• Home
  • Search
  • Local and multilinear noncommutative de Leeuw theorems
  • Cite Icon4
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02611-zCopy DOI Icon

Local and multilinear noncommutative de Leeuw theorems

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Let Γ<G\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Gamma < G$$\\end{document} be a discrete subgroup of a locally compact unimodular group G. Let m∈Cb(G)\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$m\\in C_b(G)$$\\end{document} be a p-multiplier on G with 1≤p<∞\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$1 \\le p < \\infty $$\\end{document} and let Tm:Lp(G^)→Lp(G^)\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$T_{m}: L_p({\\widehat{G}}) \\rightarrow L_p({\\widehat{G}})$$\\end{document} be the corresponding Fourier multiplier. Similarly, let Tm|Γ:Lp(Γ^)→Lp(Γ^)\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$T_{m \\vert _\\Gamma }: L_p({\\widehat{\\Gamma }}) \\rightarrow L_p({\\widehat{\\Gamma }})$$\\end{document} be the Fourier multiplier associated to the restriction m|Γ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$m|_{\\Gamma }$$\\end{document} of m to Γ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Gamma $$\\end{document}. We show that c(supp(m|Γ))‖Tm|Γ:Lp(Γ^)→Lp(Γ^)‖≤‖Tm:Lp(G^)→Lp(G^)‖,\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\begin{aligned} c( {{\\,\ extrm{supp}\\,}}( m|_{\\Gamma } ) ) \\Vert T_{m \\vert _\\Gamma }: L_p({\\widehat{\\Gamma }}) \\rightarrow L_p({\\widehat{\\Gamma }}) \\Vert \\le \\Vert T_{m }: L_p({\\widehat{G}}) \\rightarrow L_p({\\widehat{G}}) \\Vert , \\end{aligned}$$\\end{document}for a specific constant 0≤c(U)≤1\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$0 \\le c(U) \\le 1$$\\end{document} that is defined for every U⊆Γ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$U \\subseteq \\Gamma $$\\end{document}. The function c quantifies the failure of G to admit small almost Γ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Gamma $$\\end{document}-invariant neighbourhoods and can be determined explicitly in concrete cases. In particular, c(Γ)=1\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$c(\\Gamma ) =1$$\\end{document} when G has small almost Γ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Gamma $$\\end{document}-invariant neighbourhoods. Our result thus extends the de Leeuw restriction theorem from Caspers et al. (Forum Math Sigma 3(e21):59, 2015) as well as de Leeuw’s classical theorem (Ann Math 81(2):364–379, 1965). For real reductive Lie groups G we provide an explicit lower bound for c in terms of the maximal dimension d of a nilpotent orbit in the adjoint representation. We show that c(BρG)≥ρ-d/4\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$c(B_\\rho ^G) \\ge \\rho ^{-d/4}$$\\end{document} where BρG\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$B_\\rho ^G$$\\end{document} is the ball of g∈G\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$g\\in G$$\\end{document} with ‖Adg‖<ρ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Vert {{\\,\ extrm{Ad}\\,}}_g \\Vert < \\rho $$\\end{document}. We further prove several results for multilinear Fourier multipliers. Most significantly, we prove a multilinear de Leeuw restriction theorem for pairs Γ<G\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Gamma <G$$\\end{document} with c(Γ)=1\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$c(\\Gamma ) = 1$$\\end{document}. We also obtain multilinear versions of the lattice approximation theorem, the compactification theorem and the periodization theorem. Consequently, we are able to provide the first examples of bilinear multipliers on nonabelian groups.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Multilinear transference of Fourier and Schur multipliers acting on noncommutative -spaces

  • Nov 03, 2022
  • Canadian Journal of Mathematics
  • Martijn Caspers +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Representations on partially holomorphic cohomology spaces, revisited

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Contemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society
  • Joseph Wolf
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

Discrete Series Representations for the Orbit Spaces Arising from Two Involutions of Real Reductive Lie Groups

  • Jan 01, 1998
  • Journal of Functional Analysis
  • Toshiyuki Kobayashi
  • Book Chapter

Path Spaces and Their Tangent Spaces

  • Jan 01, 1997
  • Paul Malliavin
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Generalized enveloping algebras and quantum kinematic coherent states of noncompact Lie groups

  • Aug 01, 1993
  • International Journal of Theoretical Physics
  • J Krause
  • Research Article
  • Citations160

Discrete decomposability of the restriction of A q (λ) with respect to reductive subgroups

  • Feb 18, 1998
  • Inventiones Mathematicae
  • Toshiyuki Kobayashi
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Approximating Fourier transformation of orbital integrals

  • Jul 02, 2004
  • Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
  • C.K Arthur Lim
  • Single Book
  • Citations498

Affine Hecke Algebras and Orthogonal Polynomials

  • Mar 20, 2003
  • I G Macdonald
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

A Hörmander–Mikhlin theorem for higher rank simple Lie groups

  • Mar 31, 2025
  • Journal of the London Mathematical Society
  • José M Conde‐Alonso +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Graded characters of induced representations for real reductive Lie groups I

  • Jun 01, 1989
  • Journal of Algebra
  • Luis Casian
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

The Lefschetz Fixed Point Theorem for Compact Groups

  • Sep 01, 1977
  • Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
  • Ronald J Knill
  • Research Article
  • Citations43

Representation theory in complex rank, II

  • May 05, 2016
  • Advances in Mathematics
  • Pavel Etingof
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Dirac Group(oid)s and Their Homogeneous Spaces

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
  • Madeleine Jotz
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

A Characterization of Multipliers of the Herz Algebra

  • May 16, 2023
  • Axioms
  • Hans G Feichtinger
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

On a conjecture of Pisier on the analyticity of semigroups

  • Apr 07, 2015
  • Semigroup Forum
  • Cédric Arhancet
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.