Linear coloring of planar graphs with large girth

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G is linear if the graph induced by the vertices of any two color classes is the union of vertex-disjoint paths. The linear chromatic number lc(G) of the graph G is the smallest number of colors in a linear coloring of G. In this paper, we give some upper bounds on linear chromatic number for plane graphs with respect to their girth, that improve some results of Raspaud and Wang (2009).

Symmetry, such as structural symmetry, color symmetry and so on, plays an important role in graph coloring. In this paper, we use structural symmetry and color symmetry to study the characterization for the neighbor-distinguishing index of planar graphs. Let G be a simple graph with no isolated edges. The neighbor-distinguishing edge coloring of G is a proper edge coloring of G such that any two adjacent vertices admit different sets consisting of the colors of their incident edges. The neighbor-distinguishing index χa′(G) of G is the smallest number of colors in such an edge coloring of G. It was conjectured that if G is a connected graph with at least three vertices and G≠C5, then χa′(G)≤Δ+2. In this paper, we show that if G is a planar graph with maximum degree Δ≥13, then Δ≤χa′(G)≤Δ+1, and, further, χa′(G)=Δ+1 if and only if G contains two adjacent vertices of maximum degree.

Equitable colorings of planar graphs with maximum degree at least nine

Improved square coloring of planar graphs

Let G = (V, E) be a connected and simple graphs with vertex set V and edge set E. A coloring of graph G is rainbow connected if there is a rainbow path that connects each two vertices of graph G. The minimum k such that G has a rainbow-connected using k colors of the edges of G is the rainbow connection number rc(G) of G. A graph with a bijective mapping f : E → {1, 2, …, |E|}. The sums of each paired vertex has distinct value, defined as ∑ e ∈E(v)f(e). Thus, the function of G clearly an antimagic labeling if the sums of each paired vertex has distinct value. It is clear that rainbow antimagic connection number is the smallest number of colors which are needed to make G rainbow connected, denoted by rcA (G). A bijection function f : E → {1, 2, …, |E|} is called a rainbow antimagic labeling if there is a rainbow path between every pair of vertices and for each edge e = uv ∈ E(G), the weight w(e) = f(u) + f(v). A graph G is rainbow antimagic if G has a rainbow antimagic labeling. In this paper, we will analyze the rainbow antimagic coloring of related book graph.

A proper coloring of a graph is a labeled partition of its vertices into parts which are independent sets. In this paper, given a positive integer j and a family ℱ of connected graphs, we consider proper colorings in which we require that the union of any j color classes induces a subgraph which has no copy of any member of ℱ. This generalizes some well-known types of proper colorings like acyclic colorings (where j = 2 and ℱis the collection of all even cycles) and star colorings (where j = 2 and ℱconsists of just a path on 4 vertices), etc. For this type of coloring, we obtain an upper bound of O(d(k − 1)/(k − j)) on the minimum number of colors sufficient to obtain such a coloring. Here, d refers to the maximum degree of the graph and k is the size of the smallest member of ℱ. For the case of j = 2, we also obtain lower bounds on the minimum number of colors needed in the worst case. As a corollary, we obtain bounds on the minimum number of colors sufficient to obtain proper colorings in which the union of any j color classes is a graph of bounded treewidth. In particular, using O(d8/7) colors, one can obtain a proper coloring of the vertices of a graph so that the union of any two color classes has treewidth at most 2. We also show that this bound is tight within a multiplicative factor of O((logd)1/7). We also consider generalizations where we require simultaneously for several pairs (ji, ℱi) (i = 1, …, l) that the union of any ji color classes has no copy of any member of ℱi and obtain upper bounds on the corresponding chromatic numbers. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 66: 213–234, 2011 © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Proper conflict-free list-coloring, odd minors, subdivisions, and layered treewidth

An L-list coloring of a graph G is a proper vertex coloring in which every vertex v gets a color from a list L(v) of allowed colors. G is called k-choosable if all lists L(v) have exactly k elements and if G is L-list colorable for all possible assignments of such lists. Verifying conjectures of Erdos, Rubin and Taylor it was shown during the last years that every planar graph is 5-choosable and that there are planar graphs which are not 4-choosable. The question whether there are 3-colorable planar graphs which are not 4-choosable remained unsolved. The smallest known example far a non-4-choosable planar graph has 75 vertices and is described by Gutner. In fact, this graph is also 3 colorable and answers the above question. In addition, we give a list assignment for this graph using 5 colors only in all of the lists together such that the graph is not List-colorable. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

For any graph $G$, the $k$-improper chromatic number $χ ^k(G)$ is the smallest number of colours used in a colouring of $G$ such that each colour class induces a subgraph of maximum degree $k$. We investigate the ratio of the $k$-improper chromatic number to the clique number for unit disk graphs and random unit disk graphs to extend results of [McRe99, McD03] (where they considered only proper colouring).

List injective coloring of planar graphs with girth 5, 6, 8

Recently Sun et al [X.-Y. Sun, J.-L. Wu, Y.-W. Wu, J.-F. Hou, Total colorings of planar graphs without adjacent triangles, Discrete Math 309:202-206 (2009)] proved that planar graphs with maximum degree six and with no adjacent triangles are total $8$-colorable. This results implies that if every vertex of a planar graph of maximum degree six is missing either a $3$-cycle or a $4$-cycle, then the graph is total $8$-colorable. In this paper we strengthen that condition by showing that if every vertex of a planar graph of maximum degree six is missing some $k_v$-cycle for $k_v \\in \\{3,4,5,6,7,8\\}$, then the graph is total $8$-colorable.

Odd graph and its applications to the strong edge coloring

Tree graph is a connected graph and has no circuits. Tree graphs used in this study include: broom graph, firework graph, banana tree graph, centipede graph, E graph, and double star graph. Graph coloring is the process of giving color to graph elements with the rule that neighboring elements must not have the same color and the number of colors used must be as minimal as possible. b-Coloring of a graph G is a coloring of the vertices of G such that each color class has at least one vertex adjacent to all other color classes. The b-Chromatic number of a graph G is denoted by φ (G), is the largest integer k such that G has a b-coloring with k colors. The limit of b-coloring of graph G with maximum degree ∆(G) is as follows. χ(G)≤φ(G)≤∆(G)+1.χ(G) is the chromatic number of a graph G where χ(G) is the minimum value of the color required for proper coloring of graph G. While ∆(G) is the maximum degree of the vertices in graph G. This study uses an exploratory research type with axiomatic deductive method and pattern detection method. Based on the results of this study, the results of the b-coloring analysis on the tree graph family are known. The results of this study are expected to be used as study material and development of scientific knowledge related to b-coloring of other graphs

The acyclic edge coloring of planar graphs without a 3-cycle adjacent to a 4-cycle

It is proved that a planar graph with maximum degree Δ ≥ 11 has total (vertex-edge) chromatic number $Delta; + 1. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 26: 53–59, 1997