Luteolin Disrupts Keratinocyte-Dendritic Cell Communication in Psoriasis by Targeting Rh Family C Glycoprotein.

Psoriasis is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease which typically follows a relapsing and remitting course, and is associated with joint disease in approximately 25% of patients.1 The significant reduction in quality of life and the psychosocial disability suffered by patients underline the need for prompt, effective treatment, and long-term disease control (reviewed2, 3). Localized, limited disease can usually be managed satisfactorily with topical agents. Those with moderate to severe disease often require systemic treatment. Phototherapy and traditional 'standard' systemic therapies, while often effective, can be associated with long-term toxicity; some are expensive, and some patients have treatment-resistant disease.4 Also, phototherapy is not available to many due to geographical, logistical or other constraints. Patients themselves demonstrate high levels of dissatisfaction with standard approaches to treatment.5, 6 Biologic therapies for psoriasis utilize molecules designed to block specific molecular steps important in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and now comprise a number of well-established, licensed, treatment options for patients with severe disease. Since 2005, when the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) first published guidance on the use of biologic therapies in psoriasis,7 much has changed. There is a substantial body of new evidence pertinent to the clinical use of these treatments, the U.K. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has approved the use of a number of biologic therapies in severe chronic plaque psoriasis and the BAD Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) has been successfully launched. Despite these developments, use of biologic therapy in clinical practice remains limited in the U.K., with a shortfall in funding cited as a significant obstacle to prescribing in approximately 40% of units recently surveyed.8 These guidelines have been revised and updated in accordance with a predetermined scope. This is based on the original scope used in 2005, and extended to include additional areas of practice. Recommendations in this guideline supersede those in the 2005 guideline. The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations on use of biologic therapies (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab) in adults and children with all types of psoriasis and, where relevant, psoriatic arthritis, for clinical staff involved in the care of patients treated with biologic therapies. Efalizumab remains in the scope of the guideline in relation to safety only, given that the European Medicines Agency has withdrawn the marketing authorization of this drug because of concerns over the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). This guidance does not cover agents licensed outside the U.K. (alefacept) or use of biologic therapies for indications other than psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The guideline working group represents all relevant stakeholders including dermatologists, nurses, rheumatologists and patients. Draft guidance was made available for consultation and review by patients, the BAD membership and the British Dermatological Nursing Group (BDNG). Advice relating to tuberculosis was reviewed and approved by the British Thoracic Society. The guideline has been developed using the BAD's recommended methodology9 and with reference to the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) instrument.10 Recommendations were developed for implementation in the National Health Service using a process of considered judgment based on the evidence and an awareness of the European product licence of the various treatments. Cochrane, EMBASE and Medline databases were searched between 1990 and June 2009 for clinical trials involving adalimumab, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab using an agreed protocol. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts independently, and full papers of relevant material were obtained. In relation to efficacy, only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of high quality (1+ or more; see Appendix 1) were included for chronic plaque psoriasis, whereas in other clinical phenotypes, given the paucity of published data, all data were included. Data from each paper were extracted by two members of the guideline group using standardized literature evaluation forms in order to create evidence tables. Evidence on safety was extracted from literature on use of biologic agents for any indication in view of the relatively limited data specifically relating to use in psoriasis. The methodological limitations of the safety analysis are detailed in section 15. The guideline was peer reviewed by the Clinical Standards Unit of the BAD (made up of the Therapy & Guidelines and Audit & Clinical Standards Subcommittees) prior to publication. These guidelines have been prepared on behalf of the BAD and reflect the best data available at the time the report was prepared. Caution should be exercised in interpreting the data; the results of future studies may require alteration of the conclusions or recommendations in this report. It may be necessary or even desirable to depart from the guidelines in the interests of specific patients and special circumstances. Just as adherence to guidelines may not constitute defence against a claim of negligence, so deviation from them should not necessarily be deemed negligent. This field of psoriasis biologic therapeutics is in a rapid phase of development, and revision of the scope and content of the guidelines will therefore occur on an annual basis. Where necessary, the guideline will be updated via the BAD website, and a fully revised version is planned for 2012. Most patients with moderate to severe disease achieve satisfactory disease control (i.e. significant or complete clearing of disease) in the short term with at least one of the systemic agents currently available.4 Long-term disease control frequently requires some form of continuous therapy and consequent, predictable risks of toxicity. At present, the risks and benefits of biologic therapies relative to standard systemic therapy are largely unknown. Widespread use of these agents in uncomplicated moderate to severe psoriasis is inappropriate and is not supported by the licensed indications for these drugs. Eligibility criteria should encompass both objective measures of disease severity and the impact the disease has on quality of life. All existing disease severity assessment tools are imperfect11-13 and most require some training to complete. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a measure of disease severity in chronic plaque psoriasis12 and has been chosen for the purposes of this guideline as it has been widely used in clinical trials including those investigating biologic therapies, and has also been adopted by NICE. A PASI score of ≥ 10 (range 0–72) has been shown to correlate with a number of indicators commonly associated with severe disease such as need for hospital admission or use of systemic therapy,14 and reflects the minimal level of disease severity required for patient inclusion in most of the clinical trials of biologic therapies to date. Where the PASI is not applicable (e.g. pustular psoriasis), body surface area (BSA) affected should be used, with severe disease defined as > 10% BSA affected.14 The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a validated tool for the measurement of quality of life across all skin diseases, including psoriasis, and has been used in both trial and clinical practice settings.13, 15 A score of > 10 (range 0–30) has been shown to correlate with at least 'a very large effect' on an individual's quality of life.12, 14, 16 When using the PASI and DLQI to determine whether or not a patient should be considered for biologic therapy, clinicians should take into account the applicability of these measures to each individual patient. There are circumstances where the use of these tools fails to give a sufficiently accurate assessment of the clinical situation. With respect to the PASI, this is especially pertinent in patients with localized disease that involves special 'high-impact' sites (genitalia, hands, feet, head and neck) where highly significant functional and/or psychosocial morbidity may exist with a PASI < 10. The DLQI may be a poor indicator of emotional disabilities resulting from psoriasis and the validity of the DLQI (and of other quality of life measures) may also be undermined due to linguistic or other communication difficulties.13 Patients with psoriasis may be considered eligible to receive treatment with any of the licensed biologic interventions when they fulfil the eligibility criteria set out below. However, the decision to proceed with treatment must be made in collaboration with the patient and include a careful assessment of the associated risks and benefits17 Eligibility criteria To be considered eligible for treatment, patients must have severe disease as defined in (a) and fulfil one of the clinical categories outlined in (b): (a) Severe disease defined as a PASI score of 10 or more (or a BSA of 10% or greater where PASI is not applicable) and a DLQI > 10. In exceptional circumstances (for example, disease affecting high-impact sites with associated significant functional or psychological morbidity such as acral psoriasis), patients with severe disease may fall outside this definition but should be considered for treatment (Strength of recommendation D; level of evidence 3) AND (b) Fulfil at least one of the following clinical categories (Strength of recommendation D; level of evidence 3, and formal consensus) where phototherapya and alternative standard systemic therapyb are contraindicated or cannot be used due to the development of, or risk of developing, clinically important treatment-related toxicity. are intolerant to standard systemic therapy are unresponsive to standard systemic therapyb have significant, coexistent, unrelated comorbidity which precludes use of systemic agents such as ciclosporin or methotrexate have severe, unstable, life-threatening disease Eligibility criteria for patients with skin and joint disease patients with active psoriatic arthritis or skin disease that fulfils defined British Society for Rheumatology (BSR)18 or BAD guideline criteria, respectively patients with severe skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis who have failed or cannot use methotrexate may need to be considered for biologic treatment given the potential benefit of such treatment on both components of psoriatic disease aPhototherapy may be inappropriate in patients (i) who have exceeded safe exposure limits (150–200 treatments for PUVA, 350 treatments for narrowband UVB19, 20), (ii) who are nonresponsive or relapse rapidly, (iii) who have a history of skin cancer or repeated episodes of severe sunburn, (iv) who are intolerant of UV exposure, especially if skin phototype I (sun-sensitive), or (v) for logistical reasons bStandard systemic therapy includes ciclosporin (2·5 mg kg−1 daily; up to 5 mg kg−1 daily), and in men, and women not at risk of pregnancy, methotrexate [single dose (oral, subcutaneous, intramuscular) of 15 mg weekly; max 25 mg weekly] and acitretin (25–50 mg daily) An adequate response to treatment is defined as either (i) a 50% or greater reduction in baseline PASI (PASI 50 response) (or % BSA where the PASI is not applicable) and a 5-point or greater improvement in DLQI4, 21-23or (ii) a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with baseline (PASI 75 response). Initial response to therapy should be assessed at time points appropriate for the drug in question (Table 1). For patients on tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist treatment with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, treatment may be continued if there has been a sufficient response in at least one of these components (see BSR guidelines18 for definition of disease response in psoriatic arthritis). TNF is a proinflammatory cytokine produced by a wide variety of cell types including keratinocytes. It plays a central role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and a number of other disease states. TNF is released from cells as a soluble cytokine (sTNF) following cleavage from its cell surface-bound precursor (transmembrane TNF, tmTNF). Both sTNF and tmTNF are biologically active, and bind to either of two distinct receptors: TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1, p55) and TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2, p75). This leads to NF-κB activation (which promotes inflammation) and/or cell apoptosis. In addition, tmTNF can itself act as a ligand (via a process of reverse signalling) to induce cell activation, cytokine suppression or apoptosis of the tmTNF-bearing cell. Soluble forms of the TNF receptors also exist and, by binding and neutralizing sTNF, may act as natural TNF antagonists. There are currently two approved groups of biologic agents that target TNF: anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (adalimumab and infliximab), and sTNF receptors (etanercept). Infliximab is a chimeric human–murine monoclonal antibody (∼ 25% mouse-derived protein) whereas adalimumab is fully human. Etanercept is a genetically engineered fusion protein composed of a dimer of the extracellular portions of human TNFR2 (p75) fused to the Fc domain of human IgG1. All three agents specifically bind both soluble and transmembrane forms of TNF and act by (i) blocking TNFR-mediated mechanisms and (ii) inducing tmTNF (reverse-signalling) events. Etanercept also binds members of the lymphotoxin family [LTα3 (also known as TNF-β) and LTα2β1] although the biological significance of this is unclear. Aside from the latter, there are important differences between the three agents with respect to pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and structure-based mechanisms of action (only some of which are completely understood).24 It is likely that these differences, in the context of the highly complex biology of TNF, account for observed differences in the efficacy and adverse events profile of TNF antagonists. Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) is a cell surface protein that binds to intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) 1–3 and plays a key role in T-lymphocyte recirculation, trafficking to sites of inflammation, antigen presentation by dendritic cells and other activated cells including keratinocytes, and T-cell costimulation. Efalizumab is a recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the CD11a subunit of LFA-1, which by interfering with LFA-1/ICAM binding inhibits several key steps important in the pathogenesis of psoriasis including T-cell migration into the skin and T-cell activation. More recently, in vivo data have shown that efalizumab induces a state of reversible T-cell 'hyporesponsiveness' including downregulation of a number of T-cell surface molecules unrelated to LFA-1 both in the circulation and in psoriatic plaques.25, 26 Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 are heterodimeric cytokines secreted by activated antigen-presenting cells, and share a common protein subunit, p40. Of relevance to psoriasis, IL-12 activates CD4 and natural killer cells to induce expression of type 1 cytokines (TNF and interferon-γ) while IL-23 stimulates survival and proliferation of a subset of T cells that produce IL-17 (Th17 cells). Recent immunological27 and genetic studies indicate a central role for IL-23 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.28Ustekinumab is a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody which acts as an IL inhibitor by binding with high affinity and specificity to the p40 protein subunit. It thus prevents IL-12 and IL-23 from binding to their IL-12Rβ1 receptor protein expressed on the surface of immune cells. Three large RCTs demonstrate that etanercept is effective in chronic plaque psoriasis.29-31 Onset of action is slower than that seen with the monoclonal antibodies, with clinically significant improvement in disease severity scores evident between 4 and 8 weeks after initiation of treatment.30 Response is dose related, with 34% (25 mg biweekly) and 48% (50 mg biweekly) of patients achieving PASI 75 by 12 weeks (Table 2). Continuing therapy up to 6 months improves response rates further (43% and 57% for 25 mg biweekly and 50 mg biweekly, respectively).29, 30, 32 While there are no RCT data establishing efficacy beyond 6 months, data from a 2-year, open-label etanercept 50 mg biweekly extension study32 (following the phase III study reported by Tyring et al.31) suggest that efficacy is maintained for up to 1 year, with approximately 75% of patients maintaining their PASI 75 response over the ensuing year. Overall, continuous therapy provides better disease control and higher levels of patient satisfaction compared with interrupted therapy. When treatment is stopped, disease relapses slowly: median time to disease relapse as defined by loss of PASI 50 in those who achieved PASI 75 after 24 weeks of continuous etanercept 25 or 50 mg biweekly, was 85 and 91 days, with no evidence of disease PASI scores were with the of patients achieving efficacy after 12 further weeks (i.e. and of PASI 75 achieved this level of efficacy on Aside from objective measures of disease improvement studies also report associated clinically in quality of life reduction in and and of patients in analysis of two of these RCTs that response rates in those over were the as those although in the group were The 25 mg and 50 mg are given that their are that the number of patients achieving PASI 75 at 12 weeks following etanercept 50 mg an RCT compared with was with that seen in other RCTs investigating etanercept 25 mg biweekly and that no significant differences were observed in PASI or DLQI in a of patients open-label etanercept 25 mg biweekly and etanercept 50 mg In the RCTs the of adverse events or adverse events in patients etanercept was no greater than in the control patients, with the of in each treatment RCT has shown efficacy of etanercept 25 mg compared with acitretin mg kg−1 at 24 weeks (see the role of TNF in levels of TNF in patients, and the used for etanercept, response rates may occur in patients, with This is in by published RCT and data cited in the study by et The of etanercept and methotrexate has been shown to be more effective in arthritis than either with no significant additional toxicity. data suggest that the of methotrexate may also etanercept efficacy in psoriasis. A RCT the efficacy and safety of etanercept (25 mg biweekly) in patients on and reported of patients or at 24 weeks on therapy, as compared with those in methotrexate was A reported both efficacy with the of methotrexate in patients on etanercept and loss of efficacy on of methotrexate from patients on Data from a RCT reported that the of etanercept 25 mg with acitretin mg kg−1 is as effective as etanercept 25 mg and that both these interventions are more effective that acitretin These data suggest that in the short term at the may additional efficacy as there is no additional associated toxicity. The patient in the cited RCTs may not be of patients likely to be treated in clinical practice as to the studies required patients only to be considered or have or systemic therapy. However, objective disease severity criteria were the as those currently recommended by the BAD and and PASI scores on to studies were higher from 16 to studies of practice report response rates in patients who have failed systemic therapies, all of which that data from the RCTs can be to clinical 50 There is a of long-term RCT data beyond 6 months, and only limited data on the two published studies one is and both report following one of treatment RCT data indicate that 50 mg biweekly is more effective than 25 mg biweekly, but there are no trial data whether the dose to 50 mg biweekly in patients who to achieve or adequate on 25 mg biweekly results in disease This is especially pertinent given guidance which currently limits treatment to the 25 mg biweekly dose (see Etanercept is licensed for use in moderate to severe psoriasis at either 50 or 25 mg biweekly for the first months, and 25 mg biweekly for up to 24 therapy beyond 24 weeks may be appropriate for some patients has approved use of etanercept in severe plaque psoriasis to defined disease at the 25 mg biweekly dose only, and not the 50 mg dose effective, with therapy to be continued only in those patients achieving disease response at months (Table 1). Etanercept is recommended for the treatment of patients with severe psoriasis who fulfil the disease severity criteria to section (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Etanercept therapy may be at either 50 or 25 mg and disease response assessed at months (Strength of recommendation level of evidence The of which dose to use will on clinical disease body and, in the U.K., the dose that will be (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Patients on etanercept 25 mg may to to etanercept 50 mg as these two are in of efficacy (Strength of recommendation level of evidence In patients who treatment may be continued to clinical although long-term data on efficacy are limited to 2 (Strength of recommendation level of evidence may be risk of disease although there may be a response on therapy (Strength of recommendation level of evidence may be recommended in clinical where it is required for associated or to efficacy (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Three large indicate that infliximab therapy is highly effective in chronic plaque psoriasis (Table Onset of action is with evidence of significant improvement the first 2 weeks of treatment and benefit by 10 when of patients achieve PASI 75 (Table (and in DLQI of This response is largely maintained over time with and achieving PASI 75 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (Table 2). of efficacy with development of antibodies to which in of patients continuous therapy and 5 mg following a standard 2 and 6 continuous therapy at 5 mg kg−1 8 weeks achieved to relapse in the by loss of PASI was as and in the of although data were not An that 50% patients relapse of PASI by There are no published trial data beyond 1 year. study assessed disease using the Psoriasis Severity Index to a a improvement in from baseline was observed at 10 with a of improvement reported at This was maintained of patients with complete of disease the target continued to between weeks 24 and 50 and There are no RCT data on use of methotrexate in with infliximab in psoriasis. In both and psoriatic arthritis, with methotrexate is a licensed and response rates and are at least in these disease levels of infliximab have been reported with methotrexate which may in of mg also the of antibodies to The patient in the cited RCTs may not be of patients likely to be treated in clinical practice. The PASI at baseline was ≥ 10 in all the studies However, of systemic therapy was not an in that most studies required patients to be for systemic therapy and/or failed A of patients in the study by et indicate that baseline PASI > and the of treatments two or more systemic therapies, or biologic no on treatment The of the study investigating continuous infliximab therapy is in that study at patients randomized to receive therapy receive infliximab at PASI 75 was not and in both were reported as Infliximab is licensed for use mg kg−1 8 in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. has approved use of infliximab in patients with severe (PASI ≥ DLQI ≥ with treatment beyond 10 weeks recommended only in those who achieve response Infliximab is recommended for the treatment of patients with severe psoriasis who fulfil the disease severity criteria to section (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Infliximab therapy should be at a dose of 5 mg kg−1 at weeks 2 and 6 and disease response assessed at months (Strength of recommendation level of evidence In patients who mg should be given at to disease control although long-term data are available only up to 1 (Strength of recommendation level of evidence therapy should be given the associated risk of and disease control (Strength of recommendation level of evidence may be recommended in clinical where it is required for associated to efficacy or to the development of antibodies to infliximab (Strength of recommendation D; level of evidence 3) Three large RCTs demonstrate that adalimumab is a highly effective treatment for chronic plaque psoriasis (Table Onset of action is with significant in disease severity evident 2 weeks of treatment and disease response seen between weeks 12 and Response is dose with of patients achieving PASI 75 at 12 with adalimumab mg other (i.e. the licensed dose for psoriasis), and achieving PASI 75 with adalimumab mg relevant in quality of life indicators are also In one a subset of patients who failed to achieve PASI 50 following at least 24 weeks of adalimumab other was to the dose for the of the study 40% of this PASI 50 that dose may further data are available up to 1 year, with no evidence of significant loss of response over time in those patients who and are continued on of response on treatment was also in the phase of the study reported by et those who maintained PASI 75 by were to receive either or a further weeks of adalimumab While time to relapse was not of patients PASI 50 response relative to baseline with a of a in PASI score relative to compared with relapse in those on adalimumab by of this patients who

Background It is unclear whether primary efficacy outcomes in plaque psoriasis clinical trials represent residual disease during treatment. Objectives To evaluate supplementing dichotomous efficacy with residual disease activity. Methods This post hoc analysis used pooled, patient-level data after tildrakizumab 100 mg (N = 616) or placebo (N = 309) treatment from reSURFACE 1/2 (NCT01722331/NCT01729754) phase 3 clinical trials of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Results Median baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 17.9 for patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg. At Week 12, median PASI was 2.9, whereas dichotomous PASI 90 response rate was 36.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 64.0%, 50.8%, and 23.3%, respectively. At Week 28, median PASI was 1.7, whereas PASI 90 response rate was 51.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 75.3%, 62.8%, and 38.0%, respectively. Dermatology Life Quality Index and PASI scores were correlated through Week 28 (r = 0.51, p ≤ .0001). Conclusions Disease activity was more reliably estimated by PASI scores than percentage PASI improvement; this may partially explain efficacy disparities between clinical trials and practice. These results suggest supplementing dichotomous PASI improvement with PASI scores and consideration of patient treatment goals could facilitate clinical decisions.

BackgroundChronic plaque psoriasis is a common immune-mediated dermatosis that often requires long-term systemic therapy in patients with moderate to severe disease. Methotrexate has been a cornerstone of systemic treatment for decades; however, concerns regarding delayed onset of action, cumulative toxicity, and the need for close laboratory monitoring have driven interest in newer targeted oral therapies. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, modulates multiple cytokine signaling pathways implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis, though comparative data from the Indian population remain limited.ObjectivesThe present study aimed to compare the efficacy, time to response, relapse rates, and safety profile of oral tofacitinib versus oral methotrexate in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.MethodsThis prospective, randomized, open-label comparative study was conducted over 18 months (August 2023 to January 2025) at Great Eastern Medical School & Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Adult patients with biopsy-proven chronic plaque psoriasis of at least three months’ duration, a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score greater than 10, and body surface area involvement exceeding 10% were enrolled. Forty-two eligible patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (n = 21) received oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, while Group B (n = 21) received oral methotrexate 10 mg once weekly with folic acid supplementation. Clinical assessment using PASI was performed at baseline and at two, four, eight, 12, and 16 weeks. Treatment efficacy, PASI 75 and PASI 90 responses, time to PASI 75, relapse, and adverse events were analyzed.ResultsBoth treatment groups demonstrated a progressive and statistically significant reduction in mean PASI scores over the 16-week treatment period, with no statistically significant difference in mean PASI reduction between the two groups at individual follow-up visits. Tofacitinib showed a faster onset of action, with a higher proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 by week 12 (57.1%), whereas methotrexate demonstrated a higher cumulative PASI 75 response by week 16 (71.4%). Achievement of PASI 90 at week 16 was significantly higher in the tofacitinib group compared to the methotrexate group (57.1% vs. 19.0%; p < 0.05). Relapse was observed more frequently in the methotrexate group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Mild elevation of liver enzymes was the most commonly observed adverse effect in both groups, and no serious adverse events were recorded.ConclusionOral tofacitinib and methotrexate are both effective systemic therapies for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Tofacitinib offers the advantage of faster and deeper clinical clearance, while methotrexate demonstrates comparable efficacy over a longer treatment duration. Tofacitinib may be considered a useful oral alternative in patients requiring rapid disease control.

Efficacy cannot be maintained in some psoriasis patients after biological discontinuation. This study aimed to explore predictors of efficacy maintenance after vunakizumab discontinuation in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This post hoc analysis used data from a phase III trial (NCT04839016); 291 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who achieved 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at Week 52 were enrolled. Efficacy maintenance was defined as patients who maintained PASI 90 or PASI 100 after 20 weeks of vunakizumab discontinuation. There were 44.7% and 72.5% of patients with PASI 100 and PASI 90 maintenance, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model, body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.922, p = 0.024) and treatment interruption (OR = 0.550, p = 0.020) were independently associated with a lower possibility of PASI 100 maintenance; however, the association of family history of psoriasis and the first time of PASI 100 achievement with PASI 100 maintenance did not achieve statistical significance. Duration of psoriasis (OR = 0.972, p = 0.049) and treatment interruption (OR = 0.257, p < 0.001) were independently associated with a lower possibility of PASI 90 maintenance. Two nomograms for predicting PASI 90 and PASI 100 maintenance were constructed based on the multivariate models, which disclosed good calibration performance. PASI 90 and PASI 100 maintenance rates are 72.5% and 44.7% after 20 weeks of vunakizumab discontinuation in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. BMI, treatment interruption, and duration of psoriasis predict a lower possibility of efficacy maintenance after vunakizumab discontinuation.

Introduction The Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR; NCT00508547) is a large, international, prospective, longitudinal, disease-based registry that enrolled patients with psoriasis (PsO) who were receiving, or were candidates for, systemic therapy. The aims of the Registry are to assess the long-term safety and improve understanding of real-world biologic use in patients with PsO. Objective The objective of this analysis is to describe real-world effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis. Methods Disease characteristics, absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, percentage of body surface area (BSA) involvement, and change from baseline in PASI score and BSA through two years are reported for patients with PsO treated with guselkumab (GUS). Some patients initiated GUS ahead of enrolment in the registry. Results As of 12 July 2024, 2198 patients who initiated GUS prior to, or at, enrolment were included with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up of 3.02 (1.08) years. Of these, 1184 (53.9%) were from North America, 672 (30.6%) were from Europe and 342 (15.6%) were from the Asia-Pacific region. Through 2 years of treatment, 244 (11.1%) patients withdrew from the registry, with the most common reason for withdrawal being patient choice (n=96, 39.3%) and 48 (19.7%) patients being lost to follow-up. Most patients had plaque PsO (2140, 97.4%) with a mean (SD) baseline PASI score of 6.0 (7.02) and a mean (SD) BSA involvement of 8.9% (12.72%). At baseline, 427 (21.1%) patients had a PASI score of 0, 188 (9.3%) had PASI &gt;0–&lt;1, 199 (9.8%) had PASI ≥1–&lt;2, 160 (7.9%) had PASI ≥2–&lt;3, 231 (11.4%) had PASI ≥3–&lt;5 and 816 (40.4%) had PASI ≥5. Approximately 1 in 4 GUS patients had a PASI score of &gt;10 (n=496; 24.5%). At Month 6, the mean (SD) change from baseline in PASI score was −4.5 (7.06) and the mean (SD) change from baseline in %BSA was −6.6 (12.41), corresponding to a mean (SD) absolute PASI score of 1.6 (3.10) and a mean (SD) BSA of 2.3% (5.81%), respectively. Improvements were maintained through 1 year of therapy; at Month 12, the mean (SD) change from baseline in PASI score was −4.4 (6.96) and in %BSA was −6.8 (12.26), corresponding to mean (SD) absolute PASI score of 1.5 (2.74) and a mean (SD) BSA of 1.9% (4.79%). Improvements were maintained through 2 years of treatment, with a mean (SD) absolute PASI score of 1.5 (3.13) and a mean (SD) BSA of 2.1% (6.08%), respectively. Conclusion: Patients in this large real-world registry experienced improvements in PsO severity while receiving treatment with GUS. Improvements were maintained through 2 years of treatment, supporting the use of GUS as a highly effective long-term option for patients with PsO.

Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, is caused by infiltrating lymphocytes and associated cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-17. Effective treatments, including pathogenesis-based biological agents against psoriasis, are currently under development. Although the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the pathogenesis of psoriasis has been investigated, it remains to be fully elucidated; ROS-targeted therapeutic strategies are also lacking at present. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess whether H2, a ROS scavenger, has a therapeutic effect on psoriasis-associated inflammation by reducing hydroxyl radicals or peroxynitrite in the immunogenic psoriasis cascade. Three methods were used to administer H2: Drop infusion of saline containing 1 ppm H2 (H2-saline), inhalation of 3% H2 gas, and drinking of water containing a high concentration (5-7-ppm) of H2 (high-H2 water). Treatment efficacy was estimated using the disease activity score 28 (DAS28) system, based on C-reactive protein levels, and the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score, determined at baseline and following each H2 treatment. Furthermore, levels of TNFα, IL-6, and IL-17 were analyzed. The DAS28 and PASI score of the three patients decreased during H2 treatment, regardless of the administration method. The psoriatic skin lesions almost disappeared at the end of the treatment. IL-6 levels decreased during H2 treatment in Case 1 and 2. IL-17, whose concentration was high in Case 1, was reduced following H2 treatment, and TNFα also decreased in Case 1. In conclusion, H2 administration reduced inflammation associated with psoriasis in the three cases examined and it may therefore be considered as a treatment strategy for psoriasis-associated skin lesions and arthritis.

Patients with psoriasis experience higher rates of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation than the general population. With effective treatment, there is evidence that with the initial decrease in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score, patients' quality of life (QoL), measured by the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) improves. However, to date, there have been no studies demonstrating that patients' QoL remains improved. We investigated the association between the DLQI and PASI of patients with psoriasis on biologic agents for an extended period of time of up to 6.5 years. The data for this longitudinal, retrospective study was collected from a large tertiary teaching hospital in South Australia. Data was collected from all patients with psoriasis who had been on biologic agents for 2 or more years (n = 54). PASI and DLQI were highly correlated over all time points (ρ = 0.50), P < 0.001. DLQI scores significantly decreased by 0.8 (95% CI: 0.30, 1.26) units per year from 12 months to 6.5 years, P = 0.002. After 12 months, PASI scores declined by 0.19 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.52) units per year, P = 0.24. This study demonstrates that DLQI and PASI remain low after 12 months, and, in fact, both gradually decline further with time. Patients on biologic agents for prolonged periods maintained their improvement in QoL for up to 6.5 years.

Introduction: Studies show that hematologic parameters can be used as biomarkers in systemic inflammatory skin diseases. Materials and methodology: A case–control study was performed between April 2018 and April 2019 on 55 newly diagnosed (age: 20–60 years), untreated, biopsy proven psoriasis patients and 55 healthy nonpsoriatic individuals with no family history of psoriasis as controls. Sociodemographic details and clinical features from the 55 patients with psoriasis were collected using a questionnaire. Severity of psoriasis was assessed by psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score. Blood samples of 110 study subjects were analyzed for the following parameters: red blood cell indices, hemoglobin, platelet count and mean platelet volume (MPV), white blood cell count, differential count, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Along with this, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were also analyzed for all the samples. Highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was analyzed. Student t test for independent samples was used to compare the data obtained from the patients and the controls. Patients were divided into two groups: one group having PASI &lt; 10 and the other group PASI &gt; 10. Results: Student t test performed on psoriasis patients showed that the two groups were significantly different (P &lt; 0.05) in the levels of red blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, neutrophils, lymphocytes, NLR, red-cell distribution width (RDW), MPV, ESR, fibrinogen, and D-dimer. Out of 55 cases, hs-CRP is reactive for 11 patients from PASI &lt; 10 (n = 36) compared to 19 patients from PASI &gt; 10 (n = 19; P = 0.010) and had a positive correlation with MPV, ESR. RDW, NLR and ESR, ESR can be used to assess the disease severity of psoriasis and assess the response to treatment. Along with clinical PASI score, these simple, less expensive biomarkers can be effectively employed in place of other biomarkers such as hs-CRP for management of the disease.

Indigo naturalis and its refined formulation, Lindioil, are effective in treating psoriatic symptoms topically. Indirubin is the active ingredient in indigo naturalis. To determine the efficacy and safety of different concentrations of indirubin in Lindioil ointment for treating psoriasis. In this randomized, double-blind trial, adult patients presenting with chronic plaque psoriasis for > 1 year and with < 20% of the body surface area (BSA) affected were randomized to apply Lindioil ointment containing 200, 100, 50 or 10 μg g-1 of indirubin twice daily for 8 weeks followed by an additional 12-week safety/extension period. The primary end point was the mean percentage change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score along with the proportion of participants achieving 75% and 90% reductions in PASI scores (PASI 75 and PASI 90, respectively) from baseline to week 8. The results from week 8 revealed that the 200 μg g-1 group had the greatest reduction in PASI score [69·2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 55·5-82·8], followed by the 100 μg g-1 group (63·1%, 95% CI 52·8-73·5), the 10 μg g-1 group (53·4%, 95% CI 42·8-64·0) and the 50 μg g-1 group (50·3%, 95% CI 37·4-63·2), with a between-group comparison of P = 0·0445. The group with the highest proportion of the patients achieving PASI 75 (57%, P = 0·0474) and PASI 90 (30%, P = 0·0098) was the 200 μg g-1 group. No severe treatment-related adverse events were reported during the 20-week evaluation. An amount of 200 μg g-1 of indirubin in Lindioil ointment is the most effective concentration studied so far for treating psoriasis topically, and is safe.

Interferon (IFN)-α-producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), inflammatory CD11c+CD1c- myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) and macrophages have been found to contribute to the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Heliotherapy is a well-established treatment modality of this disease, although the details of how the effects are mediated are unknown. To test the hypothesis that exposure to natural sun affects pathogenic DC subsets in lesional skin. Skin biopsies were obtained from lesional and nonlesional skin in 10 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis subjected to controlled sun exposure on Gran Canaria. Biopsies were obtained at baseline, day 2 and day 16 and examined by immunohistochemistry. Sixteen days of heliotherapy had excellent clinical effect on patients with psoriasis, with significant reductions in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores. In lesional skin pDC numbers and expression of MxA, a surrogate marker for IFN-α, were rapidly reduced. Inflammatory CD11c+CD1c- mDCs were significantly reduced whereas resident dermal CD11c+CD1c+ mDCs were unaffected. Expression levels of the maturation marker DC-LAMP (CD208) on mDCs were significantly reduced after sun exposure, as were the numbers of lesional dermal macrophages. A decrease of dermal DC subsets and macrophages was already observed after 1 day of sun exposure. An additional finding was that DC-SIGN (CD209) is primarily expressed on CD163+ macrophages and not DCs. The clinical improvement in psoriasis following sun exposure is associated with rapid changes in dermal DC populations and macrophages in lesional skin, preceding the clinical effect. These findings support the concept that these DC subsets are involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and suggest that sun-induced clinical benefit may partly be explained by its effect on dermal DCs.

IFN-α Enhances Poly-IC Responses in Human Keratinocytes by Inducing Expression of Cytosolic Innate RNA Receptors: Relevance for Psoriasis

Artículo traducido] Gravedad de la psoriasis, calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, productividad laboral y deterioro de la actividad en pacientes con psoriasis moderada a grave que reciben tratamiento sistémico: datos de la vida real de la práctica clínica en España

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory skin condition characterized by uncontrolled keratinocyte proliferation and potential systemic manifestations. Its pathogenesis involves activation of both innate and adaptive immune responses, leading to an imbalance in inflammatory cytokines. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 are key cytokines in the pathophysiology of psoriasis and sustain chronic skin inflammation. Biologic therapies, such as ustekinumab (UST), have been developed to induce long-term remission in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The objective of this study was to identify differences in serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers [erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), IL-12, IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23] between optimal and suboptimal responder Iraqi patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with UST. Clinical response was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, patients with an optimal response (PASI ≤ 3); and Group 2, patients with a suboptimal response (PASI &amp;gt; 3). Optimal responders demonstrated significantly greater improvement in PASI and body surface area percent change compared to suboptimal responders ( p = 0.001 for both). In contrast, suboptimal responders exhibited significantly higher levels of hs-CRP, IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23, indicating a greater inflammatory burden among individuals with an inadequate clinical response. These findings suggest that patients with persistent disease activity have an elevated pro-inflammatory cytokine environment, which may contribute to their reduced therapeutic response. Cytokine levels may serve as crucial indicators that optimal responders achieve not only skin clearance but also deeper, systemic control of the inflammatory disease process.

IntroductionPsoriasis is a chronic disease involving the skin, which significantly impacts the quality of life. Disease severity and treatment efficacy (i.e., response) are assessed through the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). A PASI 75 response, i.e., an improvement of at least 75% with respect to the baseline PASI score, has traditionally been used as a therapeutic benchmark in clinical trials. Therapeutic advances have made PASI 90 or PASI 100 responses possible in most patients treated with some biologics. A greater response may generate social value beyond clinical outcomes that would benefit both patients and society.MethodsA 1-year economic model was applied to estimate the impact of having a PASI 75, PASI 90, or PASI 100 response in four areas of analysis (quality of life, activities of daily living, work productivity, and out-of-pocket expenditures) and the social value of having a PASI 90 or PASI 100 response in comparison with a PASI 75 response. A mixed-methods approach based on the scientific literature, a focus group with patient, and an advisory committee with psoriasis stakeholders was used. The model included three different scenarios: having a PASI 90 vs a PASI 75 response; a PASI 100 vs a PASI 90 response; and a PASI 100 vs a PASI 75 response. A sensitivity analysis was included.ResultsThe annual economic impact per patient with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis having a PASI 75 response was estimated at Ł 6,139, mainly related to labour productivity losses and quality of life reductions. Having a PASI 90 or a PASI 100 response would reduce this impact to €3,956 or €1,353, respectively. Accordingly, the social value of having a PASI 90 instead of a PASI 75 response was estimated at €2,183, and €4,786 with a PASI 100 response.DiscussionA PASI 90 or PASI 100 response would have a lower economic impact and a greater social value than a PASI 75 response for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Association of leptin, resistin, and high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels with psoriasis area and severity index scores, obesity, and insulin resistance in psoriasis patients