• Home
  • Search
  • Lumbar Discectomy Using Tubular Retractor and Microendoscopy
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon3
  • https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2008.15.4.265Copy DOI Icon

Lumbar Discectomy Using Tubular Retractor and Microendoscopy

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective study Objectives: To compare the surgical results of microendoscopic discectomy using a tubular retractor with those of a conventional discectomy for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus. Summary of Literature Review: Minimally invasive approaches to the lumbar spine have been attempted with success over the past 25 years. Materials and Methods: This study examined 36 cases who underwent lumbar discectomy using a tubular retractor and microendoscopy (Group A) and 30 cases who underwent a conventional discectomy (Group B). The operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay were recorded. The clinical results were assessed using the Korea Version Oswestry Disability Index (KODI), and the radiological results were evaluated from changes in disc height. Results: The patients in Group A had a longer operation time(mean, 95.56±23.57 minutes vs 81.17±35.30 minutes, p=0.062), less intraoperative blood loss (mean, 58.61±97.08 cc vs 161.00±88.64 cc, p=0.001) and a shorter hospitalization stay (mean, 8.22 ±4.99 days vs 17.33±10.98 days, p=0.001) than group B. There was significant improvement in the mean KODI score for Group A; 6.36±7.18 and Group B; 5.97±5.14. However, there was no significant difference in the pain improvement (mean, 1.14 ±1.15 vs 1.30±1.06, p=0.559) and walking index (mean, 0.25±0.44 vs 0.30±0.47, p=0.656). In terms of social life, Group A had better results (mean, 0.20±0.48 vs 0.67±1.01, p=0.018). The disc height according to radiography decreased from 8.44±1.98 mm to 7.40±1.59 mm in Group A and 9.07±1.93 mm to 7.67±1.90 mm in Group B, but there were no statistical differences in the changes in disc height between the two groups (p=0.143). Conclusion: Microendoscopic discectomy is an effective procedure with good outcomes in treating lumbar disc herniation that allows less tissue trauma, compared with conventional open discectomy.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations92

Risk factors for lumbar intervertebral disc height narrowing: a population-based longitudinal study in the elderly

  • Nov 09, 2015
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Koji Akeda +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

The Changes of Adjacent Segments after Fusions (above 3-levels to L5) in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disorders

  • Jan 01, 2002
  • Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
  • Whoan Jeang Kim +5
  • Abstract

145. Disc height assessment: interobserver variability and auto segmentation technology

  • Aug 10, 2021
  • The Spine Journal
  • Douglas P Beall
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Development of a decision-making pathway for utilizing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

  • Oct 28, 2021
  • European Spine Journal
  • Dominik Adl Amini +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Expandable versus static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages: comparing radiographic outcomes and complication profiles

  • Sep 28, 2024
  • The Spine Journal
  • Alexander M Crawford +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Microdiscectomy, Interspinous Device Implantation, and Full-Endoscopic Discectomy for Simple Lumbar Disc Herniation.

  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Journal of clinical medicine
  • Chien-Ching Lee +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Clinical study of Microendoscopic Discectomy + Fibrous Ring Suture Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy alone in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in young and middle-aged patients.

  • Feb 06, 2024
  • Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
  • Hong-Xun Cui +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations100

Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED

  • May 31, 2005
  • European Spine Journal
  • Ryuichi Sasaoka +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Facetectomy and Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages for Lumbosacral Foraminal Stenosis

  • Jan 01, 2010
  • Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
  • Jin Hoon Park +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Development of an ex vivo cavity model to study repair strategies in loaded intervertebral discs.

  • Apr 01, 2016
  • European Spine Journal
  • Zhen Li +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Caudad Insertion of Pedicle Screws Facilitates Interbody Distraction During Spondylolisthetic Vertebrae Restoration: A Retrospective Study

  • Sep 15, 2021
  • Pain and Therapy
  • Xin Xi +9
  • Research Article

Initial Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Cage Implants in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Review

  • Jun 04, 2025
  • Cureus
  • Mary J Parkash +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional–Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration

  • Dec 01, 2021
  • World Neurosurgery
  • Dominik Adl Amini +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.

  • Jul 05, 2022
  • Journal of Robotic Surgery
  • Lianlei Wang +6
  • Abstract
  • Citations1

Poster 40: Decreased Lower Back Pain after Noninvasive Spinal Decompression May be Due to Restored Disk Height

  • Nov 01, 2008
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Joseph V Pergolizzi +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.