framework entails 53 characteristics grouped under seven constructs. It draws attention to the importance of balancing communality with individuality, comfort with health, and novelty with conventionality. Flexibility and functionality are recognised as central enablers for a quality learning environment. The study suggests a design framework and principles for learning environment co-design. They can serve as a research-based introduction to the topic after which priorities can be defined based on the concrete design target and goals, and concrete design solutions can be created in the participatory design involving learners and other key stakeholders.

This chapter outlines key findings of cognitive and developmental psychology which could be used as a theoretical framework to guide the design and research of e-learning applications. The chapter consists of two main sections. The first section presents the basic cognitive mechanisms and their development, while the second part discusses how our knowledge of the cognitive system can guide the design of computer-based learning environments. It is proposed that the human mind is organized in three levels: two of them are general-purpose mechanisms and processes and one consists of domainspecific structures of knowledge representation and problem solving processes. These three levels are associated with an effective learning framework. The suggested framework describes the basic points that any designer of e-learning environments must consider. The second section of the chapter discusses e-learning, connecting it to knowledge about the human cognitive system. In this section, we first present the conceptual bounds of the e-learning construct and discuss how cognitive theories of learning should guide the design of technologically-enhanced learning environments. It is proposed that a synergy between the study of human cognition and the design of e-learning applications is required for effectively understanding both fields.

This paper is about interaction design patterns that describe common solutions of reoccurring problems in the design and development of video-based learning environments. The patterns are organized in two layers. The first layer incorporates the micro interactivity in the video player itself. Any manipulation that effects the presentation within the video or intervening its playback is part of the micro-level of interactivity. The second layer of the pattern language consists of 12 patterns that describe the interactivity on a macro level. Macro interactivity comprises all manipulations concerning one or more videos as a whole. That does not include the playback but the organisation and structure of the video learning environment. Currently 17 macro patterns have been identified. Four of them will be object of that article: Related Videos, Playlist, Detail on Demand, and Journal Navigation. Additionally the paper includes explanations of four-step process of pattern identification and elaboration.

Little attention has been given to the psychological and sociological value of play despite its many advantages to guiding the design of interactive multimedia learning environments for children and adults. This paper provides a brief overview of the history, research, and theory related to play. Research from education, psychology, and anthropology suggests that play is a powerful mediator for learning throughout a person's life. The time has come to couple the ever increasing processing capabilities of computers with the advantages of play. The design of hybrid interactive learning environments is suggested based on the constructivist concept of a microworld and supported with elements of both games and simulations.