- Conference Article
- 10.2514/6.1991-2054
Nuclear upper stage propulsion for insertion to fast Mars transfer ellipses
- Jun 24, 1991
- David Perkins
The paper investigates the utility of how nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) upper stage propulsion could substantially reduce the interplanetary transit time while greatly enhancing the economics of performing the manned Mars mission. au ECCV GTO IMLEO Isp kg kg/kw km km/sec kw LEO MEV mw NTR sec !N Nomenclature astronomical unit Earth capture crew vehicle geosynchronous transfer orbit initial mass in low Earth orbit specific impulse kilogram kilograms per kilowatt kilometer kilometers per second kilowatt low Earth orbit Mars excursion vehicle megawatt nuclear thermal rocket seconds delta V 1. Background Initial responses to the launch cost issue have been to suppose the development of heavy lift launch vehicles that are assumed to have fundamental launch cost savings. In general, most studies have isolated launch vehicle systems from the interplanetary vehicle assembled in low Earth orbit. This paper investigates a potential synergism between applying nuclear thermal rockets as both upper stages of the launch vehicle and as departure propulsion for a Mars vehicle departure stage. II. InterPlanetary Vehicle Description The mission to Mars is a propulsion technology dominated mission. The velocity change requirements (llV or delta V) are very large and very sensitive to trip time constraints. Due to this, there has been a heavy emphasis on high specific impulse (Isp) propulsion systems for performing the manned missions to Mars. The fundamental problem of high Isp systems is that they are generally thermally limited by material temperature limits. This issue is eliminated by electric propulsion systems that use electro-magnetic forces for accelerating a working fluid, but are thrust limited due to practical limitations in power supply mass. More exotic propulsion systems tend to use plasma working fluids that can only be contained by such methods as magnetic nozzles. The Space Exploration Initiative (SET) has a long range goal to perform a manned mission to Mars. Preliminary design goals of an interplanetary vehicle for this mission stress extremely high propulsion requirements to minimize transit times while allowing significant stay times on Mars. Related to this key trade between propulsion performance and trip time is the space transportation economics of 20 or more Earth launches required of the current launch vehicle architecture to place adequate vehicle mass in low Earth orbit to perform a single manned mission to Mars. The large initial mass in low Earth orbit (IMLEO) to perform the manned Mars mission is recognized as a dominant mission cost driver using the current launch infrastructure. IMLEO has been used as a preliminary figure of merit to evaluate various design approaches. * Senior Advanced Propulsion Engineer, Member AIAA Most analysis to date has focused on nuclear thermal rockets (Isp ... 1000 sec) and megawatt class electric propulsion systems (Isp ... 5000+ sec). The vehicle strategies have been to split the mission between a one way only cargo mission to Mars and a fast transfer manned vehicle. Mars rendezvous is essential for mission success, and techniques to slow at Earth return have used Earth capture crew vehicles (ECCV) with very high excess velocities (9+ km/sec) that are ballistically braked. Analyzed here is a very simple single vehicle. It uses an NTR driven, high thrust, Earth departure stage that is dropped once the vehicle has entered a fast Mars transfer ellipse. Once the vehicle has exited the deep Earth gravity well, it relies solely on a 5000 second Isp electric propulsion system for capture at Mars, departure from Mars, and final mission capture at Mars with zero excess velocity (a conservative assumption) The payload to Mars is broken into two elements. The ECCV is assumed to weigh 40,000 kg for a crew of four, and is the crew's interplanetary travel habitation module. The Mars excursion vehicle (MEV) is the element used to drop the crew from Mars orbit to the planet surface, be the crew's planetary habitation module, carry all science equipment, and carry the ascent module for returning to Mars orbit. The MEV has a baseline weight of 84,000 kg for a nominal 30 day planetary stay time and is scaled with the squareroot of normalized stay time. The MEV is not returned to Earth. Consumables are estimated at 10 kg per person per mission day. optimized for minimum l1V by adjusting the up leg perihelion and aphelion while maintaining the constraints of Earth rendezvous and travel time. Figure 2 (with the radius in millions of kilometers) shows a transfer ellipse for the up leg for the 320 day travel time, 80 day Mars stay time, 0 degree mean Mars true anomaly case. Figure 3 shows the down leg of that mission. The mission l1V requirement of 29.1 krn/sec is divided into 4.2 krn/sec for Earth departure (in heliocentric space), 6.0 krn/sec for Mars capture, 7.4 krn/sec for Mars departure, and 11.5 krn/sec for Earth capture. Transfer Ellipse Up. III. Interplanetary Mission Modeling The problem of analyzing the interplanetary mission can be driven by very exacting issues such as actual planetary configurations for particular mission opportunities, the requirements for travel time, and the Mars stay time. The issue that needs near term resolution, however, is the general efficacy of various propulsion and/or vehicle configuration options for the Mars mission in general. To answer these type of questions, it was necessary to generalize the Mars transfer problem. To do so, simplifying assumptions were that the Mars and Earth orbits were coplanar, and that the Earth orbit was circular. The nominal planetary configurations for Mars, Earth, and Venus are shown in Figure 1. The radius units are in astronomical units (Earth radius =1 au) and the angular units are the true anomaly of the orbital positions in degrees (Mars perihelion = 0 degrees). tojMJoC:: ~ •• ~: ••• . -
Read more