Locally Consistent Constraint Satisfaction Problems with Binary Constraints

The exponential-time hypothesis (ETH) states that 3-SAT is not solvable in subexponential time, i.e. not solvable in O(c^n) time for arbitrary c > 1, where n denotes the number of variables. Problems like k-SAT can be viewed as special cases of the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP), which is the problem of determining whether a set of constraints is satisfiable. In this paper we study the worst-case time complexity of NP-complete CSPs. Our main interest is in the CSP problem parameterized by a constraint language Gamma (CSP(Gamma)), and how the choice of Gamma affects the time complexity. It is believed that CSP(Gamma) is either tractable or NP-complete, and the algebraic CSP dichotomy conjecture gives a sharp delineation of these two classes based on algebraic properties of constraint languages. Under this conjecture and the ETH, we first rule out the existence of subexponential algorithms for finite domain NP-complete CSP(Gamma) problems. This result also extends to certain infinite-domain CSPs and structurally restricted CSP(Gamma) problems. We then begin a study of the complexity of NP-complete CSPs where one is allowed to arbitrarily restrict the values of individual variables, which is a very well-studied subclass of CSPs. For such CSPs with finite domain D, we identify a relation SD such that (1) CSP({SD}) is NP-complete and (2) if CSP(Gamma) over D is NP-complete and solvable in O(c^n) time, then CSP({SD}) is solvable in O(c^n) time, too. Hence, the time complexity of CSP({SD}) is a lower bound for all CSPs of this particular kind. We also prove that the complexity of CSP({SD}) is decreasing when |D| increases, unless the ETH is false. This implies, for instance, that for every c>1 there exists a finite-domain Gamma such that CSP(Gamma) is NP complete and solvable in O(c^n) time.

The Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is a central and generic computational problem which provides a common framework for many theoretical and practical applications. A central line of research is concerned with the identification of classes of instances for which CSP can be solved in polynomial time; such classes are often called “islands of tractability.” A prominent way of defining islands of tractability for CSP is to restrict the relations that may occur in the constraints to a fixed set, called a constraint language , whereas a constraint language is conservative if it contains all unary relations. Schaefer’s famous Dichotomy Theorem (STOC 1978) identifies all islands of tractability in terms of tractable constraint languages over a Boolean domain of values. Since then, many extensions and generalizations of this result have been obtained. Recently, Bulatov (TOCL 2011, JACM 2013) gave a full characterization of all islands of tractability for CSP and the counting version #CSP that are defined in terms of conservative constraint languages. This article addresses the general limit of the mentioned tractability results for CSP and #CSP, that they only apply to instances where all constraints belong to a single tractable language (in general, the union of two tractable languages is not tractable). We show that we can overcome this limitation as long as we keep some control of how constraints over the various considered tractable languages interact with each other. For this purpose, we utilize the notion of a strong backdoor of a CSP instance, as introduced by Williams et al. (IJCAI 2003), which is a set of variables that when instantiated, moves the instance to an island of tractability, that is, to a tractable class of instances. We consider strong backdoors into scattered classes , consisting of CSP instances where each connected component belongs entirely to some class from a list of tractable classes. Figuratively speaking, a scattered class constitutes an archipelago of tractability . The main difficulty lies in finding a strong backdoor of given size k ; once it is found, we can try all possible instantiations of the backdoor variables and apply the polynomial time algorithms associated with the islands of tractability on the list component-wise. Our main result is an algorithm that, given a CSP instance with n variables, finds in time f ( k ) n O (1) a strong backdoor into a scattered class (associated with a list of finite conservative constraint languages) of size k or correctly decides that there is not such a backdoor. This also gives the running time for solving (#)CSP, provided that (#)CSP is polynomial-time tractable for the considered constraint languages. Our result makes significant progress towards the main goal of the backdoor-based approach to CSPs—the identification of maximal base classes for which small backdoors can be detected efficiently.

An instance of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is given by a family of constraints on overlapping sets of variables, and the goal is to assign values from a xed domain to the variables so that all constraints are satised. In the optimization version, the goal is to maximize the number of satised constraints. An approximation algorithm for CSP is called robust if it outputs an assignment satisfying an (1????g("))-fraction of constraints on any (1????")-satisable instance, where the loss function g is such that g(") ! 0 as " ! 0. We study how the robust approximability of CSPs depends on the set of constraint relations allowed in instances, the so-called constraint language. All constraint languages admitting a robust polynomial-time algorithm (with some g) have been characterised by Barto and Kozik, with the general bound on the loss g being doubly exponential, specically g(") = O((log log(1="))= log(1=")). It is natural to ask when a better loss can be achieved: in particular, polynomial loss g(") = O("1=k) for some constant k. In this paper, we consider CSPs with a constraint language having a nearunanimity polymorphism. This general condition almost matches a known necessary condition for having a robust algorithm with polynomial loss. We give two randomized robust algorithms with polynomial loss for such CSPs: one works for any near-unanimity polymorphism and the parameter k in the loss depends on the size of the domain and the arity of the relations in ????, while the other works for a special ternary near-unanimity operation called dual discriminator with k = 2 for any domain size. In the latter case, the CSP is a common generalisation of Unique Games with a xed domain and 2-Sat. In the former case, we use the algebraic approach to the CSP. Both cases use the standard semidenite programming relaxation for CSP.

Handbook of Constraint Programming

The Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is a central and generic computational problem which provides a common framework for many theoretical and practical applications. A central line of research is concerned with the identification of classes of instances for which CSP can be solved in polynomial time; such classes are often called "islands of tractability." A prominent way of defining islands of tractability for CSP is to restrict the relations that may occur in the constraints to a fixed set, called a constraint language, whereas a constraint language is conservative if it contains all unary relations. This paper addresses the general limit of the mentioned tractability results for CSP and #CSP, that they only apply to instances where all constraints belong to a single tractable language (in general, the union of two tractable languages isn't tractable). We show that we can overcome this limitation as long as we keep some control of how constraints over the various considered tractable languages interact with each other. For this purpose we utilize the notion of a \emph{strong backdoor} of a CSP instance, as introduced by Williams et al. (IJCAI 2003), which is a set of variables that when instantiated moves the instance to an island of tractability, i.e., to a tractable class of instances. In this paper, we consider strong backdoors into \emph{scattered classes}, consisting of CSP instances where each connected component belongs entirely to some class from a list of tractable classes. Our main result is an algorithm that, given a CSP instance with $n$ variables, finds in time $f(k)n^{O(1)}$ a strong backdoor into a scattered class (associated with a list of finite conservative constraint languages) of size $k$ or correctly decides that there isn't such a backdoor.

Many natural combinatorial problems can be expressed as constraint satisfaction problems. This class of problems is known to be NP-complete in general, but certain restrictions on theform of the constraints can ensure tractability. The standard way to parameterize interesting subclasses of the constraint satisfaction problem is via finite constraint languages. The mainproblem is to classify those subclasses that are solvable in polynomial time and those that are NP-complete. It was conjectured that if a core of a constraint language has a weak near unanimity polymorphism then the corresponding constraint satisfaction problem is tractable, otherwise it is NP-complete. In the paper we present an algorithm that solves Constraint Satisfaction Problem in polynomial time for constraint languages having a weak near unanimity polymorphism, which proves the remaining part of the conjecture.

The tractability conjecture for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) describes the constraint languages over a finite domain whose CSP can be solved in polynomial-time. The precise formulation of the conjecture uses basic notions from universal algebra. In this talk, we give a short introduction to the universal-algebraic approach to the study of the complexity of CSPs. Finally, we discuss attempts to generalise the tractability conjecture to large classes of constraint languages over infinite domains, in particular for constraint languages that arise in qualitative temporal and spatial reasoning.

Feder and Vardi have conjectured that all constraint satisfaction problems to a fixed structure (constraint language) are polynomial or NP-complete. This so-called dichotomy conjecture remains open, although it has been proved in a number of special cases. Most recently, Bulatov has verified the conjecture for conservative structures, i.e., structures which contain all possible unary relations. We explore three different implications of Bulatov's result. First, the above dichotomy can be extended to so-called inclusive structures, corresponding to conservative constraint satisfaction problems in which each variable comes with its own domain. (This has also been independently observed by Bulatov.) We prove a more general version, extending the dichotomy to so-called three-inclusive structures, i.e., structures which contain, with any unary relation R, all unary relations $R'$ for subsets $R' \subseteq R$ with at most three elements. For the constraint satisfaction problems in this generalization we must restrict the instances to so-called 1-full structures, in which each variable is involved in a unary constraint. This leads to our second focus, which is on restrictions to more general kinds of "full" input structures. For any set W of positive integers, we consider a restriction to W-full input structures, i.e., structures in which, for each $w \in W$, any w variables are involved in a w-ary constraint. We identify a class of structures (the so-called W-set-full structures) for which the restriction to W-full input structures does not change the complexity of the constraint satisfaction problem, and hence the family of these restricted problems also exhibits dichotomy. The general family of three-inclusive constraint satisfaction problems restricted to W-full input structures contains examples which we cannot seem to prove either polynomial or NP-complete. Nevertheless, we are able to use our result on the dichotomy for three-inclusive constraint satisfaction problems, to deduce the fact that all three-inclusive constraint satisfaction problems restricted to W-full input structures are NP-complete or "quasi-polynomial" (of order $n^{O(\log n)}$). Our third focus deals with bounding the number of occurrences of a variable, which we call the degree. We conjecture that the complexity classification of three-inclusive constraint satisfaction problems extends to the case where all degrees are bounded by three. Using previous results, we are able to verify this conjecture in a number of special cases. Conservative, inclusive, and three-inclusive constraint satisfaction problems can be viewed as problems in which each variable is restricted to a "list" of allowed values. This point of view of lists is frequently encountered in the study of graph colorings, graph homomorphisms, and graph partitions. Our results presented here, in all three areas, were strongly motivated by these results on graphs.

In this paper, we introduce a new form of consistency in general constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), called ω-pairwise-consistency which can be applied to both binary and non-binary constraints. Enforcing ω-pairwise-consistency in a CSP simplifies the problem representation by removing those tuples from the given constraints that will not participate in any solution. Typical CSP solving algorithms can then solve the simplified CSP more efficiently. We show that ω-pairwise-consistency is stronger than some other forms of consistency reported in the literature. We also present an algorithm for achieving ω-pairwise-consistency.

Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) are well known models used in Artificial Intelligence. In order to represent real world systems, CSPs have been extended to Dynamic CSPs (DCSPs), which support adding and removing constraints at runtime. Some approaches to the NP-complete problem of solving CSPs use filtering techniques such as arc consistency, which also have been adapted to handle DCSPs with binary constraints. However, there exists only one algorithm targeting non-binary DCSPs (DnGAC4). In this paper we present a new algorithm DnSTR for maintaining arc consistency in DCSPs with non-binary constraints. Our algorithm is based on Simple Tabular Reduction for Table Constraints, a technique that dynamically maintains the tables of supports within the constraints. Initial results show that our algorithm outperforms DnGAC4 both for addition and removal of constraints.

In many practical settings it is useful to find a small unsatisfiable subset of a given unsatisfiable set of constraints. We study this problem from a parameterized complexity perspective, taking the size of the unsatisfiable subset as the natural parameter where the set of constraints is either (i) given a set of clauses, i.e., a formula in conjunctive normal Form (CNF), or (ii) as an instance of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). In general, the problem is fixed-parameter in tractable. For an instance of the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT), it was known to be W[1]-complete. We establish A[2]-completeness for CSP instances, where A[2]-hardness prevails already for the Boolean case. With these fixed-parameter intractability results for the general case in mind, we consider various restricted classes of inputs and draw a detailed complexity landscape. It turns out that often Boolean CSP and CNF formulas behave similarly, but we also identify notable exceptions to this rule. The main part of this article is dedicated to classes of inputs that are induced by Boolean constraint languages that Schaefer [1978] identified as the maximal constraint languages with a tractable satisfiability problem. We show that for the CSP setting, the problem of finding small unsatisfiable subsets remains fixed-parameter intractable for all Schaefer languages for which the problem is non-trivial. We show that this is also the case for CNF formulas with the exception of the class of bijunctive (Krom) formulas, which allows for an identification of a small unsatisfiable subset in polynomial time. In addition, we consider various restricted classes of inputs with bounds on the maximum number of times that a variable occurs (the degree), bounds on the arity of constraints, and bounds on the domain size. For the case of CNF formulas, we show that restricting the degree is enough to obtain fixed-parameter tractability, whereas for the case of CSP instances, one needs to restrict the degree, the arity, and the domain size simultaneously to establish fixed-parameter tractability. Finally, we relate the problem of finding small unsatisfiable subsets of a set of constraints to the problem of identifying whether a given variable-value assignment is entailed or forbidden already by a small subset of constraints. Moreover, we use the connection between the two problems to establish similar parameterized complexity results also for the latter problem.

The ability to solve various constraints is a principal factor of automatic constraint solvers. Most object-oriented languages treat a character string as a primitive data type which is manipulated by string library functions. Most constraint solvers have limitations on their input constraints, such as strong restrictions on the expressiveness of constraints or lack of the ability to solve hybrid constraints. These limitations hinder applying automated constraint solvers on program analysis techniques for programs containing strings and string manipulation functions. We propose an approach to automatically solve program constraints involving strings and string manipulation functions. Based on the character array model, we design a constraint language which contains primitive operations to precisely describe the constraints of commonly used string manipulation functions. The translated string constraints together with numeric constraints are then solved by a two-phase test generation procedure: firstly, a partial solution is obtained to satisfy the arithmetic constraints of the position variables, and the solution is utilized to simplify the string constraints into pure character array constraints; secondly, the pure array constraints are solved by an off-the-shelf array-specific theory based constraint solver. We integrate the approach into an automated testing tool to support the generation of string test cases, and then perform experiments. The results of the experiments prove that the integration of the proposed approach promotes the testing coverage of the existing testing tool, and the integrated tool has an advantage of handling specific string manipulation functions compared with an existing string solver.

Although Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) are generally known to be NP-complete, placing restrictions on the constraint template can yield tractable subclasses. By studying the operations in the polymorphism of the constraint language, we can construct algorithms which solve our CSP in polynomial time. Previous results for CSPs with Mal’tsev [7] and generalized majority-minority operations [10] were improved to include CSPs with k-edge operations [15]. We present an alternative method to solve k-edge CSPs by utilizing Boolean trees placing the problem in the class NC2 . We do this by arranging the logical formulas describing the CSP into a Boolean tree where each leaf represents a constraint in the CSP. We take the conjunction of the constraint formulas yielding partial solutions at every step until we are left with a solution set at the root of the tree which satisfies all of the constraints.

The Workflow Satisfiability Problem (WSP) is a problem of practical interest that arises whenever tasks need to be performed by authorized users, subject to constraints defined by business rules. We are required to decide whether there exists a plan - an assignment of tasks to authorized users - such that all constraints are satisfied. It is natural to see the WSP as a subclass of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) in which the variables are tasks and the domain is the set of users. What makes the WSP distinctive is that the number of tasks is usually very small compared to the number of users, so it is appropriate to ask for which constraint languages the WSP is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT), parameterized by the number of tasks. This novel approach to the WSP, using techniques from CSP, has enabled us to design a generic algorithm which is FPT for several families of workflow constraints considered in the literature. Furthermore, we prove that the union of FPT languages remains FPT if they satisfy a simple compatibility condition. Lastly, we identify a new FPT constraint language, user-independent constraints, that includes many of the constraints of interest in business processing systems. We demonstrate that our generic algorithm has provably optimal running time O*(2^(klog k)), for this language, where k is the number of tasks.

The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) has important applications in computer science and AI. In particular, infinite-domain CSPs have been intensively used in subareas of AI such as spatio-temporal reasoning. Since constraint satisfaction is a computationally hard problem, much work has been devoted to identifying restricted problems that are efficiently solvable. One way of doing this is to restrict the interactions of variables and constraints, and a highly successful approach is to bound the treewidth of the underlying primal graph. Bodirsky & Dalmau [J. Comput. System. Sci., 79(1), 2013] and Huang et al. [Artif. Intell., 195, 2013] proved that CSP(Γ) can be solved in n^(f(w)) time (where n is the size of the instance, w is the treewidth of the primal graph and f is a computable function) for certain classes of constraint languages Γ. We improve this bound to f(w)n^(O(1)), where the function f only depends on the language Γ, for CSPs whose basic relations have the patchwork property. Hence, such problems are fixed-parameter tractable and our algorithm is asymptotically faster than the previous ones. Additionally, our approach is not restricted to binary constraints, so it is applicable to a strictly larger class of problems than that of Huang et al. However, there exist natural problems that are covered by Bodirsky & Dalmau's algorithm but not by ours.