• Home
  • Search
  • Making Structural Condition Diagnostics Robust to Environmental Variability
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29751-4_13Copy DOI Icon

Making Structural Condition Diagnostics Robust to Environmental Variability

  • Jan 1, 2016
  • Harry Edwards +4 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Advances in sensor deployment and computational modeling have allowed significant strides to be made recently in the field of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). One widely used SHM technique is to perform a vibration analysis where a model of the structure's pristine (undamaged) condition is compared with vibration response data collected from the physical structure. Discrepancies between model predictions and monitoring data can be interpreted as structural damage. Unfortunately, multiple sources of uncertainty must also be considered in the analysis, including environmental variability and unknown values for model parameters. Not accounting for uncertainty in the analysis can lead to false-positives or false-negatives in the assessment of the structural condition. To manage the aforementioned uncertainty, we propose a robust-SHM methodology that combines three technologies. A time series algorithm is trained using "baseline" data to predict the vibration response, compare predictions to actual measurements collected on a potentially damaged structure, and calculate a user-defined damage indicator. The second technology handles the uncertainty present in the problem. An analysis of robustness is performed to propagate this uncertainty through the time series algorithm and obtain the corresponding bounds of variation of the damage indicator. The uncertainty description and robustness analysis are both inspired by the theory of info-gap decision-making. Lastly, an appropriate "size" of the uncertainty space is determined through physical experiments performed in laboratory conditions. Our hypothesis is that examining how the uncertainty space changes in time might lead to superior diagnostics of structural damage as compared to only monitoring the damage indicator. This methodology is applied to a portal frame structure to assess if the strategy holds promise for robust SHM.

Similar Papers
  • Front Matter

Foreword

  • Jul 01, 1988
  • Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
  • Theodore E Keats
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations128

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Civil Structures

  • Aug 04, 2017
  • Applied Sciences
  • Gangbing Song +2
  • Research Article

Damage detection in structural health monitoring using BiLSTM-1DCNN hybrid network: a case study on a large-scale steel truss bridge

  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Engineering Computations
  • Nhung Cam Thi Nguyen +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

Sensing region of PZT transducers bonded to concrete

  • Apr 06, 2007
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Yuhang Hu +1
  • Conference Article

Precursor Damage Inception Quantification

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Subir Patra +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations184

Advancements in fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials damage detection methods: Towards achieving energy-efficient SHM systems

  • Jul 12, 2021
  • Composites Part B: Engineering
  • Osama Ahmed +3
  • Conference Article

A Co-Word Analysis of the Structural Health Monitoring Field

  • Nov 15, 2019
  • Kaitlyn Kliewer +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Strain sensor with big sensing gauge length based on Webcam

  • Apr 18, 2022
  • Chunzhe Li +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Torque Loss and Crack Monitoring Near Fasteners for Isotropic and Composite Helicopter Tail Boom Structural Models

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • Young-Tai Choi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Unsupervised structural damage assessment method based on response correlations

  • Dec 26, 2023
  • Engineering Structures
  • Yonghui Lu +7
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Dynamic extreme stress prediction of bridges based on nonlinear mixed Gaussian particle filtering algorithm and structural health monitoring data

  • Jun 01, 2016
  • Advances in Mechanical Engineering
  • Xueping Fan +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Damage evaluation and analysis of composite pressure vessels using fiber Bragg gratings to determine structural health

  • Nov 09, 2005
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Nicholas E Ortyl
  • Research Article

Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Structural Health Monitoring

  • May 30, 2025
  • Applied and Computational Engineering
  • Likun Yang
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations24

Hazards, accidents and events-a land of confusing terms

  • Sep 18, 2013
  • R Winther +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Detection of Subtle Damage in Structures through Smart Signal Reconstruction

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Procedia Structural Integrity
  • K Lakshmi +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.