Lifting Quasianalytic Mappings over Invariants

We give a general theory of matrix elements (ME’s) of the unitary irreducible representations (UIR’s) of linear semisimple Lie groups and of reductive Lie groups. This theory connects together the following things, (1) MEUIR’s of all the representation series of a noncompact Lie group, (2) MEUIR’s of compact and noncompact forms of the same complex Lie group. The theory presented is based on the results of the theory of the principal nonunitary series representations and on a theorem which states that ME’s of the principal nonunitary series representations are entire analytic functions of continuous representation parameters. The principle of analytic continuation of Clebsch–Gordan coefficients (CGC’s) of finite dimensional representations to CGC’s of the tensor product of a finite and an infinite dimensional representation and to CGC’s of the tensor product of two infinite dimensional representations is proved. ME’s for any UIR of the group U(n) and of the group U(n,1) are obtained. The explicit expression for all CGC’s summed over the multiplicity of the irreducible representation in the tensor product decomposition is derived.

Let G be a connected semi-simple Lie group with finite center, say — then it is not necessarily the case that G possesses enough finite dimensional representations to separate points (cf. 3.1.1). In fact G will, in general, admit no non-trivial finite dimensional unitary representations (cf. number 4.3.2). Nevertheless, despite these apparently discouraging facts, the finite dimensional representations of G are important — this will be elaborated on below.

The original Novikov conjecture concerns the (oriented) homotopy invariance of higher sig-natures of manifolds and is equivalent to the rational injectivity of the assembly map in surgery theory. The integral injectivity of the assembly map is important for other purposes and is called the integral Novikov conjecture. There are also assembly maps in other theories and hence re-lated Novikov and integral Novikov conjectures. In this paper, we discuss several results on the integral Novikov conjectures for all torsion free arithmetic subgroups of linear algebraic groups and all S-arithmetic subgroups of reductive linear algebraic groups over number fields. For re-ductive linear algebraic groups over function fields of rank 0, the integral Novikov conjecture also holds for all torsion-free S-arithmetic subgroups. Since groups containing torsion elements occur naturally and frequently, we also discuss a generalized integral Novikov conjecture for groups containing torsion elements, and prove it for all arithmetic subgroups of reductive linear algebraic groups over number fields and S-arithmetic subgroups of reductive algebraic groups of rank 0 over function fields. 1

Consider a reductive linear algebraic group G acting linearly on a polynomial ring S over an infinite field; key examples are the general linear group, the symplectic group, the orthogonal group, and the special linear group, with the classical representations as in Weyl’s book: For the general linear group, consider a direct sum of copies of the standard representation and copies of the dual; in the other cases, take copies of the standard representation. The invariant rings in the respective cases are determinantal rings, rings defined by Pfaffians of alternating matrices, symmetric determinantal rings and the Plücker coordinate rings of Grassmannians; these are the classical invariant rings of the title, with $S^G\subseteq S$ being the natural embedding. Over a field of characteristic zero, a reductive group is linearly reductive, and it follows that the invariant ring $S^G$ is a pure subring of S, equivalently, $S^G$ is a direct summand of S as an $S^G$ -module. Over fields of positive characteristic, reductive groups are typically no longer linearly reductive. We determine, in the positive characteristic case, precisely when the inclusion $S^G\subseteq S$ is pure. It turns out that if $S^G\subseteq S$ is pure, then either the invariant ring $S^G$ is regular or the group G is linearly reductive.

The asymptotic root distribution is computed for systems of matrix functions associated with finite-dimensional holomorphic representations of a Lie group. This distribution can be expressed via the increments of the representations involved. If the group is reductive, then the number of equations in the system can be arbitrary, from 1 to the dimension of the group. In this case, the computation results are stated in the language of convex geometry. These computations imply the previously known formulas for the density of the solution variety of a system of exponential equations as well as for the number of solutions of a polynomial system and, more generally, of a system formed by matrix functions of representations of a complex reductive Lie group.

A linear étale representation of a complex algebraic group G is given by a complex algebraic G-module V such that G has a Zariski-open orbit in V and $\dim G=\dim V$ . A current line of research investigates which reductive algebraic groups admit such étale representations, with a focus on understanding common features of étale representations. One source of new examples arises from the classification theory of nilpotent orbits in semisimple Lie algebras. We survey what is known about reductive algebraic groups with étale representations and then discuss two classical constructions for nilpotent orbit classifications due to Vinberg and to Bala and Carter. We determine which reductive groups and étale representations arise in these constructions and we work out in detail the relation between these two constructions.

In this paper we study twisted conjugacy classes and isogredience classes for automorphisms of reductive linear algebraic groups. We show that reductive linear algebraic groups over some fields of zero characteristic possess the R ∞ ${R_{\infty}}$ and S ∞ ${S_{\infty}}$ properties.

Introduction Representations of $\mathbf {SU}(2)$ The general theory of linear representations of compact groups Lie theory of representations of compact connected Lie groups Induced representations of compact groups Spherical functions on compact groups Examples spherical harmonics The general theory of spherical functions Fourier and Plancherel transforms Extension of the Plancherel transform The subtleties of harmonic analysis Differential properties of spherical functions on Lie groups Spherical functions on semisimple Lie groups More on $\mathbf {SL}(2, \mathbf R)$ Automorphic functions Groups of isometries and Bessel functions Other special functions References.

Let G be a complex analytic group, and let A be the representation space of a finite-dimensional complex analytic representation of G. We consider the cohomology for G in A, such as would be obtained in the usual way from the complex of holomorphic cochains for G in A. Actually, we shall use a more conceptual categorical definition, which is equivalent to the explicit one by cochains. In the context of finite-dimensional representation theory, nothing substantial is lost by assuming that G is a linear group. Under this assumption, it is the main purpose of this paper to relate the holomorphic cohomology of G to Lie algebra cohomology, and to the rational cohomology, in the sense of [1], of algebraic hulls of G. This is accomplished by using the known structure theory for complex analytic linear groups in combination with certain easily established results concerning the cohomology of semidirect products. The main results are Theorem 4.1 (whose hypothesis is always satisfied by a complex analytic linear group) and Theorems 5.1 and 5.2. These last two theorems show that the usual abundantly used connections between complex analytic representations of complex analytic groups and rational representations of algebraic groups extend fully to the superstructure of cohomology.

Basic Representation Theory-I Induced Representations and Their Characters Multilinear Algebra and l-rings Representations of Compact Groups Lie Groups and Algebras SL2(p) and SL2(R).

Chapter 3 - Lie Groups

We study the question of whether the topological quotient of a real linear representation of a simple three-dimensional compact Lie group is a manifold. We obtain an upper bound for the dimension of a representation whose quotient is a manifold, and examine most of the remaining cases.

Let Γ be a connected reductive group over an algebraically closed field F of positive characteristic and let G be the set of fixed points of Γ under some Frobenius map of Γ. Then G is a finite group of Lie type. The p-modular representations of G for p = char F (the “describing” characteristic case) are closely related to rational representations of Γ, and thus results from the theory of reductive algebraic groups can be used to develop the representation theory of finite groups of Lie type in the describing characteristic case. One of the outstanding open questions in this area is to determine the dimensions of the irreducible representations and the decomposition matrix whose entries record multiplicities of irreducible modules as composition factors of Weyl modules. One way to define Weyl modules is by reducing modulo p (p = char F) the irreducible modules of the complex algebraic group of the same type. Here reduction modulo p happens in both, in the field underlying the group and in the field over which the representing matrices are defined, simultaneously. One of the main tools to study these questions is derived from the Weyl group of Γ. If, for example, Γ is a general linear group, the decomposition matrix of the Weyl modules can be calculated from decomposition numbers of Schur algebras, which in turn can be calculated in terms of symmetric groups. We shall discuss this phenomenon in more detail below.

Let G → GL ( V ) be a representation of a reductive linear algebraic group G on a finite-dimensional vector space V , defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. The categorical quotient X = V // G carries a natural stratification, due to D. Luna. This paper addresses the following questions: (i) Is the Luna stratification of X intrinsic? That is, does every automorphism of V // G map each stratum to another stratum? (ii) Are the individual Luna strata in X intrinsic? That is, does every automorphism of V // G map each stratum to itself? In general, the Luna stratification is not intrinsic. Nevertheless, we give positive answers to questions (i) and (ii) for interesting families of representations.

Determinantal method and the Littlewood-Richardson rule