Lump in my side: transplanted kidney or something more?

Case report - IntroductionCatastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare, life-threatening disease occurring in up to 1% of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) cases. It was first defined in 1992 and remains a difficult to treat entity with a mortality rate of 37%. We describe a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and CAPS presenting with simultaneous multi-organ injuries who was successfully managed with ‘triple’ therapy including cyclophosphamide.Case report - Case descriptionA 42-year-old female presented to her local hospital with chest pain and worsening vision. She had a background of SLE, triple antibody-positive APS (previous DVT, pregnancy loss and strokes), hypertension, a metallic mitral valve, a previous myocardial infarction and pre-existing visual impairment due to a prior intra-cerebral bleed related to anticoagulation. Examination revealed a faint malar rash, cortical blindness and long tract neurological signs. Her ECG showed ischaemic changes and the admission troponin was significantly raised (3773ng/L). An echocardiogram showed new left ventricular dysfunction and a subsequent cardiac MRI was in keeping with coronary artery disease. Investigations showed an acute kidney injury, newly deranged liver function tests and a raised INR (>11, with no bleeding). Complement was normal with a low dsDNA titre. Urinalysis revealed proteinuria and a protein creatinine ratio measured 176mg/mmol. MRI diffusion weighted brain imaging showed acute bilateral occipital and left fronto-parietal infarcts. She had symptoms of a lupus flare with arthralgia and a butterfly facial rash. COVID-19 PCR tests were negative and she had not been recently vaccinated. She was diagnosed with CAPS and transferred to St Thomas’ hospital intensive care.On arrival, she received 1mg intravenous vitamin K followed by triple therapy for CAPS: an unfractionated heparin infusion, oral prednisolone 40mg daily, 5 days of plasma exchange and, given her background of SLE, she was treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide (according to the EUROLUPUS regimen). Intravenous methylprednisolone was avoided due to a previous hypertensive encephalopathy reaction. She responded rapidly. Her troponin fell from a peak of 5054 to 294ng/L, her creatinine settled at a new baseline (232umol/L) and her liver function normalised. She was switched back to warfarin due to her metallic valve and started on aspirin for cardiovascular secondary prevention. She required physical and occupational therapy due to her strokes but recovered well.Case report - DiscussionAccording to the 2003 criteria, CAPS can be classified as definite when there is evidence of: ≥3 organs involved, development of manifestations simultaneously or within a week, confirmation by imaging and/or histopathology of small vessel occlusion and positive antiphospholipid antibodies. Probable CAPS is when 3 out of the 4 criteria are present. In this case, three organs were confirmed to be involved with imaging showing cerebral and cardiac ischaemia. Her creatinine rose from a base of 190 to 289umol/L coupled with a high protein creatinine ratio confirming renal involvement. A Budd-Chiari syndrome was also suspected due to deranged liver function tests and INR, though imaging performed after therapy did not confirm this. A biopsy of any of these four organs was not feasible given the severity of her presentation and coagulopathy. There are no randomised controlled trials but data from the CAPS registry guides treatment and management follows a logical approach: anticoagulation to treat thrombosis, glucocorticoids for inflammation and plasma exchange (or IVIG) to remove the circulating autoantibodies. Triple therapy was associated with a reduced mortality compared to no treatment (28.6% versus 75%, respectively).Following analyses from the CAPS registry we also chose to treat with cyclophosphamide, which is associated with improved survival in patients with SLE. This decision was based on the clinical features of an SLE flare as opposed to serological grounds. There have been reports of rituximab and eculizumab being used successfully in CAPS, though generally as a last resort. As complement activation is seen in animal models of antiphospholipid syndrome thrombosis and rituximab is often used in refractory SLE, they may prove to be promising agents for refractory CAPS.Case report - Key learning pointsPrompt recognition and early treatment is vital in managing CAPSTriple therapy with anticoagulation, glucocorticoids and plasma exchange / IVIG is associated with better survival in CAPSCyclophosphamide is associated with better survival in patients with CAPS and concomitant SLE

IL-2, IL-5, TNF-α and IFN-γ mRNA expression in epidermal keratinocytes of systemic lupus erythematosus skin lesions

There is evidence that HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) can be prevented and its progression slowed by HAART. More than 20 antiretroviral drugs and drug combinations are available, and life expectancy of HIV-infected individuals is now measured in decades. However, it is likely that more indolent forms of HIVAN remain common in the HAART era, predisposing patients to nephrotoxicity from HAART and related therapies. Indeed, the prevalence of acute renal failure and chronic kidney disease appears to be increasing among HIV-infected patients in the United States [1,2], and kidney disease has emerged as an important predictor of mortality [2,3]. Adverse effects of antiviral treatments should be considered, including their long-term renal toxicity and their role in renal scarring after acute adverse events. In addition, the burden of comorbid chronic kidney disease is likely to increase with ageing of the HIV-infected cohort, continued growth of the epidemic among susceptible minorities and increasing prevalence of HAART-related metabolic abnormalities. In this population of patients, evaluation of renal disorders and prevention of evolution toward chronic renal failure are a crucial challenge. Epidemiology of HIV-associated nephropathy and HIV-related diseases Most epidemiological data on HIVAN generated in the pre-HAART era are based on the US Renal Data System (USRDS). Initial clinical studies indicated that 10% of HIV-1-infected patients appeared to develop renal disease, of which 90% showed clinical and/or pathological features consistent with HIVAN [4,5]. Past postmortem studies also yielded a prevalence of HIVAN ranging between 1% and 15%, depending on the population [6,7]. The prevalence and distribution of HIVAN was associated strongly with African-American ancestry [8,9] as indicated by an USRDS-based report of 3653 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to HIVAN during 1992 to 1997 [10]. Since the introduction of HAART, national epidemiological data show a reduction of incidence of ESRD associated with HIV-associated renal disease in the United States [11,12] contrasting with the steady increase in HIV/AIDS in the general population [13]. From a mathematical model using available epidemiological data on HIV-infected patients in the USRDS database and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data for HIV-seropositive patients, Blower et al.[14] suggested that HAART decreases the incidence of ESRD in patients with HIVAN and the mortality from HIV, with an overall efficacy of 23%. This trend has been attributed, in part, to beneficial effects of HAART, which was commenced in 1996. Preliminary retrospective series or case reports support the efficacy of HAART in improving outcome in HIVAN [15–19]. In a retrospective cohort study, Szczech et al.[20] reported that treatment with protease inhibitors (and prednisone) was associated with a slower decline in renal function in patients with HIVAN or other HIV-1-related renal diseases. Cosgrove et al.[18] reported another retrospective series of 23 patients with HIV-1-related nephropathies, including patients with HIVAN. Patients with HIVAN were treated with HAART and none doubled their serum creatinine. In the non-HAART group, all patients showed a doubling of serum creatinine, two patients died and eight required dialysis. One study [21], retrospectively comparing two cohorts of 102 and 33 patients with biopsy-proven-HIVAN in the pre-HAART and in the HAART eras, respectively, also argues for improvement of renal survival by HAART. However, a recent postmortem-based survey reported that 12% of African-American patients dying of HIV-1 infection have histologically confirmed HIVAN [22]. Even if HAART decreases the incidence of HIVAN in African-Americans, the prevalence of HIVAN may not change because of the improvement in the survival of these patients. The onset of HIVAN could, therefore, just be delayed. Indeed, we have recently reported a patient with biopsy-proven HIVAN despite the lack of any past or present AIDS-defining condition and HAART-controlled HIV-1 infection for at least 2 years [23] Schwartz et al.[1] developed a mathematical model of the dynamics of HIV infection in the ESRD population in order to assess the impact of HAART on the progression of patients with AIDS to the development of ESRD and to predict the prevalence of HIV-related ESRD through to 2020. The authors concluded that, despite the potential benefit of HAART, the prevalence of HIV-related ESRD in the United States would be expected to rise in the future as a result of the expansion of the number with AIDS among black individuals. Nonetheless, while prospective controlled trials evaluating HAART on HIVAN or other HIV-1-related nephropathies are not ethically acceptable, consensus guidelines recommend consideration of HAART in HIV-infected patients with chronic renal insufficiency [24]. Changes in clinicopathological presentation HIV-associated nephropathy HIVAN is an unusual form of poorly responsive glomerular disease characterized by nephrotic syndrome, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and a rapid fulminant progression to ESRD. Proteinuria occurs in up to 30% of HIV-infected patients, but not all of these patients have HIVAN [25–27]. The true prevalence of HIVAN is not known. The geographic distribution of HIVAN is not uniform, and it depends on specific risk factors for HIV disease, including race, gender and drug use. There is a striking predilection for HIVAN among African-Americans, as is also true for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis associated with intravenous drug use [4]. HIVAN is 7–10 times more common in men than in women, and 30–60% of people with HIVAN have a history of intravenous drug use [7]. In the pre-HAART era, patients with HIVAN typically presented with a nephrotic syndrome consisting of nephrotic-range proteinuria classically without oedema despite severe hypoalbuminaemia. Urinalysis reveals microhaematuria. Patients with HIVAN are typically not hypertensive, even in the face of renal insufficiency, and their kidneys are usually normal to large in size and highly echogenic by ultrasonography. The most common histological light microscopy finding is a collapsing form of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Tubulo-interstitial scarring, atrophy and marked dilatation of the tubules (microcystic dilatations) are usually present. Immunofluorescent microscopy is usually negative. Electron microscopy reveals wrinkling of the basement membranes, epithelial cell proliferation and focal foot process effacement. Tubulo-reticular structures in the glomerular endothelial cells consisting of ribonucleoprotein and membrane, the synthesis of which is stimulated by alpha-interferon, is highly predictive of HIVAN. Risk factors for progressive renal disease include CD4 cell count < 200 cells/μl, detectable plasma HIV RNA, hypertension, low plasma albumin and elevated serum creatinine [28]. In our experience during the HAART era, where most patients have well-controlled HIV, a nephropathy typically presents as stable or slowly progressive renal failure, hypertension, glomerular proteinuria, not necessarily of nephrotic range, and a preserved rather than increased kidney size. Pathologically, simple tuft ischaemia tends to replace florid (?) glomerular collapse while mild interstitial infiltration and cystic tubular dilatation are seen. Paradoxically, we noted more frequent atherosclerotic vascular changes even in younger affected patients. Until recently, the clinical course of HIVAN was one of inexorable progression to ESRD in 6–12 months, with limited treatment options. More options are now available to patients; these include antiretroviral therapy, steroid treatment and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Evidence exists that antiretroviral therapy can reverse or improve the progression of HIVAN [15,16,19]; however despite the widespread use of HAART, no prospective studies have demonstrated benefit in slowing the progression of HIVAN. The survival benefit from antiretroviral therapy is indisputable. HAART may also prevent the development of HIVAN in at-risk groups. Lucas et al.[29] evaluated a cohort of 3976 at-risk patients in the Johns Hopkins HIV clinic database from 1989 to 2001. They identified 135 cases of HIVAN based on either clinical or pathological criteria. There was a 50% decline in HIVAN incidence in 1998–2001 compared with 1995–1997, and HAART was associated with a 60% reduction in risk for developing HIVAN. Patients with AIDS developed HIVAN at a rate of 12.5/1000 person-years, compared with 3.1/1000 person-years in patients without AIDS (relative risk, 4.1). However, it is notable that in over 1071 person-years of follow-up, no patient developed HIVAN when HAART was initiated prior to the onset of AIDS. The rationale for treating HIVAN with corticosteroids is that steroids are the mainstay of treatment for idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [30]. The first report of steroid treatment in four patients with HIVAN found a significant reduction in serum creatinine after a course of corticosteroids lasting 2–4 weeks [31]. The initial case report study has now been extended to include 20 patients, and these results confirm that prednisone at a dose of 60 mg daily for 2–11 weeks leads to a significant reduction in serum creatinine and in 24-hour urinary protein excretion [30]. The encouraging short-term results must be balanced by the findings during the follow-up period. During a median follow-up of 44 weeks, 8 of 20 patients required maintenance dialysis, 11 of 20 died of HIV disease after completing prednisone treatment, and 6 of 20 developed serious infections while receiving prednisone. Only 7 of 20 patients were alive and free from ESRD after a median of 25 weeks following initiation of prednisone. A more recent retrospective study reported the course of HIVAN in 13 patients treated with prednisone and a further eight patients not treated with prednisone. Even after controlling for baseline creatinine, proteinuria, and CD4 cell count, among other variables, the prednisone group had an 80% reduction in risk of progressive azotaemia after 3 months [32]. Prednisone may work by reducing the amount of interstitial inflammation [33]. In 1995, The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) designed a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial to determine the efficacy of prednisone therapy in HIVAN, but this trial was cancelled because of poor patient recruitment. The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and fosinopril have also been studied as possible therapy for HIVAN [34]. In one study in which 18 patients were enrolled, nine were treated with captopril, 6.5–25 mg three times daily, and nine controls did not receive captopril. All patients had biopsy-proven HIVAN, and renal survival was defined as the time from initiation of captopril treatment to initiation of dialysis (ESRD). The initial mean serum creatinine concentration was 34 mg/l (±7.0) in the captopril group and 37 mg/l (±0.5) in the controls. A small renal survival advantage of approximately 8 weeks (median 83 versus 30 days), was seen in the captopril group [35]. Two non-randomized studies have investigated the effect of fosinopril on the progression of HIVAN. Both studies showed a significantly lower risk of reaching ESRD in the fosinopril group compared with non-treated controls [35,36]. Despite the limitations of these studies, they suggest that therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor initiated early may offer renal survival benefits in HIVAN. The ACTG is currently developing a clinical trial (protocol A5179) to compare treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker (valsartan) plus HAART with HAART alone in patients with HIVAN. Indications for kidney biopsy The decision to obtain a renal biopsy sample is somewhat controversial in the general medical community. Even if a patient presents with the classic clinical features of HIVAN, clinical presentation is predictive of the biopsy diagnosis in only 50–60% of patients. Furthermore, non-invasive tests or clinical markers to identify the precise renal lesion do not exist. Renal biopsy should be offered to patients because a variety of renal lesions occur in HIV-infected patients, and the treatment implications and prognosis vary according to the biopsy results. We, therefore, believe that to distinguish HIVAN from other forms of renal disease, and to redefine HIVAN pathological findings in the HAART era, HIV-positive patients who have unexplained renal abnormalities (i.e., kidney failure and/or daily protein excretion greater than 1 g and/or microscopic haematuria) should have a renal biopsy. HAART-related kidney disorders Electrolyte and acid-base profiles It is noteworthy that the biological profile in HIV-infected patients has dramatically changed in the HAART era. Previous studies stated that hyponatraemia, hyperkalaemia or hypokalaemia and acidosis were the main biological abnormalities in HIV-positive patients [37,38]. A prospective cross-sectional descriptive study (1219 HIV-infected patients over 3 months) undertaken to assess the prevalence of fluid electrolyte and acid–base disturbances showed hyperuricaemia and hypophosphataemia to be the most prevalent abnormalities [39]. Hyperuricaemia was detected in 140 (41.3%) out of the 339 patients tested. Among hyperuricaemic patients, only 47% were treated with didanosine. Multivariate analysis showed that patients not taking non-nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) had a 1.8-fold risk [95%confidenceinterval(CI),1.1–2.9] of hyperuricaemia. With protease inhibitor treatment and male gender, the risk of hyperuricaemia rose to 4.4 (95% CI, 2.1–9.6). A plasma phosphate level below the normal range was observed in 63 (17.2%) of the patients tested for plasma phosphate. Multivariate analysis showed that patients taking an NNRTI regimen had a 1.9-fold increase in risk of hypophosphataemia (95% CI, 1.1–3.3), male patients had a 2.6-fold increase in risk (95% CI, 1.1–6.3). Bicarbonate plasma level below the normal range was observed in 112 patients (13.6%) out of the 824 patients tested. Multivariate analysis showed that patients taking HAART had a 4.4-fold increase in risk having a low plasma bicarbonate level (95% CI, 2.2–8.9), women had a 2.4-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.5–3.8) and patients with CD4 cell count < 200 cells/μl had a 1.8-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.2–2.9). Only 13 patients (3.1%) out of the 419 patients tested exhibited low calcium levels (n = 13). Factors significantly associated with low plasma calcium concentrations were NNRTI regimen and CD4 cell count. An absolute CD4 count < 200 cells/μl was associated with an increased risk of hypocalcaemia when compared with a cont of > 200 cells/μl. Lactic acidosis Approximately 20–30% of patients who are treated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) can be found to have asymptomatic hyperlactataemia; this typically develops after several months of therapy and may be transient [40–42]. Severe lactic acidosis is much rarer, occurring in 1.5–2.5% of patients, is usually preceded by fatigue, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, abdominal pain and other systemic symptoms, and is associated with a mortality rate of approximately 80%. Lipoatrophy, myopathy, peripheral neuropathy and pancreatitis are more often observed in patients with symptomatic hyperlactataemia rather than in patients who have frank lactic acidosis. Risk factors include NRTI use, longer duration of treatment, older age, female gender, pregnancy, hypertriglyceridaemia, obesity, concomitant hepatitis C infection, use of ribavirin, impaired kidney function and alcohol ingestion [41–44]. Acute renal failure Before the HAART era, mild acute renal failure, defined as a peak serum creatinine ≥ 20 mg/l, was been reported to occur in up to 20% of hospitalized HIV-infected patients [45]. This is in comparison with an incidence rate of 1% in hospitalized non-HIV-infected patients [46]. The two major acute renal complications in HIV disease that resulted in potentially reversible failure were acute tubular necrosis and HIVAN. Sepsis contributed to the development of severe acute tubular necrosis, defined as a peak creatinine ≥ 60 mg/l, in up to 75% of cases [47]. A study of kidney biopsy specimens in HIV-infected patients with severe acute renal failure not thought to be from prerenal causes or acute tubular necrosis reported the following distribution of renal lesions: 53% haemolytic uraemic syndrome; 40% acute tubular necrosis, either of ischaemic–toxic origin or rhabdomyolysis; 26% obstructive renal failure, extrinsic, drug induced or secondary to paraprotein precipitation; 23% HIVAN; 3% acute interstitial nephritis; and 6% various glomerulonephritides [48]. In a recent cohort study of ambulatory HIV-infected patients, acute renal failure occurred in nearly 10% of patients, with an incidence rate of 5.9 episodes/100 person-years [49] Antiretroviral agents have been shown to have a range of nephrotoxic effects, including crystal-induced obstruction, tubular toxicity, interstitial nephritis and electrolyte abnormalities. Drugs are responsible for one-third of all acute renal failure events. Although only responsible for a few events, antiretroviral drugs cause two-thirds of all obstructive acute renal failure. Indinavir, tenofovir, and nevirapine were the antiretroviral drugs associated with acute renal failure in this cohort [49–52]. Iatrogenic acute renal failure can be dose dependent, manifesting as acute tubular necrosis, acute glomerulopathy, vascular disease or interstitial immunoallergic reactions. Table 1 summarizes the nephrotoxicities induced by antiretroviral drugs [53–77]. According to the renal syndrome, the clinician will attempt to distinguish between possible causes from each of the four aetiopathogenic groups of nephropathies defined above. Depending on the situation, renal biopsy may be indicated. Table 2 proposes a diagnostic flowchart applicable for a HAART- treated patient with renal abnormalities.Table 1: Antiretroviral drug-induced renal abnormalities.Table 2: HIV-infected patients with renal abnormalities: a diagnosis proposition.Chronic renal failure Chronic renal abnormalities are frequently observed in HIV-infected individuals. Despite drug adjustment, some HIV-infected patients experience progressive renal disease. Usually, the diagnosis of renal toxicity of antiretroviral treatment is considered when patients experience acute renal abnormalities. However, the potential insidious long-term renal toxicity of antiviral treatment may be underappreciated in the pathogenesis of nephropathies of chronic progression in HIV infected patients. In prospective studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the protease inhibitor indinavir, or some reverse transcriptase inhibitors, a of patients with acute renal failure did not their baseline renal function and data the of renal after acute renal related to antiretroviral the large range of kidney diseases that may occur in HIV-positive patients taking HAART, each case should be and the benefits and of drug The main for the clinician is to determine the of the nephropathy in order to specific in to symptomatic complications With the of HIV the complications associated with HIV infection have to include changes in HIV protease inhibitors and the to peripheral and impaired distribution elevated plasma and and elevated plasma have been reported in clinical trials and in changes in may be related to HIV disease or may be a of treatment with antiretroviral agents through in to long-term antiretroviral therapy the development of chronic kidney disease, through metabolic complications Indeed, black and have been associated with the development of Both protease inhibitors and NNRTI have been associated with and studies have shown plasma concentrations to be associated with increased mortality in in and/or older patients Evidence of hyperuricaemia in HIV-positive patients should to change in the of patients, as of The impact of and antiretroviral metabolic disorders on the of kidney or disease in patients with HIV therefore, an important Risk factors for nephrotoxicity renal adverse are not it is possible to identify patients who may be at increased risk factors for kidney disease, including older age, African-American comorbid and kidney disease, to be associated with renal failure in patients In addition, disease and hepatitis have been associated with increased risk for acute or chronic kidney disease in HIV-infected patients kidney function is one of the most of risk for acute or chronic kidney disease in patients The recently consensus guidelines for chronic kidney disease in all HIV-infected patients at the time of with frequent in the of kidney function or other evidence of kidney disease [24]. Initial should include and serum creatinine with of the glomerular rate by either the or of in Renal Disease has been in patients with HIV, are more than serum creatinine of patients with a glomerular rate < 60 will for dose of by the and should more frequent of kidney toxicity and The according to the glomerular rate and the of dose for each are in Table The of proteinuria by or also chronic kidney disease, and may identify patients at increased risk for nephrotoxicity [24]. In to chronic kidney disease, other factors as and concomitant of other nephrotoxic agents may also patients to the nephrotoxic effects of HAART or related HAART can also to Indeed, studies over the past 20 in patient have demonstrated a between in disease and et found a increase in the risk of developing elevated among patients receiving compared with receiving In addition, the results suggested that the increased risk associated with was at least in part, through an increase in Antiretroviral dose based on creatinine with HIV and hepatitis or C The effect of with hepatitis in and C on disease progression and survival among patients infected with HIV has an increasing this has from the effects of while this function and decreases the incidence of infections in HIV-infected patients, it also the of chronic disease to the overall and mortality of these individuals. use of alcohol is an in this Approximately of HIV-infected patients are Among intravenous drug with HIV, this rate is at least 50% and can be up to 90% in with and HIV is with of HIV-infected individuals having evidence of past or infection The prevalence of chronic of among HIV-infected individuals is Among intravenous drug 90% of HIV-infected individuals have evidence of to and 60% also have evidence of past infection with the of of renal disorders has not been reported in However, proteinuria and have been reported frequently in or patients without HIV proteinuria to and in infected patients; proteinuria to 30% and 30% in patients. has been in and patients and is characterized by and peripheral neuropathy The renal presentation of in patients may include renal insufficiency, proteinuria, and The course of renal disease is much more in the with some to ESRD in a of months However, while reports had shown between HIV and with et did not an between HIV infection and In patients not with HIV, the of nephropathy with and has also been and the reports of nephropathy in HIV-infected patients may be by the incidence of infection, and in this population The life expectancy of HIV-positive patients treated with HAART now that of the general The has to the and renal that can increase with more in patients hypertensive, 2 and risk factors to renal disorders from HIV infection and HAART. it more important to develop for treating these patients from the renal Renal to be in patients with HIV/AIDS and potentially reversible factors to be identified and the we suggest the antiretroviral drug use and kidney disease in HIV-infected patients. All patients at the time of HIV diagnosis should be for kidney disease with a for proteinuria and a of renal is no evidence of proteinuria at initial patients at risk for the development of renal disease (i.e., African-Americans, with CD4 cell < 200 cells/μl or plasma HIV > and with hypertension, or should Renal function should be on a to assess for changes over proteinuria, renal renal biopsy. Patients with glomerular rate 60 or with proteinuria > by or on should be to a for further evaluation and In HIV-infected patients with evidence of should be controlled to a level no than enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor are the drugs of first for patients with proteinuria, and these drugs should also be considered in HIV-infected patients with renal disease. should be in patients receiving protease inhibitors. Patients with HIVAN should be treated with HAART at HAART should not be from patients because of the of their renal The antiretroviral regimen is a between the benefits of and the risk of adverse events, including The of renal insufficiency should the and dose of the antiretroviral of prednisone should be considered in patients with HIVAN if HAART alone not result in improvement of renal function or in patients with HIVAN renal failure is A that the of short-term the benefit of slowing the progression to ESRD and the should the decision reduction of for antiretroviral drugs that are the kidneys is With dose and renal insufficiency or ESRD is not an absolute to the use of any antiretroviral nucleoside should not be in patients with renal function for of the development of lactic acidosis. Drugs that are by dialysis should be after to of In HIV-positive renal are important between the inhibitors and protease inhibitors, and the NNRTI drug may increase levels of and tenofovir, their In the of protease inhibitors, a major reduction in the of inhibitors may be Although most antiretroviral agents are free of renal toxicity, renal can occur and may to be from progression of HIVAN or other HIV-related kidney kidney diseases by other infections or or kidney diseases to HIV infection and its and diseases have emerged as important complications in patients, infections as causes of among HIV-infected patients. patients with risk or a history of a consideration should be to or to protease antiretroviral with the use of NRTI or NRTI and and between disease and will diagnosis and treatment of chronic kidney and vascular diseases with the of progression to ESRD. The authors and for their The authors in the had to all the data in the study and had for the decision to to

AB0503 Large Vessel Vasculitis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - A Case Series from A Single Centre in South india

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease in an adolescent diagnosed following COVID-19 infection.

Objective To analyze the risk factors of chronic kidney disease complicated with acute kidney injury and its treatment efficacy.Methods 180 chronic kidney disease patients complicated with acute kidney injury were divided into the elderly group and the young group.The underlying diseases,risk factors of acute kidney injury and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups.Results The proportions of chronic glomerulonephritis,nephrotic syndrome and lupus nephritis in young and middle-aged group were 37.8％,15.6％ and 20.0％,which were significantly higher than those in the elderly group (17.8％,8.9％,2.2％) (P ＜ 0.05).The proportions of diabetic nephropathy and hypertensive renal injury in elderly patients were 31.1％ and 24.4％,which were significantly higher than those in the young and middle-aged group (6.7％,4.4％) (P ＜ 0.05).In the old age group,the proportions of infections and renal toxicity drugs were 28.9％ and 22.2％,which were significantly higher than those in the young group.In the young and middle-aged group,the proportions of malignant hypertension and deterioration of the primary disease were 22.2％ and 26.7％,which were significantly higher than those in the elderly group (P ＜0.05).The total effective rate of the young group was 88.9％,which was significantly higher than 71.1％ of the elderly group (x2 =6.846,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Elderly and young and middle-aged chronic kidney disease patients complicated with acute kidney injury have differences in risk factors and clinical efficacy. Key words: Nephrosis ; Kidney injury; Risk factors ; Age groups

There is little information about the epidemiology and factors associated with opioid therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to assess the prevalence of opioid therapy and explore factors associated with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in patients with SLE. Patients with SLE were matched with controls without SLE in a population-based cohort on January 1, 2015. We captured demographics, manifestations of SLE, comorbidities (ie, fibromyalgia, mood disorders, osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain [CLBP], chronic kidney disease (CKD), avascular necrosis, osteoporosis, fragility fractures, and cancer), and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Opioid prescription data were used to assess the prevalence of LTOT, defined as contiguous prescriptions (gaps of < 30 days between prescriptions) and receiving opioid therapy for ≥ 90 days or ≥ 10 prescriptions before the index date. A total of 465 patients with SLE and 465 controls without SLE were included. In total, 13% of patients with SLE and 3% of controls without SLE were receiving opioid therapy (P < 0.001), and 11% of patients with SLE were on LTOT vs 1% of controls without SLE. Among patients with SLE, acute pericarditis (odds ratio [OR] 3.92, 95% CI 1.78-8.66), fibromyalgia (OR 7.78, 95% CI 3.89-15.55), fragility fractures (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.25-11.07), CLBP (OR 4.00, 95% CI 2.13-7.51), and mood disorders (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.47-5.16) were associated with LTOT. We did not find an association between opioid therapy and ADI. Patients with SLE are more likely to receive LTOT than controls. Among patients with SLE, LTOT was associated with pericarditis and several comorbidities. However, LTOT was not associated with CKD despite the limited pain control options among these patients.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has significant clinical and therapeutic implications. This study assessed CKD prevalence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), both with and without lupus nephritis (LN). This single-center, retrospective, medical records review study, conducted between 2014 and 2023, included adult patients with SLE. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or albuminuria ≥ 30 mg/24 h in ≥ 2 consecutive tests, spaced ≥ 3 months apart. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, t tests, multivariable regression, and Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 175 patients with SLE were included, with a mean follow-up of 18.3 (SD 14.7) years. Of these patients, 12 required kidney replacement therapy. CKD was diagnosed in 54.6% (89/163) of patients, including 15.7% with reduced eGFR only, 52.8% with albuminuria only, and 31.5% with both. LN was associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) of 5.4 for CKD, and 46.1% of patients with CKD had no history of LN. CKD was associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and hospitalization rates for SLE exacerbations and infections. Cox analyses identified LN as the strongest predictor of CKD, with age and lower eGFR at diagnosis identified as other predictors. CKD was an important predictor of mortality among patients with SLE, in both univariate and multivariable analyses (19.1% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001). CKD is highly prevalent in SLE, including in patients without prior LN. CKD is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study emphasizes the clinical relevance of CKD diagnosis and management in patients with SLE.

Background : Anemia is a common clinical manifestation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients. Anemia can be caused by an ineffective hematopoietic process or excessive red blood cell destruction. The aim of this study was to classify and characterize anemia in SLE patients. Methods : This study involved 97 outpatients visiting the Rheumatology Clinic of Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, from January 2013 to September 2014. Patient data was collected from medical records and study subjects were selected according to the American College of Rheumatology 1997 criteria for SLE, and the characteristic of anemia among outpatients were described according to the World Health Organization criteria. Results : The characteristics among 97 respondents showed 95 (98%) were female; 32 (33%) were 21–30 years old; and 49 (51%) had SLE for 1–5 years. The characteristics and classification of anemia, 57 (59%) had normocytic normochromic, and 33 (34%) had microcytic hypochromic anemia. According to the severity classification, 48 (50 %) had moderate anemia, only 8 (8%) had severe anemia. Four (4%) subjects had anemic conjunctiva, 45 (46%) had fatigue and 48 (50%) had no clinical manifestations of anemic conjunctiva and fatigue. Conclusions : Moderate anemia, normocytic normochromic anemia are the most prevalent among the subjects. Half of the anemic SLE patient has no clinical manifestation of anemic conjunctiva and fatigue. DOI: 10.15850/amj.v4n2.1094

Immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients with renal impairment

We describe a 12-year-old girl with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who first presented with an atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) associated with hypocomplementemia, and compare the clinical manifestations and prognosis between SLE patients with HUS and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the reported literature. Diagnoses were based on renal failure, hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytonemia, including the observation of fragmented red blood cells, hypocomplementemia and on the American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE. Cocktail therapy may have been effective against the pathological condition of SLE. In 4 patients with SLE and HUS, prednisolone and immunosuppressive drugs were administered, and none of the patients suffered from chronic renal insufficiency. The prognosis for SLE patients with HUS is good. These findings suggest that SLE should be suspected in any HUS patient presenting with hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, acute renal failure and hypocomplementemia, and the therapeutic response and prognosis for SLE with HUS are good.

Serum alkaline phosphatase levels associate with elevated serum C-reactive protein in chronic kidney disease

Does Normal Reticulocyte Hemoglobin Rule out Iron Deficiency As a Cause of Normocytic Normochromic Anemia?

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), has recently emerged as a great health challenge. The novel corona virus may affect the kidneys mainly as acute kidney injury (AKI). Also, the outcome of COVID-19 may be different in patients with underlying kidney disease. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of COVID-19 in patients with and without underlying kidney disease. This was a retrospective study on 659 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in six centers of Iran. Patients were classified into kidney (chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or kidney transplantation) and non-kidney groups. The clinical conditions and laboratory data were extracted from the charts. Outcome was defined as death during hospitalization or within 30 days of discharge. Among 659 COVID-19 patients (mean age: 60.7 ± 16.4, 56% male), 208 were in the kidney group (86 ESKD, 35 kidney transplants, and 87 CKD patients). AKI occurred in 41.8%. Incidence of AKI was 34.7% in non-kidney, 74.7% in CKD, and 51.4% in kidney transplant patients (P < .001). Totally 178 patients (27%) died and mortality rate was significantly higher in CKD patients (50.6 vs. 23.4%, P < .001). AKI was associated with increased mortality rate (OR = 2.588, CI: 1.707 to 3.925). Initial glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 44.2 mL/min and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) had significant association with mortality. We showed a higher mortality rate in COVID-19 patients with AKI and CKD. Low initial GFR and elevated LDH and CRP were associated with high mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Background and Aims Impaired renal function is a common finding in patients with cardiac diseases and confers an adverse prognosis in this population. To evaluate the incidence, phenotypes and prognostic value of cardiorenal interrelations in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Method we examined 278 patients with ADHF (85.3% had anamnesis of symptomatic HF with frequent hospitalizations, 20.1% had ejection fraction &amp;lt;35%) and 288 with NSTE-ACS (64.9% developed myocardial infarction (MI)). In ADHF group in comparison with NSTE-ACS the patients were younger (69.7±10.2 vs 72±12.1 years, p&amp;lt;0.01), there were more males (55.4 vs 36.5%, p&amp;lt;0.001), smokers and alcohol abusers (47.8 and 30.6% vs 8 and 5.6%, p&amp;lt;0.001). The comorbidities were more typical for ADHF group: atrial fibrillation 46 vs 24% (p&amp;lt;0.001), obesity 55.8 vs 30.9% (p&amp;lt;0.001), anemia 40.6 vs 25.3% (p&amp;lt;0.001), diabetes mellitus 33.1 vs 23.3% (p&amp;lt;0.01). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) were diagnosed according to KDIGO 2012 Guidelines. AKI phenotypes were identified depending on time of development (community- or hospital-acquired), persistency (transient or persistent), history of CKD (AKI de novo or AKI on CKD). Results Incidence of CKD in patients with ADHF and NSTE-ACS was 45 and 46.5%, CKD was first diagnosed on admission in 57.6 and 64.2% of patients respectively. In 7.6% cases of ADHF and 14.2% of NSTE-ACS groups the duration of impaired kidney function was unknown. No associations of existing CKD and in-hospital mortality were detected. Incidence of AKI in ADHF and NSTE-ACS groups was 43.5 and 37.2%. The hospital-acquired AKI, AKI on CKD and persistent AKI were found in 52.9, 47.9 and 46.3% of ADHF patients, and in 57.9, 58.9 and 50.5% in NSTE-ACS group respectively. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with AKI in ADHF and NSTE-ACS groups (12.4 vs 5%, p&amp;lt;0.01 and 17.8 vs 3.3%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Mortality in patients with ADHF and hospital-acquired persistent AKI de novo and community-acquired persistent AKI on CKD was 41 and 29%, and in community-acquired transient AKI on CKD in the NSTE-ACS group – 29%. Conclusion Different cardiorenal interrelations were revealed in 75.2% of patients with ADHF and in 61.8% with NSTE-ACS. In patients with acute cardiac diseases high in-hospital mortality is tightly associated with phenotypes of hospital-acquired persistent AKI de novo and community-acquired persistent AKI on CKD in ADHF, and in community-acquired transient AKI on CKD in the NSTE-ACS.